Roger Ailes Hires Peter Thiel's Favorite Lawyer To Threaten NY Mag For Its Stories About Him
from the just-don't-publish-sex-tapes,-they-said... dept
Remember how lots of people (including plenty of you right here) were saying that it was no big deal that Gawker was shut down due to a campaign financed by Peter Thiel? Remember how people said it wouldn't mean any harm for anyone else as long as they "don't publish someone's sex tape?" Remember how we pointed out that Thiel's funding campaign included plenty of other lawsuits that had nothing to do with sex tapes? Yeah, about that. It appears that Thiel's favorite lawyer, Charles Harder, who he apparently helped set up in his own law firm with ongoing support for a variety of cases to take down Gawker, has now become the go-to lawyer for another famous hater of media: Donald Trump and his friends. Trump, of course, has repeatedly publicly stated that he has sued a reporter just to cost him money. So, Trump and Harder seem perfect together.Last week, Harder, representing Donald Trump's wife, Melania, sued The Daily Mail and a random blogger in Maryland, claiming defamation. The inclusion of the blogger was weird, but many are saying it was to get the specific jurisdiction they wanted, in Maryland (where anti-SLAPP laws can't be used).
And now it appears that Harder has another big name client closely connected to Trump: former Fox News boss Roger Ailes has apparently hired Charles Harder to threaten New York Magazine with defamation claims. If you're not aware, one of the top reporters for NY Magazine is Gabriel Sherman, who has written extensively about Ailes, including an entire book about Ailes. More recently, Sherman has been basically the go-to source for anything having to do with the litany of sexual harassment claims made about Ailes, including being the first to report on Megyn Kelly's statements to investigators that Ailes had allegedly sexually harassed her, and a massive recent story on "the Fox News women" who took down Ailes.
Ailes has apparently gone on the offensive, having some high-profile lawyers basically start a ridiculous smear campaign against Sherman, which not only seems to call more attention to Sherman's reporting, but also makes Ailes and his friends look desperate. And, of course, the latest move is apparently to hire Harder to threaten New York Magazine and Sherman, because Harder is now making quite a reputation for himself as the guy to go to when you want to burden publications with questionable legal claims.
And NY Mag didn't even publish a Roger Ailes sex tape or anything.
NY Magazine notes (not surprisingly) that the threat letter from Harder didn't include specifics, but rather just asked the publication to retain information for a possible legal action. In other words, it feels like a pretty empty threat.
But, once again, we're reminded of why we need a federal anti-SLAPP law. Thin-skinned billionaires (and not billionaires) are finding it way too easy to burden publications with bogus defamation claims these days.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: charles harder, defamation, donald trump, gabriel sherman, peter thiel, roger ailes
Companies: ny magazine
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Of course this won't matter or be dealt with until 1 powerful person screws up and takes on another just as powerful person (or someone backed by power). Everyone else will just have to wait for this to bite someone important enough in the ass until something changes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gretchen Carlson get $20 from Fox News
The situation described in the OP may be somewhat different from the Fox New business but respectable journals/journalists are likely to be very careful in how they write their stories in order to avoid defamation accusations.
And as far as Ailes is concerned, maybe he should just stop digging that hole he's been working on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Gore Vidal
Oh, sure. *NOW* Roger Ailes switches to litigation. If he'd done it at age fifty he wouldn't have been fired over sexual harassment claims in the first place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another Attack on Investigative Reporting
The rich and powerful make it a priority to control information.
The masses need unbiased, critical journalism to be able to make informed decisions. Unfortunately that's a threat to the powers that be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NY Mag didn't even publish a Roger Ailes sex tape or anything
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time to update the saying
To jump to the end and avoid constant revisions due to the many, many lawsuits of this type that will be cropping up now that they've been proven to be effective the saying should be changed to "Don't publish anything that someone with enough money doesn't want published".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Time to update the saying
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thiel
*Is there even a way to find out (legally)?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thiel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]