Apparent Redaction Failure Leads To Government Confirming Target Of Lavabit Investigation
from the SPOILER-ALERT? dept
The US government has just undercut one of its own gag orders. It imposed one on Lavabit after demanding its source code and encryption key. It has revealed the target of its demands from the encrypted email provider -- a person everyone already knew was the target, but one that wasn't likely to be officially confirmed for years to come. Kim Zetter at Wired has the details:
Ladar Levison, owner of the now defunct email service, has been forbidden since then, under threat of contempt and possibly jail time, from identifying who the government was investigating. In court documents from the case unsealed in late 2013, all information that could identify the customer was redacted.The unsealed documents were posted to PACER and picked up by Cryptome, which uploaded them yesterday. The inadvertent exposure is contained in the Appeal Cover Sheet, which was apparently left unredacted when the unsealed docs were uploaded to the court's electronic filing system.
But federal authorities recently screwed up and revealed the secret themselves when they published a cache of case documents but failed to redact one identifying piece of information about the target: his email address, Ed_Snowden@lavabit.com. With that, the very authorities holding the threat of jail time over Levison’s head if he said anything have confirmed what everyone had long ago presumed: that the target account was Snowden’s.
Sometimes inadvertent transparency is the best transparency. Despite this being made public (most likely accidentally), it still doesn't change the stipulations of the gag order.
When asked for comment, Levison’s lawyer Jesse Binnall told WIRED in a email that “due to the letter and spirit of the court’s January 7, 2016 order, Lavabit has no further comment on the unredacted email address.”Yes, a gag order can still be violated even though anyone who's paying attention has known for nearly two years now that the target was Edward Snowden. Unless the government meant to release this document in unredacted form, Ladar Levinson and his lawyers could still face contempt charges for even confirming what thousands of others can see with their own two eyes.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ed snowden, failures, redaction
Companies: lavabit
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Govt employees can't
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Save the planet
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fairness
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Incompetence or Malice?
I recall when a child soldier arrested in Afghanistan, then help in Guantanamo for a decade, was being tried for allegedly fighting back in a fire-fight; the government side "inadvertently" released documents to the defense suggesting he was innocent, that someone else could have tossed the grenade.
Just because some higher-ups have it in for the constitution doesn't mean everyone else goes along willingly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Freedom, we barely knew you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Motion to rescind gag order?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stay on your toes 'cuz they're just aching to make you pay!
Come hell or high water, someone's going to pay for the Government fucking up all the time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]