Ridiculous: Vietnam Sentences Musicians To Jail For Songs That Protest Government Actions
from the freedom-isn't-free dept
We talk a lot about the importance of free speech here in the US, and worry tremendously about any efforts to chip away at such free speech rights. Even as we worry about how free speech issues are dealt with at home, we're very aware that most other countries have significantly less respect for basic free expression concepts. It's somewhat horrifying to learn that last week, a court in Vietnam sentenced two Vietnamese musicians to years in prison for writing, recording and posting online some "protest" songs:Both were accused of posting songs on a Web site of Patriotic Youth, a opposition group based overseas. Mr. Tri, 34, who uses the stage name Viet Khang, has criticized the government in his songs for not taking a harder line against China in territorial disputes. A video for his song, "Viet Nam Toi Dau" ("Where Is My Vietnam?"), has become a YouTube hit, with 700,000 views. Mr. Binh, 37, recorded the song "Courage in the Prison" ("Nguc Toi Hien Ngang") in support of an imprisoned blogger, Nguyen Van Hai. The song urges people to mount nonviolent protests.And we're not just talking about a few weeks in prison, either. Tri got four years and Binh got six years. Binh's situation is especially ridiculous since his song is about an equally ridiculous prison sentence for a blogger. Basic political dissent is important to any free society, and to completely lock people up over some rather straightforward protest songs (that don't advocate violence or anything like that) is really quite horrifying. The US, thankfully, has condemned these sentences, but this is an issue that more people need to know about and speak out about.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bloggers, free speech, musicians, political protests, vietnam
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Silence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Silence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Silence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The US condemning censorship and nothing is pretty much the same these days. Unfortunately.
But yes, we must rise awareness specially among Vietnamese. But how?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Gotta love the good ol
Corporate States of RIAA,MPAA,Chevron,Toyota,General Motors,Carl's Jr,Apple,Sony,Orville Redenbacher,Mc Donald's,Chuck Mother Fucking Norris!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
The US government is no position to condemn others for silencing political dissent. Protestors right here in our country were fenced in like caged animals, beaten, pepper-sprayed, tasered, tear gassed, arrested on trumped-up charges and held indefinitely without a trial.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course it did. It's appalled it gave these two individuals a trial rather than skip the process and keep them jailed indefinitely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Really?
I don't know, maybe it'd be more appropriate to play up the hypocrisy of the US criticism of these arrests given the US' own treatment of online dissent (in the form of information leaks) lately. But as it is, it's just kind of an awkward story for this blog.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Really?
"They came for the Gypsies, and I did not speak up, for I was not one of them.
"They came for the Jews, but I did not speak up, for I was not one of them.
"They came for the Communists, but I did not speak, for I was not one of them.
"They came for me, but there was no-one to speak for me."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Really?
I dont feel they are, it's not an issue about technology, or the media the the music is on or transmitted.
but he talk long and hard on the subject..
as for this case, again, there is only a thin connection between tech and the issue.
I dont think, these two people should be emprisioned, but the law in one country is not the US Law, standards are different, but the world certainly does not look to the US as an example of how to do it right..
they, i am sure were fully aware of the fact they were breaking their countries laws, they acted anyway, willfull intent. They probably wont do it again !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Really?
Get serious.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Really?
for something to be copyrighted, it has to be 'in a technology' right, be it 8-track, wax-tubes, CD's, DVD, broadcast, printing press !!!, so by definition, and reality, we've always had an issue with 'technology' and what is contained within it, it's not a modern problem, or a new problem, it's been the case as long as there has been technology, in fact it was the technology that LED to the development of copyright laws, to stop it's abuse.
no, you get serious.. have a bit of a think, it will do you wonders.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Really?
lol
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Really?
I'm not going to take your post seriously, your punctuation says enough about you. The only times you've used caps are for "I", "US" and US Law. And I'm not even sure that "L" is supposed to be capitalized.
"standards are different"
The Nazi's had different standards too, 'nuff said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Really?
However, thank you all for the quote of the day as far as I'm concerned: "standards are different".
That is either the solution or the problem--I can't remember what we're working on. I suppose we all have our own conventions.
I'm now confident we CAN all just get along...separately.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, really
As for the most probable reason it was posted? That's covered in the final sentence, here:
'...but this is an issue that more people need to know about and speak out about.'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yes, really
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Yes, really
We have to stop it...for the children!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yes, really
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Yes, really
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Yes, really
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Yes, really
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The US jails people for telling the truth about situations that are politically embarrassing. I'm sure if the songs were about a true event, the US would be completely behind throwing them in jail for whistle-blowing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The US, at least, has done this for a long time. *cough* Eugene Debs *cough*.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, we "talk" a lot about it, but just try being active in a left wing movement in this country (for example) and see how quickly a) the government opens a "file" on you and b) your group gets infiltrated by government agents. The idea of free speech in the US is a myth that has never really existed in the way that many naive folks like to imagine. Yes many forms of speech are well tolerated but as soon as you tread on the interests of those in power you still become a target.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Of course it is not just the government. Without touching government systems I can probably find out in less than 3 minutes; where you live (and have lived); who you work for; how much you make; what your political leanings are; any blogs you post to; any medical problems you may have, or have had; your driving record; your criminal record; if you own a firearm (legally); your phone number(s); your email address(es); your complete credit history; and the list goes on.
The more information I have about you (age, current address, DL#, SS#...)the more accurate the information I can obtain about you.
The government, of course, can do much more, since they have access to even more data than I.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
BULLSHIT !!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
When you have to guard your borders to keep your people IN, or you feel the need to jail anyone who speaks out about your system... then something in your system is horribly, horribly wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What free society?
Yes, except one little detail: Vietnam is not a free society; they're a Communist state with a single-party government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Basic political dissent is important to any free society...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Weasel coffee ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]