DC Cops Learn From FBI: Regularly Invent Crimes To Arrest 'Possible Future' Criminals

from the minority-report dept

Thu, Jul 24th 2014 10:11am — Timothy Geigner

As we recently discussed, it's becoming readily apparent that the FBI's most vaunted counter-terrorism wins are almost all stings for "crimes" they made up all by themselves and then coerced others to join. Even for those that don't have a problem with this kind of practice in theory, it has to be jarring to learn just how many of these "terrorists" are either suffering serious mental or social illnesses or have had their confessions beaten out of them. By all appearances, it looks pretty clear that the FBI is bumping up their "win" statistics on the backs of these highly questionable stings.

So of course local law enforcement is getting in on the action as well. Take the police in Washington D.C., for instance, who are featured in a Washington Post story detailing how they invent armed robbery plans whole-cloth and then recruit civilians to join up shortly before arresting these future-criminals. Some of the plots the police of devised are quite detailed and terrifying, involving robbing liquor stores and targets that are supposedly drug dealers. After discussing the plans with an undercover cop, everyone is then arrested and charged with a variety of "conspiracy to commit" charges. According to some experts, the government is on firm legal ground with regards to entrapment.

The government is on solid legal ground, experts say, when it comes to fending off allegations that suspects were set up — or entrapped — by the police. Even if the government entices the defendant, the target has to show that he was not predisposed to commit the crime.

Sure, and if you're a defendant in one of these cases, good luck convincing anyone that you didn't have a predisposition for the crime you were tricked into thinking you were going to commit. Again, it's easy to opine that these are bad people, but that doesn't take into account mental illness and pressure applied by undercover officers eager to bolster their arrest statistics. According to reports, that kind of pressure included giving minors alcohol and/or taking them to strip clubs, because nobody has ever made themselves out to be something they're not when drunk or in the presence of naked members of the opposite sex. The question becomes whether anything like the made up crime would have ever happened had it not been first invented by the police.

“When you have the government offering guns or the getaway car and making it really attractive, you have to ask: Is this an opportunity that would have really come around in real life? Would this person have been able to put together this type of crime without government assistance?” said Katharine Tinto, a professor at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in New York who has studied undercover policing tactics.

It's even worse when the police engineer aspects of the made up crimes in the sting in order to manufacture longer sentences for the would-be criminals they ensnare.

Tinto and others also take issue with the government’s ability to essentially engineer tough penalties by controlling the details of the made-up crime. Part of the reason the District cases have been so successful, according to defense lawyers, is that the potential jail time for the federal conspiracy charge is steep enough that many defendants are more inclined to make a deal with prosecutors than risk losing at trial.

The global problem in all of this is the aim: this is all about bolstering crime-fighting statistics rather than responding to any actual crimes or criminals. Will the police likely get some violent criminals off the streets with this tactic? Sure, but so could actual police work and, as I indicated, that isn't what this is all about. On top of that, the questions raised by the tactic are serious and some of the people caught up in all this probably aren't benefited most by engineered jail time. Add to all that questions about who the police are generally going to look towards as targets of this kind of sting operation (gasp, minorities), and we should be left wondering why they aren't fighting the crime that exists rather than making up crime that otherwise wouldn't.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: criminals, entrapment, fbi, own plots, police, stings, washington dc

35 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 10:27am

Not entrapment...sure...pull the other one...
So if this is not entrapment, what is? Is it enough to show that you never expressed interest, or will they then try to get you on how you knew a crime was being planned and didn't turn in the would-be culprits (who are actually undercover cops)? How quickly do you need to run away when the would-be crime is first discussed to establish that you definitely didn't want to be part of it? Based on how far this has already gone, will the courts let the undercover cops commit a real crime to demonstrate street cred to the planned sting victim? I don't just mean setting up a false rap sheet, but actually committing it in a way that the sting victim can personally witness.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 10:35am

Re: Not entrapment...sure...pull the other one...
It would probably never come up. They more then likely use the copyright troll tactic. Target everyone and only go after the ones stupid enough to not ask questions. It would never catch any real criminals, but it will catch a lot of people too stupid to be a threat on their own.

