SWAT Team Raids House And Kills Homeowner Because Criminal Who Burglarized The House Told Them To
from the get-cops-to-do-your-bidding-using-this-one-simple-trick! dept
We've heard complaints that warrant requirements for searches are an obstacle to efficient crime fighting. Here's a timeline of an incident that led to the death of a homeowner during a SWAT team raid in search of drugs it never found. (via PoliceMisconduct.net)
Late Sept. 22nd/early A.M. Sept. 23rd: David and Teresa Hooks' home was burglarized. Among the items stolen was their SUV.
Sept. 23rd, 3:45 pm: After a brief investigation, the Laurens County Sheriff's Dept. issues an arrest warrant for suspect Rodney Garrett.
Sept. 24th, 3:45 pm: 24 hours later, Garrett is in police custody, turning himself in after becoming "fearful for his life" when he realized a bag he stole from the Hooks' home contained crystal meth. He confessed to the burglary, vehicle theft and "other crimes." (It must be noted that this version of events comes from the warrant application. Hooks' attorney's statement merely says Garrett was "taken into custody.")
Sept. 24th, 9:56 pm: Six hours, later the Laurens County "drug task force" has its warrant application for a search of Hooks' house signed by Judge Snell, based almost solely on the statements made by an admitted felon in their custody.
From a statement by the Hooks' attorney, Mitch Shook:
The facts submitted to Deputy Magistrate Snell to convince her that probable cause existed to issue the warrant consisted of the statement by Rodney Garrett a confessed burglar, thief, and a meth addict who was under the influence at the time of his arrest that the approximately 20 grams of methamphetamine, a digital scale, and 2 firearms found on him at the time of arrest had been stolen by him out of another vehicle at the Hooks home.The warrant application also lists an investigation from 2009 as more "probable cause."
In the warrant application, Laurens investigator Chris Brewer wrote that he knew Hooks and his home address from a previous investigation. Brewer said a suspect claimed he had been supplying "multiple ounces" of methamphetamine to Hooks, who re-sold it.The timeline continues. One hour later -- at 10:55 PM -- Hooks' home is raided and David Hooks is shot dead.
Shook says that investigation was done in 2009. Neither Shook or the Sheriff's department stated the outcome of that investigation.
Here's the police version:
The Laurens County Sheriff's office says Hooks was shot after he got out a firearm and started showing aggression.Here's his wife's version:
He says Teresa Hooks, David's wife, looked outside and saw people with hoods during the evening of the drug search. He says she woke her husband up, thinking the burglars were back. He says Hooks then armed himself.Which seems plausible. Less than 48 hours had passed and Hooks would have had no idea he was on the receiving end of a drug task force "investigation." The word "investigation" receives the scariest of scare quotes, considering it mostly consisted of a multiple felon trying to explain away the gun, scale and meth in his possession. If the suspect had claimed he didn't rob Hooks' house, the police wouldn't have believed him. But when this same suspect starts blabbering about finding meth during his robbery, the cops are all ears, as though he were Abraham Lincoln himself, swearing on a stack of Bibles.
How do we know all of this is bullshit? Because the police spent almost as much time searching Hooks' house -- nearly two days -- as it did between the point Hooks' house was invaded the first time (by confessed burglar Rodney Garrett) and the second time (by the SWAT team).
[A]fter taking over the scene at around 11:55 p.m. on the 24th of September the GBI conducted a thorough search of the property that lasted until approximately 8:00 p.m. Friday, September 26th. That search of some 44 hours conducted by numerous agents with the GBI resulted in not one item of contraband being found! This has been confirmed to the family by the GBI and is evidenced by the return of the original search warrant which was finally filed in court on September 29th and indicates that nothing was seized pursuant to the search warrant.In between these two periods of 40+ hours was a flashpoint: the raid itself. The task force shot Hooks dead in his own home, pursuing the self-serving pipe dreams of a meth addict. The SWAT team broke down the back door and fired "no less than 16 shots" at David Hooks, some blindly through an adjacent wall. Hooks had every right to pick up his weapon and investigate this second home invasion. But in doing so, he gave every raiding officer all the justification needed to shoot first -- and shoot often.
