No, Mitt Romney Didn't Personally Hack Your Facebook

from the going-mobile dept

Fri, Oct 12th 2012 7:20am — Timothy Geigner

And the election season silliness continues. In keeping with the tradition of campaigning against candidates' gaming habits and strange Obama/YouTube conspiracy theories, there's apparently been some hubbub surrounding the mysterious liking of Mitt Romney. Apparently a fair number of liberal-minded folks have noticed that their Facebook profiles have "liked" Mitt Romney on the social media network against the wishes of the profile owner. When questions began to rise as to how this was possible, one popular theory circulating was that Mitt Romney was Zero-Cool-ing people's Facebook profiles to garner more positive attention. Theoretically someone inside his campaign did this for him.

"Now we'll have to spell your name all 'puter like, p4uL rY4n!"

Image source: CC BY 2.0

Well, in what I'm sure will shock everyone, no, Mitt Romney and his campaign did not rappel into a server farm Mission Impossible style and hack the internet tubes. Instead, the culprit appears to be Facebook's clumsy mobile application and its accomplice Senor Your-Fat-Fingers.

[Facebook] concluded that users are probably liking the Romney page on a mobile device by either accidentally clicking on a Romney ad or a “sponsored story” from the Romney campaign in their news feed. A Facebook spokesman, who wanted to remain anonymous, said the issue is unique to mobile because of the way the app works on small screens, and rejected the idea that the Romney camp was engaging in clickjacking. He added that the company is currently working to clean up its mobile interface.

That, coupled with people who are "liking" Romney's page just so they can see what he's putting out there, even though they may not support him, is admittedly a far less fun explanation than the idea of Romney going all The Net on social media, but I never claimed that the truth was better than fiction. So it's back to your regularly scheduled social media political talk for all of you. Remember: anyone supporting Obama is a Chinese commie spy moron and anyone supporting Romney is almost certainly Hitler.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: hacks, likes, mitt romney
Companies: facebook

63 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Atkray (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:30am

We need answers not speculation, someone call Scully and Mulder.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2012 @ 4:55pm
  
  Re:
  OK, here's the answer. If you swap two letters in "Romney" and add a hyphen, you get "R-money". In US politics "R" means "Republican", so really "Romney" says "Republican money". Surely you see it now?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:35am

"Remember: anyone supporting Obama is a Chinese commie spy moron and anyone supporting Romney is almost certainly Hitler."

I've got my polarized sunglasses on, no worries :D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zakida Paul (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:35am

If nothing else, US presidential elections are good comedy value. Candidates have no substance and simply rely on cheap slogans and soundbites to get elected. They avoid a serious debate on real issues at all cost and take any opportunity to stick the knife in their opponent to make them look bad.

People get plenty of reasons why they should not vote for the competition but very few on why they should vote for them. I hate negative politics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Yakko Warner (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:52am
  
  Re:
  I remember a comment I heard on TV many years ago:
  
  It used to be that you voted for the candidate you liked the most. Then it became voting for the candidate you disliked the least. Now, you vote against the candidate you hate the most.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Manfred Manfriend, 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:36am

Fat-Fingers-Freddy explanation fails to factor...
I see almost every day a post with a picture of some kind or another with text on it. From both candidates, usually something that will primarily appeal to their core demographics, but also more times than not a generic statement about Mom, Apple Pie, and 'Merica is shown and people are liking the photo or the text of that particular photo, not realizing they are also liking the page when they like the image. It has a lot more to do with the way Facebook is allowing the "like" to be construed than it does blaming the victim for having "fat fingers" does.

I'm not too sure how much longer I'll have a Facebook account though. Between this type of thing, inability to sort my feed by time posted, and the constant sponsored stories I'm finding the site less and less valuable to actually get the information about people I care about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That Anonymous Coward (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:43am
  
  Re: Fat-Fingers-Freddy explanation fails to factor...
  Amercia tyvm
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:59am
  
  Re: Fat-Fingers-Freddy explanation fails to factor...
  I wonder how many "fat fingers" will need to be corrected in the election for those who accidently chose someone that isn't really running and actually meant to cast in favor of Oba-mny.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Manfred Manfriend, 12 Oct 2012 @ 9:38am
    
    Re: Re: Fat-Fingers-Freddy explanation fails to factor...
    That's kind of my point. There's clearly something else at work here besides fat fingers.
    