I shouldn't call it the copyright troll tactic. Should call it the Prince of Nigeria tactic. Target everyone and hope enough people fall for it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TasMot (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 10:38am

Solving a crime after it's committed is too hard.....
Have you ever reported a stolen item to the police? They give you a copy of the report and then you're forgotten. My friend had a mini-van stolen. He had to find it because the police couldn't. But they gave him a report for his insurance company for filing a claim. I mean, it was a couple of blocks away, not in the next state.
If they manufacture a crime whole-cloth, then they know exactly where to show up and arrest everybody. So much easier since they are also providing the fake weapons and they can't get shot. Everybody wins except the "criminals" that are all mouth and no action until they are stood in place with fake gun in hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 10:39am

"Even if the government entices the defendant, the target has to show that he was not predisposed to commit the crime."

WTF happened to innocent until proven guilty and the burden of proof being with the accuser?

Perhaps it's time for groups like Copwatch to try to infiltrate and sting some of these sting operations to expose what their tactics and who is actually behind them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Michael, 24 Jul 2014 @ 10:42am

DC Cops Learn From FBI

Just another group of freetards that think it is ok to steal someone else's ideas.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 10:46am

What?
Some of the plots the police of devised are quite detailed and terrifying, involving ... targets that are supposedly drug dealers.

Because they're targeting crime against drug dealers?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 10:46am

Re: Not entrapment...sure...pull the other one...
The police committing actual crimes to make cases in sting ops happens all the time. The sale of illegal drugs on the street is a crime for both parties involved in the transaction. When an undercover cop buys or sells drugs on the street in order to arrest the other individual in the transaction, engaging in that transaction is still a crime regardless.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Applesauce, 24 Jul 2014 @ 10:50am

Police don't have much choice...
FBI statistics show crime, especially violent crime has been falling since the 1970's (about the time that tetra-ethyl lead started being removed from the environment).
With less real crime being committed, the cops have no choice but to invent crime to justify having a job.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Roger Strong (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 10:52am

Someone alert the MPAA
Up next: The MPAA runs anti-piracy ads in theatres, with a "You wouldn't steal a car" theme. Microphones pick up anyone responding along the lines of "No, but I would totally download a car if it left the original in place." They would be arrested for conspiracy to steal cars.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 10:53am

Re: Not entrapment...sure...pull the other one...
This isn't entrapment in the same way that lobbying isn't bribery.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 11:05am

Lets face it folks ,we are all screwed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 11:13am

Re: Re: Not entrapment...sure...pull the other one...
The sale of illegal drugs on the street is a crime for both parties involved in the transaction.
Right, but not what was meant. The question was addressed to the idea of whether it is permitted for an undercover cop to, say, rob a convenience store while the future-sting-victim watches from across the street, thereby "proving" the undercover cop is willing to commit a crime. The idea was seeded off the mafia style of inductees conducting a murder-for-hire to prove themselves to the family, but includes plenty of lesser crimes too.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
bob, 24 Jul 2014 @ 11:24am

Re: Solving a crime after it's committed is too hard.....
don't forget the trunk full of cocaine in the getaway car that was put there by the police. that should get some hard time for the perp. leave some room for a bit of ebola virus and you can nab a drug dealing bio-terrorist. :-P
the cops just aren't being imaginative enough.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Vel the Enigmatic, 24 Jul 2014 @ 11:24am

I know why they're making it up.
Cause real crime doesn't get them paid enough.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 11:32am

Re: Re: Re: Not entrapment...sure...pull the other one...
The cops don't need to rob a bank for that. They just need to get the bank to let them stage a fake robbery where they give all the money back.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Uriel-238 (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 11:37am

Enhanced Community Watch
This may be a symptom not only of the dropped crime rate (I had forgotten about the tetra-ethyl lead factor, but like to blame the internet. Thanks Applesauce) but also of our resistance to call the cops since they either a) file and ignore if they can't be bothered, or b) grab the most obvious suspect and bully the shit out of them, either way making the situation only worse.

If we start seeing new community vigilante groups appear who solve neighborhood problems and police report rates drop to negligible, we know this is what's happening.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Padpaw (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 11:44am

Your country is has become a third world banana republic.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 11:51am

Re:
We're working on it, but all the good examples are copyrighted by the CIA.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
David, 24 Jul 2014 @ 11:54am

Your country is has become a third world banana republic.

