Steve Jobs Is 'Big Brother' And Smartphone Users Are 'Zombies,' According To NSA Cell Phone Tapping Presentation
from the the-NSA-hates-you-for-your-freedom dept
Just in case you're not convinced the intelligence community views the public (American or otherwise) as little more than exploitable data generators, two paragraphs from Der Spiegel's full article on the NSA's cell phone exploits should do the trick.
The first deals with former NSA boss Michael Hayden and his iPhone experience.
Michael Hayden has an interesting story to tell about the iPhone. He and his wife were in an Apple store in Virginia, Hayden, the former head of the United States National Security Agency (NSA), said at a conference in Washington recently. A salesman approached and raved about the iPhone, saying that there were already "400,000 apps" for the device. Hayden, amused, turned to his wife and quietly asked: "This kid doesn't know who I am, does he? Four-hundred-thousand apps means 400,000 possibilities for attacks."What most people would view as a feature list, the NSA views as a way to turn a person's phone into an informant. What Hayden references goes much deeper than simply grabbing location data and call records, something most intelligence and law enforcement agencies can already obtain without a warrant.
In the basest terms, the NSA wants to be inside your phone and will do anything to get there, but rather than follow that particular idiom into a dead end filled with rapey metaphors, we'll move on to the part where the NSA blames you for creating such attractive data.
In three consecutive transparencies, the authors of the presentation draw a comparison with "1984," George Orwell's classic novel about a surveillance state, revealing the agency's current view of smartphones and their users. "Who knew in 1984 that this would be Big Brother …" the authors ask, in reference to a photo of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs. And commenting on photos of enthusiastic Apple customers and iPhone users, the NSA writes: "… and the zombies would be paying customers?"No doubt whoever put together this presentation was pretty pleased with applying the Big Brother epithet to a private corporation. Without a doubt, many tech companies gather a ton of data on their users. Pre-installed apps routinely ask for permission to use location data and nearly every website visited gathers that along with anything else they can pick up. But private corporations aren't Big Brother because, for one thing, they're not the government. Apple can't spy on you and then use that data to imprison you. Only the government can.
Not that the NSA wants any tech company to start gathering less data. It loves the data and it loves being able to shake down these companies for their collections whenever deemed necessary. Referring to customers as "zombies" is the sort of thing you'd expect from neckbearded hipsters and other self-proclaimed individualists who tend take a dim view of any popular activity. It's rather jarring to hear the lingo deployed in a government intelligence agency presentation.
A private individual referring to iPhone customers as "zombies" is one thing. The NSA doing it is quite another. People who don't take an active effort to protect their information are being labeled as sub-human by a government agency. If these smartphones users don't care about the data they're leaking, then they really don't have an "expectation of privacy" to be steamrolled. That's the argument. As Der Spiegel puts it, the agency is arguing that the smartphone-buying public is "complicit in its own surveillance."
But they aren't, as one recent decision on acquiring cell phone location data without a warrant pointed out:
People buy cell phones to communicate with others, to use the Internet, and for a growing number of other reasons. But no one buys a cell phone to share detailed information about their whereabouts with the police.The agency clearly feels that if the data is willingly being produced by cell phone users, it should have access. By reducing smartphone users to "zombies" and painting cell phone manufacturers as "Big Brother," the NSA is dehumanizing its targets. These aren't people -- they're just data producing entities, too brainless to be bothered with niceties like piviacy and security.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: nsa, nsa surveillance, smartphones, zombies
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I think you and I have the right idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
enecryption is everything
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Sep 9th, 2013 @ 2:42pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: dumbphone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This is how it starts; first, they dehumanize us, then they come after us. What they do to us doesn't matter because we're lesser beings than them.
Welcome to Police State USA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And I'm sad to say, the agency is right. Let me give you the reason why I say that.
Go to your nearest mobile phone dealer. Or go look online, if you don't want to get out of your chair.
Try to find a phone that makes phone calls...and only phone calls. Go on, try.
Even if you can, and I'll be rather surprised if you do, you'll have to wade past endless smartphones with cameras and IP connectivity and GPS and bluetooth and apps and and and and...all of which are of course ripe for exploitation because they have far too many features to be secure.
This observation hasn't been lost on the bad guys out there (a term which now clearly includes the NSA): go search for "mobile phone malware" and start reading. That ecosystem is rich and diverse because it can be: smartphones are layers of crappy apps on crappy operating systems on crappy firmware: the whole stack has been miserably engineered, with predictable results. And yet smartphone users can't get enough of it, can't wait to get the next one, the next one, the next one, more crap-on-crap-on-crap, hell, they stand in line to buy this overpriced crap.
I'm not condoning what the NSA has done/is doing/will do. But really, anyone who thinks their smartphone is secure is an absolute, first-class, grade-A moron. THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN SECURE, not in their entire existence. The NSA is merely the latest (that we know about) in a lonnnnnng line of people and organizations to leverage that fact to their advantage.
