Ubuntu Users To Get To Vote With Their Wallets In Support Of New Features
from the probably-a-good-investment dept
Free software is famously close to its users, drawing on them for warnings about bugs (and sometimes fixes), as well as ideas and suggestions for future developments. But I don't think any project has previously gone so far as to encourage ordinary users to make financial contributions directly in support of new features they want. That's precisely what Canonical, the company that oversees the Ubuntu GNU/Linux distribution, plans to do:
Today, we're making it easier for people to financially contribute to Ubuntu if they want to. By introducing a 'contribute' screen as part of the desktop download process, people can choose to financially support different aspects of Canonical's work: from gaming and apps, developing the desktop, phone and tablet, to co-ordination of upstreams or supporting Ubuntu flavours. It's important to note that Ubuntu remains absolutely free, financial contribution remains optional and it is not required in order to download the software.
As this notes, even if people don't offer money, their views on what's important to them can still be gathered, and that's valuable information for developers who need to prioritize their work.
By allowing Ubuntu users to choose which elements of Ubuntu they're most excited about, we'll get direct feedback on which favourite features or projects deserve the bulk of our attention. We're letting users name their price -- depending on the value that they put on the operating system or other aspects of our work. That price can, of course, be zero -- but every last cent helps make Ubuntu better.
In principle, letting people support new features of interest sounds like a good idea, since it gives users a chance to vote with their wallets. But it comes in the wake of a plan to let people search for items on sites like Amazon from within the Ubuntu operating system, for which Canonical would presumably get paid if purchases were made as a result. As the hundreds of comments on the blog of Mark Shuttleworth, the founder of Canonical and Ubuntu, indicate, this has raised a number of concerns about privacy and the direction of the Ubuntu project.
Some might see both moves as evidence that Canonical still isn't making as much money from the Ubuntu ecosystem as it needs to, and that Shuttleworth is looking to bolster income. Four years ago, he admitted that Canonical was "not close" to breaking even, and that it would "require time and ongoing investment" to make it do so. Given Ubuntu's place as probably the most popular GNU/Linux distribution, users must hope that Shuttleworth will still be happy to invest in Canonical, and hence in Ubuntu, for a while yet. Perhaps that's another good reason for Ubuntu fans to start paying at least some of the development costs under the new scheme.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: features, free software, money, ubuntu
Companies: canonical
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Ubuntu is dead to me now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I do scientific work on my machine, and I need stability and functionality, not uncustomizable unintuitive crap in gaudy colours. I have a computer, not a glorified mobile phone, so I've moved on from Ubuntu and probably won't be back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Give Mint MATE a try
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm using kubuntu as my primary work system and it works great. Unity, on the other hand, is terribad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Mint also has a Debian fork with some nice things, but it seems that every time I run "apt-get upgrade", the system gets more and more messed up. I still prefer pure Debian because of this.
I liked CentOS too, mostly due to the fact that it will be supported, like, forever. It is nice and super-stable, but doesn't have newer packages that you might want.
One day, I might try Arch. I figure it won't be a smooth ride, but I've been hearing/reading good things about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmm....
Debian is a real operating system.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder how many people complaining have contributed to the community themselves with code or bug reports or suggestions for improvement?
I have tried many distros (Opensuse, Fedora, Mint, Mandriva....) and I always keep coming back to Ubuntu because it is the most intuitive and user friendly, not to mention the most innovative.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If I were to use Linux today I"d go for that Mint fork or Open Suse. I heard Slackware improved in terms of how user friendly it is but I have bad memories of my attempt at it as a not-so-experienced user heh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The shrill cry of the wounded fanboy.
A jackass response to valid criticism.
Whether or not I contribute does not alter the fact that Canonical is as much of a leech as any of us. They are not the ones that deserve most of the credit, gratitude, or money.
I suspect you are in no position to be sanctimonious.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The shrill cry of the wounded fanboy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So yes, I contribute. And yes, even I hate Unity. I suppose in a way it is living up to its name, though - Unity has a way of unifying everyone in their desire to return to GNOME 2, i.e. what just plain worked, period.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
At first glance, it seems like a positive development to me. Open source work always is influenced by resource constraints in the form of $£€¥ or personhours. Users and contributors always "vote with their feet", whether by donating time or money.
Devices that will bring more resources to bear, generally speaking, are good. Some of the objections to this plan (posted elsewhere) may be explained by the old saw about confusing the two meetings of the word "free." #FOSS #freeasinbeer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not good enough
There are a number of Ubuntu bug reports that I follow with little hope of ever seeing fixed, and this new fundraising scheme is not going to help their chances in any way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not good enough
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Go back upstream
You could just run Debian at that point.
If you're feeling generous, you can also donate to them too (Debian).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
if all these different distro's and developers just tried to develop new technology, not just re-invent the wheel then linux would have progressed much further in the past 20+ years than it has.
the only thing that has really held back GNU/Linux/FOSS is 'the community', it all sounds good, "give back" and "many eyes fix bus" and "unbreakable security" all sound good !! in lala land.. but reality has never met idealogy..
even FOSS (FREE SHIT), is finally understanding you need MONEY to PAY people to create things. that means people willing to pay for it... usually customers, you've had it free for 20 years, it's only a few steps away from making it just like windows, where it will have to compete fairly on an open market, where the product will actually have to be WORTH paying for, to make it worth paying for you will have to hire professional people to do that work..
Same applies to music, movies just the same, you have to create a product people are willing to pay for. If they are willing to pay for it, but can get it for free, the money it costs to pay the person (or group) to make is is not there, ipso fatso,, it's not made. (or its rubbish)..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Contributions to Canonical
That said, I think this is a GREAT idea, and I intend to give till it hurts; even without a reason.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'll pay money
OSX is over ten years old now, showing every day exactly how friendly, hassle-free and awesome an Unix desktop can be.
I'll pay Ubuntu the DAY they get something exactly as usable as OSX out-of-the-box.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'll pay money
Beyond that, things can get hairy with MacOS very quickly.
It's a preloaded quasi-Unix. That's it's only real advantage and you can find those elsewhere.
It suffers as much from "not being the monopoly product" as Linux does.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]