Alex Mauer Gets Another Game Taken Down From Steam Via DMCA As She Sends Imagos' Lawyer Death Threats
from the whoo-boy dept
Last month, we discussed a strange spate of DMCA notices going out from Alex Mauer, a video game music composer. Through her DMCA blitz, she managed to get a game removed from Steam, as well as getting several DMCA strikes against several YouTubers that had covered that game, all apparently as a result of a contract dispute she had with Imagos Softworks and her general inability to understand contractual language and copyright law. The tone of that post was justifiably critical, but some are now concerned that there is a well-being issue at hand. For starters, Mauer has now targeted a second game via DMCA takedown and has managed to get Steam to remove the game from its listings.
A copyright claim by a composer with a tendency to attract legal drama has led Steam to remove the game River City Ransom: Underground. The developers are disputing the claim and say they expect the game to be back on Steam at some point in the future.
On Friday, July 14th, Steam removed River City Ransom: Underground due to a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) claim filed by composer Alex Mauer. In the claim, Mauer said that music she produced for the game was being used without her permission.
Mauer goes on to note that she doesn't have any documentation of her arrangement with Conatus Creative, developers of the game, but that this actually strengthens her claim, reasoning that if her music appears in the game and there is no written permission, it's copyright infringement. That seemingly sensical stance is rebutted, however, by Conatus, who does claim to have documentation proving its side of the argument.
Let me make it absolutely clear – Alex Mauer’s claim that the game violates her copyright is false. She is a co-creator of the music, with Dino Lionetti and Rich Vreeland. Our written license agreement is with Rich, who subcontracted Alex and Dino. When Rich offered to pay Alex an equal share of the music fee for her contribution to the game soundtrack, she emailed back: “oh that's awesome man i'm all for it thanks!” Rich has shown us the documentation that Alex was paid in full.
Our lawyers advise us that there is no legal basis for Alex’s DMCA take-down claims. That’s undeniable by anyone except Alex. But being legally right is only half the story – as a practical matter, the costs of legal action would put console development plans on hold, perhaps indefinitely. We don’t have any interest in spending our time and our energy dealing with this matter further.
So, we’re swapping out the soundtrack. When it’s completed, we hope that it will delight you, and we hope that you keep taking a chance on independent games, on Kickstarter projects, and on all labors of love. They’re worth it.
If all of that is true, and only one side of this fight is claiming to have documented evidence of their position, you can once again see how reckless abuse of the DMCA system can be undertaken by a party that is blatantly in the wrong as a matter of copyright law, while at the same time forcing their targets into unwanted actions due to the costs of the legal action. This, it goes without saying, cannot be what copyright is supposed to be for. If someone can falsely file DMCA notices with this kind of ignorant alacrity, where the most charitable reading of the situation is that Mauer is flatly confused about copyright and contract law, and where the more realistic reading is that she is running a DMCA extortion program, and there are no serious consequences for that abuse, then the DMCA system is plainly broken.
But there are also more serious accusations flying around as part of this, including the legal staff for Imagos, Mauer's initial DMCA target, being on the receiving end of death threats from her.
After the publication of this story, several people pointed us to a message from Imagos Softworks’ lawyer, Leonard French, claiming that Mauer had sent him death threats. We reached out to Mauer about this and she confirmed that it was true. She said that she had been receiving her own set of threats in the wake of claims by French and other YouTubers, which she reported to the police. “The police told me it was ok for these people to make death threats to me because of freedom of speech,” she said in a private Twitter message. “So my immediate response was to issue death threats to the people who started the defamation crusade against me.”
First, making death threats is a crime, if they are truly serious death threats. I doubt a law enforcement officer told her they are simply "ok because of freedom of speech." And to then take that as a reason to send more death threats in reply is petulant at best.
