Coal CEO Threatens John Oliver With A SLAPP Suit
from the not-a-good-idea dept
This past weekend on John Oliver's Last Week Tonight, he took on the issue of "coal" and some politicians' obsession with coal jobs as the only true "American" jobs. The whole segment is interesting, but obviously not the kind of thing we'd normally write up. What we do frequently write about, however, is censorious threats, often from wealthy execs, designed to try to silence people from commenting on issues regarding those doing the threatening. And, it appears that's exactly what happened with coal exec Bob Murray, the CEO of Murray Energy, when he found out that John Oliver was doing a segment that included some bits about Murray.
I recommend watching the whole thing, but the parts about Murray include a brief bit around 4:45 in the video and then a much longer section starting around 12:30 in the video, where Oliver notes:
I'm going to need to be careful here, because when we contacted Murray Energy for this piece, they sent us a letter instructing us to "cease and desist from any effort to defame, harass, or otherwise injure Mr. Murray or Murray Energy" and telling us that "failure to do so will result in immediate litigation..."
Oliver notes that this is the first cease & desist his show has received (which he agrees is incredible). Oliver also points out that Murray has, in fact, been known to follow through on these threats -- suing the NY Times, a contributor to the Huffington Post and more. Many of these lawsuits appear to be fairly classic SLAPP suits, in which the lawsuits against reporters and journalism outfits are designed to try to silence them. Thankfully, Oliver and HBO have good lawyers who clearly know Oliver's rights to talk about, criticize and satirize Murray -- and Oliver then spends the next ten or so minutes doing so (hilariously), even to the point of involving a talking squirrel (you need to watch it yourself to understand why it makes sense). He also notes this at the end:
Bob Murray, I didn't really plan for so much of this piece to be about you, but you kinda forced my hand on that one. And I know you're probably going to sue me over this. But, you know what? I stand by everything I said.
Kudos to Oliver for taking a principled stand here for free speech on an important issue. Of course, Oliver has HBO and its lawyers to back him up, but it sure would be a hell of a lot easier if we had strong anti-SLAPP laws to protect him. So, once again, this is why we need a strong federal anti-SLAPP law, not to mention better state-level anti-SLAPP laws. Bob Murray appears to be based in Ohio, which (lucky him) appears to have no anti-SLAPP law, while I believe John Oliver is in NY, which has an incredibly weak anti-SLAPP law.
Perhaps, sometime soon, John Oliver can take on the need for stronger anti-SLAPP laws.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: anti-slapp, bob murray, coal, first amendment, free speech, john oliver, mockery, reporting, satire, slapp
Companies: hbo, murray energy
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Like in Massachusetts! And preferably with retrospective effect!!
#ShivaTime
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://constitutionus.com/
Article I
Section 9
Paragraph 3
No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The multiple retroactive extensions to copyright laws would seem to argue otherwise.
Not saying it should be allowed('What you did was legal yesterday, and isn't today. Guess who's going to court tomorrow?'), but the legislature doesn't seem to have a problem doing it anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
- Media Companies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
um... why???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: um... why???
We are not a police state, hands on your head!
BLAM!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Geo Restriction
Way to go HBO, how to connect with your fans. NOT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Geo Restriction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Geo Restriction
Isn't "The uploader has not made this video available in your country" basically a lie though? The problem is not that they failed to do something, but that they took specific action to limit the viewership. The default is that anyone can see a video.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Geo Restriction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kinda torn
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Kinda torn
In this case the politicians need to plan 10+ years ahead and prepare a solution before the problem occurs. Energy companies using a near-monopoly on an essential service to squeeze people is not exactly new or unforeseeable (Enron *cough*).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Kinda torn
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Kinda torn
Bottom line, there's 2 main things killing coal miner jobs. One is increased automation (7 whole workers can now do 'mountain top removal' to harvest as much coal as it took hundreds in a coal mine in the past).
The other thing killing coal jobs is that it's just not that economical anymore compared to many alternative sources. Natural gas is the biggest alternate fuel thing that's hurt coal at the moment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trump is blowing smoke up peoples butts.
It is amazing they still believe him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/03/31/8-surprisingly-small-industries-that-em ploy-more-people-than-coal/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Why do you find this amazing? People will always believe someone that tells them what they want to hear. If you live in a coal town you have the following choices:
Number 3 is pretty scary for a lot of people, so when someone tells them its all going to be fine and they can keep doing numbers 1 and 2 of course they believe them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Some US versus THEM rhetorics in catchy language can go a long way in creating fanatics for "the cause"! The problem with fanatics is the despair when the subject of their affection is gone or the common cause is abandoned.