He's too dead to be charged with forcing law enforcement weapons to discharge (because they fire themselves so often in official police statements), and he died as the result of a speedy judge-jury-executioner process that hinged on the arbitrary credulity of the Sheriff's Department and its drug task force. To call this willing suspension of disbelief an "investigation" is to strip the word of all meaning. (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, etc.) A late-night raid has all sort of deadly implications that could have been avoided by an actual investigation. Now, the department has blood on its hands and a lawyer on its trail -- all because a burglar told some law enforcement officers whatever came to mind during his interrogation.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: evidence, militarized police, swat team
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Now, you just need a confessed drug addict burglar, while high on his drug of choice, to say he got the drugs from the person he burgled. That's all the justification SWAT needs to go in guns blazing, to kill someone.
Excuse me a mo. I'm going put in a call to SWAT that a certain man of African American origin living in a certain famous house on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington DC keeps meth in his desk. How do I know he keeps meth in his desk officer? Why, this meth that I'm currently high on and desperately trying to explain the origins of in such a way that I hope will draw attention away from myself was found by me in that desk while I was busy robbing it!
Psst. Make sure you bring lots of guns!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
How would you know? Have you ever hired a hit man or have you ever done this type of work for hire?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I think your joke needs adjusting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They believed him because they wanted to.
No matter that their 'source' was stoned out of his mind at the time, his claims gave them an excuse to play 'cops and robbers' with all that gear they love so much, and they'd be damned if they ignored the opportunity by doing something completely insane, like, I dunno, not going in guns blazing, in the middle of the night, busting into a house that had been recently robbed, where the homeowners, thanks to the recently robbery, would already be suspicious of any dark figures sneaking around or looking like they were trying to break in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Pffft. You can tell a Judge 'the clown in your courtroom is playing games with his address to avoid the court system' via your filing in the case then the Judge writes an order where the Judge chastises the landlord doing an eviction for citing the wrong address.
"playing Geek Squad" - why bother if the Judges are too lazy to read the Squad reporting?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
or could it have been that the police WANTED to go to Hooks place, do a search for drugs because he had got away with something, in the polices eyes maybe, in 2009 and the shooting was just the icing on the cake for them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Oct 8th, 2014 @ 2:33pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Oct 8th, 2014 @ 2:33pm
It was a commercial from the local realtor association where they add some tag line at the end of the commercial like "Realtors may have more information than you do."
I think it falls in the same category as the "You wouldn't download a car" type ads.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Oct 8th, 2014 @ 2:33pm
The Feds raid the Cartel House regularly, and the Cartel raises the cost of their product (due to police interference) regularly, claiming scarcity of product.
The Feds knew it was a Cartel House, because they were just there the previous month, and the month before that and so on.
Its an economic marriage. A business model.
Both sides in the War on Drugs, earn their livelihood from the war and thus both sides wholeheartedly want the War on Drugs to continue.
Only the public (the couple who bought the house) suffer any real harm from this occupational hazard.
---
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sadly, because the criminals happen to be cops, we will never be allowed to know the truth of this affair.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..
FtFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..
(At least toilet paper still has some use and when you get it - it's clean.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..
I think most people don't know what effigy means.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..
Why are you blaming the US Constitution? IT assigned these duties to us, "We the people" exactly so these things would not occur. WE are the militia of the several states, it is our duty to train and carry weapons to be able to:
- Enforce the US Constitution and each state's Constitution,
- Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which is constitutional laws ONLY),
- Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
- “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.
US Constitution, Article I, Section. 8, Clause 11: “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water”.
This - Letters of Marque and Reprisal - is using private citizens in their own privately owned crafts to defend the USA and her people, this is using the Militia.
Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.
The militia of each state is taxed with the defense of the USA and her people, not just with the defense of their state; and they are to be armed with weapons that can repel any invasions bearing modern weapons of war. Congress is required to provide those military grade weapons for the militias - NOT to the LE's, NOT to foreign terrorists, NOT to foreign countries - in Clause 16.
