You Don't Actually Own What You Buy Volume 2,203: Google Bricking Revolv Smart Home Hardware
from the permanent-software-downgrade dept
Google (Alphabet) isn't making any friends on the news that Alphabet's Nest is effectively bricking working smart home hardware for a large number of users. About seventeen months ago the company acquired Revolv, rolling the smart-home vendor's products in with its also-acquired Nest product line. Revolv hardware effectively lets users control any number of smart-home technologies around the home, ranging from home thermostats and garage door openers, to outdoor lights and security and motion detection systems. But according to an updated Revolv FAQ, all of these systems will no longer work as of May 15, 2016.In other words, the FAQ notes, users who thought they bought smart home hardware will soon own very pricey bricks:
"On May 15th, my house will stop working. My landscape lighting will stop turning on and off, my security lights will stop reacting to motion, and my home made vacation burglar deterrent will stop working. This is a conscious intentional decision by Google/Nest. To be clear, they are not simply ceasing to support the product, rather they are advising customers that on May 15th a container of hummus will actually be infinitely more useful than the Revolv hub."What's more users claim this wasn't really communicated, but was only something a user realizes if they happen to wander over to the Revolv website:
"That’s a pretty blatant “fuck you” to every person who trusted in them and bought their hardware. They didn’t post this notice until long after Google had made the acquisition, so these are Google’s words under Tony Fadell’s direction. It is also worth pointing out that even though they have my email address, the only way a customer discovers this home IoT mutiny is to visit the Revolv web site."Obviously this isn't new, it's the new normal. Consumers are pretty constantly buying hardware they think they own, either to have that hardware made less useful (as we've seen with some game consoles), or in this instance stop working entirely thanks to later software updates. There's any number of things Google could have done to avoid customer ill will, from a slight discount off of Nest or other products, or even, hey, an e-mail reminding users that the smart home hubs they paid $300 for would soon be little more than a lovely paperweight.
Google obviously wants these users to spend money on new Nest hardware, but lately that doesn't seem like such a solid bet. Initially the darling of unskeptical media reviewers (thanks to the company using some very Apple-esque marketing tactics), Nest has been plagued in more recent months by a series of software updates that have caused the IOT devices to occasionally stop working (as in, a thermostat that won't heat your house). Company leadership has also recently been criticized as tyrannically bureaucratic, and the company has taken heat as an under performer while losing executives at a notable rate.
So sure, go ahead and buy all new pricey Nest hardware for your smart home. Surely it will still actually work in a year, right?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: iot, smart home
Companies: google, nest, revolv
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
As I said, being upset at this is still fine, but the article's depiction makes this sound much more nefarious.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That being said, this is further proof that consumers need to be very wary of anything that must "phone home" first in order to work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I'm know I'm being nitpicky, but the original article makes it sound like Google/Nest is doing something to the actual devices. It's a very different connotation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
BTW this is essentially how Google gets away with stuff like this. Half our nerds are still living in 1980.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Also, You can say they have done something to the device. They have locked it down so it uses their servers that they are now turning off. I'm not seeing anything saying they are offering people the source code to work around this. So it is likely the act of making a workaround so you still can use your device is illegal due to laws like DMCA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Your next post should either be a complete tutorial on how to revive the device and make it independently operable, or else an admission that you are wrong and have no further argument.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
It's like when a video game discontinues multi-player support, surely the single player mode should still work, but the features that require servers are gone. Well what if, as in this case, the game is online only?
Sure, it sucks but when you live on the bleeding edge you've got to have the possibility of failure in the back of your mind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
And when game companies turn off the servers for games people are still playing, there's a backlash.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I'm a Panono backer, still waiting on my hardware 27 months later. Yes it sucks that it's taken that long, but I'm most concerned that photo processing is cloud-only. That's a major fail-point in the system. But I knew I was buying into an unknown, that's on me. All these people saying not to buy things that connect to the Internet are missing the real lesson here, which is to know what features of your purchases are services and which are independent functions. This isn't new.
There's FAQs on the Nest site about what happens when you lose connection. Spoiler: the thermostat is still a thermostat, and the Protect is still a mesh networked smoke and carbon monoxide alarm, but the drop-cam is dead. My Amazon Echo will be dead in the water one day, but my chrome-casts will still work. The traffic updates in my car will fold with Sirius but my maps and routing will still work. I could go on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
"Mother may I?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
In this case, the car is setup to stream gas via a long tube from a single company, the gas is a special mixture that the car requires to run on, and when the stream is turned off, the car ceases to be useful.