    As for the election, you'll have to get back to Diebold on that.
    
    Myself, I'm casting a vote of "no confidence" in the system by staying home election night. I do not consent to be governed by this broken one party system, and I choose to deny its validity by not participating in its rituals. We have no democracy or representation in the United States of America.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Skeptical Cynic (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:37am

ID-Ten-T Error
Enough said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:39am

Remember: anyone supporting Obama is a Chinese commie spy moron and anyone supporting Romney is almost certainly Hitler.

Gary Johnson for president!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Skeptical Cynic (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:56am
  
  Re:
  Mike Masnick for President! VP - Dark Helmet.
  
  And we could get a great cabinet and Agency appointments out of the other writers on TechDirt.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Dark Helmet (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:04am
    
    Re: Re:
    Are you insane? Think about this. If a Masnick/Helmet ticket actually won the election, these would be my first steps in office:
    
    1. Initiate long-held plan to assassinate Mike Masnick, leading to my ascending to President
    
    2. Ensure all government badges/emblems had "Motherfucking Eagle" plastered on them
    
    3. Make the TSA where clown outfits. I mean, if they're going to go around creeping people out anyway....
    
    4. Rescind the enforcement of copyright/patent law to a hilarious 3 days and watch the scrambling fun
    
    5. Have my cabinet littered with high-priced call girls. At briefings around the table, my head is the only one you'll be able to see.
    
    Is that REALLY what you want in a President?!!?!?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:10am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      At least you're honest, so yes.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - A Dan (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:21am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      3 and 4 would make the whole thing worth it.
      
      Can you also refuse to sign anything, ever, just to make things harder for them?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:22am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      What, no first-grade blow to go with the high-priced call girls ?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:29am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        He isn't a media executive, damn it!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:32am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      yes, atleast you are honest....
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Berenerd (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:44am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Yes.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Yakko Warner (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:54am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Is that REALLY what you want in a President?!!?!?
      
      Well, when you compare it to the presidents we've actually had, then sure, why not?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Aaron *Head* Moss (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 10:02am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Seeing as how I think we've already had #5 in a president (not looking at you Bill... ok, I am).
      And rumors #1 (not that I'm a JFK conspiracy nut)....
      
      I'm fully behind 2-4.
      
      So, I don't really see a problem here DH.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - New Mexico Mark, 12 Oct 2012 @ 10:37am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Hmmm... I think #5 has already been accomplished... just replace the words "high priced call girls" with the synonym "politicians".
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2012 @ 10:45am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      That's the most honest campaigning I've seen in awhile, I'd vote for you.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - art guerrilla (profile), 13 Oct 2012 @ 3:20am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      oh, hell yes ! ! !
      
      like a previous commenter posted: we are reduced to voting for the korporate shill we hate the least; at least with the masnick/dh ticket we'll have some fun before daddy takes the t-bird away...
      
      art guerrilla
      aka ann archy
      eof
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Zakida Paul (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:16am
    
    Re: Re:
    Can I be Secretary of State?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Yakko Warner (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:55am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      You may want to take a look at DH's platform before you volunteer to be in his cabinet....
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Zakida Paul (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 9:02am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I just want to be included :'(
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Zakida Paul (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 9:02am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I just want to be included :'(
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - ltlw0lf (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 9:04am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Can I be Secretary of State?
      
      Dibs on Secretary of Education.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:41am

So let me get this straight....
There's a social media platform where you're given intrusive enough ads that this many people accidentally click on them, and clicking on an ad automatically tells the world that you like what the ad was for, and people are still using this?

Lets tack that on as yet another reason to not use facebook.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Zakida Paul (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:42am
  
  Re: So let me get this straight....
  What are ads?
  
  I haven't seen any ads in the Internet in years.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - akp (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 9:03am
    
    Re: Re: So let me get this straight....
    TFA refers to the mobile app, where adblockers and such don't work.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Zakida Paul (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 9:13am
      
      Re: Re: Re: So let me get this straight....
      They do on my phone because I have it rooted :p
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - MahaliaShere (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 3:44pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So let me get this straight....
        Ad blocking: theft you can feel good about!
        
        -rooted user with no FB account.
        
