Illinois Woman Files For Trademark On Phrase 'I Can't Breathe' Because This Is America Damn It

from the infringing-protest dept

Fri, Dec 19th 2014 4:07am — Timothy Geigner

You know, when you write for Techdirt, you see so many silly trademark stories that you become sort of numb to them. Even when it comes down to people, multiple people, attempting to trademark simple words and phrases because we've reached a point where we think anything can be owned with the proper government documents, you don't really react. But then you hear about a woman from your home-state thinking it's okay to trademark the phrase of a man who died at the hands of police hundreds of miles away, the phrase that was the last he was ever to utter, the phrase that has become a rallying cry for a protest designed to seriously take on the issue of police abuse, and you find that you still have those emotional nerve endings within you.

An Illinois woman is seeking to trademark the dying last words of the New York City man who gasped “I can’t breathe” while being arrested by NYPD cops for selling loose cigarettes. In a December 13 application, Catherine Crump petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the phrase for use on hoodies and t-shirts for men, women, boys, girls, and infants.

I just threw up in my mouth a little bit. The depravity here astounds me. First, even if the phrase coined by a deceased now-icon of a protest qualifies for trademark by the person who didn't utter it, the idea of it is so distasteful that I hope for that reason alone this application is denied. But the claims within the application are astounding.

The 57-year-old Crump, who lives in Waukegan, a city 40 miles north of Chicago, contends that she has been using “I can’t breathe” for commercial purposes since “at least as early” as August 18, one month after Eric Garner, 43, died following a confrontation with police on Staten Island.

Keep specifically in mind the claim that Crump claims her use in the immediate aftermath of Garner's death has always been commercial in nature. Keep it in mind both because it serves beautifully that Crump is both a horrible person and likely a liar when she says the following.

In an interview, Crump said that she had “nothing to do with the Garner family,” and had not spoken to them about her trademark bid. While claiming that her purpose for marketing “I can’t breathe” garments was not to make money, she declined to disclose what other reason there was for her trademark filing (which cost $325).

Riiight. Say whatever you like, you're milking the death of an unarmed black man from hundreds of miles away, and now attempting to lock up the ability to do so for yourself. I'd like to think that nobody else would think to do something like this, but I'd probably be wrong. Worst of all, any attempt to enforce this trademark, in the event that it was granted, would hinder the ability of the protesters to get their message across. That would bring the horror of this full circle: you locked up the dying words of a man whose death can't be protested effectively because of your doing so. Brilliant.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: catherine crump, eric garner, i can't breathe, trademark

39 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

That One Guy (profile), 19 Dec 2014 @ 2:16am

Let her patent it
And then, the very first time she tried to enforce her patent, just sit back and watch as the public and press tore her to shreds over her pathetic, disgusting attempt to cash in on someone else's death.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ninja (profile), 19 Dec 2014 @ 4:26am
  
  Re: Let her patent it
  Which would miss part of the target: if this patent ever makes through then the patent office has a huge issue and deserves a lot of backlash. The woman will already have a good dose of backlash for even trying. Tim qualified her just right, she's despicable.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 4:58am
  
  Re: Let her patent it
  Trademark, not patent.
  
  And cashing in on death and misery is an old, old tradition among the greedy segment of the population. Just watch what happens when some national tragedy happens and all the domainers -- who are some of the most vile, abusive sociopaths on the planet -- rush to register domain names so that they can cash in on the search traffic.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 6:09am
  
  Re: Let her patent it
  This is about a trademark application that will be resoundingly rejected by the USPTO. It has absolutely nothing to do with patent law, with the only relationship being that trademark and patent application examiners work within the same buildings.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - That One Guy (profile), 19 Dec 2014 @ 1:23pm
    
    Re: Re: Let her patent it
    True enough, my bad for choosing the wrong terminology, I just wish I was as sure as you that they'll reject it. Some pretty crazy stuff makes it through the system after all.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 1:26pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Let her patent it
      Is she Disney?
      Yes: Well.... I'm glad I live out of the US.
      No: No chance lady.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 19 Dec 2014 @ 4:30am

If she used the term in a line of scuba diving equipment not trying to cash in protesters anger it would probably be more effective and she wouldn't face a good load of backlash in the face.

Then again there is the fact people buy Guy Fawkes mask from semi-slave labor granting Warner (was it?) their penny for the wonders of copyrights.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 9:13am
  
  Re:
  I wouldn't use that equipment when breathing is the goal .
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ninja (profile), 19 Dec 2014 @ 9:33am
    
    Re: Re:
    That's the point, yet it would be more effective in revenue than capitalizing on the death of a man.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 4:37am

You know what? I’m gonna say something and not feel the least bit bad about it.

*ahem*

What a bitch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 5:10am

Oddly, perhaps a good thing overall
The increasing levels of outrageousness we see in such things will, perhaps now, reach a point where even more people currently just sitting on their sofas will finally conclude that this is all just really screwed up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- David, 19 Dec 2014 @ 6:06am
  
  Re: Oddly, perhaps a good thing overall
  This is the U.S.A. we are talking about. The people currently just sitting on their sofas will clamor "why didn't I think of this first?".
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 6:26am
    
    Re: Re: Oddly, perhaps a good thing overall
    This fundamentally bothers me. Most people don't think of copyright, patent, and trademark law as the stifling tools that they are, or how those laws could be used against them.
    
    They see them as lottery tickets to easy money.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 5:25am

Just imagine if one letter was changed.

I can breath.

tm me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Roc Rizzo (profile), 19 Dec 2014 @ 6:21am
  
  Re: Change a letter
  How about changing a few letters to get:
  "I can't breed?"
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 7:46am
    
    Re: Re: Change a letter
    "I can't breed?"
    