That is a problem Trump has created and as unruly the stupid liberals have been since the election, that is only the beginning. The stupid conservatives will enter the fray either in a revolt against politicians in general or in a war against democracy when their beloved leader cannot stay in power...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My first thought/opinion after watching that segment of the show was:
If Murray Energy's first reaction upon media contact is to threaten legal action, then they must seriously be up to some shady BS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's Not Just "shady BS.." It's a Charge of Murder.
Murray cannot run away from his own blood-guilt, however far he runs-- or whoever he sues. It is only necessary to read the Federal findings into the court record, and it's a case of Damages of One Penny.
http://www.dominionpost.com/Murray-Energy-sues-New-York-Time
https://arlweb.msha.gov/genwal/ccs ummary.asp
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crandall_Canyon_Mine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WHERE'S TRUMP'S SLAPP?
.
.
ATTENTION: CHRIS WRAY
.
.
In addition to Trump FAILING to sue CNN for CNN's refusal to air Trump's "PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT (the which, Trump would LOSE!... as he could be shown to have attempted a violation of the CONSTITUTIONALLY SANCTIONED Security of the Person of Americans!)", he has also FAILED to "legally challenge" an "alleged victim" at, h-t-t-p://www(dot)huffingtonpost(dot)com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944(dot)html, for an allegation of C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E/ C-H-I-L-D A-B-U-S-E!... and to sue alleged "FAUX NEWSERS", that/ which have "falsly reported" the said C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E/ C-H-I-L-D A-B-U-S-E TALE! Thus, how can ANYONE-- i.e., of G-O-O-D C-O-N-S-C-I-E-N-C-E!-- trust a wanna- be Prez who screams "FAUX NEWS", "FAUX NEWS", "FAUX NEWS"!... and would sue his neighbor's housecat if given the chance!... but would "clam up" tighter than a Contestant's crotch on a segment of his The Apprentice, when challenged on his F-A-I-L-U-R-E to go after the I-L-L-E-G-A-L-I-T-Y, O-F A C-L-A-I-M O-F C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E/ C-H-I-L-D A-B-U-S-E! The reason, is ABUNDANTLY CLEAR!... T-H-E C-L-A-I-M I-S L-E-G-I-T!... A-N-D J-A-M-E-S C-O-M-E-Y, T-R-U-M-P-- A-N-D T-R-U-M-P-'-S "W-I-F-E"!-- K-N-O-W I-T!
.
Chris Wray, If the allegation of C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E/ C-H-I-L-D A-B-U-S-E against Donald Trump is C-R-I-M-I-N-A-L and T-O-R-T-I-O-U-S!... and, proffered by a "FAUX VICTIM"* and "FAUX MEDIA"!... then will you-- as the new FBI Director (who has been Appointed by a "President" who is in a C-L-E-A-R CONFLICT OF INTEREST in making the Appointment!)!-- be going after this "FAUX VICTIM" for proffering C-R-I-M-I-N-A-L A-N-D T-O-R-T-I-O-U-S C-L-A-I-M-S O-F C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E/ C-H-I-L-D A-B-U-S-E, and, will you be going after the FAUX NEWSERS for spreading C-R-I-M-I-N-A-L A-N-D T-O-R-T-I-O-U-S F-A-U-X N-E-W-S O-F C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E/ C-H-I-L-D A-B-U-S-E? Chris Wray, will you uphold your D-U-T-Y to protect America's children, and American families? Otherwise!... it's hard to rationalize why the FBI would leave the alleged Trump victim "HIGH AND DRY (e.g., she withdrew her filing on Nov 4, 2016, due to said fears for her life!... stated her counsel!)"!... and conversely, would fail to go after this FAUX VICTIM for C-R-I-M-I-N-A-L-L-Y A-N-D T-O-R-T-I-O-U-S-L-Y giving false testimony re an allegation of C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E on the one hand, and, would fail to go after FAUX NEWESERS for reporting C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E on the other! And, how does that absence of FBI D-U-T-Y even make sense? And, why would one believe-- should one believe!-- that the FBI is S-O-O-O-O I-N-C-O-M-P-E-T-E-N-T that it would either fail to protect a victim of C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E (F-O-R W-H-I-C-H, T-H-E-R-E C-A-N B-E N-O M-O-R-A-T-O-R-I-U-M!)!... or fail to go after A FAKE VICTIM who has alleged such a claim, and fail to go after FAUX NEWSERS which have reported same! A-B-S-O-L-U-T-E-L-Y I-N-C-R-E-D-I-B-L-E! And in Huffington Post's report of Trump's C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E/ C-H-I-L-D A-B-U-S-E charges, there was SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE for a judge to ratify the sending of the matter to a court for adjudication by Dec 28, 2016! And, so!... if the victim was P-A-I-D O-F-F, W-E S-H-O-U-L-D K-N-O-W A-B-O-U-T I-T!... A-N-D I-F H-U-S-H M-O-N-E-Y W-A-S O-F-F-E-R-E-D U-P A-N-D R-E-C-E-I-V-E-D, T-H-E-N T-H-E V-I-C-T-I-M A-N-D D-O-N-A-L-D T-R-U-M-P S-H-O-U-L-D B-E C-R-I-M-I-N-A-L-L-Y C-H-A-R-G-E-D! The victim, for R-E-C-E-I-V-I-N-G A B-R-I-B-E!... and he, for O-F-F-E-R-I-N-G A B-R-I-B-E, and for C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E/ C-H-I-L-D A-B-U-S-E!
