Texas Can't Get Its Innovation Act Together: Fails To Pass Bills To Let Tesla & Uber Provide Service
from the corruption-index dept
Last year, we wrote about two key "corruption indicators" in city and state governments: they ban direct sales models to block Tesla from competing with traditional car companies and they ban Uber/Lyft style car hailing services to protect local taxi incumbents.It appears that Texas is really trying to wave its anti-innovation flag as strongly as possible as the legislature down there failed to move forward on two key bills that would have made it possible for Tesla to do direct sales in Texas... and to stop local cities from blocking Uber & Lyft to favor taxi incumbents.
A Texas House deadline has come and gone, killing many top-priority bills for both parties — among them one that would allow Tesla-backed direct car sales and another to regulate ride-hailing companies. Midnight Thursday was the last chance for House bills to win initial, full-chamber approval. Since any proposal can be tacked onto other bills as amendments, no measure is completely dead until the legislative session ends June 1. But even with such resurrections, actually becoming state law now gets far tougher.And, of course, this comes just after the FTC warned Michigan for its blocking of direct sales of cars like Tesla.
The failure to allow direct sales is a much bigger deal than the car hailing stuff, but both are bad. And the response from Texas politicians is really quite disgusting:
Rep. Senfronia Thompson — one of the House's most senior members currently serving her 20th term — said it was the company's own fault that the bill didn't pass.Really? In what world is it considered appropriate to force an innovative company that wants to go direct to consumers to first "sit down" with the gatekeepers that are trying to block them? "I can appreciate Amazon wanting to sell books to people, but I think it would have been wiser if Mr. Amazon had sat down with retail store builders first." "I can appreciate YouTube wanting to let anyone upload videos, but I think it would have been wiser if Mr. YouTube had sat down with TV producers first."
"I can appreciate Tesla wanting to sell cars, but I think it would have been wiser if Mr. Tesla had sat down with the car dealers first," she said.
That's not how innovation works. At all. And thus, we can cross Texas off the list of innovative states.
The law around car hailing is not quite as big of a deal, but without the new Texas law, various cities within Texas can still create their own rules that would effectively make it impossible for such services to operate there. There are states that create spaces for innovation -- and then there are those that protect incumbents. Texas appears to be making it clear that it's the latter. If I were a startup in Austin, I might consider finding somewhere else to operate.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: car hailing, corruption, direct sales, electric cars, regulations, ride sharing, senfronia thompson, texas
Companies: lyft, tesla, uber
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Too good to pass up
"I can appreciate Emile Berliner wanting to sell records, but I think it would have been wiser if Mr. Berliner had sat down with the orchestral musicians first," she said.
"I can appreciate Karl Benz wanting to sell automobiles, but I think it would have been wiser if Mr. Benz had sat down with the horse-drawn buggy makers first," she said.
"I can appreciate the movie industry wanting to sell films, but I think it would have been wiser if Mr. Movie Maker had sat down with the live theater companies first," she said.
"I can appreciate Fred W. Wolf wanting to sell refrigerators, but I think it would have been wiser if Mr. Wolf had sat down with the ice sellers first," she said.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Also, hasn't Mr. Tesla died a while ago?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Too good to pass up
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Err Innovation?
I'm not seeing the innovation,ah I had to think I make a cell phone that becomes obsolete every 2 yrs INNOVATION ! love me!
They shouldn't be blocked from operating but to call either company innovative is massively overstating the reality
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Err Innovation?
innovation: "a new idea, more effective device or process"
Both companies are doing stuff that seems to fit the definition of the word as I know it. What definition are you using?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So, she's so ignorant of the company that she doesn't even know that Elon Musk and Nicola Tesla are two different people, one of whom has been dead for 70 years, but believe her she's an expert on what their business model should be and who they should emulate? Why does that not surprise me?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Err Innovation?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
OK, so I'm piling on
"I can appreciate wanting to sell Bibles, but I think it would have been wiser if Mr. Gutenberg had sat down with God first."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Err Innovation?
I mean, surely you have so please point other examples aside from Tesla and Uber/Lyft.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: OK, so I'm piling on
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bought and Paid For
http://www.houstoniamag.com/eat-and-drink/gastronaut/articles/houston-march-2015
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jus' 1 queschun f'r yall
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tesla Should Move To Canada
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Err Innovation?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: OK, so I'm piling on
[ link to this | view in thread ]
As a Texan
Repukes are just like Demtards, one is worth barf and the other is a tard, and we all still elect them into office. Maybe that makes the electorate a bunch of puketards?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Too good to pass up
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Jus' 1 queschun f'r yall
But that's not to say that this doesn't make me sick that we can't get our Reps to pull their heads out of their asses...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Too good to pass up
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I think that if you read through the archives of this site, you'll find that the stance tends to be less black-and-white than that. It's more along the lines of "government can be a force for good and ill, and we prefer the good."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Err Innovation?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Err Innovation?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
We agree on that. I do believe that with most government interference in the marketplace the law of unintended consequences rears it's ugly head. The road to hell is, after all, paved with good intentions.
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/UnintendedConsequences.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]