NSA/GCHQ Use Lolcats To Discuss What They Learn By Spying On All Of Our YouTube Views And Facebook Likes
from the squeaky-dolphins-and-lolcats dept
Just hours after the NY Times/the Guardian and Pro Publica released their stories about Snowden documents revealing the NSA and GCHQ spying on mobile apps, NBC News, working with Glenn Greenwald, revealed a different bunch of Snowden documents concerning how the NSA and GCHQ are collecting unencrypted data concerning YouTube views, Facebook likes and Twitter messages via the taps they have on various internet backbone cables. These are not from the companies themselves, but rather because the data travels unencrypted across the internet, which the NSA and GCHQ grab because they can:The reporters reached out to multiple tech companies, who note that they had nothing to do with this. That's true, as it seems clear that the information was gleaned from the taps placed on the backbone, with the help of the giant telcos, rather than the internet companies. However, at this point, it seems time for any company to recognize that if any bit of data is not being encrypted, the NSA/GCHQ is looking through it. Google, once again, seems particularly upset to discover this was going on, after it had pushed back on attempts by the UK to set up data retention rules for this kind of purpose -- when it's clear that GCHQ was already doing it anyway.
A source close to Google added that Google was “shocked” because the company had pushed back against British legislation that would have required Google to store its metadata and other information for U.K. government use. The legislation, introduced by Home Secretary Theresa May in 2012, was publicly repudiated by Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg in 2013 and has never become law. May hopes to reintroduce a modified version this spring.While it may have been reasonable in the past to assume that if the government wasn't asking for this information via the front door, the info was safe, given both of the big stories of the day, it seems that every online company needs to get much more serious about encryption.
“It’s extremely surprising,” said the source, “that while they were pushing for the data via the law, they might have simultaneously been using their capability to grab it anyway.”
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: data, facebook likes, gchq, lolcats, nsa, privacy, surveillance, tapped cables, youtube views
Companies: facebook, google, twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Lolcats
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lolcats
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Squeaky Dolphin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: timing
Like: why keep a local copy of anything you found online.
It's a diy waybackmachine (for free) for those with/without a warrant to go fishing ...tyvm US citizen, I see ur tax dollar$ are hard at work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well shit. They gotta put on a good show to project the illusion they aren't connected at the hip with the feds - a fact painfully obvious to those whose heads aren't inserted up Google's asspucker.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: simpler
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: simpler
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "Anyone else notice OOTB is missing out today on really good material?"
Besides, having stoked fanboys to point where my screen name is featured front page on the weekend, and they're daily compelled to mention my absence, er, out of the blue, I'm pleased to sit and watch them flounder without me...
Techdirt: a sore for site eyes. (90 of 192)
10:02:47[l-5-2]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "Anyone else notice OOTB is missing out today on really good material?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: paranoid much
If it's currently a possibility, why not insist it's contemporaneously probable.
The only thing "new" about these valuable secrets is that they are leaked to you and me. If there's a secret conspiracy then the conspirators "know & use" the secret NSA rules & even more deeply buried harvested-data at *any* point in time you care to imagine. Makes for a good story. Now how can we decide which day was the 1st example of your "population manipulation by telco-spying" thesis? Where must we look to find the 1st smoking gun? And who you gonna call, ghostbusters??
Stay tuned here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That is a stunningly disingenuous, or naive, comment, as the NSA™ and those who own Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Apple, PayPal, eBay, Facebook, Twitter, et al, are of the exact same fiend ilk and aid and abet one another, even if they don’t trust one another.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Talk about security minded apps. Just look, Lolscats must be highly rated for security. Geeze the things you learn at Techdirt. And here all those folks were concerned with encryption breaking. Why they can all just head over to Lolscats and have the ultimate of security. /s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: dragnet 101
That is,
Free-public-website-usage-showing-unencrypted-users-assuming-privacy-and-clicking-like-on-a-lolca t
+++PLUS+++
Warrant-lawfully-obtained-for-a-targetted-search-of-US-governmental-spy-catelogues-full-o f-decrypted-secrets-through-crippled-RSA-cryptograpy-hopefully-used-by-dangerous-violent-wellfunded- young-men-also-using-gmail-to-plan-an-imminent-and-terrifying-crime-on-noncombattants
===EQUALS===
a whole bunch of raw data 0s and 1s with 0% predictive power as information to save any of us surveiled-but-not-targetted telco user's precious post-2001 living-a-life-in-fear life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Right now, i bet, the pro nsa twats, all their concerned about is, that this information was released from the vaults of "government national security", and not on the context of what was released
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://cheezburger.com/2735157760
I'm pretty sure that doing so violated that site's TOS.
Time to sue the NSA for violating the CFAA!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'd like to be paid for playing WoW, Angry Birds, watching YouTube, and reading blogs all day.
So, basically, the same thing I do now, except as a Highly Paid Professional.
Sign me up!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[1] Floor 64, an Insight Company:
[2] [Thee[!]] Insight Community:
(Bolding mine. ...Rod Serling stirs at the stunning greed, manipulation, and hypocrisy which succeeded his Twilight Zone series. Of course, the most effective way to refute commentary such as the above, has been to flaunt the comment (though not comment on it) as the default response, as if it were not true.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Still, add that to the myriad of data they already grab and you can pretty much have everything a person does online. How long till they want the same capabilities for the offline world?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh yeah, I'm sooo surprised.
Does anyone else out there think that it is even the slightest bit surprising that they may have been grabbing the data any way they could get it? Come now, this has been going on for what, say, a century maybe? Not until someone actually calls them up on it would they likely even be concerned, most likely..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...and as soon as an individual matches these 'interesting data, connections and trends' they...
..dig up the 'pertinent' records and...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hahah
Splunk> Even gub'mint ninjas use it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]