Australian Recording Industry Continues To Fight The Technology That Is Saving It
from the death-wish dept
There have been many posts on Techdirt about the copyright industry's hatred for new technologies that eventually turned out to be important sources of additional revenue -- the VCR being perhaps the most famous example. Here's a splendid column from Adam Turner in the Sydney Morning Herald about the same thing happening again in Australia.
As he points out, last year Australia saw a 4% growth in music sales, which outpaced the rest of the world, whose much lower 0.3% growth we discussed recently. In other words, if anything, the Australian recording companies should be celebrating the present and optimistic about the future. Instead, they are once more frightened by some technological developments that will in fact help them: an upgrade to the country's Internet infrastructure. Here's how Turner puts it:As the National Broadband Network [NBN] rolls out across the country, it's going to make music and video downloads more accessible to all Australians. It's time for the music industry to learn the lessons of the past decade and seize the initiative. But it seems you can't teach old gucci-clad dogs new tricks.It's really extraordinary that even in the face of figures that suggest digital sales are taking off, the recording industry is still demanding harsher measures against people who share unauthorized copies of files online, as if that ever worked -- or ever could work. For, as Turner rightly says:
"If more action isn't taken by the government and ISPs to curb piracy levels the NBN could have disastrous results for the local industry," according to a major report from the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. "All Australian content industries" will suffer if pirates are allowed to run rampant on the NBN, added Dan Rosen -- CEO of Australian Recording Industry Association.
Ramping up the war on its customers won't see people start buying more music. It's a war the music industry can't win, but it seems determined to die trying.Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, business models, downloads, high speed broadband, technology
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Industry doesn't hate "new technologies" but their ILLEGAL USAGE.
Manifestly, copyright is basis of the industry view, and so long as people PAY for content on the new medium, that's ALL they want. -- But you pirates want something for nothing.
See this item for perspective:
Short version: "Congratulations, freetards: You are THE FIVE PER CENT"
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/08/hug_a_pirate/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Industry doesn't hate "new technologies" but their ILLEGAL USAGE.
a) less skeevy to consumers;
b) better, economically-speaking, for those who fund the content; and
c) more rational to positive legalities.
Note, that I did NOT say that there is a one size business model that is 100% guaranteed to rake in the money.
And frankly, that article is flame-bait of the highest order.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Industry doesn't hate "new technologies" but their ILLEGAL USAGE.
They lump all that and more under "illegal," which they can do because they're not lawyers and their word holds no weight. So I understand your confusion.
The "six strikes" program specifically encourages people to uninstall BitTorrent software. It does not teach people how to use BitTorrent in a non-infringing way. The US guys hate that new technology.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Industry doesn't hate "new technologies" but their ILLEGAL USAGE.
Some of them are lawyers, who argue for a living. But none of them are judges or lawmakers. That's what you meant. Otherwise, good points.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Industry doesn't hate "new technologies" but their ILLEGAL USAGE.
Technology is neutral, the Internet is neutral. So why are the entertainment trying to censor it into oblivion?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Industry doesn't hate "new technologies" but their ILLEGAL USAGE.
So, how do you stop the latter without crippling or destroying the former? Nobody's suggesting the latter is good, only that it can be vastly reduced without shooting yourself in the foot. Perhaps if drooling idiots such as yourself bothered to listen to suggestions rather than lying and name calling, then...
"you pirates"
"freetards"
Oh, you're still too stupid? Carry on supporting the destruction of the industry you love, you deserve it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Industry doesn't hate "new technologies" but their ILLEGAL USAGE.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Industry doesn't hate "new technologies" but their ILLEGAL USAGE.
I want something that i can't get by any other means than piracy or by waiting 1+ year for the serie to be translated and distributed in my country.
I want to listen to music that I am unable to find in stores and I want to pay the artists not the companies that take advantage of them.
I want to consume tons and I am able to do so with the piracy and to listen/watch/read things without having to pay 30-50$ for a dvd of an old movie put back in blue ray. And I will consume more than the average buyers and I will find myself buying a CD of an artist I love or 10 movies in salesstores but I refuse to compulsively support a broken economic model trying to shit on me and my that are trying to shit on my 5% crewmates and that prefer to use money gained from sale and stupid trials to breed people that thrive on the "hunt for pirates" when they should focus on innovating and making things more accessible.
I dont want something for nothing I want something for the right price.
Sincerely, fairpricebutnotfreetard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Industry doesn't hate "new technologies" but their ILLEGAL USAGE.
