Apple's Blocks Popular Kickstarter Project [Updated]
from the unfortunate dept
Update: And... after a bunch of negative publicity, Apple has reversed course and lifted the ban. Original article below...A bunch of folks have been submitting this story about Apple refusing to allow a company, Edison Junior, to offer its Lightning connector as part of its POP portable power station, which had run a very successful Kickstarter campaign earlier this year.
“We are pissed,” Edison Junior CEO Jamie Siminoff told me on the phone today. “I think they are being a bunch of assholes, and I think they’re hurting their customers.”Understandable. The company plans to still build versions of the device that focus on the Android market, and which might possibly work with Apple products if people use adapters, but it's certainly not ideal.
The whole thing, of course, is silly, but representative of the unfortunate world we live in today where companies lock up their products. In the past, building alternate versions or compatible accessories, and reverse engineering parts, was generally considered part of how an ecosystem was built up around your market. But Apple's infatuation with over-controlling its market only serves to piss off Apple customers who want a solution like this. Unfortunately, due to the nature of using security chips and claiming patents on everything, rather than just being a simple reverse engineering challenge, Apple is effectively able to use patent and copyright laws to block any such innovation.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: charging, copyright, crowdfunding, licensing, lightening charger, patents, pop portable power station
Companies: apple, edison junior
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Apple changed mind perhaps?
Ars is reporting that Apple has changed their mind about this.http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/12/apple-lifts-block-on-combo-30-pinlightning-charging-ac cessories/
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Apple changed mind perhaps?
http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/12/apple-lifts-block-on-combo-30-pinlightning-charging-ac cessories/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Apple changed mind perhaps?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stupid reason, cheap PR stunt for Kickstarter rival
My guess is that there is more this story than Apple refusing the use of the 30-pin. Like, for example, that Siminoff has started is Kickstarter rival that has as a competitive differentiator Kickstarter, what else, offering refunds on failed projects....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Stupid reason, cheap PR stunt for Kickstarter rival
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Stupid reason, cheap PR stunt for Kickstarter rival
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Stupid reason, cheap PR stunt for Kickstarter rival
Hence the whole "Apple blocked my Kickstarter project and I can't issue refunds" PR stunt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Stupid reason, cheap PR stunt for Kickstarter rival
Except he IS issuing refunds, including refunds for credit card and Kickstarter fees.
So. Yeah.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stupid reason, cheap PR stunt for Kickstarter rival
So there's more than a little self interest in his 'method' of doing refunds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
Apples connector sucks, you only ever use around 4 pins of a 30 pin connector. That is true efficiency!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111208/12500917012/riaa-doesnt-apologize-year-long-blog-cen sorship-just-stands-its-claim-that-site-broke-law.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
Hope you weren't waiting for $900 to sell...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
I should note that I pity you if you are one of those "completely and utterly against Apple regardless of what it does" people. You're type is more rabid than any fanboy out their than both the Android and Apple fanboy crowds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
"Hey Blue! How's that Apple stock trending?
Hope you weren't waiting for $900 to sell..."
As you can see when you look at OOTB's comment, he states that Apple changed their minds. The AC had no reason to say what he said and went after Blue assuming he was a fanboy.
When you look outside of the attack, OOTB was correct in stating that in fact, Apple did change their minds, but he was just as stupid for attacking Mike as he did.
For the record, Apple's customer service has been on top of the Consumer Reports list for 6 years running. I am not a fanboy for saying that. I subscribe to Consumer Reports...
As for the AC, Blue was being Blue. I thought that the snap back at blue was extremely week and uncalled for. Which is why I attacked the AC.
I get gaffe all the time from AC's like that who accuse me of being an Apple fanboy. it so happens that other users and AC's have called them out on it. The AC's I'm talking about bawk at the very mention of Apple when someone mildly supports them or condones something they have done right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
Denial. Pure and sweet.
Oh and I am not the same AC that posted the original piss take on your beloved OOTB, just in case you get confused that more than one person can be and AC (again!).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And we all know how POORLY Apple is doing with PROPRIETARY!
No, he made a sarcastic comment against a known troll, hoping to bait a response.
"I am not a fanboy for saying that."
No, but you do display fanboy tendencies when you write paragraphs of text defending Apple, even in articles that have nothing to do with them. Citing consumer report lists in response to something that has sod all to do with their customer services, etc., might also be a clue. Whatever overall consumer satisfaction they have, they aren't perfect and do a lot of crap that's not only damaging to their own customers, but the industry at large. Some people like them despite that, but some criticisms are valid.
