EU Orders Makers Of DieselStormers To Change Name Because Diesel Clothing Trademarked Diesel For Everything
from the you-got-game? dept
In trademark disputes and their resolutions, it's not often that I see a pure headscratcher. That is to say, I rarely see a ruling on a trademark dispute and find myself at a loss for all explanation. This is, however, one of those cases. The dispute is between Black Forest Games, makers of a game entitled DieselStormers and Diesel the company, which makes clothing. The problem arose over a year ago, it seems, when Diesel reached out to Black Forest Games about the title of the game, expressing concern that it was a trademark violation of the Diesel brand.
The dispute began in July 2014 when Black Forest Games, maker of Giana Sisters: Twisted Dreams, received a trademark claim from Diesel over the name of its co-op arena brawler, Dieselstormers, which was funded through Kickstarter and released to Steam Early Access in July 2014. The Italian clothing manufacturer had claimed there would be a "likelihood of confusion" if Dieselstormers received its own trademark. Diesel's trademark covers things outside of clothes, such as toothpaste, walking sticks, Christmas tree decorations - and games.Turns out no understanding was ever reached, however, and Diesel ended up taking the dispute before the EU Office for the Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM). At issue was Diesel's registration of their trademark "Diesel," including in the marketplace for games. The reason why the developer kept referring back to clothing, including in the quote above, is because Diesel doesn't make games. Like, at all. And Black Forest Games doesn't make clothing using the "Diesel" mark. In other words, for the OHIM, there was no internal market to harmonize, because there was no conflict. If anything, Diesel had registered a trademark for a market it wasn't participating in, which is typically grounds for the loss of the trademark. Nothing about this seemed to make sense.
"In all probability an understanding will be reached as Black Forest have no intent to create clothing under the Dieselstormers brand," the developer stated at the time, before adding, "the 'Diesel' part of Dieselstormers refers to the liquid fuel type of the same name and is not a parody of the fashion brand."
Unfortunately, the OHIM is apparently in possession of logic that I don't have access to, because it is forcing Black Forest Games to change the name of DieselStormers to something else.
Now, over a year later, the Office for the Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM), which rules on trademark matters in Europe, has decided in Diesel's favour - and forced Black Forest to come up with a new name.And why? Because a clothing company registered a trademark in a marketplace it isn't participating in and then had the gall to push around a small game developer over it. Whatever you might think the purpose of trademark is or should be today, it sure isn't this.
"This decision has caught us with our pants down," said Black Forest boss Adrian Goersch. "We are quite surprised that our trademark application has been formally denied. We are no multinational corporation, we cannot fight this decision, even though, frankly, it is a disaster with indie marketing as difficult as it is today. But the history of this game and our company as a whole has been marked with tough challenges and we will manage to overcome this one as well. First of all, we will make sure everyone will be able to keep playing the game, then we'll come back with a new name."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: diesel, eu, trademark
Companies: black forest games, diesel
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
VW's way out of the mess
A perfect way out for VW from their environmental certifications trouble. The Diesel engines will be renamed to whatever cute, engaging and positive word the PR bunch come up with. All to avoid stepping on Diesel's trademark toes, of course. And as a useful side-effect the car-company gets to pretend the whole diesel-gate talk do not apply to them, 'cause they no longer have diesel engines. Talk with the clothing company, please! :P
Shiny!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now, technically speaking, Diesel®™© is in the right here, but morally... ಠ_ಠ
So basically any title of a creative work, commercial or no risks ending in the danger zone if they use the word "diesel" in the title ?
I'm assuming "Maintenance and Repair for Diesel Engines" should still be safe ? Or is that confused with clothing as well ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There isn't a way to overrule the agency?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There isn't a way to overrule the agency?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: There isn't a way to overrule the agency?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know what's really funny?
In particular if you pick a generic as a brand name, you should be strictly limited to trademarking your logo and use in the specific product branch.
Maybe the estate of Rudolf Christian Karl Diesel (the inventor of the Diesel engine) should sue Diesel S.p.A. over misappropriating his name.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Diesel is going down the drain anyway
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clearly
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
awesome.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vin_Diesel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FuelStormers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FuelStormers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Those were the days
Beretta had a similar issue, but one promised not to make cars, the other not to make guns.
Be nice to go back to those reasonable times.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Those were the days
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Those were the days
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But I wish TM stories here on Techdirt would differentiate between refused TMs and infringement cases. If I've understood, the TM was refused, but there is no infringement issue (did OHIM deal with infringement, or is it left to national courts?)
If infringement was not an issue, it's not right to say OHIM has prevented use of the name of the game - it's not giving an exclusive right to it. While the game company may feel they need to use a different name if they can't have a TM, OHIM are not making them change it.
Not arguing that Diesel are overreaching, but the distinction seems important to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]