Like with everything you write I just gotta call BULLSHIT on this. What was illegal with the Diamond Rio? It's perfectly legal and morally ok to rip your own CDs to mp3 and play them songs on the go. Only the industry couldn't stomach this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Industry doesn't hate "new technologies" but their ILLEGAL USAGE.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111208/12500917012/riaa-doesnt-apologize-year-long-blog-cen sorship-just-stands-its-claim-that-site-broke-law.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Industry doesn't hate "new technologies" but their ILLEGAL USAGE.
Your wrong premise invalidates the rest."
Actually it's your comment that's invalidated because it's your premise that's quite wrong.
The content industries have a long history that proves without doubt how much they hate new technology, because those technologies so often reduce their own power to control the content we get. They have fought against perfectly legal activities, and sometimes even managed to have them made illegal to suit their purposes, i.e. anti-circumvention.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Music is not merely entertainment, it is not even about making money. Music is about making a connection with people and sharing is an important part of that. I share my love of music with my friends all the time and I do not feel guilty about that. What is the point of music if we cannot share it with the people we care about?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Piracy isn't a technology, it's a behavior.
Is there a real technology you have in mind when suggesting they are fighting something? It would be nice to be able to take you seriously and not just assume you're writing talking points for some lobbyist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
---------------------
Torrent technology?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It's called an article. You should read it before saying something stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Taking the bait..
BitTorrent (or P2P altogether)
Blank media
Printers
Ebook readers
Technologies maximalists would like to vanish.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Taking the bait..
If you have a quote from any of them saying "vanquish ______", post it.
I'll wait.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Taking the bait..
�Hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties and the Administration of Justice of the Committee of the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session on H.R. 4783, H.R. 4794 H.R. 4808, H.R. 5250, H.R. 5488, and H.R. 5705, Serial No 97, Part I, Home Recording of Copyrighted Works, April 12, 1982. US Government Printing Office.[14]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Taking the bait..
And yet, everything they do or have attempted clearly heads towards the end point of vanquishing all of them. Except maybe printers. Maybe.
If that's not their intention, then they're idiots. And I don't think they're idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Taking the bait..
They don't need to out and out say "Vanquish X". Their actions have said that for them.
Blank media? That's got a "pirate tax" on it in several countries. A piece of technology is taxed straight out, as if by default, the blank media is automatically a tool for illegal activities.
MP3 players? They sued the makers of the Diamond Rio, and lobbied for (can't remember if they succeeded) to force all MP3 players to include FM radio.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Taking the bait..
Nobody has used the word "vanquish" but you. Learn to read properly before commenting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Taking the bait..
The RIAA sued diamond rio for making the first mp3 player. Just as the MPAA sued Sony for the ghastly and evil VCR. But before that radio, player pianos, phonographs.
Now, while trying to destroy the internet, they claim they are not against technology.
Freakin' idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Glyn, with these tropes, your views are dismissed right out the box. It's really too bad.
Piracy isn't a technology, it's a behavior.
Is there a real technology you have in mind when suggesting they are fighting something? It would be nice to be able to take you seriously and not just assume you're writing talking points for some lobbyist."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
TechDirt didn't censor anything in any sense of the word. Users reported you as spam, so TechDirt KEPT YOUR POST ONLINE but behind a click wall. I read it just fine. And I reported this one, because you don't know what "censor" means.
When you lie in bed with trolls, people think you're a troll, and they may be right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If Techdirt wanted it censored for real, they wouldn't make it so fucking easy to read, now would they? Or just stand by and allow us to read it without so much as going "Nein!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
And it's "censored" right again. how does that work for you, jackass?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If you're offended by this, have you ever considered not being an obnoxious moron?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Is there a real technology you have in mind when suggesting they are fighting something?"
Here's a US example: The "six strikes" program specifically encourages people to uninstall BitTorrent software. It does not teach people how to use BitTorrent in a non-infringing way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is getting out of hand...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is getting out of hand...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.triplejunearthed.com/Default.aspx
This is precisely the sort of site that the record labels would love to censor and shut down completely. The labels' ultimate end-goal is to control the entire market so that they no longer have to compete on even ground with independent artists, especially those who give songs away for free and ask their fans to share, shattering the entire premise of their argument for greater copyright enforcement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"We must....."
think of the suppliers of the buggy whip industry, the tanners of hide, the ranches of cattle......
the cowboys that drive the cattle, think of the job loss.....
What??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
latest technology
[ link to this | view in chronology ]