Human Rights Lawyer Explains Why He's Working For Kim Dotcom: Exposing American Corruption

from the corruption-laundering dept

Tue, Jan 29th 2013 5:27am — Mike Masnick

We recently wrote about how Kim Dotcom has retained famed human rights lawyer Robert Amsterdam to explore whether or not there's a human rights angle to his case, specifically alleging "contract prosecution" by the entertainment industry. I'm still somewhat skeptical that such an argument could go anywhere, but Amsterdam himself has put up a rather detailed blog post, explaining why he's taking the case, which may seem quite different than his usual fare: taking on corruption and human rights violations in far flung parts of the world, including Africa and Latin America. After highlighting the many problems with the case (and the continued failures in court to date), as well as the close ties prosecutor Neil MacBride has with big copyright holders, he points out that he sees some serious similarities to what's happening here with the kind of corruption he's witnessed in third world nations.

This case highlights not only the issue of “state capture” by the Hollywood lobby, but at the same time should lead to a thoughtful discussion on how we define corruption. No one would venture to allege that there is any form of cash payment taking place when official bodies appear to act at the behest of special interests motives. Because that’s not how these groups work.

It is a demonstration of the growing ambiguity of the lines between regulators and the regulated, and the proper role of intellectual property in the digital age. As we’ve seen in the sad and tragic case of Aaron Swartz, for whom Prosecutor Carmen Ortiz was seeking 13 criminal charges and more than 50 years in jail, the American justice system is increasingly flawed by this prosecutorial exuberance aimed at future political reward.

It is one thing when the victims of these abuses are American citizens, who live at the whim of an unaccountable prosecutorial machine driven by personal political ambitions and an appetite for headlines. It is something else entirely when these prosecutors visit their ambitions upon foreign citizens, charging them with heinous crimes with no basis under law, even if that person has never once set foot inside the United States (like Kim Dotcom).

That is, he appears to be aware of the nature of corruption laundering that's going on -- using the close connection between big businesses and governments to create laws where people can make the case that cracking down on some behavior is necessary to stop crime, but where the details show it's really about cracking down on competition and innovation.

And, he notes, this sort of activity is a huge stain on the US and the federal government:

With this attempt to “colonize” the global internet under U.S. laws, Washington is quickly making a bad name for itself, and putting its considerable influence on the wrong side of digital rights, free markets, and competitive innovation. They do this in the name of protecting a broken business model, subsidizing monopolies, and seeking to destroy crucial online functions instead of adapting to the incredible opportunity afforded to them through mass connectivity. We deserve better, we can do better, and everyone can benefit from a more reasonable approach focused on the best interests of the public, not the best interests of lobbyists and the politicians in their pockets.

We see this as a grand ideological debate with far-reaching implications, and sadly, my lengthy experience in countries where special interests control the levers of power may have some utility here.

Even if there isn't a legal human rights angle, it should be interesting to see what Amsterdam turns up. This growing recognition of how laws are created to benefit legacy players, and then used against innovators, is a real problem. Shining more light on that would be tremendously helpful in actually promoting important innovations.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: corruption, human rights, kim dotcom, robert amsterdam
Companies: megaupload

57 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

anonymouse, 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:01am

At least he seems to have a very clear understanding about how the governments around the world try to hide their corruption and pass it off as in the interests of the country. I wonder if his voice will be heard by the court or if the corrupted will shut him down before he even starts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Zos (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 10:16am
  
  Re:
  Depends on which court you mean. US courts, hell no.
  NZ or international human rights courts on the other hand? seems a lot more likely. Ofc, any decision against the US would be trumpeted as foreigners trying to undermine our democratically elected by god legislators and met with overwhelming hostility
  (see the bullshit fox news & the right trumped up about election observers for an example.)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:09am

more importantly, showing how certain people want to be in charge of things they are not entitled to, the lengths they will go to to try to obtain it and the assistance that is given because they mix in the 'right circles'!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:09am

Has Lessig weighed in yet? This seems like his ball of wax.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jay (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:18am

Systemic Corruption
Maybe I'm alone but I don't think the human rights abodes gets to the root of the problem. Chris Dodd is a red herring here. He's just a Patsy.

Why in the world would anyone want to take down Kim?

