Verizon 'Competes' With T-Mobile By Raising Prices, Then Denying It's A Price Hike
from the tomato,-tomahto dept
For years T-Mobile has been making some welcome changes to U.S. wireless service, implementing everything from free data while roaming internationally, to rollover data plans that let you keep unused data. T-Mobile's strange, new tactic of treating consumers well has paid incredible dividends for the company, which has been adding significantly more postpaid wireless subscribers per quarter than any other major carrier. Between the elimination of consumer pain points and its foul-mouthed CEO, T-Mobile's been a welcome change for the sector (just ignore its attack on the EFF and failure to support net neutrality).This is of course in stark contrast to Verizon Wireless, which has desperately been trying to avoid competing with T-Mobile on price, even proudly proclaiming that it's happy to kick "price sensitive" customers to the curb. The carrier's primary tactic has been to claim that the company offers such an incredible wireless experience," it doesn't need to compete on price. But as T-Mobile has gained ground and improved its own network, that tactic has started to falter.
So this week, Verizon Wireless unveiled a new attempt to try and 'compete' with T-Mobile, the primary focus being to raise already high prices another 17%:
"On Wednesday, Verizon overhauled its main offerings for monthly customers, increasing most data allowances by 33%, adding a rollover feature for unused data and cutting prices for using phones in Mexico and Canada. But it also raised its standard monthly charges on all the new plans by as much as 17%. For example, a 6 GB plan that cost $60 per month will be replaced by an 8 GB plan that costs $70.So you'll get a bit more data, but you'll continue to pay a steep premium for it. Keep in mind that Verizon's wireless data prices were already some of the highest in the industry. Also realize that Verizon carefully analyzes customer usage patterns and designs their shared data plans to drive as many customers as possible to the more expensive plans. One of the biggest benefits of such shared data plans for carriers? Most consumers have no idea what a gigabyte even is. As such, they sign up for bigger, more expensive plans they likely don't need -- just to avoid the hassle of worrying about overage fees.
This being Verizon, the company was quick to claim that charging 17% more wasn't a price hike, clinging tightly to the narrative that it doesn't have to compete on price because it's just that awesome:
"But Verizon executives say that customers will pay for the increased data allowances and superior quality of their network. "Customers are using more and more data on our network,” Nancy Clark, senior vice president for marketing and operations, said in an interview with Fortune. “We needed to build bigger data plans and the value is better than ever.”..."This is in no way a price increase,” Clark added."To try and counter the price hikes that aren't price hikes, Verizon made a number of other changes to the way its wireless plans work, including offering a new "safety mode" where users can avoid overage fees, but have their connections throttled back to 128 kbps (for an extra $5 a month). The carrier also unveiled a new rollover data option (which Verizon last year breathlessly declared it wouldn't follow T-Mobile on). But in very Verizon fashion, the company made a number of changes to the way rollover data is supposed to work in order to make it less useful for consumers:
"In addition to the price and allotment changes, Verizon's also following T-Mobile's lead in offering "Carryover Data," a rollover data plan that lets you forward unused data to the next month. But like AT&T's version Verizon has muted the benefit of the idea by forcing users to burn through their existing allotment before being able to touch your carried over data allotment -- and by making the data expire if you don't use it in a month."In other words, Verizon Wireless' attempt to compete with T-Mobile involves raising prices and copying a bunch of ideas T-Mobile implemented years ago -- then somehow magically making them worse. Watching Verizon Wireless try and "compete" is much like watching a rhinoceros do the electric slide -- it's just too foreign a concept to ever really seem natural.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: competition, mobile, price hike
Companies: t-mobile, verizon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How far we have come in only a century...
"your business might burn down - but you can avoid it by paying us $30/month"
Guess they did learn from history.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why would I switch to Verizon and pay, literally, 3 times more. Their network could be 10 times faster and have full coverage around the planet and I couldn't justify paying nearly 100 dollars a month for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We never hit the data because of Music Freedom and BingeOn. I believe it to be nearly impossible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Essentially, because the per-gigabyte charge is lower then it's not *really* a price increase even if you're forced to pay more per month. You're actually paying less because each GB is cheaper! Plus, they're going to allow existing customers to continue paying the original price if they want so isn't that a great customer choice!
That's how management and marketing types tend to see things sadly, and they will continue to do so as long as enough people continue to fall for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Former Verizon Customer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Former Verizon Customer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Former Verizon Customer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Former Verizon Customer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The other way of stopping
The wesult at the thiwd gwade wevel was vewwy amusing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Joke ...NO !
This is going to be very good for competition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-move to Google's Project Fi if you can
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Verizon v. Tmobile
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who needs a contract like that from Verizon, prepaid is where it's at!
So yeah, orange is the new black. Verizon's gonna be hemorrhaging customers real soon. And I'll be reading about it with a smile on my face.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Who needs a contract like that from Verizon, prepaid is where it's at!
When people go on strike, contracts are re-written. Most people don't mind paying a little more when they understand what it *actually* is that they're paying for. When Verizon employees went on strike, they were able to increase their salaries; wages, and standard of life.
To compare, T-Mobile employees were also in Kansas ABCNews recently for desiring to join a union... In Kansas. If people aren't paid enough to stay around, there's likely not enough money to fix coverage problems either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder if they will try that slogan next?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]