The Cable Industry's Response To A Banner Year For Cord Cutting? Massive Across The Board Price Increases For 2016
from the pouring-gasoline-on-a-house-fire dept
2015 was the year cord cutting stopped being written off as fringe behavior and truly went mainstream. 23% of consumers engaged in "cord trimming" in 2014 (reducing their overall package where they could), while 16% said they had unsubscribed from pay-TV services in the past year. Billions in stock value evaporated in a flash as Wall Street realized cord cutting wasn't a fad. in 2015, 4.9 million consumers called themselves former cable customers, a tally that's expected to jump 12.5% in 2016. Consumers are finally tired of paying an arm and a leg for bloated channel bundles, when they only watch, on average, about 17 of them.Facing an unprecedented shake up in their industries and a dire need for evolution, cable and broadband companies are ringing in the new year the only way they know how: rampant tone deafness and major across the board price hikes starting in January. AT&T, Verizon, Dish, DirecTV, Comcast and Time Warner Cable are pummeling customers with $2 to $10 rate hikes for cable TV service in the new year. Not only are base channel bundles seeing a hike, but all providers are jacking up regional sports fees and so-called "Broadcast TV" fees:
"Comcast, the nation's largest cable provider, announced earlier this month that subscribers nationwide will see prices go up an average of 3.9 percent, and increases already have taken effect in some markets. The company will also hike its "broadcast TV fee" by 66 percent from $3 a month to $5. This relatively new fee covers the cost of retransmission fees that over-the-air broadcast TV networks like CBS, NBC, ABC and FOX charge cable companies for redistributing their networks on pay-TV systems."Those retransmission fees are simply the cost of doing business (read: the cost of programming). But cable operators have started breaking a portion of these costs out below the line in order to misleadingly keep their advertised rates low. In other words, fees like this are why your already absurdly expensive cable rate is usually significantly higher once you actually get your bill.
As all cable operators are quick to do, they cry to the media, stating they too are simply victims of the soaring cost of TV programming nobody seems able to do anything about:
"Cable and satellite companies say the higher prices cover some but not all of the higher programming costs. The amount that Time Warner Cable pays local broadcast channels has risen 85 percent in the past two years, while its costs for carrying sports networks have increased 116 percent since 2008, according to spokesman Bobby Amirshahi."While it's true many cable operators (especially smaller ones) are finding TV profit margins tightening, there's a few problems with cable operators' faultless narrative. One, many companies like Comcast/NBC Universal are also broadcasters and -- like Time Warner Cable -- own the regional sports networks contributing to higher costs. More importantly, it's worth noticing that many of these cable operators -- the same ones breathlessly pretending to be consumers' friends on the issue of soaring programming rates and retransmission disputes -- are busy raising rates on most of their non-TV-related services as well.
For example, Time Warner Cable's going to be ringing in 2016 by jacking up the cost of cable modem rentals from $8 to $10 a month (if you're still renting a modem, do yourself a favor and buy your own). DirecTV's jacking up the cost of the company's "TV fee," which the provider's website (seriously) claims is a monthly equipment fee that "allows us to keep our monthly fees low." Most providers are also jacking up the rental costs of set top boxes, and even the fees charged to pay your bills in person or over the phone. That's before you even get to the relentless pursuit of usage caps and overage fees.
And to tie these new year rate hikes off with a bow, most providers insist on insulting their customers' intelligence by claiming these increases are about improving the customer "experience," ignoring most of these companies rank lower in customer service and satisfaction than any other U.S. industry or company. In other words, the cable and broadband industry plans to respond to a banner year for cord cutting by pouring gasoline on a house fire, highlighting why they're absolutely begging for a disruptive ass kicking in the new year.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, cable, cord cutting, price increase, tv
Companies: at&t, comcast, directv, dish, time warner cable, verizon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
When all you have is a rate hike...
If I wasn't enjoying the schadenfreude so much I'd almost feel sorry for them. So used to raising prices any time they want to boost profits, any exec brave enough to suggest maybe dropping rates for once in order to make sure that they have customers past the next few years would probably soon find themselves given the boot.
With no-one willing or able to face the unpleasant truth that there's actual competition in the market and it's only going to get worse(for them), it's only a matter of time until they have no choice but to admit it, and once it reaches that point it will be far too late.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When all you have is a rate hike...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: When all you have is a rate hike...
ISP's buy their data by transfer rate not volume. If they buy 1MBPS for $1 they get the max 324GB over 30 days.
If they insist on keeping caps that's fine, but it's their funeral. Death by attrition is a pathetic uneventful way to go, but don't expect any sympathy from me. Nope not when the cause is greed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When all you have is a rate hike...
Tester: You can eat this Cookie now if you want, but I'll give you two cookies if you wait 15 minutes.
Cable Exec: I understand; I choose two now and two later.
Tester: No, you don- where did you get that bag of Marshmallows?
Cable Exec: It was in the lab next door. So where's my three cookies?
Tester: Next door? That's where we're testing the streaming video execs. And what are you talking about THREE cookies?
Cable Exec: Four now... chop chop, time's a wastin'.
