Separate And Unequal: Gen. Petraeus Facing Mild Wrist Slap For Leaking Eight Books Full Of Classified Info To His Mistress
from the granted-Most-Favored-Leaker-status dept
The administration still wants to punish whistleblowers and leakers, but only if it can do it with logic borrowed from Animal Farm. When it comes to prosecution, some leakers are more equal than others.
John Kiriakou -- who exposed a single CIA operative's name while exposing its waterboarding tactics -- spent more time in jail than former CIA director Leon Panetta, who has spent (at last count) a grand total of 0 days locked up for leaking tons of classified info to Zero Dark Thirty's screenwriter, Mark Boal.
Of course, some leaks just aren't leaks, at least not according to the government. Kiriakou's were wrong. Panetta's were right. And Kiriakou spent three years in prison for a lesser "crime."
Thomas Drake faced a potential 35-year sentence for his exposure of wasteful NSA spending. The government's case against him self-imploded, however, resulting in a guilty plea to a misdemeanor and no jail time.
General Petraeus, who leaked classified information to his mistress, is in line to receive the lightest of wrist slaps for his indiscretion: two years probation and a $40,000 fine. The lightness of the sentence suggested by government prosecutors belies the extent of Petraeus' wrongdoing.
What he handed over to his mistress far surpasses anything the above whistleblowers "leaked."
While he was commander of coalition forces in Afghanistan, Petraeus “maintained bound, five-by-eight inch notebooks that contained his daily schedule and classified and unclassified notes he took during official meetings, conferences and briefings,” the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of North Carolina writes in a statement of fact regarding the case...On top of that, he lied to the government about these books, first in the form of a sworn statement...
All eight books “collectively contained classified information regarding the identifies of covert officers, war strategy, intelligence capabilities and mechanisms, diplomatic discussions, quotes and deliberative discussions from high-level National Security Council meetings… and discussions with the president of the United States.”
The books also contained “national defense information, including top secret/SCI and code word information,” according to the court papers. In other words: These weren’t just ordinary secrets. This was highly, highly classified material.
Petreaus retained those Black Books after he signed his debriefing agreement upon leaving DOD, in which he attested “I give my assurance that there is no classified material in my possession, custody, or control at this time.” He kept those Black Books in an unlocked desk drawer.And again to investigating FBI agents.
In an interview on October 26, 2012, he told the FBI:Simply lying to the FBI has consequences far greater than those Petraeus will face. But that's because he's General Petraeus and you're not -- as 22-year-old Kirstie Barratt recently discovered.
(a) he had never provided any classified information to his biographer, and (b) he had never facilitated the provision of classified information to his biographer.
United States Attorney Bill Nettles stated today that Kirstie Elaine Philome Barratt, age 22, of Fort Mill, South Carolina was sentenced to 24 months’ imprisonment today after earlier pleading guilty to making a false statement to a federal agent, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001. United States District Judge Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. imposed the term of imprisonment, which will be followed by a 3 year term of supervised release. In October, Barratt plead straight up to the charge without a plea agreement. Barratt also may face deportation as a result of her guilty plea. During the sentencing hearing, Judge Anderson granted the government’s motion for an upward departure from the federal guidelines sentencing range of 0 to 6 months, noting that this was a “rare” case and that Barratt “knowingly placed a law enforcement officer’s life in jeopardy” by her false statement.Petraeus was a trusted member of the military and the CIA. And he turned over eight books worth of classified info to his biographer/mistress just because she asked. But because he's part of the administration's arbitrarily-selected "in crowd," and because he didn't embarrass the government as much as he embarrassed himself, he's facing a sentence of nearly nothing. His suggested punishment will have zero effect on his current position at a top equity firm and his life will suffer none of the disruptions Kiriakou and Drake experienced. He'll be $40,000 poorer -- and with "deterrents" like these being deployed -- none the wiser.
What's most disgusting about Petraeus' cakewalk of a proposed sentence is that he himself took a hypocritical hardline stance on leaking after Kiriakou's sentencing.
When John Kiriakou pled guilty on October 23, 2012 to crimes having to do with sharing a single covert officer’s identity just days before Petraeus would lie to the FBI about sharing, among other things, numerous covert officers’ identities with his mistress, Petraeus sent out a memo to the CIA stating,Yeah. "Oaths matter." Except when you're the one uttering them, right? Apparently, a "requisite degree of secrecy" means stashing eight books full of classified info in an unlocked desk drawer and handing them out to your clandestine SO in hopes of keeping your
"Oaths do matter, and there are indeed consequences for those who believe they are above the laws that protect our fellow officers and enable American intelligence agencies to operate with the requisite degree of secrecy."
This administration is severely hypocritical, but seemingly no more so than in its treatment of whistleblowers. There are those who will be persecuted and punished and those whose similar indiscretions will be waved away by government prosecutors. The problem is: you may not know which of these faces of the administration you'll be facing when you decide to start blowing the whistle. Chances are -- given this administration's track record -- it will be the vindictive, angry administration that continually hopes to "send a message" with each new whistleblower/leaker prosecuted.
Those on the inside of the military/industrial/surveillance supercomplex -- who leak under the name of "anonymous official" to aid filmmakers, deploy talking points or steer narratives -- will never see this side of the two-faced administration. Their leaks are more equal than others.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cia, classified information, david petraeus, doj, fbi, john kiriakou, leaking, lying, punishment, thomas drake, wrist slap
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Only a blind idiot would believe this even after seeing countless examples of it being bullshit.
