USOC Demands That Company Take Down Twitter Posts Of Olympic Athlete It Sponsors
from the facepalm dept
All I have to do is say that this is a story that involves the Olympics and you probably already know exactly what kind of story this is going to be. That's because we here at Techdirt have posts going back years that detail how the IOC and the USOC go about bullying, threatening, berating and downright pestering anyone it can over even the slightest of intellectual property concerns. The fact that these international games come around every two years now, instead of four, only means this bullying occurs now in near perpetuity instead of at a pace of a half-a-decade staccato.
So, with the Rio Olympics right around the zika-infested, super-bacteria-in-the-water corner, it's time to start relaying the most predictable news possible: the USOC are still bullying people over laughably slight trademark concerns. Though I will credit the USOC this much: they're finding new and inventive ways to come off as petty and money-grubbing as possible. The link above details the USOC's demands that Oiselle, an athletic apparel company that sponsors Olympic athlete Kate Grace, take down the following Instagram posts.
The USOC said these posts were trademark violations and that Oiselle was using them to confuse the public into thinking it was sponsoring the Olympics. Now, Kate Grace is sponsored as an athlete by Oiselle. The posts above appear to be a runner's sponsor alerting its followers at the accomplishment of one of its athletes. You know, exactly the kind of thing that a corporate sponsor should be expected to do. So, are you confused as to what any of the above has to do with the USOC's claim that Oiselle is trying to trade off of the trademarks of the Olympics?
Sally Bergesen, CEO of Oiselle, told the Orange County Register that she received an email from the U.S. Olympic Committee informing her that the posts violated USOC trademark guidelines, requesting that Oiselle to take down all images of Grace and other Oiselle athletes competing at the Trials. The USOC official, Carol Gross, asked that Oiselle stop all “Olympic-related advertising” and take down images by “close of business” Wednesday, July 6.
“This is about USOC’s intellectual property, ownership of the terms Rio, Road To Rio, the rings—all of the branding they use,” Bergesen said by phone. “By using the caption ‘She’s heading to Rio’ and showing the branding [#RoadToRio, Olympic rings] on her bib, which is ironed onto her Oiselle top, they’re saying it’s akin to creating advertising, that we’re making it look like we’re part of Team USA and doing Olympic advertising. They’re saying that our reporting is advertising; we differ with that.”
Yes, because the USOC has managed to get all kinds of generic trademarks on words and locations that have no business being trademarked at all, and because the athlete was wearing a bib while competing that showed some valid IOC trademarks, suddenly the image and caption can't be put on social media. Does anyone actually look at that picture and caption and immediately conclude that Oiselle is an Olympic sponsor? Even the hashtags, a brand new insane place for people to fight over trademark concerns, don't conjure up an association with the olympics.
But here's where we can see the USOC's intentions laid bare. Keep in mind that Kate Grace is sponsored by Oiselle, just not for the Olympics. Instead, she's a sponsored athlete for all of her non-Olympic competition and training. Meaning that Oiselle is part of what got Kate Grace to the Olympics, but now that company can't even tweet out a picture of her success.
Bergesen says she understands the USOC’s position with regard to maintaining the value of trademarks, but takes issue with the fact that the neither the USOC nor its major corporate sponsors support athletes’ training, nor pay athletes for competing at the Olympics, but make vast sums from the event. “It comes down to how the money is spent,” she said. “I would be somewhat okay [with non-USOC rmarketing restrictions] if some of the money were getting to athletes. But the reality is, if it were not for small private entities who actually support athletes, you’d have a beautifully branded stadium with no athletes in it.”
Filled with all the branding in the world and nobody there to take pictures of it all and tweet them out, because the athletes are actually supported by the very people unable to congratulate them on social media. Gold medal for asshole-ery goes to the USOC.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: kate grace, olympics, rio, rio olympics, trademark, usoc
Companies: oiselle, us olympic committee, usoc
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It appears that "Rio 2016" is trademarked, along with other phrases. But claiming that "Rio" (or "RIO") is trademarked looks more like a bluff.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I'm currently very ashamed of my country. These games must be by far the most corrupt ever. Remember FIFA got pwned after the games in Brazil. I'm hoping the same happens after the "event I don't give a shit about".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or just The Games and open source it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Or just The Games and open source it.
At any rate: "giant", "non-profit", "principled": targetting two out of three is already ambitious.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trademarks should bite both ways
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Long story short no one else was willing to pay off the IOC to have the olympics in their country
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Time to rewatch "The Sting".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unless they add corpse-fishing to the events... Gold medal goes to whomever gets the largest torso out of the bay.
Bonus points if the limbs match the torso.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The Olympics ceased to be about sports a long time ago. It's just a giant money machine using athletes to generate profit. And don't forget, the taxpayers of the host cities usually wind up taking it right in the wallet, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So the Olympics is kind of like the record labels of the sports world? They take all of the money for themselves and give nothing back? Fun.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Compared to the Olympics the record labels are angels. At least they give 1-5% (guess) to the artists, the Olympics seem to keep 100% of the money.
You know something is wrong when record labels seem charitable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I've seen the list of next host cities dropping out due to the demands of the IOC people.
Its corrupt, unchecked, and a huge waste of resources for host countries. The athletes often get next to no help from the USOC beyond a bag of wear this branded stuff or we'll sue.
Can we just say fuck it and maybe see if we can turn Eurovision into a world wide event?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Gone are the days when the songs were any good. These days, the quality is something like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzYzVMcgWhg
This was 2014's winner: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PR60m1WTiT8
I rest my case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An entire field of Olympic™ winners it's crystal clear who the losers are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Which is exactly what should happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course, whoever organizes THAT will eventually become evil and corrupt, but we'll have a respit for a few years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'd say you guys have ruined me for the Olympics
Still I've heard about all sorts of awful risks of the Olympics at Brazil this year. I hope the athletes get home safe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
minor edits
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oiselle should send the IOC and USOC a bill!
Or, even better, if the problem is that there is a tiny little Olympic symbol, just blur it into unrecognizability and leave the picture up that way. Take out the RIO and change it to she is going to Rio de Janeiro for an event, and leave it at that. OR, has IOC now trademarked the name of the city and nobody (including the residents) can use the name of the city except in officially sanctioned IOC activities?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Road to Rio - 1947
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FUCK Rio de janero
Fuck Rio
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is it about how the main Olympic Stadiums are dangerously unstable because of the corpses of some of the 4000 dead workers that have been left in the concrete foundations?
Or about the 3 MASSIVE sewage pipes pumping out 10s of thousands of gallons of untreated sewage right into the lake for the water events? (One athlete whilst practicing complained that as they lifted their oar from the water, a large turd was sitting on it).
Is it the large number of athletes who've already been mugged at gunpoint and had their Olympic equipment stolen?
The hotel staff breaking into atheletes quarters and robbing them?
The many MANY thousands of murdered homeless children of Rio that have just 'disappeared' ?
Is it the 4 billion dollars of Olympic money that vanished right into the presidents personal accounts?
Or perhaps it's the Brazilian Cartels sensing a major opportunity to peddle coke at the tourists?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So does this mean they'll soon be going after Rovio for Angry Bird Rio I & II?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]