Verizon Punishes Techs That Try To Repair DSL Customers It No Longer Wants
from the taxpayer-subsidized-apathy dept
For decades Verizon has enjoyed billions in tax breaks and subsidies in exchange for fiber optic upgrades the telco either partially or never actually deploys. Now, for the last half decade or so, the telco has been trying to hang up on these unwanted, un-upgraded DSL customers entirely as it shifts its focus to more profitable (read: usage capped) wireless service. Well, that and buying up old and uninteresting 90s internet brands in a quest to become the next media and advertising juggernaut (note: it's not going all that well).While it's understandable that Verizon executives want to migrate to higher-growth sectors, there's a few problems. Most of these networks were built on the backs of taxpayers, and the "burdensome regulations" governing them exist in many instances to ensure nobody can unceremoniously disconnect phone service from the elderly. And Verizon has been far from ethical as it tries to back away from networks that should have been upgraded years ago, even going so far as to refuse to repair them after natural disasters like Hurricane Sandy.
Pennsylvania is one of several states where Verizon nabbed billions in subsidies, didn't do all that much with it, and now wants to just walk away from frustrated broadband customers. As the state continues scattered, largely toothless investigations into Verizon's behavior on this front, the Communications Workers of America recently issued a filing with the state PUC detailing how Verizon hamstrings its own employees from giving customers better (or any) service:
"We are seeing increasing numbers of dissatisfied customers whose service goes out when it rains or who simply have no dial tone at all,” Gardler wrote. “We know the reasons why—the cable is bad and needs to be replaced; air pressure systems are not working property; and backup batteries are not replaced when they wear out. But we are powerless to make the changes that would provide good service to customers because Verizon is not willing to spend the money, or hire the people needed, to repair the service. Instead, we're told to install VoiceLink for voice-only customers and allow the copper network to deteriorate even further."As noted above, Verizon's "solution" for axing these DSL lines is "Voice Link" a wireless-based service that only provides voice (no data) and doesn't work with the lion's share of security systems, fax machines, or many pacemakers that require landline monitoring or updates. It was the solution du jour pushed by Verizon in the aftermath of Sandy, triggering massive public backlash from users that found this "upgrade" to be a downgrade.
Obviously the unions have a vested interest in Verizon not migrating to less-unionized wireless, but the CWA also notes that Verizon employees now face termination if they actually try to do their jobs:
"Field technicians are required to have VoiceLink units on their trucks and to refuse to repair copper plant serving voice-only customers. Our members are being told that if they actually try to repair copper plant instead of using VoiceLink, they will be subject to disciplinary action by Verizon."Again, that's a telco actively punishing technicians for trying to make customers happy, since it runs contrary to Verizon's mission of trying to drive these DSL customers away via the one-two punch of repair apathy and constant price hikes. Again though, none of this would really be a problem if Verizon had actually used taxpayer subsidies to upgrade to the more resilient fiber networks it originally promised and we all collectively paid for (over and over and over again).
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Their point of view..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh wait, that's illegal now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Market failure
2) We're not getting it.
3) They're actively enforcing us not getting it, despite the fact that we paid for it.
4) It's critical infrastructure, as necessary to the smooth functioning of our modern society as roads or power lines.
Considering that Verizon has apparently settled on an official policy of fraud, (that's what it's called when you get someone to pay for something and then don't give it to them,) and considering that Verizon's apathy is specifically the result of maintaining this critical infrastructure being unprofitable, are there any good reasons why it shouldn't be nationalized at this point and run by a public agency?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Market failure
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Market failure
Red scare politics/Powell Memorandum/Southern Strategy.
While researching last night's On t'Internet blog post learned that the Southern Strategy wasn't just about overt and covert racism, it was also about states' rights and anti-federalism.
As long as the think tanks and media outlets, etc., whose inception was inspired by the Memorandum continue to exist, they will continue to preach the gospel of fear, loathing, and anarchy that keep situations like this in place. There's only one thing we can do about it: call out the lies wherever you see them and refuse to drink the Kool Aid. The more of us who push back, the less influence these people will have.
Other think tanks, etc., exist to counter these but their partisan nature has resulted in Echo Chamber One V Echo Chamber Two. It's why the right is in ascendancy: you've got to divide in order to conquer and people swing right and look for a strongman when they're scared.
You're right, Mason, but until enough people agree with you nothing will change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Market failure
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time to repay those "subsidies" hrmm PayDay Loans!
Either that, or make good on deployment of fiber to every house in America, with a minimum of gigabit-full-duplex speed @ 20.00 a month, unlimited download/upload.
So either pay back trillions in interest, or do what they fucking said they would, but now it has to be better and cheaper.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Innovation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One word to explain what we should do
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Send them to my father-in-laws
What he doesn't have is WIFI. Sure I could add at it to his existing setup but what is the point, it is too slow to do anything meaningful. I have a bunch of cool Christmas gifts picked out for the in-laws that I can't get them; like Amazon Prime and Netflix for their smart TV and an Echo Dot radio... but no instead I will end up getting them a new microwave, how lame is that.
The only silver lining is that Verizon sent him a letter stating that DSL was being discontinued in like 6 months or so.
Bottom line is that although it is shady to not repair someones DSL if the service still exists, but for the love of God please head over to my in-laws and break their existing DSL and then not fix it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Duh
If a company orders their employees not to fix a network that they intend to pretty much "end of life" at some point, it's pretty normal. It's also pretty normal that high pay line technicians have a vested interest in keeping the crappy, failing copper network running. Switching customers to voice link pretty much means that they are out of a job over time, and they know it.
So the question really is this: Is there something that specifically says and obligates Verizon has to maintain a copper network?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Duh
Yeah, baby! Kind of like the "old" people using it. Maintaining them is expensive and doesn't lead towards the future Verizon is aiming for. Let's get rid of them. I'm getting hard just thinking about it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Damned if they do, damned fi they don't. Fired either way.
And they will also be fired if they don't repair it and the customer somehow manages to make a stink that gets attention and embarrasses management.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good Bye Verizon
They can go to hell!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]