Bill Introduced To Push Back Approval Of DOJ's Proposed Rule 41 Changes

from the buying-time dept

Wed, Nov 23rd 2016 12:59pm — Tim Cushing

Unless someone steps up to push this off course, the DOJ's proposed changes to Rule 41 will become law December 1. That's the key part: doing something. All that has to happen is nothing for the changes to become law. The December 1st date plays right into the DOJ's hands, arriving between two major holidays when legislators have other things on their minds, including the annual Congressional fisticuffs over the federal budget.

The DOJ says the changes are no big deal. Just an "update" on outdated laws. Oddly, it's never shown any interest in updating any other outdated laws (like the CFAA) or pushed for a reconsideration of the Third Party Doctrine, which traces back nearly four decades. When it comes to expansions of power, though, it's apparently time for some "updating."

The proposed changes would allow the FBI to hack thousands of computers around the world with a single warrant, much like it already did during two child porn investigations. Unfortunately for the FBI, its warrant is being met with successful challenges because the agency clearly violated Rule 41 jurisdictional limitations.

In addition, the DOJ wants permission to break into "compromised" computers and poke around inside them without the permission or knowledge of the owners of these computers. It also wants to treat anything that anonymizes internet users or hides their locations to be presumed acts of a guilty mind. The stripping of jurisdictional limits not only grants the FBI worldwide access for digital seizures and searches, but also encourages it to go venue shopping for judicial rubber stamps.

Earlier this year, Sen. Ron Wyden introduced a bill aimed at stopping the DOJ's Rule 41 push. Not much has been heard about this bill since, so Wyden (along with Sens. Coons, Lee, Franken, and Daines) has introduced another bill seeking to prevent a "do nothing" approval of expanding hacking/search powers. The "Review the Rule Act" [PDF] is about as succinct as legislation gets. Here's the complete summary of the proposed legislation (via Naked Security):

To delay the amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Wyden's earlier bill hasn't gained any traction and the hopes of a complete rejection before December 1st are nearly nonexistent. So, this bill just asks for a little more time to discuss the implications of the changes. This would move the default approval date back seven months to July 1, 2017.

This would allow representatives more time to fully consider the DOJ's proposal, freed from the time crunch of major holidays and annual federal budget discussions. There's far too much at stake to simply allow the DOJ to roll its Rule 41 ball downhill and past a distracted Congress. Many legislators like procrastination as much as they like not doing anything, so signing off on this proposal shouldn't require much effort, mental or otherwise.

2016 11 17 Review the Rule Act of 2016 (PDF)2016 11 17 Review the Rule Act of 2016 (Text)

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: congress, doj, fbi, hacking, nit, ron wyden, rule 41, warrant

24 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 23 Nov 2016 @ 1:13pm

It also wants to treat anything that anonymizes internet users or hides their locations to be presumed acts of a guilty mind. The stripping of jurisdictional limits not only grants the FBI worldwide access for digital seizures and searches, but also encourages it to go venue shopping for judicial rubber stamps.

So if people, who are not living in the US, take steps to try and avoid the US spying on their business, they are guilty of something, and their machines can be attacked. That attitude is painting a huge target on the US, and it is its citizens, and not the politicians, who will suffer.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Peter (profile), 23 Nov 2016 @ 1:26pm

If the Russian FSA faxes a warrant signed by a Russian judge over to the State department, will the FBI close the investigations on the Russian hackers?
Following DOJ's rule book, they'd have to: the hacking would be perfectly legit as long as any Judge anywhere in the world agrees it is necessary based on local laws.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Nov 2016 @ 2:23pm

"the DOJ's proposed changes to Rule 41 will become law December 1"

How exactly do they propose changes that become law? They do not write law. Hell, even congressmen don't write laws anymore. Apparently only lobbyists write laws these days. THAT I could rant about for hours!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Capstan, 23 Nov 2016 @ 3:10pm

DOJ Outlaws
//

"They do not write law."

Silly boy, you somehow think the US Federal Government and DOJ operate "lawfully" under the US Constitution ?

They do not and have not for at least century.

Dozens of Federal Executive agencies (DOJ, IRS, FDA, SEC, etc) have extensive law-making power... in open defiance of the Constitution. Few Americans know or care.

Executive "laws" are usually called "regulations" or "policies" or "directives". They are all laws from a citizens perspective. Most US "laws" exist in this unconstitutional category... almost half a million of them.

American "laws" are so numerous,complex & constantly changing--- that no one can possibly understand them. Laws are supposed to shield citizens against tyrannical government, but instead are now used as a government weapon to control the populace.

Rule of Law is long gone in America.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Personanongrata, 23 Nov 2016 @ 3:23pm

Faith No More
Bill Introduced To Push Back Approval Of DOJ's Proposed Rule 41 Changes

It is no great mystery that when government and it's agents continuously seek to circumvent the Constitution via overt/covert schemes that use expedient circumstances as the rational in order to further empower themselves at the direct expense of every citizens Inalienable Rights to Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness people justifiably will lose faith in governments institutions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Nov 2016 @ 3:30pm

Re: DOJ Outlaws
Oh, I know they do not operate "lawfully" under the US Constitution, but that's a whole different ball of wax from CREATING law.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rekrul, 23 Nov 2016 @ 4:58pm

What's the point? Even if the attempt to push the date to next July is successful, nothing will change. There won't any discussion. Congress will just sit there with their thumbs up their asses until a week or so before the deadline when someone like Wyden will try to block it again and the cycle will repeat until the changes eventually get implemented.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Nov 2016 @ 6:03pm

I must have missed when the broader world decided the FBI had the right to do whatever it wanted, wherever it wanted, irrespective of location. I must have missed the part when US jurisdiction was expanded to include all of Earth.