For the record, I own 4 Apple devices and am mostly happy with them (though don't ask me about the atrocious podcasts app on iOS6 if you want to hear kind words). I prefer their products to some degree, especially with regard to certain hardware builds, but they deserve some of the flack they get.
"The AC's I'm talking about bawk at the very mention of Apple when someone mildly supports them or condones something they have done right."
Then if you feel the need to defend against such criticism, at least wait until it happens. Diving in to defend any slight against Apple, no matter how clearly tongue-in-cheek or even based on fact, is the sort of thing that earns you the "fanboy" tag.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have to say something, because it's bugging me. While I can appreciate the new wave of "app mentality", when are developers going to learn they're slicing their own throats?
With Windows pushing developers toward Metro app development, and Apple's history of pulling apps, then replacing them with their own, when will developers stand up and say "Enough is enough!"
With the success of a few apps generating some coin, this is a new gold rush that has only one future road to take: giving back control to monopolies, to which developers spent years using open source to get away from.
This may seem like a tinfoil hat argument, but I've seen it before. Back when desktop apps no longer had their monopoly control once the new era of developers migrated to internet websites. What Microsoft charged, Google provided for free.
This article, even updated, just covers up the bigger issue of losing control, and it's a shame to read.
"Welcome to Walmart!" I best get used to saying this in my new career, because as a web developer, I'm watching apps put my future at risk and I have no desire to return to a world I already knew wasn't profitable once everyone else started making desktop apps.
I give it just five years when companies start announcing the closing of their websites in favor for their apps.
All for control.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even if Apple had every right to act as they did, they should have found another way. The majority of Apple fans will almost certainly hear "Apple blocks popular Kickstarter project", and Apple's reputation will be tarnished.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
so Apple could have been selling warm dog shit in Gladwrap ! and they would be as big as they are now! no it has nothing to do with the products and services they provide, it's just because there is a pic of an Apple on the side.. problem solved.
So why would they bother with patents, and trying to develop new products and technologies ? when all they have to do is print "apple" on the side and legions of die-hard supported will buy whatever it is !!!
*your and idiot*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Oh and God forbid you criticize any flaws an Android device has. You get yelled at in derp about how Apple holds a monopoly, or that you own stock in Apple, or my personal favorite...how much Apple sucks because "they just do".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
There's nothing wrong with criticizing Android, if you do so in a manner consistent with the facts. As has been evident early since you first showed up on this site though, you know nothing about Android. The comment left on the "Live by the patent" (the last two comments actually) show that you don't even know anything about your alleged Android phone. It's kind of hard to believe anything you say negatively about Android when you can't even tell the truth about a phone you (supposedly) personally own.
And it's not the first time you've been called out for saying things that weren't even remotely true, and definitely not just against Android.
Also, technically you aren't in the same boat as PaulT. Anyone who can read can see the moment someone says something not 100% supporting Apple you'll chime in and label them as trolls or say that they are personally attacking and trolling you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why apple?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
yea, until Google changes the Android terms. Never say never. I have been in this industry long enough to see free things go paid or become restrictive. So I choose to be happy with whats available now but knows it will not last forever. Then I just move on to the next flavor of the month.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Oh hey, look at that. A comment showing just how misinformed you are. Android, the operating system, IS open source. Anyone can take the source code and build their own custom version from it. The only thing NOT "free and open" are Google Apps, which are proprietary.
But the moment a new version of Android is released and the source code pushed to the repositories, anyone is free to tinker with it. (Thus the reason there are a plethora of custom ROMs for devices that have never officially been updated by the manufacturers/carriers, all of which are running the latest version of Jelly Bean 4.2.1, a version it should be noted is only "officially" available on 3 devices.)
But yeah, Wally, Android is totally not "free and open". You're fucking clueless and insanely misinformed shot at Android shows how biased you are. Someone said something you didn't like about Apple, so you take to it's defense and then take a (horrible and wrong) shot at Android in the process.
You're totally not an Apple fanboi. /s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
they have been closed, and you wonder why they object to a 3rd party producing products for their "closed shop".
We all know that is how apple operate, we know they are a closed shop and closed design, so why on earth would they suddenly change the way they operate and become any more open than they have been.
They do ok, with their present business model, they don't need to change it..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]