The answer is surprisingly simple... He was competition. The system allows for the one with the greatest assets to use them against their enemies. Steve Jobs supported sharing when he had no power. Now that Apple is miner one, he ruled as a dictator, exploiting labor in third world countries, fostering horrible management practices on employees, and creating a company that is now worse than Microsoft in the 90s.

He was willing to use patent law against Palm just to keep his advantage over them in a classic Prisoner's dilemma that any person should recognize. And just to add more, Steve Jobs also told Obama that he wasn't going to move manufacturing jobs into the US. Honestly, how do you tell our sitting president, one of the supposedly most powerful people in the world, that you aren't going to do what's on the best interests of the nation? The only logical reason would be that you take orders from someone other than the public.

I think the problem here is not the corruption, or even the human rights abuses. That's just a symptom.

The problem is with capitalism. You have a system that exploits workers, artists, politicians, and anyone weaker to create vast amounts of wealth for a select few people.

Workers get very low wages for their work in movies. Artists get screwed out of millions through the Performance Rights Organizations, one-sided contacts, vast amount of licenses to acquire and destruction of their venues. The politicians give these rich people vast amount of incentives for lower wage jobs just to get money for re-election. And the public gets screwed because they aren't focused on the vast amount of pressures that only affects them in passing.

It's incredible that as you connect the dots, you see that our system allows a small people to get very rich by breaking a ton of ethics rules. The only way to really fix it would be to recognize what Iceland did and follow its example in punishing those at the top who got there through dubious means.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:24am
  
  Re: Systemic Corruption
  "Artists get screwed out of millions through the Performance Rights Organizations, one-sided contacts, vast amount of licenses to acquire and destruction of their venues."
  
  Not to mention "creative bookkeeping" that somehow shows that even James Cameron's Avatar STILL hasn't shown a profit!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Forest_GS (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:00am
    
    Re: Re: Systemic Corruption
    Hollywood Math��
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 7:22am
  
  Re: Systemic Corruption
  The way to fix it is to strengthen collective bargaining rights of workers.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - art guerrilla (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:03am
    
    Re: Re: Systemic Corruption
    no, i've heard unions is communistical and evil, so it must be so...
    having a counterforce to the unrestrained kapitalist piggies will just make our bankster overlords, well, antsy, so we don't want to upset them, now do we, no, i didn't think so...
    
    art guerrilla
    aka ann archy
    eof
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Z, 29 Jan 2013 @ 7:59am
  
  Re: Systemic Corruption
  "You have a system that exploits workers, artists, politicians, and anyone weaker to create vast amounts of wealth for a select few people."
  
  That sounds a lot more like communism/socialism to me. It seems to me that maybe the U.S. version of "capitalism" polluted by special interest corruption to the extent that it exhibits the same symptoms of those failed models.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Jay (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:00am
    
    Re: Re: Systemic Corruption
    Communism is absolution of private property, not exploitation of it.
    
    While must people make remarks about Communism, I find them highly lacking after studying the economic history of Russia from 1917 -1980.
    
    The short version is this: Russia went from a defeated country to the second most powerful one in the worlds with just a focus on the macrolevel economics. In other words, it was a state capitalist society where the workers still were exploited by bureaucrats instead of private markets (think about if the government had all the power to create movies instead of Hollywood).
    
    A true challenge to the system and the true Communism is actually going to be done with coops such as those in Austin, TX or VA.
    
    Think about the potential that comes from more coops. You have local communities working on various projects such as local goods and services. Say that Google comes in to give fiber and a union keeps it updated and maintained through higher taxes on the businesses that stay in the area. You have less need to figures on job creation and can instead work on higher wages as the community sees fit.
    
    The Communism that you're pointing to seems to be one that comes from those critical of other forms of markets but doesn't learn the lessons of what that truly means.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - A Monkey with Attitude, 29 Jan 2013 @ 10:06am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Systemic Corruption
      OK communism does work in small groups with a common idea and goal.. Thats proven in some cases and totally crashes in others. So I will be happy to agree that in theory you can extrapolate it a mass society (say state or country).
      