Sure about the "republic" part?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 11:58am

Re: Police don't have much choice...
about the time that tetra-ethyl lead started being removed from the environment

This is some insane bit of info o.o

I'd also argue that marijuana usage for recreation is on the rise and it's a pacifying drug too along with the reasons but that would require further study.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Uriel-238 (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 12:06pm

My country has become...
I don't think we're a Republic anymore.

The United States is a third-world banana.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 12:07pm

Re: Re: Police don't have much choice...
Next you will argue it is all part of a meta El Nino cycle.

Or would that be El Nino in relation to the quality of the global pot harvest?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 12:28pm

Re: Re: Police don't have much choice...
about the time that tetra-ethyl lead started being removed from the environment

This is some insane bit of info o.o

No this is absolutely solid evidence - the correlation is observable nation by nation (and state by state in the US).

I am normally totally skeptical about the correlation-causation thing - but the evidence here is solid.

Of course the US poli9ce reaction to this would be to demand that the lead levels of the population be tested and incarcerate everyone showing a high level!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
art guerrilla (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 12:43pm

Re: Re: Not entrapment...sure...pull the other one...
HA!
another great pithy remark...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Patrick, 24 Jul 2014 @ 2:32pm

I said it yesterday
Why don't they set up stings like this for robbing a 7/11. They could get a lot of would be armed robbers off the street.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 3:18pm

Re: Re: Police don't have much choice...
Personally I suspect unemployment and under-employment are to blame for its rise of use. If you're going nowhere fast in the economy and are working retail or a crap fast-food job might as well smoke weed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That One Guy (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 3:19pm

Re: Enhanced Community Watch
Nah, they'd just arrest everyone involved as 'vigilantes', can't have the regular citizens showing up the police after all, then how are they supposed to justify needing an armored truck or two, maybe a couple of assault rifles and sets of heavy duty body armor? /s
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Padpaw (profile), 24 Jul 2014 @ 10:34pm

Re:
your still a republic in name if not reality. Even if most Americans are ignorant of their history
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bob V (profile), 25 Jul 2014 @ 4:09am

Re:
Just another example of the entitled poor looking for handouts from the government.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 25 Jul 2014 @ 11:40am

Re: Re: Re: Police don't have much choice...
Oh I meant in a good way. As in unbelievable even though it's real. My bad. The marijuana part was serious.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
John85851 (profile), 25 Jul 2014 @ 2:50pm

Things like this happen all the time on TV shows
“When you have the government offering guns or the getaway car and making it really attractive, you have to ask: Is this an opportunity that would have really come around in real life? Would this person have been able to put together this type of crime without government assistance?” said Katharine Tinto..."

I disagree.
How many people watch crime shows or movies like "Ocean's Eleven" and think it's not that hard to pull off a crime caper. All you need is a smart guy, a getaway car, maybe 2 or 3 hired muscle-guys, a foolproof plan, and you're in!
Heck, I saw a Jason Statham movie the other night where they easily stole money from a state fair and hid out in Miami... and met Jennifer Lopez! You can't tell me that doesn't happen in real life. :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
GEMont (profile), 25 Jul 2014 @ 4:42pm

You're under arrest for considering our offer.
"this is all about bolstering crime-fighting statistics rather than responding to any actual crimes or criminals"

Don't mean to pee on yer party here, but methinks ye might want to take a wee peek at whether or not there may be another "incentive" behind these phony arrests... one that is slightly less apparent, but pretty obvious just the same.

Like perhaps, there's an under-the-table per-head finder's fee being quietly offered to (crooked) cops by the many corporate incarceration firms, in order to increase their occupancy rates at a faster pace. More bodies, more income and all that.

Just a thought.

---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jul 2014 @ 5:01am

Re: Re: Police don't have much choice...
Don't forget global warming. As temps are going up people are becoming less violent. So pass the Mai Thai and let the beach come to us rather than us go to the beach.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
FBI insider, 30 Jul 2014 @ 12:13am

Pizza Hut
As of 7/30/2014 all FBI offices will offer their employees free Pizza Hut on Fridays. There is a 4 piece maximum. If you are very fat talk to your boss about extra pieces.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
mark ulmer, 24 Oct 2014 @ 5:02pm

This is really happening
this is happening to me and now I'm on the run. They set me up to look like a narc for a bust they did and I heard was going to happen. Sounds crazy but I will be killed by the person they busted. They made it look like I did it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]