Clause 16: “To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.
Joel Barlow, Revolutionary War veteran, American whose political writings were debated on the floor of Parliament said of the US Constitution: "… not only permitting every man to arm, but obliging him to arm.”
Thomas J. Jackson: “The patriot volunteer, fighting for country and his rights, makes the most reliable soldier on earth.”
Thomas Jefferson:“Every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans, and must be that of every free state.”
Thomas Jefferson: "None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important."
Richard Henry Lee, Member of the First U.S. Senate: "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms..."
Daniel Webster: "Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster, and what has happened once in 6000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the
American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world."
Abraham Lincoln: ""We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution."
James Madison: An efficient militia is authorized and contemplated by the Constitution and required by the spirit and safety of free government.
Richard Henry Lee: "A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves …"
George Mason, Co-author of the Second Amendment: "I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
Thomas Jefferson: "The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed and that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of press."
BTW, what those "cops" did qualifies as terrorism against the American people:
28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.
Does this sound familiar to anyone? Change a few words and it IS gun control.
SA Oberfuhrer of Bad Tolz, March, 1933: "All military type firearms are to be handed in immediately ... The SS,
SA and Stahlhelm give every responsible opportunity of campaigning with them. Therefore anyone who does not belong to one of the above-named organizations and who unjustifiably nevertheless keeps his weapon ... must be regarded as an enemy of the national government."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
3 cheers for smoked pork
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They have to use it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well duh!
Drug king pins with a house full of contraband always call the cops when they get robbed!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'We don't track those numbers'
Tracking the number of deaths caused by police? Well, those are all accidents you know, and there's just so many other, much more important things to focus on, and clearly anyone who would be interested in these statistics have it out for the police, so for 'officer safety' it's best to just not track or report that sort of thing.
Yeah, it's in their best interest not to have those statistics available, and even if they were, you can bet 99% of the deaths suffered by police would be classified as intentional murder(so no 'accidental death', and certainly no 'self-defense against the officer'), while 99% of deaths cause by police would be 'accidental' and 'self-defense'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*peep*, comedians most have a hard time to top reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Keeping people in line and compliant through fear works... to a point. Push too far though, crank up the intimidation and fear enough, and people will switch from defensive, to offensive means to deal with the perceived threat(because once someone is in fear of their life, what do they have to lose?) and once that happens, things are going to be nasty indeed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Self-fulfilling prophecy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Self-fulfilling prophecy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I don't see that in the linked article, do you have a reference?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"To protect and serve"
Now it is hard to even find, but if still used it apparently is interpreted to mean protecting LEOs at all cost while serving an ever-expanding legal machine.
"You know the score, pal! If you're not cop, you're 'little people'."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "To protect and serve"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "To protect and serve"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "To protect and serve"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Doubtlessly this new bit of information has them rubbing their hands in glee. An army of psychopaths with deadly weapons at their beck and call for legal assassination? I wouldn't be surprised if the notion made Whatever jizz his pants or something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thugs in uniform willing to shoot pets dead just for being near them, beat up people that get in their way. Did anyone expect them not to continue with the time honoured tradition of break into a home shoot first then say "were the police"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What did the higher up expected the swat to do?
Knock politely on the door, in full swat gear, and ask if they can do a sudden search of the property based on the word of a witness that hasn't proven themself?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There really is no justice in this world
The swat team that nearly blew up the kid in Atlanta was just let off by a grand jury. They too didn't find much of anything and were acting on a tip from a known felon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the judge signs the warrant, then he should be accountable if later it is found that the evidence did not support his signing it in the first place. Common sense starts creeping into things when you suddenly have accountability.