      But the big thing you seem to gloss over in your love of Russian Communism is that the average "worker" or normal person it was an absolute failure at providing even the most basic needs (Food, Clothes, Heat, House)... and before you start ranting this was based on propaganda and false, I think I will point out I will trust the words of my Grandmother about life in Russia under the Communist over any rants other wise, and I will trust what I saw in Russia, Poland and Eastern Germany after the fall (about 2 months after everything finally stopped kicking). Crappy built buildings, crap cars, crap everything basically except the pieces owned by the "special" leaders...
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Richard (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 11:54am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Systemic Corruption
        But the big thing you seem to gloss over in your love of Russian Communism is that the average "worker" or normal person it was an absolute failure at providing even the most basic needs (Food, Clothes, Heat, House)...
        
        Actually it did provide some things. Education is a case in point. Even religious people who had good reason to fear and hate the communists will admit that the education system worked better in those days.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Jay (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 2:07pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Systemic Corruption
        OK communism does work in small groups with a common idea and goal.. Thats proven in some cases and totally crashes in others. So I will be happy to agree that in theory you can extrapolate it a mass society (say state or country).
        
        Dude, with 400+ employees, Valve takes on and exceeds at almost everything they do far more than the hierarchical EA that has horrible customer relations, subpar games and digital distribution, and more support for the CEO than they do the games they produce. It's a company that is breaking the status quo left and right by just allowing people to work as they see fit.
        
        But the big thing you seem to gloss over in your love of Russian Communism is that the average "worker" or normal person it was an absolute failure at providing even the most basic needs (Food, Clothes, Heat, House)... and before you start ranting this was based on propaganda and false, I think I will point out I will trust the words of my Grandmother about life in Russia under the Communist over any rants other wise, and I will trust what I saw in Russia, Poland and Eastern Germany after the fall (about 2 months after everything finally stopped kicking). Crappy built buildings, crap cars, crap everything basically except the pieces owned by the "special" leaders...
        
        No, I just didn't want to get into all of the discussion about it and say that it went through a lot of wars, which made it incredibly good at gun making and industrialization. As I said, it didn't focus on the microlevel politics that freed the workers from exploitation. If you want the long version, just listen to this where Richard Wolff goes into the details of where Russia failed and why based on the economics.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:26am
  
  Re: Systemic Corruption
  "There's some lovely filth down here."
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- A Monkey with Attitude, 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:56am
  
  Re: Systemic Corruption
  Why do you always rant on Capitalism? Just curious to the seeds of this.
  
  And as you say Capitalism is evil (even though everything is built upon it in some form or another), what is the fix? What system will allow people freedom and exist with out Capitalism?
  
  I am not being sarcast or attacking, I reallly am curious what your answer is...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 2:15pm
    
    Re: Re: Systemic Corruption
    What corporate America practices isn't Capitalism: it is Oligarchism.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Jay (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 2:37pm
    
    Re: Re: Systemic Corruption
    Why do you always rant on Capitalism? Just curious to the seeds of this.
    
    I'm doing a lot of study into the history of feudalism and capitalism and I'm beginning to understand that the systemic failures of capitalism rub off on everything else. When you look at how capitalism is the new mercantilism, how the rich use every incentive to keep their advantage and disrupt new businesses as well as how the government is rigged against the little guys... Well... You begin to see it as a failure of capitalism.
    
    I searched to find the good parts of copyright. Yet, as more evidence comes out, copyright looks worse and worse. It's a part of the capitalist system and my own view is that it shouldn't be. Yet it seems to have continued to grow into a life of its own that deprives artists of income and keeps very rich labels and corporations in business over the artists that try their best to opt out of the system.
    
    And as you say Capitalism is evil (even though everything is built upon it in some form or another), what is the fix?
    
    I don't think capitalism is evil. I just think it's the root of the problems. Think about the large problems that are about to come down on the entire world economy that have yet to be fixed.
    
    The banks are still taking large risks (Article)
    
    Corporations get a lot of power and they're run predominantly by rich people. And our debt is held by China with little investment in infrastructure and living wage jobs here in the US.
    
    We have a judicial system that is two tier where Aaron Schwartz is judged harsher than Large banks while drug laws are used to the lives of our citizens.
    
    I mean, I can go on and on, but the basic rule here is that the haves create rules for the have nots and that's a problem. So through all of my research, it seems that the problem is our system that is coveted by others.
    
    what is the fix?
    
