Insanity Rules In Ireland: Media Ordered Not To Report On Parliamentary Speech
from the streisand-goes-to-ireland dept
Over in Ireland, it appears that some are not all that familiar with the Streisand Effect. Yesterday, an Irish member of Parliament, Catherine Murphy, gave a speech in which she detailed some charges against an Irish media tycoon, Denis O’Brien, claiming that the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation, was giving him ridiculously favorable terms on bank loans. Here's the main chunk of it:I have no doubt that the special liquidator is more than capable of carrying out such a review, but his direct involvement in the sale process, his relationship with the eventual purchaser of Siteserv and his current actions in the High Court in supporting Mr. Denis O'Brien against RTE place him in a position where there is, at the very least, a perceived if not an actual conflict of interest. The review is not confined to Siteserv, but that is the transaction that prompted a review in the first instance. I worry about the transactions that have been excluded from the review given what that we now know that in the final months before prom night, the relationship between the Department and IBRC had completely broken down. If deals were being done without the knowledge or input of the Minister, we must know what those were.Now, you may notice that Murphy mentions that O'Brien is trying to get an injunction to stop that information from being made public. Apparently, that even extends to what is said in Parliament -- because O'Brien then successfully got an injunction barring the Irish media from reporting on this. He apparently claimed that this was all a "breach of his privacy rights."
We are now aware, for example, that the former CEO of IBRC made verbal agreements with Denis O'Brien to allow him to extend the terms of his already expired loans. We also know that the verbal agreement was never escalated to the credit committee for approval. I am led to believe and would welcome clarification by the Minister that the rates applicable to the extension were extremely favourable. I understand that Mr. O'Brien was enjoying a rate of approximately 1.25% when IBRC could, and arguably should, have been charging 7.5%. Given that we are talking about outstanding sums of upwards of €500 million, the interest rate applied is not an insignificant issue for the public interest. We also know that Denis O'Brien felt confident enough in his dealings with IBRC that he could write to Kieran Wallace, the special liquidator, to demand that the same favourable terms extended to him by way of a verbal agreement be continued. We now have Kieran Wallace, who has been appointed by the Government to conduct the IBRC review, joining with IBRC and Denis O'Brien in the High Court to seek to injunct the information I have outlined from coming into the public domain. Surely, that alone represents a conflict.
In documents released to me under freedom of information, the Minister, his officials, the Central Bank and even the troika acknowledge that IBRC - the former Anglo Irish Bank - is no ordinary bank and that there is a significant public interest as the bank was fully nationalised and was in wind-down mode. They all accept that this is the people's money we are dealing with and that there can be no dispute regarding the public interest in this.
The three-day injunction hearing was told Mr O’Brien wanted to restrain publication of the broadcast report because it breached his privacy rights and would cause him incalculable commercial damage.Apparently a bunch of people in Ireland still haven't heard about the Streisand Effect. Because now the story is blowing up everywhere. Oh, and if you're interested, you can even see the speech here:
IBRC, which brought a separate but related application before the court, supported his case.
And it does seem to be backfiring in Ireland as well. While such injunctions are all too common in Ireland (and nearby in the UK, for that matter), the fact that it's flat out censoring a Parliamentary speech appears to have broken new ground that has a lot of people up in arms:
But the extension of the terms of that injunction to cover a parliamentary speech has shocked the Irish media community, not to mention the public.Whatever short term benefit O'Brien and his lawyers thought they were getting with this injunction, it appears not to have worked very well.
It had extraordinary effects. For example, RTÉ reporter Philip Boucher Hayes tweeted yesterday afternoon that the Drivetime show was about to play Murphy’s speech, but the piece was not broadcast and his tweet was later deleted.
RTÉ news bulletins mentioned that Murphy had spoken but didn’t quote what she had said or play clips. Online reports quoting Murphy were removed, stating only that Murphy had spoken about O’Brien. Similarly, the Irish Times’s report was silent on what Murphy said but it did provide a link to her speech on the Oireachtas site. (Evidently - hat tip: Padraig Reidy - the Irish Times did initially report her words).
The report on the matter by Ireland’s best-selling daily newspaper, the Irish Independent, said: “Mr O’Brien successfully stopped RTÉ from broadcasting the details which Ms Murphy raised in the Dá il”.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: catherine murphy, denis o'brien, free press, free speech, injunction, parliament, streisand effect
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't worry, it will work
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For those new here, "Streisand Effect" is Masnick's only claim to fame.
