After North Carolina Law Bans Municipal Broadband, One ISP Gives Gigabit Connections Away
from the shooting-yourself-in-the-foot dept
Back in August, we noted how the FCC lost an incredibly important case regarding municipal broadband. In short, the FCC tried to dismantle state-level protectionist laws, written by incumbent ISPs, that hamstring towns and cities from building their own broadband networks or striking public/private partnerships for broadband -- even in areas those same incumbent ISPs refused to upgrade. The FCC had tried to claim that its congressional mandate to ensure "even and timely" broadband deployment allowed it to strip away any part of these laws that hindered broadband expansion.But the courts argued that the FCC lacks this authority, forcing the agency to acknowledge it was giving up on this fight. But there are still countless municipal broadband providers in the 19 states that have passed these laws that can't launch or expand existing service lest they run face-first into a law written by Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, or CenturyLink lawyers. And there are millions of customers that are incredibly frustrated by the lack of broadband market competition, resulting in the expensive, inconsistent broadband connections most of us "enjoy" today.
In North Carolina, it took Time Warner Cable four attempts to convince the state legislature to pass such a protectionist law. The FCC's failure to dismantle this law resulted in one municipal ISP, Greenlight, facing the specter of having to disconnect customers in a neighboring county given the ban on selling municipal broadband. In response, the ISP has decided not to sell broadband to these neighbors at all, instead announcing this week that it would be giving away gigabit service for free until it can figure out what to do next:
"Wilson officials voted Thursday to provide free Greenlight Community Broadband services to existing customers outside the county on a limited basis until efforts are successful in overturning the law that prohibits fee-based municipal broadband beyond the county line.And while that's quite a feel good story and a nice move by Greenlight, the reality is there's nobody coming to the rescue of these states any time soon in the wake of the FCC's loss. Incumbent telecom providers have such a stranglehold over state legislatures, they're being allowed to quite literally write the law. In most instances, the states that pass these laws wind up being among the least connected and competitive broadband states in the union. That leaves the only solution being to vote these beholden lawmakers out of office.
“While the short-term fix is not perfect, it was the only alternative we had to disconnecting our neighbors,” said Wilson Mayor Bruce Rose. “Taking broadband service from the people of Pinetops would have been a terrible blow, especially when they are still recovering from Hurricane Matthew."
The problem is that ISPs have historically been successful in framing this as a partisan issue, one in which the mean ol' government is competing unfairly with the innocent daisies in private industry. This narrative usually involves framing all municipal broadband efforts as unmitigated financial disasters, while trying to claim these laws are necessary to protect poor, naive citizens from themselves. As such efforts in Congress to pass new laws banning state protectionist laws have consistently been scuttled, in part thanks to a public voter base that has been tricked into rooting against its own best self-interest.
The reality however is that this isn't a partisan issue at all. In fact, most municipal broadband networks are being built in Conservative areas with the support of Conservative voters. As these voters grow more and more disenfranchised by the existing duopoly status quo, it's getting harder and harder to convince them that letting AT&T, Verizon and Comcast buy protectionist, anti-competitive state law is perfectly fine, while building local, better broadband networks that dramatically improve local quality of life is the very worst sort of villainy.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, competition, fcc, municipal fiber, north carolina
Companies: greenlight
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
One would think with billions that there would be a common tier of service available to everyone, rather than money being spent to make sure these beneficiary's of a system to promote connecting everyone aren't passing laws to lock people out of being connected.
Perhaps if we demanded that Congress people are limited to the lowest available tier of service in their districts, they might take notice how those they allegedly serve aren't being served. Imagine what they might think if they had to live like us mere mortals who don't get the special Congresscritter rates & services.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
whoa whoa whoa... tap the damn brakes!
When was the last time America did anything about congress? I don't think it has happened in my life time. The some old career politicians are continually voted into office.
I tell you what, you keep your nose up the ass of YOUR local corrupt politician and I will keep my nose up the ass of MY own. As long as mine keeps giving me what I want, I don't care if you like them or not. I do not care if they are corrupt as fuck or not, I dot not care what they have to sell down the river to get me what I want. As long as they do, they get to keep their seat in my state or district.
I want corruption in government because it serves me! I don't give a fuck what else happens!
and if you think I am fucking jokes, shit no! This IS AMERICA!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100919/02284211072/back-when-the-senate-tried-to-ban-dial- telephones.shtml
.. so what makes you think they even "have" broadband? Or would even know if they had it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
we got small-dee democracy in name only, the korporations call the tune, and we dance a jig for them...
that is obviously the best possible world for all concerned....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If voting could change anything, it would have been prohibited a long time ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
both stories
the monolithic incumbents keeping the local towns and cities *and* any non-government entities out of their fiefdom much to all of our distress.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They will undoubtedly now advertise the municipal broadband as "so bad they can't even sell it outside of the county".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cant Trust Government Service???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cant Trust Government Service???
Regular telephone only needs about 400~3000 hz worth of analog transmission data to carry voice. To improve the distance the coils and repeaters would extend and clean the line of noise, which means stripping everything that could operate in frequencies beyond that which voice used. Since DSL used frequencies outside of that range they were hampered by these old relics still sitting around the telco lines.
And remember we lead the way for internet, it is real easy to pick on the people doing it all first without having the best clue. Those that came after us were able to build better infrastructure by learning from our mistakes and not repeating them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cant Trust Government Service???
Which does nothing to prevent us from building better infrastructure. The only thing preventing us from doing so is a lack of competition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cant Trust Government Service???
The usual corruption.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the only other winner is the company selling KY Jelly™ to the consumers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you live in that area...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If you live in that area...
Wouldn’t that be a kick in the teeth to TWC and friends.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They aren't paying us for broadband, they are paying a modem rental fee. Comcast does it why can't we?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Greenlight doesn't use modems. We are entirely fiber optic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here's the thing...
So, none of these ISPs should be monopolies to begin with!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cable prices have risen at more than double the rate of inflation for 20 years - http://boingboing.net/2016/11/01/cable-prices-have-risen-at-mor.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The infamous ISP manipulative act.
Local and State representation, is where the fight has to be brought to. The ISPs have immense finances, tools and representation via lobbying and special interest groups. As do just about all big business, per their own interest. Citizens need to organize and develop the same strategies when things seem unbalanced for a long time.
We all should have benefits of a free market when it helps us all. In fact, no form of business practices should exist in this Nation. That ultimately oppress its taxpaying citizens, in favor of personal interest! The monopolies that don't exist with ISP’s, really do exists. In the form of non competition, manipulated by costs! How many ISP customers complain about, deceptive practices. Yet have no other choices for lack of competition. This is the worst non policy, in my opinion.
Local and State gov. Should impliment better policy and law for the benefits of its people first, then direct attention to business. Single ISPs shouldnt be allowed to provide service in areas. Policy should be set up to require several or more providers. Lines should be installed before development completion. Inspection of equipment and services guaranteeing what people are paying for, should also be realized. Fast profiting from ISP and many Technology sector businesses, has only proven to benefit shareholders while downtrodding substantial majorities with higher cost, bad services and massive job losses!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]