    Well, that's where I currently want to research and hopefully make a book about. The fix is an upgraded democracy. It is a recognition of the problems we have and getting to the root causes of the issues and fixing them. For example, we don't need a two party system. We need to get rid of the Electoral college and promote the popular vote at the least. We need proportional representation in the House and Senate (maybe make it little larger in both the House and Senate so more people are represented through proportional voting)
    
    And while I agree with Lessig that we should strike at the root, I don't think the root cause is money in politics. I think we need a recognition that our Constitution needs fixing every 20 years for each new generation and a lot more democracy to take away the plutocracy.
    
    Getting that requires a lot more Aarons and Lessigs and others that are committed to a stronger public sphere than what is currently available. Being able to create classes for teaching, new business opportunities outside of McDonalds and new opportunities requires being able to change the world.
    
    I just think it can be done by recognizing that democracy is the key to our future success.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 2:35pm
  
  Re: Systemic Corruption
  Jay, excellent point of view. I couldn't agree more.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anon, 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:22am

Exposing American Corruption (and UK)
"No one would venture to allege that there is any form of cash payment taking place when official bodies appear to act at the behest of special interests motives."

Indeed, the transparency international definition of corruption is:-

The abuse of entrusted power for private gain.

Lobby groups all over....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Real Michael, 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:25am

Our legal system is designed intentionally to work in the interests of the entrenched corporations within our borders. Anything which begins to have a major impact outside of their controlled jurisdiction immediately sets off a red alarm, hence the raid on Kim Dotcom and the subsequent attack on all file-hosting services, the censorsing of The Promo Bay, etc. Even large, established sites such as YouTube have to play by their rules.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Josef Anvil (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:30am

I couldn't resist.
After reading Amsterdam's blog, it just made me wonder if average_joe would like to debate with a grown-up real lawyer about the Mega Case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Colin, 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:51am
  
  Re: I couldn't resist.
  AJ doesn't debate, he argues.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:56am
    
    Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
    On the contrary, I've been trying to debate Mike for years, but he's unable to carry his side of an argument.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 7:30am
      
      Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
      Yeah, we've seen your debate tactics. You're definitely someone any reasonable person would want to waste time debating with. [rolls eyes]
      
      FYI, you come off as reasonable AT TIMES then you flip out and go into batshit crazy mode in the bat of an eye when someone realizes you're going to start acting childish. You can't even deny this isn't true. Well, you can. But those of us who've been here for the past year know any denial on your part would be false. We've seen your idea of "debate".
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - art guerrilla (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:05am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        thank you for slapping the troll...
        
        go wash your hands, now...
        
        art guerrilla
        aka ann archy
        eof
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:07am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        Oddly enough I went to wash my hands just before I read your comment. But it had nothing to do with slapping the troll. I'm a little OCD at times and I get urges to do certain things like wash my hands randomly (or wash my pens after other people touch them).
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:20am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        And the only reason I act the way I do is because Mike has proven hundreds of times that he has no interest in actually discussing the issues on the merits.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 11:09am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        Oh he does. JUST NOT WITH YOU. Because of your outrageous behavior. Time and time again he's tried giving you the benefit of the doubt and time and time again you start acting like a fuckwad/ill tempered and spoiled child.
        
        So no, there's no reason for him to debate or discuss anything WITH YOU. Others are welcome though.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 1:55pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        He runs away every time as soon as he realizes he can't win. Hundreds of times he's actually bothered to talk with me, but then he runs away when he realizes he looks like an idiot. So the excuse that he doesn't want to talk to me is demonstrably false. He does talk to me quite frequently. But he always runs away when he looks like an idiot. Every time.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 16 Feb 2015 @ 10:55pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        Step away from the mirror.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        JMT (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 3:12pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        "And the only reason I act the way I do is because Mike..."
        
        Yep, it's all Mike's faults. Mike, Mike, Mike. Not your fault at all...
        
        Here's a heads-up: you are the only one who thinks this. The only one.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:22am
      
      Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
      Oh, phew I thought you were gonna whine about he never answers your question about his belief on copyright...even though he did.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:32am
      
      Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
      If you would just drop the trollish attacks and stick to supporting your ideas regardless of how unpopular they may be, you would get a lot more respect around here.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:18am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        And if Mike would have a frank and honest discussion on the merits, without avoiding the questions he doesn't want to answer and without running away like he has done hundreds of times before, then I might begin to respect him.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:51am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        Blah, blah, blah...or more appropriately, wah, wah, wah.
        