Regardless, it should go without saying that through punishment or otherwise, Mauer's DMCA abuse needs to stop.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: alex mauer, censorship, contract dispute, copyright, death threats, dmca
Companies: conatus creative
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Welcome to teh party techdirt )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Welcome to teh party techdirt )
And then keep in mind that this is not a news site, it only has a few people writing for it, and they report stories when they get around to it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Welcome to teh party techdirt )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Welcome to teh party techdirt )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Welcome to teh party techdirt )
If you wish to treat this site as a primary news source, you're wrong to do so and should seek out additional sources. If you already have those, then you should already be aware that TD doesn't rush to publish stories on most subjects, and will usually be at least a day or 2 after it's been "breaking news" elsewhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm not sure another soundtrack will help…
That said, if Steam doesn't have its own system for appealing a takedown and filing evidence to reverse it, then they are equally complicit in this problem. At least with YouTube, whenever I've had claims on videos I've uploaded, I can send supporting documentation and in all cases I've had them reversed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm not sure another soundtrack will help…
My memory for fine details can be a little spotty, so take this with a grain of salt, but a day or so ago I listened to a video by Leonard French, Imagos Softworks’ lawyer talking about the actions against his client and lo and behold, that was pretty much exactly what she did to them.
She claimed the music was infringing(on her non-existent rights), so they took it out and swapped something else in. Then she issued a claim on the sound-effects, and apparently made it clear that if they tried to swap that out too she would still make a claim against the game(for the life of me I can't recall on what though).
After dealing with that Leonard asked the judge for a TRO against her and had it granted by the judge such that if she tries that stunt again she's now in contempt of court(amusingly her lawyer-for-literally-one-hearing tried to argue that the TRO wasn't necessary because she'd already 'promised' not to continue her actions against them, with Leonard arguing successfully that he wanted the TRO in place 'just in case' essentially).
Steam has likewise caught on that she'd abusing the system as in the same video it was noted that she can no longer make claims against the game regarding music, so hopefully they realize that it's not an isolated incident against one game and block her from lashing out against others as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm not sure another soundtrack will help…
It's supposed to be claim -> counter-claim -> lawsuit.
Steam is supposed to put the game back up within 14 days if there isn't a lawsuit filed. When there is a lawsuit filed, then the person making the claim has to appear in court and can be subject to the full court process.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who am I kidding? I wish that all the time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Now putting political correctness away for a moment, I do remember a rather strange episode where the maintainer of "GNU libreboot" went overboard with getting it removed from the GNU project/umbrella (which she had sought herself) because she considered the dismissal of another cross-gendered person from the Free Software Foundation inacceptable (I did not see any such reaction from the person herself actually).
That makes me wonder how much of an actual improvement may actually be in stock at least for males who find themselves unable to work and reason with the cards nature dealt them when you substitute their hormonal system with a female one.
I have myself been prescribed Ritalin (which works with somewhat similar receptors as amphetamines/speed) for a number of focus problems affecting my work productivity. I ended up not using it any longer because the admittedly relevant gains in productivity were not worth the deterioration in my already borderline people skills.
Born females are used from puberty onward to dealing with monthly upheavals in their hormonal system and still, at least from a male observer situation, the results do not appear always entirely in line with a consistent self-image.
Starting into such a hormonal upset late in life from an education likely less focused on compromise than that of a woman seems like getting stacked the deck against oneself additionally.
At least one hears this kind of story mostly in relation to male-to-female transitions: the opposite (less common) direction seems to be much less of a magnet for problems in my admittedly quite limited experience.
I don't envy Alex Mauer but that does not mean that I'd be willing to engage in business relations with her seeing how off-hinged she appears with regard to legal and business matters.
I wish I had better answers. Contempt, chauvinism and genderism are more symptoms of a problem than leads to a solution, dear Anonymous Coward.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
When you make generalizations about all women, or 50% of the populace, you run the risk of looking like an ass. Or just being one.
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Best of luck with your disconnected self. Calling people SJWs in need of triggers doesn't make your argument stronger. It makes you weak and lacking in substance to support your already ridiculous claims.
Have a great weekend. Tell your therapist the Internet said hi.
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If "Ok, we'll make you hormonally and externally female, and you deal with the psychological outfall of the ensuing personality change yourself like a grown-up" doesn't work reliably enough, one needs to reevaluate the expected cost (and possibly definition) of a successful transition, to society as well as individual.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The problem is, from what I've seen, it isn't a charade. She honestly believes she's in the right.