    Too late.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
NoahVail (profile), 19 Dec 2014 @ 5:29am

Since when is Intellectual Property EVER about ethics?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 6:03am

As far as i'm concerned humanity just forfeited its right to existence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ramon Creager (profile), 19 Dec 2014 @ 6:14am

Trademarks and Patents as a Lottery
People seem to be treating these as a lottery. First-come-first-served! Easy money! I didn't create this but I was clever because I was first! This does nothing at all to promote trade, and if the USPTO grants this it is playing right into this perception of lottery and easy money.

Unfortunately, given the sorry record of our government to date, I can also no longer dismiss the thought that the USPTO will be urged to grant this as a political move to throw a monkey wrench into the protests.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- David, 19 Dec 2014 @ 7:43am
  
  Re: Trademarks and Patents as a Lottery
  That's not the definition of a lottery but of a Ponzi scheme.
  
  Of course, it also is the embodiment of the original American Dream: arrive on a wide plane, put up fences, declare yourself the rightful owner and shoot the people who had already been "trespassing" on your land long before you ever set foot to it. Do that while being fully supported/backed-up by a "rightful government" willing to defend your "rights" with heavy artillery.
  
  This "stake your claim" mentality is pervading the areas of "Intellectual Property": the important thing is not being the first in some well-travelled place. The important thing is being the first who chases everybody else off at gunpoint.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 6:14am

Intellectual Property
I can’t breathe! I'm being suffocated by intellectual property laws!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 6:16am

I say let her have it. Seriously. Then the first time she tries to make restrictive use of it, we can sit back and enjoy the resultant severe social justice which will undoubtedly occur.

Stupidity should be painful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 7:20am

Sadly I can see the usual trolls cheering this bitch on for her decision to promote the arts and sciences, or something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John85851 (profile), 19 Dec 2014 @ 7:20am

Can common phrases by trademarked?
This is probably a rhetorical question, but since when can common phrases be trademarked? I can understand phrases used as slogans like "I'm lovin it" or "You're in good hands", but how is anyone able to secure a trademark on something that people are already using?

The bigger problem is that the people at the trademark office may be so overworked that they simply rubber-stamp this and let it go through without realizing the consquences.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blaine (profile), 19 Dec 2014 @ 8:19am

Maybe she knows exactly what she's doing
Maybe it's truly not about the money.

Maybe she actually wants to hinder the protests in anyway she can.

It's hard to get a movement like that rolling, a couple little speed bumps here and there and it stumbles and fades away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 8:42am

Trademark Pending
"I was killed by New York cops and all I got was this crummy copyright injunction."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kaega (profile), 19 Dec 2014 @ 8:50am

Counter Claim
I used this phrase back in 1994 when I had an asthma attack. Sorry lady.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 9:08am
  
  Re: Counter Claim
  People have been using the phrase for hundreds of years: I can't breathe n-gram results.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ruth Easley, 19 Dec 2014 @ 9:16am

Your Opinion
My husband once told me an opinion was like an asshole, EEVERYBODY HAS 1. tHAT'S WHAT i THINK OF YOUR COMMENTARY.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ruth Easley, 19 Dec 2014 @ 9:16am

Your Opinion
My husband once told me an opinion was like an asshole, EEVERYBODY HAS 1. tHAT'S WHAT i THINK OF YOUR COMMENTARY.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 4:15pm
  
  Re: Your Opinion
  I think your husband married an opinion.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 9:18am

Catherine Crump her last name by definition says it all http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/crump

she totally self crumped in this endeavor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TGOET, 19 Dec 2014 @ 10:53am

Contact info
A quick search of the trademark database yields her phone and email. You can tell her directly how you feel.

http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=tess&state=4809:joqw0g.1.1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jim G., 19 Dec 2014 @ 2:07pm
  
  Re: Contact info
  Sure, she's a jerk, who has already received bad publicity and will fail in her trademark attempt. Harassing her with calls and email is also being a jerk. Encouraging others to harass her is also being a jerk.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Eldakka (profile), 20 Dec 2014 @ 2:36pm
  
  Re: Contact info
  Rather than directly contacting and harassing her, while not file an Notice of Opposition with the USPTO at http://estta.uspto.gov/filing-type.jsp (select "Notice of Opposition" from the drop down near the bottom of the page under the "File a new proceeding" heading).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 2:10pm

57-year-old Crump, is either a racist or a greedy person seeking to profit off an innocent person's death. Either way, that makes her a horrible person.

This is yet another example of horrible people flocking towards Intellectual Privilege monopolies. Trying to create a permission based society.

You can't protest with your "I can't breathe shirt", unless you bought it from me, Catherine Crump. Your entire protest movement is infringing on my Intellectual Privilege.

This is what a permission based societies looks like.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zonker, 19 Dec 2014 @ 2:19pm

I'm almost surprised that she didn't include tobacco products for coverage under that trademark application.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2014 @ 4:27pm

Could Crump be intentionally sacrificing her reputation for the greater good? Imagine that she gets the TM, and then starts making infringement claims left and right. Local police (and maybe federal alphabet agencies) start raiding print shops and arresting street vendors all over the country, including those who are giving away materials during protests and demonstrations. This could only help cast LEAs in an even worse light, and inflame the outrage directed at them...

Or am I giving her too much credit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kronomex, 21 Dec 2014 @ 2:52pm

"While claiming that her purpose for marketing “I can’t breathe” garments was not to make money..." What a vile and repulsive person!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]