Electronic Arts Unveils New Policy For Marking YouTube Videos As 'Supported' Or 'Advertisement'

from the huh dept

While the past few years have seen a torrent of criticism heaped on the video game journalism world, far too little of it has been focused on the cozy contractual deals being worked out between publishers and YouTube personalities that review games. With some of these arrangements having come to light, most notably concerning Nintendo and Warner Bros. games coverage, it's fairly safe to assume that many other publishers do something of this sort. These arrangements work something like this: the game publisher will offer access to the games for review by the YouTuber, so long as the YouTuber agrees to offer generally positive reviews to the product. The YouTuber benefits by being first to market with reviews, the publisher benefits from positive coverage, and the public gets spit in the eye while losing their trust in the personalities they have followed. Add to it all that some of these arrangements fail to follow FTC guidelines on marking paid-for material and you're left with the inevitable understanding that this is an arrangement that can only last for a short period of time, as the public trust in the reviewers will torpedo to the point of losing the audience completely.

It's devolved to the point where even companies from which we've come to expect the worst are trying to get out ahead of all this. Electronic Arts, for instance, best known for its annual rivalry with Comcast over the "Worst Company" award, has developed a new policy for marking YouTube videos produced under this arrangement that is actually quite good.

In a post on EA’s German news blog (translated by NeoGAF), EA announced that they’re stepping up their disclosure game by contractually requiring content creators to disclose with EA-provided hashtags and watermarks. The watermarks are pictured above. I reached out to EA in North America, and they confirmed that it’s a company-wide thing, though some rules vary by region.

“Supported by EA” is to be used in situations where EA has paid for access to the game (travel, review copies, etc), but did not influence the video/stream itself. “Advertisement,” on the other hand, is exactly what it sounds like: EA provided material or directly influenced the direction of the content’s, um, contents.

The disclosure logos themselves, seen at the link, are simple and clear. It's actually the exact kind of transparency we would hope for. No longer should potential customers wonder if a review has been influenced in any way by EA, or even if EA has taken some actions to ingratiate itself to the reviewer. It's clearly labeled.

Now, we'll have to see how this ends up working in practice. Questions remain, such as how big the logos will be, whether YouTubers will take things a step further and call attention to the disclosures, or if nefarious omissions of the disclosure logos will occur. But in concept, it's quite good, and perhaps not the kind of thing we would expect to be pioneered by EA. So good on them.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: advertisements, sponsored content, video games, videos
Companies: ea, youtube


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    dfed (profile), 23 Nov 2016 @ 3:23pm

    So...wait...this actually is about ethics in game journalism?

    Huh.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      dfed (profile), 23 Nov 2016 @ 3:30pm

      Re:

      So does this mean GG will stop harassing people online? Or that it works and they'll now harass more people?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Nov 2016 @ 3:35pm

        Re: Re:

        Yes?

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        PaulT (profile), 24 Nov 2016 @ 1:15am

        Re: Re:

        Most of those folks are happy to harrass and abuse anyone. GG was just the handy excuse at the time to be pricks, They'll find another soon enough if they feel like the old excuse no longer works.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 24 Nov 2016 @ 4:40am

      Re:

      Not really, it's mostly about EA not getting nominated for any more "worst company" awards.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    orbitalinsertion (profile), 23 Nov 2016 @ 4:44pm

    Re: helping

    it is to lol

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    PaulT (profile), 24 Nov 2016 @ 1:14am

    "No longer should potential customers wonder if a review has been influenced in any way by EA, or even if EA has taken some actions to ingratiate itself to the reviewer."

    *Should* being the operative word. We now have to wonder whether this arrangement is actually being followed 100% of the time, or if there's still some under the table goings on that they think will go unnoticed so long as the have the public disclaimer available on a majority of works.

    Sadly, as with DRM and every other shady practice involved by EA, they have lost the trust long ago of everyone paying attention, but the general public typically doesn't do that so long as said company has a monopoly on the things they want.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Ninja (profile), 24 Nov 2016 @ 4:04am

      Re:

      EA is dead for me. I don't even bother to pirate their games to try anymore. So, spot on.

      I will just leave this here:

      "not the kind of thing we would expect to be pioneered by EA"

      So we are expecting it not to be followed.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Padpaw (profile), 24 Nov 2016 @ 12:53pm

    The one constant I have learned with EA is, they will screw over their customers every time in some way

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.