Modifying the car to run on another type of gas *might* be possible, but the company selling the car and the gas isn't helping you figure that out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the difference?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
However, one explanation that I can easily see for this is that the user thought that the system was self-contained and would work (at least in a degraded mode) even without an Internet connection, as long as the in-home networking and power were available and no components died of old age. Clearly, that is not how Revolv designed the system to work, although I think they should have designed it that way. If they had, disabling the central servers would not render existing systems completely unusable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
And yes, it sounds like these customers had no idea how the product worked. Seems like they would have had an Internet outage or read some troubleshooting docs to see that the brains are entirely cloud based.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They have apparently abandoned it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
At this point, they're basically separately run companies, but people still believe they're under one umbrella.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Was going to buy some samples to test at work (large call centre) to see if it helps with productivity, but after this can't take the risk that google will take payment then simply shut off voice recognition or other remote servers that are required to install/use software.
So just before finance dept. signed off on buying 4 headsets we had to bin the entire idea.
We have Rifts (DK2) and CV1 ordered, OpenVR and Vive ordered etc to test, but now cannot trust google not to pull the same shady tactics in 12months.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How long do they think they can get away with this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Hmm, what might their strategy be here?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They will presumably be relying on the right to be forgotten.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I love this!
You light bulbs are a service separate from electricity. Your garage door opening is now a service! God, I am just rolling in the schadenfreude!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I love this!
It's one thing to be told or know 'Your smart device will need to be able to connect to the servers to be able to download and install any updates to the software', another entirely to find out that if those servers go down not only is the device not getting any future updates, but it effectively turns into a very expensive chunk of metal and plastic.
People are probably starting to catch on that if the server for a game or piece of software goes down that requires server access then the game/software isn't going to be working anymore, but the idea that that would also apply to physical products is something that's rather new, even if it should be expected to those paying attention.
Software that requires connection to a particular server stops working if the server goes offline.
'Smart' devices often contain similar software.
Therefore if the servers for 'smart' device software goes down, so does the device itself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I love this!
Consumers won't learn a damned thing and instead will just go buy the newest piece of hardware that is subject to the whim of some executive shutting the server down. And they won't complain as they have grown accustomed to it.
If the consumers lost their collective shits (in a constructive way) this might change. But, no, they will just roll over and take it like champs when the next round of useless hardware needs replacing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I love this!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I love this!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I love this!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I love this!
If you got your perceived "money's worth," ok. That's fine. Keep in mind a lot of people feel screwed over by this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I love this!
It's a perfectly natural response, just not a rational one. Rational financial and philosophical analysis would have indicated this product is not for anyone without disposable income.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I love this!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I love this!
something, something castles of sand...
As long as you enter into an agreement where the company has no obligation to provide you with a service and expressly reserves the right to refuse you service at will, it's hard for me to be sympathetic. Either petition your lawmakers to craft new legislation or stop agreeing to consumer unfriendly terms.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I love this!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I love this!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
from the stallman-was-right dept
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They should give refunds to all customers whose devices are still pinging their servers. If it's really that unpopular it should be cheap.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Illegal, maybe
And Google would have to stoop to RIAA levels of greed and cruelty to charge those who did.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDctw8OEoLA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The issue here is proprietary software which is easily avoidable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can you say Class-Action lawsuit?
The hardware is working, but they just expect everyone to throw away $300 worth of hardware because the company no longer wants to support it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can you say Class-Action lawsuit?
The strange phenomenon to me is that people seem to want to cede their personal authority to a "higher power"; they want to cede control over their lives and devices.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can you say Class-Action lawsuit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Can you say Class-Action lawsuit?
But, I do believe the government has a role to play in protecting the consumer. Upton Sinclair made a nice case as to why regulation is needed in certain industries. How much? Well, that's what's debatable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I know it'll always work without some third party backend.
It also won't know known security vulnerabilities that can be published and affect others.
Google sucks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The problem is that my wife for example, wouldn't know what the hell an Arduino module is. She might recognise the Raspberry Pi, as I made a big deal about the Pi Zero. The vast consumer base isn't like you or me, they don't care about tinkering or having something that they actually control. They want the shiny new device that "just works."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
With it connected to my own server, I just have to worry about securing the small web interface.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Build it yourself or buyer beware.
In fact, my appliances are more reliable than my Sony BluRay player which uses many of the same bits of Free Software. More reliable than my Rokus too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
boilerplate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: boilerplate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: boilerplate
Since it was in the terms and the terms are always right, there should be no problem - unless of course companies use boilerplate text to give themselves plenty of outs.
You decide which one... I'll wait for your less than pithy reply.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: boilerplate
And once again he drops the pretense of being anything but a troll.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: boilerplate
Do you have a link to that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here's an idea
Some nerd can update the app to let people choose a central node address, and allow people to run their own servers.
