'Honey Badger' Narrator Sues Greeting Card Company For Selling Products Featuring An Apathetic Honey Badger

from the and-a-huge-number-of-shits-were-given-that-day dept

Honey badger may not care, but "comedic narrator" Christopher Gordon certainly does. The voice behind viral "Honey Badger Don't Care" video is suing (yet another) entity, alleging that Papyrus Recycled Greeting, Inc. infringed on his trademarks with its line of honey badger greeting cards.

Sarah Jeong has more details at Motherboard, including that a) the "rip off" cards aren't very amusing…

The allegedly infringing greeting cards—apparently manufactured under Papyrus’s “Recycled Greetings” brand—are invariably formulaic and deeply, deeply unfunny.
“It’s Your Birthday!” a honey badger appears to say. Within, the heartbreaking revelation that Honey Badger don’t give a shit.
and that b) the allegedly infringing phrase only appears in the video once and isn't among the trademarks Gordon has registered.
Here’s the thing: when Randall’s video blew up all those years ago, he went ahead and did register some trademarks, which he used to sell shirts, mugs, toys, and game apps. But he only registered HONEY BADGER DON’T CARE, not HONEY BADGER DON’T GIVE A SHIT, which now makes his case a bit weaker.
You can probably chalk up the lack of a "HONEY BADGER DON'T GIVE A SHIT" trademark to the Patent and Trademark Office's general resistance to all things sweary. Gordon either didn't think to register this phrase or knew it would be futile. Even if he had attempted registration, it's likely it would not have received protection, meaning Gordon -- along with anyone else similarly motivated -- could use the "SHIT" variation without trampling on each other's trademarks.

That hasn't stopped Gordon from pursuing this lawsuit, even though the defendant isn't using the trademarked phrase or anything else of Gordon's other than his general portrayal of honey badgers and their give-a-shitness.

But the most likely reason this lawsuit exists is because IP law tends to encourage speculative litigation. Trolls of all varieties (trademark, copyright, patent) have long capitalized on the low barrier to entry (a relatively low filing fee) and the sky-high potential costs of defending against a lawsuit (limited only to the defendant's imagination) to extract settlements from all and sundry. This "comedic narrator" is no different, as Jeong points out via a PACER screencap.


Considering its a pretty standard (and pretty baseless) trademark infringement lawsuit, you might be wondering why the filing is 114 pages long. Well, it appears Gordon has implemented the Zarrelli Complaint Collation Technique™ , which involves printing out screenshot after screenshot of anything that might conceivably be considered relevant... and then adding several that aren't. In Gordon's case, this means printing out what appears to be his entire website and submitting it as an exhibit.

Will Gordon succeed? It's tough to say. Taken on its merits, the lawsuit seems unlikely to be resolved in his favor. However, if he has more disposable income available or just an insane amount of persistence, he could outlast his opponent and obtain the settlement he would obviously prefer to an injunction. Unfortunately, if Gordon's looking for a quick settlement, the arrival of a motion to dismiss by the defendant isn't a welcome development.

One thing is certain, though: IP law has a lot to answer for. Jeong sums it all up in this pithy paragraph.
This is what you do now, I guess. Make one joke that resonates with the internet, trademark it, and then find a lawyer. Money Badger don’t give a shit?

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: christopher gordon, honey badger, honey badger don't care, honey badger don't give a shit, trademark, trademark troll


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Jan 2016 @ 12:55pm

    "Honey Badger Don't Care" is just a spin-off of "Homie Don't Play Dat" and countless others that pre-date In Living Color. Hope it gets thrown out of court and trademark invalided.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Crazy Hong Kong Monkey (profile), 25 Jan 2016 @ 1:18pm

    I guess "Honey Badger Does Care"

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Anonymous Coward, 25 Jan 2016 @ 1:32pm

    Reap what you sow.

    Anyone that would use Patrick Zarrelli's antics as a role model deserves whatever consequence they get, or don't get.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mark Wing, 25 Jan 2016 @ 2:07pm

    Honey Badger should go on tour with Honey Boo Boo.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 25 Jan 2016 @ 5:16pm

    Constipated Badger Doesn’t Give A Shit

    I can has trademark?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Dave Cortright (profile), 25 Jan 2016 @ 10:48pm

    EXTREME IRONY ALERT

    The video footage Mssr. Gordon used in his iconic work was taken by Keith and Colleen Begg and used without their permission. Since they are based in South Africa, they don't have US standing. If anyone wants to become the US copyright holder of said video and sue the hell out of Chris, get in touch with them.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Jeremy Lyman (profile), 26 Jan 2016 @ 5:43am

    Expert IP Tip

    Hey now there's a reason to pepper my dialog with random profanities. No I don't have turrets, I'm just making sure my words don't infringe any trademarks.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    M. Alan Thomas II (profile), 27 Jan 2016 @ 11:58am

    Does anyone know if any of the other suits were valid? A lot of them seem to be against t-shirt companies, and I can see that being a lot more likely. Not just because they're a likely place for a meme, but because I've seen plenty of t-shirt companies with rapidly-rotating stock that strikes me as dubiously licensed (but gone too fast for most people to notice). But I want to know if I'm being overly-cynical here.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Marvin, 28 Jan 2016 @ 1:15am

    I love this

    Oh my god I love this article. subscribe us on Amolink.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.