Tester: Hey! Give back my watch!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When all you have is a rate hike...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ok, maybe they are just dumb....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I held off on the HBO bundle with comcast for a few months because HBO's product wasn't out yet, but now that it is I'm cord cutting comcast in January myself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
All an is has to do is provide 24mb speeds for most people they can upgrade later and they could take every single cable subscriber at less than 10% of the price they are paying for cable right now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All that said, Comcast can't go suck an egg. Google will be here soon and I can't wait.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It seems to me it is a failed business model when prices tend downwards overall and you are not only the few sectors displaying increase in costs and everything else AND at the same time your customers are leaving. Time to jump boat, no? Or, God forbid, adapt and evolve.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think TD's view on this is a little backwards.
Hulu is a subsidiary of Comcast. Probably they are metering rate hikes against edge hosting rollouts for Hulu. (a subsidiary of Comcast) They want to ditch the old hardware but want to retain customers at the same time. (Zero rating)
I imagine the whole plan is on a whiskey stained spread sheet under a cocaine dusted mirror somewhere in Philadelphia. Periodically VP's crawl in on hands and knees to look at it, and retreat quickly before drawing any attention.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I think TD's view on this is a little backwards.
It is somewhat unlikely that they want to go all in on Hulu taking over since their revenue is about 1 billion per year, while their owners revenues are about: Comcast (68 billions), Disney (50 billions) and FOX (30 billions). That is a drop in the sea!
Netflix with their 5.5 billions are already well ahead in that market and HBO has a well-established online presence too.
Comcast is the only company with a real straw in both boxes (And they suck hard in both, ay?). The rest are looking at a darker economic transition. Particularly FOX needs to move off their burning platform.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I think TD's view on this is a little backwards.
AT&T is trying to buy DirecTV presumably for their content management. So this seems to be the desired architecture for companies with frat house business practices. It is of course, bad for consumers at every level.
But cord cutting itself isn't a sign of anything more than a technology migration. I find the number of articles balley-hooing this as a loose for Comcast strange. I don't want Comcast too loose, I want them to stop violating the right of their customers to communicate and trade freely without interference.
Their history as a broadcast company has slanted their network architecture at every level, and it is why everybody hates them. It is like subscribing to a telecom carrier that is run by a nosy mother in law. Just drop the pipe off, and GO AWAY! We aren't interested in being a captured audience. Stop screwing around with the data of the citizenry without their knowledge or consent.
The only way forward is to separate the carriers from the content providers. PERIOD. These guys need to get broken up. And there is only one candidate talking about anti-trust activities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shocked
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shocked
The first group may have caused more harm to those impacted, but the latter has the numbers, so that they impact significantly more people, even if not nearly to the same extent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shocked
Just frauds and charlatans.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Shocked
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shocked
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shocked
Their supporters, Vote, while the majority don't.
Ha...choosing to voting is power in your life, stupid fools
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In just a short time, they got used to watching what they want when they want NOT what was on when it was on.
These kids will grow up and be on their own have to decide between $10/mo box rental without programming or $10/mo subscription with on-demand entertainment included. Good luck selling cable with that model.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cord Cutting
As soon as I can get gigabit internet only service from someone I'll be dropping the comcast account all together, but until then i guess i look like someone still interested in pay TV.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cord Cutting
Hell, US internet has 2.5 and 5 gig now in some neighborhoods in the west metro. Good luck man.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google Fiber
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sinking ship.
Assumptions:
1. Over the next decade or so, all media consumption will be done over IP streaming. No one will continue to pay for cable.
2. Fiber to the home will become the standard method of connectivity for urban/suburban population centers, making the cable infrastructure meaningless.
Analysis:
1. Assumption 1 indicates that a primary revenue source will dry up, regardless of their actions.
2. Assumptions 1 and 2 together mean that a large amount of capital infrastructure is about to become worthless.
3. Because of point 2, if they wish to continue to compete (long-term) in the ISP market, they'll need to procure a huge amount of capital expenditures.
4. Because of point 1, they will not be able to rely on their other service to fund the necessary infrastructure changes.
Conclusion:
In order to remain competitive long term, these companies need to spend a large amount on infrastructure. Even if they do so, however, there is no guarantee that a suitable RoI will follow. Competitors such as Google Fiber make the market uncertain.
However, there previous capital expenditures have not yet been completely devalued. By gradually raising prices and cutting costs, they can drain every last cent from the business before it inevitably goes under. By taking the funds wrung from the dying business and investing it in a different market, they can get a better return than if they had tried to pivot their business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cord cutting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems they are trying the US Postal model
This is the same thing they are cutting their won throats to make a little more today rather than protect long term success. Now is the time to lower prices not raise them. Now is the time to break up the forced package deals and let us buy Ala cart. It may not protect them forever but the lower resistance you create to make it easier to stay, the longer buyers will stay. The hard and more costly you make it, you create reasons for people to leave.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Set top boxes
Even if you have the box 5-10 years. No depreciation discount. Really inconsiderate. And you've been renting it all those years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Monopolistic extortionist mob style tactics
[ link to this | view in chronology ]