Masnick's putting that in so often is NOT an inside joke, not intentional self-parody, he's actually proud of that simple little quip from last century. But does get more hilarious to those who see through Masnick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For those new here, "Streisand Effect" is Masnick's only claim to fame.
Masnick's putting that in so often is NOT an inside joke, not intentional self-parody, he's actually proud of that simple little quip from last century. But does get more hilarious to those who see through Masnick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For those new here,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Enough sour grapes to start a whinery
What have you done that's of note, other than display enough sour grapes to start a whinery using someone else's screen name, either to try and lend some legitimacy to your ranting, or hide your identity behind someone else's in hopes that people won't realize who you are?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Enough sour grapes to start a whinery
That's pretty funny. Nice shot. I really wonder how stupid his/her employer is for he/she to get away with pathetic attempts like this and still remain on the payroll.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Enough sour grapes to start a whinery
It's hilarious that on this site which rails at control by copyright and trademark, that one can't even use a screen name without being accused of infringing proprietary right to four characters.
This probably has come up before. Did you back anyone previously objecting to "their" screen name being used by others?
GOTCHA, and QED.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Enough sour grapes to start a whinery
Wait. Where did anyone accuse you of "infringing proprietary right to four characters."?
Hell, I've even given you permission to use mine a couple of years ago.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130227/14231422143/comcast-we-wont-terminate-your-account-un der-six-strikes-well-just-block-every-single-website.shtml#c1393
This probably has come up before. Did you back anyone previously objecting to "their" screen name being used by others?
It has come up before and you claimed it was (incorrectly of course) "fraud". Have you come to your senses nowadays or are you just a hypocrite?
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130227/14231422143/comcast-we-wont-terminate-your-acco unt-under-six-strikes-well-just-block-every-single-website.shtml#c1562
GOTCHA, and QED.
Right back at ya.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Enough sour grapes to start a whinery
Is someone on here actually blocking anyone from using a screen name?
Is anyone accusing anyone of infringing proprietary rights?
What *I* see is someone being rather rude and inconsiderate, and others calling them on it. Freedom of speech (and freedom to ignore) and all that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Enough sour grapes to start a whinery
I thought your doing it was stupid, not infringing. Please go right ahead and look as stupid as you wish.
Are you really as thick headed as you look or are you just paid to look that way? Either way, no skin off my ass. I'm just curious trying to understand a strange phenomenon. And, I wish I could get in on the action. Your paymaster must be an intellectual imbecile. Good for you for reeling the idiot in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Off topic...
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/29/congress-nsa-website-block-patriot-act
This is the real news of the day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Off topic...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Off topic...
Really? The "blackout" isn't really that interesting on its own. We have another story on the sunset coming out in a bit. But covering just the blackout? Eh...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Off topic...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Off topic...
Why, yes you should, especially if it would make you happy and stop you from being a twat waddle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Off topic...
None of the email scandal you keep going on about is interesting either... but that never stopped you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Off topic...
NSA still wants the power to illegally snoop? No surprise there. Congress still don't know what they're doing wrt ignoring the 4th amendment? Same old, ... McConnell is still stooging for the police state surveillance aparatus? Wake me up when anything changes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Recursive Streisand
Get an injunction against talking about the injunction against talking about the charges.
Get an injunction against talking about the injunction against talking about the injunction against talking about the charges.
Continue until the legal system collapses under the weight of the injunctions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sequence of events
O Brien's lawyers say the injunction pre-empted the reporting of comments made under privilege. However, the injunction's judgement hasn't been issued yet, so we don't know.
Also, the *official* report of the comments is privileged under the constitution, and they are available on the official record's website: http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail201505280002 7
Whatever about the Streisand Effect, his lawyers need to be sacked for letting him think this information can be made unknown again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I Thought Under The Westminster System, Parliamentary Speech Was Protected
Think of it as an extra “check and balance”.
Not sure why this doesn’t apply in Ireland...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I Thought Under The Westminster System, Parliamentary Speech Was Protected
it does, but the high-priced lawyers have the journos running scared
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Insanity + Dennis O'Brien
must be viewed in the context that he own's a large section
of the Irish Media both print and radio,and is in a position
to influence what's said or printed...hence the RTE injuction
Only one Internet portal defied him ....he has also been the subject
of a Judical Public Inquiry - Moriarty Tribunal which made
findings against him in relation to the procedure which a Mobile Phone licience was awarded which involved a Minister for Communication - Micheal Lowry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]