Jeff 'One Click' Bezos Once Again Concerned About Patents
from the speak-out dept
About a dozen years ago, Amazon's Jeff Bezos (taking a fair amount of criticism for his one-click patent) helped fund a project called BountyQuest, which offered up prize money for those who were able to bust bogus patents. To his credit, the first patent they put forth was Bezos' own one-click patent -- except then very little happened, and BountyQuest faded away. While it has occasionally used its own patents (such as suing B&N over that one-click patent), Amazon tends to be on the receiving end of tons of ridiculous patent lawsuits, leading Bezos to speak out about the broken patent system yet again in an interview with the UK publication Metro:"Patents are supposed to encourage innovation and we’re starting to be in a world where they might start to stifle innovation. Governments may need to look at the patent system and see if those laws need to be modified because I don’t think some of these battles are healthy for society. I love technology, I love invention, I like rapid change, and really it’s the golden age of wireless devices and mobile devices."I'd argue that the "starting to" understates where we are in this process. There's significant evidence that the problem has been around for a long, long time already. Of course, I'm curious just what kind of legislation Bezos thinks is right. Having his voice added to the debate on patents certainly would be helpful, given how so many in Congress still seem to think that there isn't a real problem here.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: jeff bezos, patent reform, patents, smartphones
Companies: amazon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
And that's when all the critics of the "one-click patent" realized and publicly acknowledged that it wasn't quite as obvious as they had thought....right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sad, really.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
So, unless you manage to patent key business processes necessary for patent trolling, there is nothing to sue over.
Even though the Apple/Samsung (or Samsung/Apple - depending on which sign you read at the courtroom door) case is big news, it is really an indication of a much smaller problem. True, these huge companies are wasting a lot of money on litigation when they could be doing things like...making better products, but they actually make something that benefits people.
NPE's do nothing but funnel money from successful companies into the hands of lawyers. It is the opposite of the purpose of the patent system. It taxes successful innovation rather than promoting it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Broken patent system
At 81, I am not much inclined to be a "champion", but I would contribute what I could to someone who worked at fixing this (even though I am an IP attorney, still working).
I think someone should start targeting members of Congress who are too happy with the money they get from business to work for the people, such as by dismantling this broken system (thereby putting me out of work, but I am okay with that).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Broken patent system
Lots of people are willing to admit to the failures of their profession / career / government when they are on the verge of leaving it.
Doesn't mean it's not correct and true. Just means that they probably should have spoken up sooner, and joined the good guys.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lawyers without one foot in retirement
1. It will be 20 years before I retire (though I have considered founding a company, and doing that instead)
2. The real problems are relatively recent
3. Lawyers are ethically bound to represent their clients,
and if they resort to actually fighting the system, they
need to be ousted. They are NOT judge, jury, or politician,
and pretending they are is counterproductive.
That said, I am free to express my personal opinion, and
I would contribute to a politician, or even an individual,
who would DO something - most people would rather whine.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Lawyers without one foot in retirement
I sincerely hope you knocked on some wood immediately after typing this.
"Lawyers are ethically bound to represent their clients..."
with you so far...
"..and if they resort to actually fighting the system, they
need to be ousted"
Hold up. There are plenty of clients that would benefit from a changes system. Fighting to change the system is not a violation of an attorney's ethical duties. In fact, many attorneys that fought to change the law are held up as models. Thurgood Marshall comes to mind.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
more dissembling by Masnick
The problem is that companies who are using your technology aren't so genteel as to stop using it merely because you politely ask them to do so. Invention is rough and tumble. The fact is, a patent is merely a right to sue someone to not make your invention without permission. Unless you have the will and money to sue them, they will turn a deaf ear. Unless you have a good patent, you will not get the money. It's sad, but it's the reality of business. All this talk about patentees gaming the system with bad patents is then a hoax. Why do these detractors never identify these supposed bad patents? Surely if they exist they can be identified?
As to the quality of patents; based on court rulings of the last several years, roughly half of all litigated patents are upheld in court. That's pretty balanced and suggests there is no problem with patent quality. Further, seldom do cases ever make it to trial as the parties settle out of court. The facts do not support the contention that there is a patent quality issue. Still, with almost half a million patent applications filed each year a few are bound to be issued that shouldn't. However, rarely are they ever an issue because you can't enforce them without money and you wont get the money unless you have a good patent. Keep in mind it costs the patent holder about as much in a patent suit as it does the accused infringer. Investors are not stupid. If they don't have confidence in your patent, they will not invest. It's that simple. Bad patents do not get funded.
When corporate America agrees to not use our inventions without consent, American inventors and small entities will agree to stop suing them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
About Patents
[ link to this | view in thread ]