China Using US Encryption Fight To Defend Its New Encryption Backdoor Mandate

from the because,-of-course dept

Mon, Dec 28th 2015 3:23am — Mike Masnick

It's not like this wasn't easy to predict (because we did exactly that), but as China is pushing forward with its new "anti-terrorism" law, it's using the US's fight over encryption as a reason for why the law shouldn't be a problem. Part of the law would require that companies backdoor any encryption for the Chinese government:

The initial draft, published by parliament late last year, requires companies to keep servers and user data within China, supply law enforcement authorities with communications records and censor terrorism-related Internet content.

China has said many Western governments, including the United States, have made similar requests for encryption keys, and Chinese companies operating in the United States had been subject to intense security checks.

Again, this is hardly surprising, but with all of these politicians demanding backdoors, or other surveillance techniques, have any of them stopped to consider the message being sent to other governments around the globe? Either way, the bill has now been approved by the Chinese Parliament. And, again, the Chinese government is pointing to other countries as to why it's no big deal:

Speaking after China's largely rubber-stamp parliament passed the law, Li Shouwei, deputy head of the parliament's criminal law division under the legislative affairs committee, said China was simply doing what other Western nations already do in asking technology firms to help fight terror.

"This rule accords with the actual work need of fighting terrorism and is basically the same as what other major countries in the world do," Li told reporters.

So, again, to all the politicians and lawmakers supporting backdooring encryption, what's your response when China uses it to say that's why they're doing it as well?

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: anti-terrorism, backdoors, china, encryption, going dark, privacy, surveillance, us

22 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

That One Guy (profile), 28 Dec 2015 @ 2:21am

You really need to ask?
So, again, to all the politicians and lawmakers supporting backdooring encryption, what's your response when China uses it to say that's why they're doing it as well?

Either:

Politicians: "China? Is that a country or something? I'm sorry, but I have no idea how that is relevant to the discussion of combating terrorism by making sure that terrorists don't have secure forms of communications to use."

Or

Politicians: "See, China has passed strong anti-terrorism laws, and they're doing fine! Clearly all the hype over how dangerous encryption backdoors are are nothing but scaremongering by the terrorist-sympathizers in the tech industry, unwilling to take simple, reasonable steps to combat terrorism!"

Those pushing for crippled encryption show a complete disregard for the security of those living in the same country that they do, why would they care what happens to the people in other countries? If anything they're probably glad for china's move here, as it means a free security vulnerability that they can exploit without having to do anything themselves but find it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2015 @ 3:55am

James B. Comey: China did it? Backdoors are evil, we must stop them at all cost.

Donald Trump: I'll nuke backdoors until there are no backdoors.

Ben Carson: This one time I fought off 9 backdoors with a rubber band and fork.

Westboro Baptist Church: God hates backdoors.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2015 @ 4:46am

With all these back doors, it's a wonder if there are any walls left.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2015 @ 9:13am
  
  Re:
  There is, but you have to have a front door to use it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ponky security tales in woe and jammin ponk, 28 Dec 2015 @ 4:53am

ponky jammin backdoors ponk
You are all an incompetant bunch of arseholes and the next world war is only a few years off. Such waste, such stupidity and such idiocy by a few in high places that are not elected and serve no purpose other than to create wars and death. This world is headed for the dustbin of history forever. The people are not wanted so they are dieing, the world is being carved up by the so called powers that be, otherwise known as the central world government. No country can challenge them no one can disobey them. Be afraid, be very afraid, you have no power, you have no rights, you have no purpose to live.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2015 @ 10:06am
  
  Re: ponky jammin backdoors ponk
  you do have a purpose... to be their lapdog, servant, slave, ignorant supporter, or cannon fodder of war!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 28 Dec 2015 @ 6:01am

Let them do it. Then hack the heck out and cause severe financial damages. You'll never see a political decision being reversed so fast. In fact, let everybody do it. Some mayhem may bring some sense in some heads.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2015 @ 7:43am
  
  Re:
  The problem with that is that governments will ensure that taxpayers compensate their corporate buddies.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2015 @ 7:59am
  
  Re:
  ...Some mayhem may bring some sense in some heads...
  
  Regret to inform you that in China - and a few other places - it may cost a few people their heads - literally. The political decision makers won't give a damn that it was their decision that started it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
TheResidentSkeptic (profile), 28 Dec 2015 @ 6:46am

Unfortunately
Destroying the internet is in the best interests of our politicians and their paymasters. Having a limited media back under control and squashing all this citizen communication would be seen as a total win for them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2015 @ 7:10am

Sooooo... The law they passed is the public word. What's to say that they don't have EOs that say anything made in china needs to have Chinese backdoor built into it already? Hmmm... phones, routers, computers -- all of these are used by everyone in our government -- hell everyone on the planet uses Made in China electronic goods.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Christopher, 28 Dec 2015 @ 7:19am

The Endgame?
Maybe this was the US endgame after all? Get the Chinese government to mandate backdoors so the NSA can get in wherever and whenever they like.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Michael, 28 Dec 2015 @ 9:32am
  
  Re: The Endgame?
  Never attribute foresight to government actions that are adequately explained by malice or stupidity.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DavidMxx (profile), 28 Dec 2015 @ 9:02am

A boon for US surveillance
Whether you agree with their methods or not, most would agree that the NSA is very good at finding ways to capture communications. If the Chinese Government actually forces a backdoor into all encryption used in China, one can expect that the NSA will be quick to take advantage of that. It is likely that this will be a short-lived requirement (and may help us make the point here in the US as well), once some highly sensitive Chinese data becomes freely available to the US...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That One Guy (profile), 28 Dec 2015 @ 9:10am
  
  Re: A boon for US surveillance
  You vastly underestimate the ego and boneheadedness of politicians. Admitting that mandatory encryption backdoors are a security nightmare would require them to admit to being wrong when they called for and/or implemented them, and you'd be hard pressed to find a politician willing to admit to being wrong.
  
  No, more likely when such data is obtained by another party, whether individual or government, they'll just double down and insist that it happened not because of the broken encryption, but because the tech companies didn't try hard enough, or didn't properly implement the broken encryption, with threats of even more burdensome legislation if it happens again.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2015 @ 9:29am
    
    Re: Re: A boon for US surveillance
    You ignore a third possibility. Blame some poor sap for "misleading" them as to the dangers of backdoors, throw him in prison for life or execute him, and quietly repeal the law.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
tqk (profile), 28 Dec 2015 @ 10:39am

Voter records database hacked.
I'll just add this as the other (important) side of the situation:

They're boning you for it from one direction, and losing it just as fast from another.

Who needs the Chinese when the US gov't's on the job? Shades of the OPM hack.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- fenix849, 28 Dec 2015 @ 5:10pm
  
  Re: Voter records database hacked.
  Yeah, read articles before you link them, this is data loss by an unknown client of voter data warehousing firm NationBuilder. Source:http://www.csoonline.com/article/3018592/security/database-configuration-issues-expose-191-mi llion-voter-records.html
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - tqk (profile), 28 Dec 2015 @ 6:02pm
    
    Re: Re: Voter records database hacked.
    "Hi. We just lost control of the PII of 191 million voters. Sorry."
    
    When's that going to be illegal?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2015 @ 10:55am

They're as bad as the UK.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Dec 2015 @ 1:10pm

number one enemy of every govt is the people it 'serves'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Dec 2015 @ 2:13am

I am guessing threats backed my military muscle from the US towards China in the name of "protecting US based companies" and coincidently the blatant hypocrisy they will show towards another country doing to them what they do to their own US citizens.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]