What SHOULD have happened is this: Judge; You mean to tell me that you have a drug addict in custody, that't currently high, brought up on a number of charges, that CLAIMS he got his drugs from robbing a home and you want to conduct a search? How about you go up and ring the door bell and talk to the citizen, have a conversation with them at the scene, if you have any reason at all while your there to suspect something nefarious, then fine, I'll sign and you can conduct your search, but as it stands I'll need more than the word of a fucked up drug addict before you go busting down the door.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's All Right
But it's okay. Since they can't blame Hook (dead guys can't fry) they'll blame Garrett: He'll soon be up for first degree murder.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
End the War on Common Sense
By making it a moral problem and making drug use and possession and manufacture illegal, we have accomplished two amazing feats.
1. We have caused to manifest an extremely lucrative contraband economy that has made millionaires and billionaires of numerous criminals world-wide, over the last half century, who have been using that money as bribes to buy immunity from prosecution, while hiring armies of men to carry out the process of marketing their wares unfettered.
Our Law Enforcement Agencies have militarized at tax payer's expense, to keep up with the Drug Dealing Joneses, but have, for half a century, lost every battle, while the "enemy" has continuously grown in size and power.
We call this a War, but only the public suffers casualties, while the warriors on both sides of the law reap massive monetary benefits.
2. We have put thousands of otherwise innocent young people in prison for self medicating and left them there as the playthings of murderers, rapists, robbers and worse. We call this morality.
As long as Law Enforcement wields the laws of morality against citizens who misuse medicines, this awful situation will continue to escalate as it has done since the day the War on Drugs was first declared. As the escalation of the losing war on drugs grows, so too will the atrocities and injustices suffered by the public escalate, as the police try harder to win a single battle.
End the War on Drugs and you end this entire cycle.
End the Legislation of Morality and you end all such cycles.
As a benefit, you take away the most lucrative contraband that organized crime has ever had and cut their profits by 80-90 percent overnight, and therefor also end their ability to run the government through bribery and graft.
Drug abusers need medical attention and care.
Drug users, like all other citizens, need to be protected from morality legislators.
---
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: End the War on Common Sense
IF you are a 1%-er...
YOU 99% are expecting it is something to 'protect and serve' *THEM*; wave up, sheeple, it is ALL ABOUT the benjamins...
and NOT for us, but for the 1%: the banksters would be insolvent if it wasn't for laundering drug money... the prison-industrial komplex would go wanting for young black men to torture if it wasn't for the war one (some) people... and corrupt politicians would have to actually do some legislating on our behalf if they didn't have a myriad of distracting hot button issues to deflect and distract us with...
(said hot button issues like abortion, school prayer, etc have NOTHING to do with 99% of us 99% of the time, but let's talk about that happy horseshit instead of tackling real problems that would mean going against the interest of the korporatocracy...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the US prosecutorial system, the "curveball" syndrome: telling people what they want to hear
It's surprising to see that no one pointed out that the root of the problem is the US prosecutorial system, in which suspects are heavily pressured to "name names" to get their own criminal charges reduced to a less draconian level. (and cops, under career pressure to find and convict as many people as possible, are more than happy to jump at any such 'naming of names')
People caught with drugs who refuse to rat-out their dealers or smoking buddies will end up getting the book thrown at them, while those who 'turn informant' and work with police to ensnare others get rewarded (even when they're lying). Amid the pressure to "tell cops what they want to hear," quite often they make up stories (the more colorful, the better) in the blind hope that the people they name just might have drugs on them, and therefore they could get their jail sentence cut in half as a result of a lucky guess. (and even if the cops find nothing, these faux-informers rarely hurt themselves by telling such lies)
An alarmingly high proportion of SWAT raids are approved by a judge who bases the warrant on nothing more than the say-so of a disreputable criminal who has a strong incentive to lie and make up stories.
And as a result, innocent people get SWATTED all the time.
This is a much more common problem than police shootings, and probably ranks up there with 'civil forfeiture' as the most often abused violation of a person's civil rights at the hands of police.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just goes to show that the People are far more advanced than us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wtf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I associated Snell with the german word Schnell (would probably be pronounced very similarly), which means fast.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We need to hold judges responsible
I hope the couple's lawyer sues the judge and finds him or her responsible for the murder of the guy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: We need to hold judges responsible
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fuck The SWAT Team!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
End these cocksuckers
Fuck these cocksucking fuckwits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]