Your smartphone is your leash, citizens. Let's see if you have the intelligence to ditch it or if you're so hopelessly addicted that you can't put it down.
"We'll make great pets..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The original idea of the Internet was based on a wish to keep track of everyone. Then it actually happens and people that voluntarily participate get butthurt about it. Typical.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No doubt they're opportunistic weasels, however, I would suggest they pushed mobile "phone" technology from the start. How do you sell tracking-devices/mobile-microphones to the public? You shroud them with the "benefit" of being social from anywhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael Hayden admits to un-authorized intel leaks to wife
American citizens are clearly the enemy and don't look to tea bag conservatives in the house to do anything about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Michael Hayden admits to un-authorized intel leaks to wife
FTFY
It doesn't have anything to do with D or R, they're all on the take.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Michael Hayden admits to un-authorized intel leaks to wife
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Michael Hayden admits to un-authorized intel leaks to wife
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Michael Hayden admits to un-authorized intel leaks to wife
Go read about the Church Committee in the 70s. The CIA was the whipping boy back then.
Your whining is literally as old as your Grandma now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If this were attributed to a creepy stalker instead, I wouldn't be able to tell the difference.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Heroes and Villains
I didn't think so at first, but the importance of the stories coming out of the NSA leaks has convinced me that he's done more good for the United States by exposing our government's misdeeds than anyone in elected office.
I consider myself to be on the Far Left, not a libertarian in any way except socially. But the information in these leaks is the best argument for serious oversight and limitation on military/intelligence/corporate/law enforcement power I've ever seen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Heroes and Villains
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Heroes and Villains
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Heroes and Villains
oh mercy, I am in shock. All this time I thought the the US simply posted requests for information about those who wanted to blow them up in the classifieds of local papers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Heroes and Villains
Usually, the nutjobs that do the blowing up associate with other nutjobs, visit nutjob websites and post nutty statements on the social media. They're usually easy to identify and can therefore be caught via probable cause and a warrant. All this surveillance is not only unnecessary, it hasn't prevented any terrorism so stop jizzing yourself over it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Heroes and Villains
All you know, is that there haven't been any terrorist attacks since 9/11.
Which is the only thing that really matters when discussing the effectiveness of anti-terrorist measures.
Please explain to me what illicit purposes the NSA is using their massive data collection for. All that data. What are they using it for besides terrorist surveillance, hmm? And if you think posting the outlier of some flunkie abusing it to spy on some random piece of ass, you've failed miserably.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Heroes and Villains
Every single example that the NSA and those defending them have trotted out to justify their actions and existence to date have been debunked, as either not real threats, or threats that were handled the normal, legal, not-violating-constitutional-rights way.
As has been pointed out numerous times, the argument that 'If it stops terrorists it's acceptable' is completely ridiculous. Cameras in every home would probably stop a lot of terrorists, as well as a ton of crime, but you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who thought that was an acceptable price for the public to pay, and those that did agree with such measures would probably only be agreeable right until the cameras were being installed in their homes, as such people always seem to think that such intrusive surveillance would never be used against such 'law abiding people' such as themselves.
As for purposes, that's beside the point, merely collecting and having such massive data is a problem, if for no other reason than it makes for the world's most tempting hacking target for any technologically inclined criminal or group, and sooner or later they will break in(or just pay off/threaten the right person to get the data directly).
And of course there's the ever so insignificant fact that such widespread data gathering is not only in violation of constitutional rights, but downright illegal, and in fact something that multiple courts have ruled against, and the problem only grows.
Of course then you've got blackmail, extortion, political/industrial espionage, keeping tabs on those that potentially threaten the status quo or powers that be... the list of potential abuses is legion, and given the NSA, those working for them, and those that they 'answer to' are all human, abuses will happen as long as such a massive database exists.
Finally, love the 'outlier' line, apparently you missed the article a while back that talked about the thousands of abuses per month that occurred in just one of the local agencies; when the numbers get that large they are hardly 'outliers' I'd say.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Heroes and Villains
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google just hates it when they've been usurped as the supreme exploiter of the interwebz.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The open concept should be specially applied to the infra-structure level too to avoid the whole infiltration thing the NSA has been engaging into for the last decades.
As much as I don't like Apple it's not fair to put the blame on them or on Mr Jobs unless there is clear evidence that the company is engaged in helping the Govt surveillance and that it is not the fault of infiltrated agents. We've come to the point where trust has been completely lost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ah it makes sense now why Adam and Eve were told not to eat from the Apple tree. I always used to wonder about that!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I’d be curious to see how many of those against cellphones in-flight were more concerned about privacy/comfort and how many were concerned about safety.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
American citizens are clearly the enemy and don't look to tea bag conservatives in the house to do anything about it.
Source : https://firedout.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]