        *trolldance*
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - John Fenderson (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 9:17am
      
      Re: Re: Re: So let me get this straight....
      Actually, you totally can block ads on android phone apps. I do it with a firewall.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zakida Paul (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:41am

"Remember: anyone supporting Obama is a Chinese commie spy moron and anyone supporting Romney is almost certainly Hitler."

How times have changed. 25 years ago, that would have said Russian.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That Anonymous Coward (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:47am

I look at the picture and think...
RomneyCare...
Bend over Mr. Ryan its time for your prostate exam....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MrWilson, 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:47am

"[Facebook] concluded that users are probably liking the Romney page on a mobile device by either accidentally clicking on a Romney ad or a �sponsored story� from the Romney campaign in their news feed."

While fat fingers might be the cause of the action, it sounds like Facebook's mobile interface is to blame. Why would clicking on an ad or a sponsored story cause you to "like" something? Since when does attention equal affection?

It sounds like Facebook is making a weird assumption in their user experience design that assumes that people only read about things they like.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- A Dan (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:02am
  
  Re:
  My girlfriend accidentally "Likes" things on Facebook Mobile on a fairly regular basis. Apparently it's quite easy to accidentally click it.
  
  Similarly, I often use another app on her phone and accidentally click advertisements (bringing up the web browser with the advertisement). There's no real incentive for them to improve it, since that's how they get money.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Michael, 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:58am
    
    Re: Re:
    Just because your girlfriend keeps using the "I accidentally liked him." excuse does not mean there is a UI deficiency.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zakida Paul (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 7:47am

Funny as hell
Woman calls Obama a Communist and has no idea what that means.

http://youtu.be/2E87gciwebw
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Englebert the Immensely Well Endowed In Trouser Sn, 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:10am

Isn't it more likely
as per this story from last week, that Facebook is liking things people talk about - even if it's to say that they're physically repulsive?

Gizmodo - Facebook Is Reading Your Messages and Liking Things For You
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Laroquod (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:11am

Techdirt you have fumbled this story. Rather than disproving something few people would actually believe, maybe a better lede would have been that this is the most politically disturbing data point yet -- by far -- in the ongoing tale of Facebook liking things against the user's will.

Facebook's automatic like system is now even distorting the picture of political allegiances online: that's the story here, not debunking some ridiculous Mitt-sion Impossible scenario.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
gorehound (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:29am

I should be on that House Committee on Science and Technology.

1.Death to all Software Patents
2.Mandatory Life Sentence to all Patent Trolls
3.No Teaching of Fake Creation BS in Public Schools
4.Next A-Hole to make Rape Comments will be Raped by a broom handle
5.Real Effort to make and mass produce Alternative Non-Middle Eastern Petroleum
6.Work on Climate Issues
7.Teach Evolution in all Public Schools
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Zakida Paul (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:33am
  
  Re:
  "4.Next A-Hole to make Rape Comments will be Raped by a broom handle"
  
  I would make a rape comment just to have that 'punishment' inflicted on me :)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:43am

As a person who does not actively facebook, can someone explain to me why this is an issue I should really care about? What value are "Likes," really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That Anonymous Coward (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:53am
  
  Re:
  its like epeen measuring with out all of the phallic stuff.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Zakida Paul (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:56am
  
  Re:
  It's a bragging tool that people use to brag to their friends about all the 'intelligent' things they like.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Zakida Paul (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:57am
    
    Re: Re:
    A bit like following Stephen Fry on Twitter.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
IronM@sk, 12 Oct 2012 @ 8:54am

Not Allowed to Comment Unless You 'Like' Something
Lets not forget that, due to they way Facebook works, you must "like" a page in order to comment. Since 73.6% of all statistics on the internet are made up, I would suspect around 15.3% of page "likes" are from people that don't actually like the page, but just wanted to voice their opinion on, or, troll said page.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael, 12 Oct 2012 @ 10:23am
  
  Re: Not Allowed to Comment Unless You 'Like' Something
  73.6% of ALL statistics are made up. Only 69.1% of statistics on the internet are made up - the online bloggers check their sources a little better than the legacy newspaper guys.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rocco Rizzo (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 9:02am

what a steaming pile
I NEVER EVER 'liked' Rmoney's page, and I keep getting ads for his, and all kind of right wing fascist garbage. I think that their ad machine cannot differentiate between left and right politics, because EVERYTHING, and I do mean
E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G I post is leaning left. Some of it is so far left, it scares some of my "progressive" friends.
So don't pee on my head and tell me it's raining. I have even attempted to block Bishop Willard's ads, and they still keep coming up. I have used every reason that they have. Do not tell me that it's my fat fingers either.
And wtf is zero-cool-ing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dark Helmet (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 9:16am
  
  Re: what a steaming pile
  "And wtf is zero-cool-ing?"
  