Honestly, from I've read she does seem to be having some kind of breakdown and is self destructing. I hope she gets the help she needs, but this really just highlights yet again the problems with the system - a single mentally unstable individual should not have the power to bring down the work of others without due process.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
She was put on a 24 hour mental observation hold, but she has not been committed as she was unwilling and she was deemed not to be an immediate danger to herself and her surroundings.
Some mental instability is something we can all have at times, but when offered help you better damn take it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Sadly, in many cases with mental instability, it clouds your perception in such a way that you think you are the sanest person in the world and everyone else is crazy. Sometimes something snaps to get you to realize that the world hasn't gone crazy, you have...but sometimes it doesn't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alex Mauer is crazy
Hey Alex, if you're reading this, my site is http://www.myehud.com. Why don't you try filing a DMCA claim against me you crazy stupid loon?
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
I think it's very probable, given her actions, that she is mentally ill. To that end, I kind of feel bad for her, and hope that she gets the help she needs.
It's possible to condemn her actions while recognizing that this is probably a sick person.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
It doesn't matter whether you pity them for being crazy. They are causing real harm, and in this case costing money for software developers.
I have no sympathies for crazies doing stupid stuff that costs other people time and money.
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
I have no sympathies for crazies doing stupid stuff that costs other people time and money.
Tell me about it. Why did they choose the 'stupidly troublesome' brand of mental illness instead of the 'harmlessly amusing' one when they were asked which they'd prefer? If someone makes a poor lifestyle choice, they deserve to be punished for it. Self-centered jackasses.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
And it doesn't matter whether you don't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
It does matter -- quite a lot.
Thanks for writing in, and keep listening!
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
I never said "to you".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Alex Mauer is crazy
"I think it's very probable, given her actions, that she is mentally ill."
Current Twitter background: holding a knife to her own throat. So, yeah...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh there will be consequences for filing false DMCA claims.
That would certainly be a refreshing change of pace, though if any case is practically perfectly crafting to demonstrate whether or not the penalties ever apply it would be this one.
Making multiple copyright claims falsely claiming ownership over something the one making the claims does not own. Assuming her targets go after her on those grounds if she gets a pass then it will have been demonstrated that nothing can trigger the penalty, and for all intents and purposes it simply does not exist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
That has nothing to do with abusing the DMCA and having the (theoretical) penalties of that come into play though, rather the backlash is likely to be entirely due to her making her reputation so incredible toxic, and it being so risky for anyone to ever hire her again that will sink her career.
The DMCA and it's 'shoot first, ask question later' slant certainly made it easier for her to screw over everyone she could, but the penalties for doing so will almost certainly have nothing to do with the law itself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You can make your point without all the anti-transgender rhetoric, sir.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But when you're one person, say on Youtube, against some corporation, it's hard to see the worth in pursuing the matter, even if you're absolutely in the right.
That's Alex's mistake, here. She's within reasonable reach of litigation and as undermined any strengths she might have held at every turn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Abolish Copyright
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's still hope yet. A bit of right to be forgotten magic will wipe the slate clean.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blacklist Alex
I can not trust someone who does this kind of thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Blacklist Alex
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Consequences
Perhaps not under the DMCA legislation, but Alex Mauer's reputation is toast. No rational* employer needs a criminally insane drama queen on staff.
*Trump supporters fail to meet the "rational" criterion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Consequences
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Consequences
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
First Amendment Rights
If you can't be bothered to sign your name, stick to discussing the topic, and not "each other" since all your crap looks the same.
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: First Amendment Rights
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bad person to do business with
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Also, seems both Steam and Youtube are considering blocking her from issuing DMCA complaints due to her abuse, specially on Youtube.
Regardless, she probably already cost the games and 3rd-parties she lashed out against quite a few thousand dollars total. If she isn't severely punished at some point for her bogus claims then the system is broken beyond repair. Not that it isn't broken, the very fact that it allows her to take down stuff without due process is already evidence that the system is broken. It should be abolished.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
*I'm kidding^
^Mostly
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Do they arrest people for threats of animal cruelty?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Plenty of people, if that person is Michael Jackson.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I hear he's much more relaxed and easy to deal with these days. ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
extortion?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]