Bill Introduced To Push Back Approval Of DOJ's Proposed Rule 41 Changes
from the buying-time dept
Unless someone steps up to push this off course, the DOJ's proposed changes to Rule 41 will become law December 1. That's the key part: doing something. All that has to happen is nothing for the changes to become law. The December 1st date plays right into the DOJ's hands, arriving between two major holidays when legislators have other things on their minds, including the annual Congressional fisticuffs over the federal budget.
The DOJ says the changes are no big deal. Just an "update" on outdated laws. Oddly, it's never shown any interest in updating any other outdated laws (like the CFAA) or pushed for a reconsideration of the Third Party Doctrine, which traces back nearly four decades. When it comes to expansions of power, though, it's apparently time for some "updating."
The proposed changes would allow the FBI to hack thousands of computers around the world with a single warrant, much like it already did during two child porn investigations. Unfortunately for the FBI, its warrant is being met with successful challenges because the agency clearly violated Rule 41 jurisdictional limitations.
In addition, the DOJ wants permission to break into "compromised" computers and poke around inside them without the permission or knowledge of the owners of these computers. It also wants to treat anything that anonymizes internet users or hides their locations to be presumed acts of a guilty mind. The stripping of jurisdictional limits not only grants the FBI worldwide access for digital seizures and searches, but also encourages it to go venue shopping for judicial rubber stamps.
Earlier this year, Sen. Ron Wyden introduced a bill aimed at stopping the DOJ's Rule 41 push. Not much has been heard about this bill since, so Wyden (along with Sens. Coons, Lee, Franken, and Daines) has introduced another bill seeking to prevent a "do nothing" approval of expanding hacking/search powers. The "Review the Rule Act" [PDF] is about as succinct as legislation gets. Here's the complete summary of the proposed legislation (via Naked Security):
To delay the amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Wyden's earlier bill hasn't gained any traction and the hopes of a complete rejection before December 1st are nearly nonexistent. So, this bill just asks for a little more time to discuss the implications of the changes. This would move the default approval date back seven months to July 1, 2017.
This would allow representatives more time to fully consider the DOJ's proposal, freed from the time crunch of major holidays and annual federal budget discussions. There's far too much at stake to simply allow the DOJ to roll its Rule 41 ball downhill and past a distracted Congress. Many legislators like procrastination as much as they like not doing anything, so signing off on this proposal shouldn't require much effort, mental or otherwise.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: congress, doj, fbi, hacking, nit, ron wyden, rule 41, warrant
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
So if people, who are not living in the US, take steps to try and avoid the US spying on their business, they are guilty of something, and their machines can be attacked. That attitude is painting a huge target on the US, and it is its citizens, and not the politicians, who will suffer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Only matter of time before enough countries get pissed off enough to risk a war.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Following DOJ's rule book, they'd have to: the hacking would be perfectly legit as long as any Judge anywhere in the world agrees it is necessary based on local laws.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How exactly do they propose changes that become law? They do not write law. Hell, even congressmen don't write laws anymore. Apparently only lobbyists write laws these days. THAT I could rant about for hours!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DOJ Outlaws
"They do not write law."
Silly boy, you somehow think the US Federal Government and DOJ operate "lawfully" under the US Constitution ?
They do not and have not for at least century.
Dozens of Federal Executive agencies (DOJ, IRS, FDA, SEC, etc) have extensive law-making power... in open defiance of the Constitution. Few Americans know or care.
Executive "laws" are usually called "regulations" or "policies" or "directives". They are all laws from a citizens perspective. Most US "laws" exist in this unconstitutional category... almost half a million of them.
American "laws" are so numerous,complex & constantly changing--- that no one can possibly understand them. Laws are supposed to shield citizens against tyrannical government, but instead are now used as a government weapon to control the populace.
Rule of Law is long gone in America.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DOJ Outlaws
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DOJ Outlaws
...No,No,No ! --- "CREATING law" (illegally) is precisely the same thing as NOT operating "lawfully" under the US Constitution
We now have outlaws blatantly creating and enforcing US laws, at their personal discretion
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Faith No More
Bill Introduced To Push Back Approval Of DOJ's Proposed Rule 41 Changes
It is no great mystery that when government and it's agents continuously seek to circumvent the Constitution via overt/covert schemes that use expedient circumstances as the rational in order to further empower themselves at the direct expense of every citizens Inalienable Rights to Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness people justifiably will lose faith in governments institutions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or is it just because non-US citizen == terrorist?
The hypocrisy and arrogance is astounding. Non-US citizen hacks US interests? Have them deported to US for charges immediately! US interests hack non-US citizen? Oh that's perfectly fine; completely different scenario.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: who will follow suit,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sadly, the US citizens are also considered terrorists until proven wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course if any other country does the very same thing to the US it means war. As the US refuses to have their soveriegnty violated like that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sure, everyone on the planet hates the United States, but it's 100% understandable. We're the worst terrorist regime that has ever existed in the history of mankind!!
The following is a must read!! https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"The proposed changes would allow the FBI to hack thousands of computers around the world with a single warrant"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't know about them, but I wouldn't especially like having 300 million, heavily-armed, really pissed off people coming my way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time to take action
[ link to this | view in chronology ]