Doing that would qualify as not being evil.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Here's an idea
Or, even better, the devices can find each other on the same subnet with mDNS (as can the app that controls them) so that they are completely serverless.
In fact, it should have been this was from the beginning, just using the server for updates.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Here's an idea
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But I am thankful that me and my home still live in the "lost world". I admit it, I'm a dinosaur.
What's wrong with walking over to the thermostat and changing it yourself? Or turning on your lights using your hands instead of some "device"?
Tales like this one make me wonder how society would survive without all their little electronic gadgets and doodads.
Things like having internet, or phones or TV are fine, but they shouldn't be the things that run our lives and it seems that the more forward thinking the devices become, the less people enjoy life and worry more about the devices working.
Spent the last few months away from home without all of that stuff and we found ourselves a lot happier.
... just sayin' don't buy "things" to run your life for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I agree, but society is moving towards a world where cars get over the air software updates and it's illegal to tamper with those computers. Don't want your car to have an IP? The answer can't be "ride a horse".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
-Updated VFD/inverter settings to increase the power output and range of the electric drive.
-Updated emission controls that allow for a wider range of higher power and more fuel efficient modes.
-Updates to the autonomous drive mode controls. You know because it's going to get better over the 10-20 year life of the car.
-ESC control algorithms based on analysis of real world data and crash studies from other similar cars.
-Driving mode updates (again for power/response and economy)
That said, I'd be happy to put a file on a USB stick and stuff it into the car and have the car ask if I want to update instead of simply downloading and installing them when I'm at home. the manufacturer could just e-mail me a notice that an update is available.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
My thermostat is a manual, it keeps me warm in winter and cool in summer. I can't control it across the net nor on my "smart" phone, but it self adjusts according to day of the week and time of day. It cost 20 bucks.
"Society" isn't me, nor do current trends and marketing dictate what I use if I see no benefit beyond the cool factor. Most of this flap is about broken toys. That's all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
warranty
I hope the FTC lowers the boom on Google in a huge way here.
Also, we desperately need a law to negate all the BS terms of "service" that prohibit taking this sort of thing (and anything else, really) to the courts for redress.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: warranty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: warranty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: warranty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google nevere innovated. They alway acquired
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zuckerberg said it best
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Broken promise
"Free lifetime subscription service"
Amongst other things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Broken promise
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Broken promise
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Broken promise
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Broken promise
I agree tho, if a device is sold to be integrated into a house it should still work in 25 years, if not 50.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Home Automation R Us
Convenience or Reliability, pick one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can someone else take over the servers?
If Google wanted to be nice, they could assure all the data was open source so that some enthusiasts could barnraise it.
This happens to dying games all the time, and since this affects real life stuff, it seems there's more motivation to get it done.
But if Google doesn't facilitate a home-grown solution that's pretty super shitty, and affirms my skepticism of the commitment of companies to continuing their services.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can someone else take over the servers?
In a few days, someone will step up and get a plan approved to migrate this to some sort of user group. This is of course assuming that enough of these boxes were sold and some of the people they were sold to are techies that can form a community to keep a server running.
Of course, the culture could have changed and Google could now just whip the engineers if they don't follow the company line.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Can someone else take over the servers?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Correction
Once we make the appliances independent from the online service which is independent from the computer and phone apps, it'll all be good.
Which is fine, because I'm not interested until it's open source, and subject to white-hat penetration tests and security fixes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Correction
But that's not what they want to sell you. I mean, how are they going to control your life like that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Correction
I know if I ran a business that made a product I'd look to crazy amounts of customer enablement, but that's because I'm long-seeing and want my product to become the new standard.
Like IBM and the PC.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's new?
Planned obsolescence. It's been going on long before now and is little more than a cash grab by an economy-centric world. Software / smart devices is only the new frontier of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You're hoping your Nest device will still work in a year? You're lucky if it works now!
Youtube - Nest Protect is a terrible buggy product
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpsMkLaEiOY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Disruption
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ludditism at its best?
That way, people's lives and livelihoods don't depend on their jobs.
In fact, I suspect that because we associate money with survival is exactly why corporation officials are willing to stoop so low as protectionism or premature product extinction in the first place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And there I was
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There are options
When they announced the demise of their server, the company actually supplied an updated firmware package that would let end users redirect the queries to their own PCs. They also wrote instructions on how to make the units function exactly like they did, even without the manufacturer's server.
That made the conversion easy to swallow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Update: Google/Nest are busy bricking MORE hardware in 2019 than ever, because they feel people will just "buy a new one!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]