But dont worry, history repeats itself and they are really pushing for it these days...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Maybe it is the hypocrisy, or maybe the lack of media questioning of obvious bullshit. Nah, that cant be it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well, she was his mistress
That's something one can sympathize with and forgive.
In contrast, Snowden, Kiriakou et al committed their crimes because of possessing strong morals and character, and love of and belief in their country.
That's unforgivable and has no place in the U.S. government. They must be rooted out and made an example of. It took the government literally centuries to stamp out the treacherous teachings of Washington, Jefferson, Madison and their revolutionary ilk.
This poison needs to be eradicated before it spreads again. Fortunately, it's well under control.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Difference between what you believe and what you know...
This highlights the difference between those who believe they are above the law, and those who know they are.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
must
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
This article is the best example about what hacks me off about my government today. The gov't is so much about their secrets. They have managed to create a world about themselves where they can make everything a secret, and claim the release of even the smallest "secret" the gravest of crimes.
Then this joker comes around and spills a bunch of them. If the secrets are really so damn important that legal FOIA requests for them drown in redactor's ink, then why does a release of this scope merit so little punishment? They should really drop the facade and admit that the secrets have nothing to do with the information, and everthing to do with the power it lets them have over others, including the citizens and Constitution they swear to protect.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
goshies, i'm certain *that* can't be the case...
(when you are being threatened by goons of the state, it helps if you can (credibly) threaten back; otherwise you are going to be steamrolled flatter than a fritter...)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Really, totally different scale here. Cleaning up after Petraeus is going to be a lot easier than cleaning up after Snowden.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Widespread abuses, no answers
Profligate misconduct by prosecutors gives an idea of the scale of the problem. Judges just don't have the tools to bring prosecutors in line, and they need a dysfunctional congress to help repair the crumbling justice system.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Difference between what you believe and what you know...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"The administration's arbitrarily-selected 'in crowd'"
During the cold war it was a common belief that women were useless in tradecraft, despite the countless stories that trickled from WWII covert operations (and, when they crossed Ian Flemming, served as inspiration for Mrs. Moneypenny.) The Soviets oddly had the same attitude because...boobs, I guess.
And yet, the KGB was famous for their sparrows, whether as the foil in a honey trap or if a long-term relationship could be established (many were), a pillow-talk source in perpetuity. In those cases, the honey trap often came later when the affair was losing its passion.
(While the CIA preferred to focus more on techy electronic surveillance solutions, don't think we didn't have our seductresses and honey traps. They were difficult to insert and exfiltrate behind the iron curtain, but lonely sailors and neutral ports.)
So, it's hard for me to imagine a freaking general being so incautious. Coming from an era of nuclear threats this is positively unthinkable.
Either this slap-on-the-wrist is going to be followed by a terrible medical onset six months from now (heart attacks are a favorite) or our administration is really just that incompetent. And they will likely underestimate partisan activity.
Ugh.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
speaking of leaks ...
It was the perfect circlejerk. When caught, Libby would fall on his sword to protect the vice president, who would likewise protect the president, who as the only person in the country with the power to grant clemency or pardon Libby -- promptly did so the moment Libby's appeals had run out (after insisting for months that he would absolutely not interfere with the course of justice). So once again, a crime had been committed, the perpetrators were caught -- yet no one went to jail.
Many of us (naïvely) believed Obama's promises that he would cancel the Bush administation's get-out-of-jail-free cards and actually start prosecuting at least some of the many Bush-era lawbreakers, but it eventually became obvious that Obama and Bush were just two sides of the same coin, equally corrupt and self-serving.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You ever wonder why the team that killed Osama bin laden all died together. Mostly because their whereabouts and info was leaked for political gain by Obama.
Obama got 30 people killed by leaking information on purpose so he could score political points. Do you really expect his administration to penalize anyone that isn't a little person?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Difference between what you believe and what you know...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
um...[Citation Needed]
If you're referring to the Chinook shootdown in 2011 in which thirty Americans died including fifteen members of Seal Team Six, those weren't the same guys, being part of Gold Squadron. Red Squadron carried out Neptune Spear.
We're certainly in an age when such a thing could happen, where the position of a transport could be leaked to the enemy because we wanted its passengers annihilated, but the ducks don't seem to line just right in this case.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Difference between what you believe and what you know...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
So that means it's OK?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Difference between what you believe and what you know...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
But admitting that would undermine that power.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: um...[Citation Needed]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I'd like more details on that claim, too...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: um...[Citation Needed]
Meanwhile, on the Dem side, they're waving pom poms and cheering for him. The only objective coverage I get of what the White House is actually up to is right here on Techdirt.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: um...[Citation Needed]
I wouldn't say that. During the midterms hardly anyone wanted Obama to campaign for them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
As much as I'd like to have more optimism for the human species...
In short, he's got about the same integrity of any other 21st century US elected representative...which is a crying shame.
After a campaign about hope and change (e.g. please undo all the terrible things Bush did), we got damn little in the way of actual reform. And with two candidates in a row who completely betrayed their identities as candidates (Remember Bush the Compassionate Conservative?) I know that I can't expect anything good from the next one, no matter how they behave when trying to win votes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: As much as I'd like to have more optimism for the human species...
[ link to this | view in thread ]