        Babies cry because they don't know how to communicate any better.
        
        What's your excuse?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Chosen Reject (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 10:28am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        Then stop worrying about Mike. There are plenty others around here that will debate it with you. I don't whine when the President won't debate the issues with me, I just debate them with someone else.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 1:57pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        I don't want to talk with people like you. I want to talk to Mike. It's his blog, I want him to stand behind his own words. I don't want to argue with his legion of idiots. Any time, any issue, let me know. I will be there, I won't run away.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 4:28pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        'Any time, any issue, let me know. I will be there, I won't run away.' HA!
        
        Such brave words from an anonymous coward.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 30 Jan 2013 @ 7:47am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I couldn't resist.
        The fact that he's responded to you multiple times is fact enough that you're lying. Just because you cannot accept the answers given does not mean he hasn't answered you. Funny you call the people who post here most his 'legion of idiots,' considering you know nothing about that. This is just another clue as to the type of febrile ravings coming from you. A classic personality disorder that we really shouldn't even be taking the time to bother with.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - weneedhelp (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:40am
      
      The only response that needs to be given
      to the boB's, AJ's, and OOTB:
      https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120818/01171420087/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week- %20techdirt.shtml#c1210
      
      I come back to you puking all over the comments again.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 10:24am
        
        Re: The only response that needs to be given
        Thanks for that link, I forgot all about that debacle... AJ needs a hobby besides trolling and rimjobs..
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 11:21am
        
        Re: The only response that needs to be given
        And yet you can't link to any threads where Mike debates me and wins. Instead he always runs away. Any plac, any issue. I dare Mike to man up even once and to have an open and honest discussion with me. Seriously.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 5:48pm
        
        Re: Re: The only response that needs to be given
        You have a pretty odd, harsh definition of what constitutes "winning". Did nobody agree to play games with you as a kid?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 30 Jan 2013 @ 11:05am
        
        Re: Re: The only response that needs to be given
        Have yet to find a comment where you actually replied to what he posted in a logical and comprehensible manner. Ignoring what was stated to you isn't debating. Ergo, you have not even begun a debate, let alone won one.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Colin, 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:50am

But Dotcom is fat and obnoxious so he deserves everything that's happening to him, right? Isn't that how this works?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Groove Tiger (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 7:07am
  
  Re:
  He also has an odd skull shape, that means he shouldn't be trusted.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Michael, 29 Jan 2013 @ 7:21am
    
    Re: Re:
    I'm pretty sure the DOJ employs a phrenologist that they can use as an expert witness.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 6:51am

+1 for humanity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael, 29 Jan 2013 @ 7:19am
  
  Re:
  The DOJ has objected to a human rights attorney representing Kim DotCom. They have irrefutable proof that he is not human. Their evidence shows that Kim DotCom is actually a corruption machine designed to spread throughout the world through the Internet.
  
  They cannot show anyone this evidence at this time because it could compromise their investigation. It is important everyone just accept it as fact and move on.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:24am
    
    Re: Re:
    In related news, Kim DotCom has moved to dismiss all charges on the grounds that the US has no jurisdiction against corporations not based or operating within their territory.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Michael, 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:45am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      The US response has been to point out that their territory is now the entire universe because they said so. Disney will send tactical teams to the home of anyone who wants to disagree.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 29 Jan 2013 @ 8:53am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        At which point, Wolverine decapitates all the Princesses and Doom oversees the transition from Disney to LatveriaCorp.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
BentFranklin (profile), 29 Jan 2013 @ 9:11am

I sincerely hope this man is able to shed light on the very shady practices that are going on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Roland, 29 Jan 2013 @ 11:11am

Free Marc Emery
"... prosecutors visit their ambitions upon foreign citizens, charging them with heinous crimes with no basis under law, even if that person has never once set foot inside the United States." Dotcom isn't the first to be treated this way. It's been going on for a long time. Free Marc Emery!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rob, 29 Jan 2013 @ 11:17am

As an American I feel terrible that my government can be bought by Hollywood or anyone else with cash to throw around. This type of corruption only undermines democracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 30 Jan 2013 @ 3:15am

Hmmm, this sounds much more interesting than some simple human rights stretch.In any case, how low has the Eagle fallen eh? To be compared to third world corrupt Governments...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]