.
Lastly... Chris Wray, will you be going after Donald Trump for releasing Classified information?
.
Please!... no emails!
.
P.S.: Given the VERACITY of the allegation of C-H-I-L-D R-A-P-E/ C-H-I-L-D A-B-U-S-E!... and Comey's ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of this!... should Comey's KNOWLEDGE soon pose an "indirect threat" to "certain" White House interests (e.g., if Comey decides to accept the offer from Julian Assange to act as a WikiLeaks Spy, re U.S. Government wrongdoing!), I'd be VERY CONCERNED about the safety and security of James Comey! Although!... maybe!... Julian Assange may feel that Comey would be "better protected" if he "befriends" the WikiLeaks League! And so... Chris Wray!... will you ensure the safety of James Comey, should Comey decide to "spill the beans" on MR. POTUS?
.
*The Federal Stalking Statute (see, Federal Stalking Statute, 18 U.S.C. §2261A) makes it a F-E-L-O-N-Y for someone to use any interactive computer service, or electronic communication service or system (by the FBI, CIA, NSA, or otherwise!... and, e.g., the aforecited URL, with the intent to kill, injure, HARASS, INTIMIDATE, or place under surveillance (through an official and/ or an unofficial proxy!) another person... and engage in a course of conduct that places a person in reasonable fear of death, or serious bodily injury, OR CAUSES, ATTEMPTS TO CAUSE, OR WOULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL EMOTIONAL DISTRESS (but, let us include, THE POTENTIAL COMPROMISE OF A U.S. FEDERAL ELECTION PROCESS!)!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Coal Barons
Domination and collusion form the foundation of their world. Aggressively vitiating a diverse economy, manipulating the regions Scotch-Irish culture of thanes and lairds, and gaming the local elections are standard stuff, Mr. Murray is in familiar territory as he seeks an Orwellian strong arm approach to criticism from the national media.
Here, the television and radio stations are largely owned by coal barons (most others are owned by tele-evangelists). The state's senators, federal and local, lie persistently about the value and role of coal to the region and the state. Decades back, a tour of Wyoming's Powder River Basin convinced many coal barons to divest, moving into banks, investment firms, and even college ebooks. What should have invited an honest admission that eastern coal wasn't competitive instead became the Big Lie, that Democrats, environmentalists, and folks that just plain didn't like rural Appalachians were to blame for the loss of market and jobs. To my great embarrassment, my neighbors have clung to those lies, changed their political views, and voted against their interests ever since. Given that so many embrace an evangelism predicated on oppression, Christians vs Romans etc, most direct efforts to bring change are trivialized to an attack on their religious beliefs.
Since that worked so well locally, owning the media, the churches, and the elected, it has been a model for the national dialog as well. Mr Murray is just doing what has worked. The tragedy is that it still works.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Coal Barons
These people you speak of are in the same boat; high on religious nostalgia and afraid of what their friends and neighbours might say if they step out of line. What a toxic mess!
It really is a tragedy and the worst thing about it is that it will take such a long time to resolve.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
video not available but its ok ill pirate oliver then
SCREW YOU
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If the miners were mining diamonds, we'd have a "diamond industry", not a "coal industry". ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The original poster tried very hard to be poetic. It's a shame for him that reality paints a far starker picture.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jun 21st, 2017 @ 9:41am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Oliver has HBO and its lawyers to back him up"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Truth hurts
[ link to this | view in chronology ]