New California Law Attempts To Fight Hollywood Ageism By Censoring Third-Party Websites
from the way-to-solve-the-problem,-jackasses dept
Actress Junie Hoang may have lost her legal battle against IMDb for revealing her age, but the California Assembly is ensuring she'll win the war. Hoang sued IMDb for $1 million, claiming the publication of facts without her permission had resulted in her being a victim of Hollywood ageism. IMDb won the lawsuit, but Governor Jerry Brown has just signed a bill into law that will prevent sites like IMDb from publishing actors' ages.
California Gov. Jerry Brown on Saturday signed legislation that requires certain entertainment sites, such as IMDb, to remove – or not post in the first place – an actor’s age or birthday upon request.
The law, which becomes effective January 1, applies to database sites that allow paid subscribers to post resumes, headshots or other information for prospective employers. Only a paying subscriber can make a removal or non-publication request. Although the legislation may be most critical for actors, it applies to all entertainment job categories.
Quotes from actors' guild representatives and "industry leaders" present this as a positive change. Supposedly the removal of this information will result in fewer actors and actresses from being passed over for roles because they're "too old." Ageism may be an industry-wide problem but the correct solution would be to change Hollywood culture, not tap dance across the First Amendment.
“We are disappointed that AB 1687 was signed into law today,” said Internet Association spokesman Noah Theran. “We remain concerned with the bill and the precedent it will set of suppressing factual information on the internet.”
Michael Beckerman, the association’s president and CEO, also wrote in August for THR, about his opposition to the law.
“Requiring the removal of factually accurate age information across websites suppresses free speech,” Beckerman wrote. “This is not a question of preventing salacious rumors; rather it is about the right to present basic facts that live in the public domain. Displaying such information isn’t a form of discrimination, and internet companies should not be punished for how people use public data.”
That's the problem with this law: it shoots the messenger rather than addresses the underlying problem. The government as a whole has passed many laws aimed at reducing discrimination, but in this case, the California assembly decided the onus should be on data aggregators that have absolutely nothing to do with the process of casting films.
It's unlikely this law will survive a Constitutional challenge, seeing as it prohibits the publication of facts. While any website can voluntarily choose to withhold this information, adding the government into the equation makes it a form of censorship.
The crafters of this law are claiming this speech suppression will benefit the little guy (and girl) the most:
[California Assemblyman Ian] Calderon said the law was more for actors and actresses not as well known as big stars.
“While age information for Hollywood’s biggest stars is readily available from other online sources, this bill is aimed at protecting lesser known actors and actresses competing for smaller roles,” Calderon said in the release. “These actors should not be excluded from auditioning simply based on their age.”
Calderon is correct. Actors should not be excluded simply because of their age. But that's a problem studios need to solve. And if they can't and legislators like himself still feel compelled to step in, the law should target discriminatory hiring practices, not IMDb and other sites like it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ageism, ages, california, discrimination, facts, first amendment, free speech, hollywood, ian calderon, imdb, internet, junie huang, movies
Companies: amazon, imdb
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"Oscars So White" No More
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "Oscars So White" No More
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "Oscars So White" No More
I'm pretty sure there's a Futurama that covers exactly that situation. (They were talking about a robot, but "Acting Organism 3477" would work too.)
Why stop there?
Film Production Studio #12 Presents a Director 540 production...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "Oscars So White" No More
Is that old thing still alive? It's not even a 5 digit!
First you give them rights and now these unhappy, odd, composites are allowed to be actors...
The world was so much better when only us happy primes could become president.
Meh, those 10 digits are on my lawn again. To cut this short: I'm happy we switched to the number system. It removed all bias!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "Oscars So White" No More
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So...when the site gets a request from an actor, cancel their subscription, refund their subscription fee, and leave the information up forever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Holly Wood is a whos who of whos who. They are so drunk on their own person that is an extensively corrupt sector of entertainment. There are even Politicians less full of themselves as these guys. Many would fit right in alongside NK's ruler Fat Kim.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Makeup can only go so far at covering up things like age and gender.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Seriously; actors get turned down all the time. It's not because they're "too old" -- it's because someone younger happens to be a better fit for the role in the caster's opinion. Maybe the actor is casting for roles that are too young -- there are lots of roles out there for older actors. Meryl Streep hasn't had any problems getting good roles, but she doesn't attempt to play 20-something people anymore. Hugh Grant has moved on too....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next year, new version of the law, age's can't be reported at all, years that movies were released have to be removed, etc. After all, if the actor was in a movie that came out in 1980, you can probably figure out their age. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"...starred in their first movie at the age of 24 in 1972's this stupid movie and ..."
Or, one of the movies in their filmography itself has as one of its' user comments or random facts about the movie:
"Filming was suspended for 3 months to allow the star, XYZ, to complete their final exams and graduate with a BA from ZZZZzzzz at the very young age of 19."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
(given that it is 'hollywood' we are talking about, i am prepared for stupefication...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good Luck enforcing
Ha ha ha... no one if fucking tap dancing across the First Amendment. It has been neatly rolled onto a cardboard cylinder and placed conveniently near a hydro action refuse disposal unit.
I cannot think of anyone whom has NOT had a wipe with it!
But regarding enforcement. How does Californuts have the power to tell a website what they can and cannot post? IMDB will have grounds for suiting the State due to this law and I hope they do!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good Luck enforcing
I'm sure no tribunals would side with giving lots of money to companies for doing nothing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Coming Soon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When the "anonymous actress" suing IMDB started, it didn't take the Internet really very long to figure out and narrow down who it was, by process of elimination. And even less time to then determine Huong "Junie" Hoang's age because somewhere was an old newspaper article from her native Vietnam when she was a teen that gave it away.
Really.. how difficult is it now to figure out someone's age. Heck nowadays with social media, an errand birthday tweet from a friend is all it takes now.
They need to deal with the discrimination problem itself (which is already illegal in and of itself), and not add yet another stupid law that does absolutely nothing to fix the problem. It just means looking elsewhere for the same info that's already public.
Sigh... humanity....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course
basically, they passed a law saying "move your internet business out of state." Not to worry, there are plenty more businesses in California and none of them at contemplating moving out of state, are they?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I mean we have CFAA, this law.
Come on legislators you need to legislate harder.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brilliant
2. Site lists age of actor.
3. Actor complains that having their age listed cost them one or more roles in films.
4. Idiot politicians make it a crime to list the age of the actor, completely ignoring the actual problem.
'Something has been done' without actually addressing the core problem, politics wins again!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Brilliant
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120107/01461317324/actress-who-wished-to-remain-anonymo us-under-40-is-now-officially-neither.shtml#c697
She has happily fluffed her resume on IMDB, and it shows a whole bunch of work of hers in post production.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ageism
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Getting my anti-SLAPP counter-slapper ready
@IanCalderon born October 19, 1985 (age 30) #firstamendment #sosumi #antislapp #legalfees #badpublicity #streisandeffect @sagaftra @techdirt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My Internet...
Gov. Brown's took Al's advice instead of actually going to the studios and prosecuting them for things that they _might_ be doing (eg: ooh, say ageism and hiding money using shell companies so that EVERY movie loses money).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Secondly, on a more serious note. I wonder how this will impact sites like Wikipedia which are supposed to have verifiable information added.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It won't affect Wikipedia. It will only only affect sites where you can pay to subscribe, for one thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What this law is really
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm kinda hoping
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they won't sign up (which is free), they get removed from IMDB. credit entirely removed from all movies.
There, happy now? no-one can see the age of....oh I can't find you anywhere!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]