Anti-Piracy Group So Desperate To Go After Popcorn Time That It Threatens A Blog Software Maker
from the no,-it-doesn't-make-any-sense dept
We've seen, over the years, how copyright holders and anti-piracy organizations have continually moved up and down the stack in trying to shut off access to things they don't like. They've sued users for sharing, as well as companies and individuals who build tools that can be used for infringement, of course. Those were the obvious ones. But, lately, they've been targeting hosting providers, registrars, ISPs and ad networks as well. And, apparently, now some are so desperate that they're going after totally unrelated software providers. At least that appears to be the case in Greece, where the Greek Society for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AEPI), sent an angry threat letter to John O'Nolan, who created Ghost, an open source blogging system. Why go after Ghost? Well, apparently because one of the more popular forks of the Popcorn Time streaming system has a blog that uses Ghost. Ghost doesn't host it. Popcorn Time is just using its software. It would take one hell of a ridiculous interpretation of secondary liability to put any liability on Ghost. It would be like going after BIC because someone at Napster wrote notes using one of their pens. But such is the ridiculous state of the anti-piracy world today, where such moves seem sensible.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blog, copyright, ghost, greece, john o'nolan, popcorn time, takedowns
Companies: aepi
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
An anti-piracy crusader isn't known for their eloquent study of language, but rather the ability to destroy it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
SOPA. PIPA. PROTECT-IP. DMCA.
It's everyone else's job to stop piracy. No matter how far removed everyone else is from the actual piracy -- it is still their job to fix it.
They just can't seem to go after the direct infringer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
In all fairness, they did sort of try that earlier on. At which point they discovered that locating the right person to go after is hard, generates a lot of bad publicity, isn't very efficient, and generates a bunch of legal fees for very little in return seeing as the people they're going after usually don't have much money. So they stopped doing that to focus on sites and services instead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Look at their reaction to the cassette tape, VCRs, and DATs. What they're doing on the internet is just continuing their long tradition harming innocent bystanders in as attempt to maximize revenue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They could, you know, be as smart as Netflix and see it as a competitor then strive to offer better services. We already saw an unicorn with Wheeler, why not dream?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they can find some way to sue your dead great-great-great-grandmother for a couple of bucks, they wouldn't hesitate to do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I disagree. I think what they actually care about is establishing legal precedents in their favor. That way the money keeps flowing in with minimal effort on their part.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This company is clearly taking money right out of the pockets of Patrick Swayze, Demi Moore, and Whoopi Goldberg.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Baby steps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Baby steps
You darned "free-willers" make me sick - free will is a myth derived from our limited, human perceptions. You go after God for this one, because He is the who predestined it all - can't be any more liable than THAT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anti- piracy
"We've seen, over the years, how copyright holders and Privateer organizations have continually moved up and down the stack in trying to shut off access to things they don't like."
Sounds better and is more accurate I think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Anti- piracy
This term has always bothered me since that is not at all what they are, what they really are, are Privateers State sanctioned pirates used to interdict enemies commerce.
They're really pro-piracy, because if piracy ceased to exist, they would be out of a job. Eliminating piracy is the last thing they would want to do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even worse
So it's even worse than chasing the maker of undeniably legitimate software for an unrelated person's use of that software. The blog in question isn't even arguably violating copyright in the first place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Even worse
They want to hold someone liable for making software that someone else uses to write about a service that other people use in a way that could violate copyright. Almost makes your head spin.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
any way that these bloody industries can go, anything they can do to prevent having to join the digital age, they will try! it costs a whole hell of a lot more to keep spending out but getting nothing in, so when will there be this necessary change of mind?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Who's that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually, this is standard practice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Actually, this is standard practice
In the case of the maker of blog software, there isn't even that much of a connection, though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Actually, this is standard practice
Maybe if they sued the manufacturer of the trucks that were used to pour the runway the airplane took off from...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems straightforward
1. Everyone uses Microsoft Windows. (Well, not everyone, but close.)
2. That means Microsoft Windows is used by murderers, druggies, robbers, politicians, rapists, and investment banks.
3. So Microsoft is responsible for all that crime!
No wonder we have so much crime! We need to lock up Microsoft!
Or, on the other hand, we could recognize the idea that software companies are responsible for how the users employ their software as: The. Dumbest. Idea. Ever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder if anyone has ever pointed out to the courts & legislators that these groups have no actual understanding of the technology they are constantly blaming for everything.
How much of courts time is wasted on these idiotic claims that have no good faith basis to be brought?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It would be a waste of time to do so, because more often than not, the courts and legislators don't understand the tech either, and have absolutely no interest in doing so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I ♥ Pirate Bay
If you don't like piracy of Music, Games, or Movies, Please keep them all to yourself do something like.
. Body search everyone who enters the theater even playing your copyrighted movie for (Cellphones, or anything that can record.)
. Make people sign a real life document legally binding contract before going inside.
Why do you honestly think Hackers go after companies like Sony, I wont say I support illegal crimes, but my honest opinion some of these companies deserve what they get for being jerks to the consumers, and I am glad someone who had the skills actually stood up for George Hotz, and being against piracy, when I buy my PS3, PS4, Any hardware I will do what I please with it unless you make me sign a legally binding contract at the time of the purchase you have no right to tell me I can't modify my hardware which I legally can do what I want with.
Thanks, Keep Torrents, and Internet streaming alive, and not like I am a free-loader of stuff either I have thousands of dollars worth of digital content purchased, but I am not running out to buy $50 DVD's or Blu Ray when its the digital age no one uses that crap anymore, and no one wants to pay $5 or $8 Plus Tax on the Time Warner Cable Bill or whatever for an on demand movie for one night I don't, now perhaps if I was streaming the movie to all my friends on the internet as well maybe like on sync tube.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]