  First, shame on you for not knowing this. Second, here you go:
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackers_(film)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - That Anonymous Coward (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 9:20am
    
    Re: Re: what a steaming pile
    If you watch it backwards its about a buncha white hats who fix the Gibson and then go back to their shitty lives.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Gwiz (profile), 12 Oct 2012 @ 10:01am
      
      Re: Re: Re: what a steaming pile
      If you watch it backwards...
      
      I thought that only worked for Country music songs. You know, you get your dog, pick-up truck and girlfriend back when you play them backwards.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Michael, 12 Oct 2012 @ 10:24am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: what a steaming pile
        Thank goodness for that order. I can stop it 2/3 of the way through.
        
        Bullet dodged.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Alto, 12 Oct 2012 @ 12:27pm
    
    Re: Re: what a steaming pile
    Actually it should be "Crash Override"
    Ahh back when Jolie was really hot.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2012 @ 1:32pm

Dude, that whole "only on mobile devices" thing is complete crap. My lady friend has no mobile device, just a PC. She had this happen to her. Her father as well, who has no mobile device. If I had to wager a guess, it would be that the "like" button is being cleverly placed near other images or content on third party sites, and thus people think they are "liking" something else. I do not use Facebook in any way, shape or for, but to me, this appears to be the issue.

The reason Facebook gave such a malarkey answer is probably because they don't want people to realize how silly and easily gamed the "like" buttons are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bob sacamano (profile), 13 Oct 2012 @ 3:36pm

Oh, the irony!
Am I the only one triggered by the absurdity of a *spokesperson*.. for teh Facebooks.. that wishes to remain.. -wait for it- ANONYMOUS??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mark Turner, 15 Oct 2012 @ 6:52am

Um, no. Something fishy is really, really happening
Sorry, TechDirt. Many Facebook users who've reported having this happen don't even own smart phones. Some occasional Facebook users with only a half-dozen likes were shocked to see they'd been hacked by Mitt Romney. One woman discovered with horror that her deceased father's Facebook page had been signed up. It's hard to fat-finger something when you're dead.

What most people don't know is that Facebook tracks EVERYTHING a user does on its site. Users can see everything they've done recorded in Facebook's Activity Log. Curiously, those who've been unwittingly signed up for Romney's page cannot find any Like for his page listed in their Activity Logs, unlike the many hundreds of other Likes they may have made. It's my opinion that this can only be a hack from the inside (whether Facebook knows it or not).

Facebook's Mobile Mistake theory doesn't hold up, as I demonstrated on my blog. The network security guru Mother Jones consulted in the article, Bill Pennington, doesn't buy Facebook's explanation either. There is more to this than most people know.

Obviously I don't think Mitt Romney is doing this himself but it appears that someone is doing it on the campaign's behalf. There's just too much anecdotal evidence to be anything else.

I urge anyone who's seen this happen to sign up for the Hacked By Mitt Romney page (http://www.facebook.com/MittYouDidntBuildThat) for more updates. You can also read my research on my blog, www.markturner.net.

Cheers,
Mark Turner
Founder, Hacked by Mitt Romney Facebook page
www.markturner.net
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
YeahRightIdidnot, 15 Oct 2012 @ 9:11am

I don't think so
I do not own a mobile device, and I do know what I am clicking on, while on FB-I use a desk top. I do not read articles about Romney, because I am not interested. SO, how did the post that I like Romney get on my FB Page? I also never click on ads on FB. So, I don't think this article is true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
referencement gratuit, 30 Nov 2012 @ 4:46pm

Salut � tous ! J'ai remarqu� que votre site est bien r�f�renc� mais pourrait etre un peu plus optimis�. Etes vous autonome dans ce secteur. Je propose des formations SEO. Si �a vous int�resse, contactez-moi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
berwar amedi, 27 Jan 2013 @ 1:24pm

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Berwar-amedi/354181707958290?ref=hl
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Berwar-amedi/354181707958290?ref=hl
[ link to this | view in chronology ]