Or is it just because non-US citizen == terrorist?

The hypocrisy and arrogance is astounding. Non-US citizen hacks US interests? Have them deported to US for charges immediately! US interests hack non-US citizen? Oh that's perfectly fine; completely different scenario.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jland, 24 Nov 2016 @ 6:20am

DOJ Outlaws
--------------

...No,No,No ! --- "CREATING law" (illegally) is precisely the same thing as NOT operating "lawfully" under the US Constitution

We now have outlaws blatantly creating and enforcing US laws, at their personal discretion
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Padpaw (profile), 24 Nov 2016 @ 10:13am

No other countries laws and governments matter when it comes to the FbI going after people they don't like. International treaties and standards be damned.

Of course if any other country does the very same thing to the US it means war. As the US refuses to have their soveriegnty violated like that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Padpaw (profile), 24 Nov 2016 @ 10:15am

Re:
Let's be honest the US has had a giant target painted on them for decades now. Ever since they started to overthrow democratic countries and installing pro US dictatorships in their place.

Only matter of time before enough countries get pissed off enough to risk a war.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Nov 2016 @ 11:32am

Re: who will follow suit,
Now.... if this law 41 passes ........ its just a matter of time .......before every law enforcement agency in the US, will want the same. As it stands today the law enforcement agencies and there departments lie, cheat, and hide the truth from the public. Can you image what will happen if this Law come into fruition ......
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Nov 2016 @ 11:39am

Fucking scummy US lawmakers. At least Russia and China are up front with their shit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Nov 2016 @ 12:47pm

I'M NOT A COWARD..... I just know that in every community in the bay area our civil rights are violated, every day by the law enforcement agencies that are suppose to protect us. Our community does not even know how bad it is or how the laws are being violated and swept under the rug, due to the fact that law enforcement polices it self, and that's how they are able to get away with it..............When i filed a complaint the original case number they gave me vanished and was replaced by law enforcement with another case number. The complaint I filed could not be traced through the original case number. Therefor my civil rights complaint was completely covered up, hidden and they were free to make it go away..............And you expect me to give my name are you JOKING!!!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
hackers of the world unite, 24 Nov 2016 @ 2:35pm

"The proposed changes would allow the FBI to hack thousands of computers around the world with a single warrant"
you fuck wiht me ill make you pay fbi.......we done this before we'll do it again and if its shown you attack me in my nation without due process here.....you wont have any redress of damages.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 25 Nov 2016 @ 2:58am

Re:
"Or is it just because non-US citizen == terrorist?"

Sadly, the US citizens are also considered terrorists until proven wrong.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Nov 2016 @ 12:41pm

Mr Wyden could introduce a bill to say the sky is green. Introducing a bill requires nothing more than a decent printer and some creative writing skills. It's not news, hundreds if not thousands of bills are introduced each year that have absolutely no chance of even making it to whatever stage comes before debate or discussion. The value is only in the slow news day or narrow focus website coverage that the person introducing the bill might get.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oninoshiko (profile), 28 Nov 2016 @ 8:39am

Re: Re:
I think you're confused, they are not non-terrorists once proven wrong, just not yet radicalized.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Nov 2016 @ 10:32am

Re:
and that would make the FBI guilty of spying computers in other countries that they are not supposed to be allowed to.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They Can Suck It!!, 1 Dec 2016 @ 7:45pm

Are we now in The (USSA), United Soviet States of America? Fuck them, fuck their watch list, and fuck their Big Brother mentality. I love TOR, and I'll use it even more now. If I commit a crime, arrest and prosecute me. By all means. Until then - SUCK IT!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2016 @ 7:48pm

Re:
We now live in a country where paranoia, delusion, greed and a totalitarian rule dominates. This won't fix itself!! It can only get worse until the people put an end to it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Dec 2016 @ 7:58pm

Re:
Well said!! We have cowardly, delusional, greedy short-dicks that pull the strings behind the scenes to keep perpetual war going, and the money flowing in. I've never heard of a never-ending war when you have no real enemy. How the fuck would you even know if you won a war on terror? Do you get an email? Does some terrorist organization send out a tweet?

Sure, everyone on the planet hates the United States, but it's 100% understandable. We're the worst terrorist regime that has ever existed in the history of mankind!!

The following is a must read!! https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bring It On, 1 Dec 2016 @ 8:04pm

Keep pushing mother fuckers. You can only push so much before people start pushing back.

I don't know about them, but I wouldn't especially like having 300 million, heavily-armed, really pissed off people coming my way.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pissed Off American, 21 Jan 2017 @ 12:28pm

Time to take action
We exist as a country because of a silly tea tax. Why are we sitting still when stuff like this is going on? We need to take our country back from these idiots.
[ link to this | view in thread ]