Michigan Attorney General Slaps Reporter With Bogus Subpoenas For Doing Her Job
from the abuse-of-power dept
Why is it always the state Attorneys General? Time and time again we see examples of state AGs who seem to think they're above the law and can abuse their position to attack those they dislike. The latest? Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette. Apparently, he was none too happy that Huffington Post reporter Dana Liebelson was investigating juvenile prison conditions in the state, and had a representative from his office follow her for two hours across the state to slap her with two separate, but equally questionable, subpoenas, demanding all of her notes:And she wasn't the only one. Another report notes that Schuette also sent a subpoena to Michigan Radio, demanding its recording of a prisoner/attorney interview.
Of course, after Liebelson's story started getting social media and press attention, Schuette's office quickly backed down, and promised to rescind the subpoenas. The excuse given by his office, to MLive, is absolutely ridiculous:
A spokesperson for Schuette, responding to a request for comment, issued a statement indicating a civil service attorney had been "doing the department's job of defending the state" from lawsuits.That makes no sense at all. Defending the state from lawsuits should never involve sending reporters subpoenas demanding all of their notes. It's a clear intimidation technique that violates all basic concepts of a free and open press.
The attorney "followed a common legal procedure" of subpoenaing information from individuals "entering Michigan prisons to speak to prisoners who are suing state taxpayers," said spokesperson Andrea Bitely.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bill schuette, dana liebelson, journalism, michigan, prisons, subpoenas
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
USA - formally a two-class country.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My experiance...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
But this is not enough, it doesn't stop a person that gets the job from abusing it, getting rich and walking away with nothing. We need real punishment like fines, stripping him off the position, jail time. Getting a bunch of people pissed off on you is worth it's weight in cash. Jail time and cash extraction would make people think twice before abusing their power.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Just one of a string of questionable actions from him
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
(Takes off pedantic hat)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Reporters should be using an online service like Dropbox for situations like this, so that they can ask for notes all day long, the reporters lose nothing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You're thinking about this all wrong...
That's gotta be it!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Nonetheless, I really think it is a very interesting question!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
It's not? I honestly thought that the major point of the request was to suppress the notes. Perhaps I've become too cynical, but I think that's a reasonable supposition.
"They want them turned over so that they can get an idea of where the story will be headed"
If I were a reporter in that situation, I'd very likely make a lot of notes that are just nonsense things that I made up on the fly. I'd know which notes were real and which were lies, but nobody else could be sure. I think that it would be truly hilarious to see what the AG would do with such a jumble.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Recourse is needed!
http://blog.simplejustice.us/2015/03/10/other-peoples-solutions/
That part about "absolute immunity" links to a Huffington post article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/01/prosecutorial-misconduct-new-orleans-louisiana_n_35 29891.html
But what I want to say is that the constitution needs to be amended so that this 'absolute immunity' is removed and some reasonable recourse for prosecutorial misconduct is available for anyone feeling the need, in such a way that the Supreme Court cannot stick their noses in it again.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
This bugs me about our reporters. It seems to me they should be employing socratic irony when writing about a story like this.
There should be a stream of questions from all reporters making it unavoidable: "What punishment will the AG receive for abusing their power in this manner?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Consigliere Schuette would be exiled back to the Old Country.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
1. Although the Supreme Court has roundly rejected, prior restraint, lower courts still grant it from time to time, especially when it's requested by officials within the same criminal justice system.
2. Even if they didn't get out ahead of it, it would allow them to know what information the reporter thought important enough to write down and would allow them time to prepare a defensive response before the story was published.
Also your suggestion of what you would do is a little bit like Monday morning quarterbacking. The reporter likely had no idea that they would subpoena the notes beforehand - after all they granted her access to the prisons in the first place. Why would she suspect that such measures would be necessary? After it happens is a little late for such counter measures.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
well, through voter roll scrubs, etc, The They (tm) don't have to... in fact, i do NOT 'trust' our UNAUDITABLE computer-based voting systems, per-i-od...
i don't think we can vote our way out of this mess; hasn't worked so far, and people been trying a long time and going backwards for their trouble...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I can't speak for why it's always an Attorney General
Currently, he is fighting gay marriage becoming legal in this state, because "the voters have spoken" (over ten years ago).
He is also currently fighting legal medical marijuana in the state, even though the voters have spoken in favor of it, because he doesn't like it.
He's an embarrassment to many of us in the mitten.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Encrypt it
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
so, no pub, no story, no sheeple to bleat...
it is happening right in front of us, kampers...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I can't speak for why it's always an Attorney General
Makes it pretty clear he doesn't care what those in his state actually want, he's only interested in using them as an excuse to do something when it's convenient.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Play nice
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh.
Oh and nothing bad can happen because he is immune to the laws others are bound by?
Perhaps it is time to demand the system be changed and make sure that EVERYONE faces the same laws & punishments.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]