The Google Fiber Honeymoon Period Appears To Be Over
from the the-disruption-that-only-half-arrived dept
When Google Fiber first arrived back in 2010, it was heralded as a gamechanger for the broadband industry. Google Fiber would, we believed, revolutionize the industry by taking Silicon Valley money and using it to disrupt the viciously uncompetitive and anti-competitive telecom sector. Initially things worked out well; with the mere mention of a looming Google Fiber target market resulting in a much-needed conversation about why the United States consistently languishes in mediocrity when it comes to our broadband networks (pro tip: it's because AT&T, Verizon and Comcast all but own state and federal lawmakers).
Seven years later, however, and the Google Fiber bloom appears to be off the rose. There's little doubt that Google Fiber brought some much-needed competition to countless markets, driving down costs and spurring deployment of gigabit networks in key areas (though these benefits are often over-hyped, and broadband competition in countless markets is actually getting worse). There's also no doubt that Google Fiber has been of great benefit to disadvantaged communities, thanks to free deployment of gigabit broadband to anchor institutions and low-income housing developments.
That said, the company has gone through two CEOs in a matter of months, laid off an unspecified number of employees during a restructuring last fall, and has begun to show signs that the company's dedication to the project is wavering at best, and notably derailed at worst. Reports began to circulate last fall that high-level Alphabet execs were bored with the slow pace and high cost of fiber deployment, and were considering pivoting the entire Google Fiber business model to wireless. But the company's messaging regarding this transition has been anything but clear, only driving unease among those waiting for the promised revolution.
Kansas City, Google Fiber's first launch market, was hyped as nothing short of a looming connectivity Utopia at launch. But the better part of a decade later and many locals say Google Fiber has cancelled their installations after years of waiting. And one Kansas City local made headlines recently when she revealed that the company cancelled her broadband service over a 12 cent dispute, a rather Comcast-esque failure by the company. And a local Motherboard report highlighted further how the honeymoon phase of Google Fiber is most decidedly at an end:
"Kansas City expected to become Google's glittering example of a futuristic gig-city: Half a decade later, there are examples of how Fiber benefitted KC, and stories about how it fell short. Thousands of customers will likely never get the chance to access the infrastructure they rallied behind, and many communities are still without any broadband access at all. Many are now left wondering: is that it?
"We were saying that in all likelihood this is too good to be true," said Isaac Wilder, co-founder of the Free Network Foundation and a Kansas City native..."Lo and behold, just a few years later and it's beginning to become clear that [Google Fiber] was just a lot of lip service," Wilder told me.
To be clear a lot of Google Fiber's problems are not the company's fault. AT&T, Comcast, and Charter have filed numerous nuisance lawsuits designed to slow the company's use of city and telco-owned utility poles, and protectionist state laws pushed by these same companies often hinder attempts at public/private partnerships with cities. Meanwhile, the company's murky messaging is in part thanks to the fact that Google Fiber has so many various wireless experiments in the oven, it's not really sure which of these technologies are going to pan out -- making publicly communicating the project's future direction a notable challenge.
That said, Google Fiber's momentum stall comes as Alphabet and Google as a whole are notably veering away from some of the more revolutionary traits that characterized the company a decade ago. Much like the way Google's net neutrality support has magically all-but-dissappeared during this period, numerous reports have indicated that there's a contingent of executives at Alphabet like Larry Page that frankly just got bored by the whole costly telecom disruption thing.
In short, it's possible that Google Fiber successfully pivots to next-generation wireless and fulfills at least some of the lofty promises made early on in the Google Fiber life cycle. But based on the conversations I've had with industry insiders, there would be little surprise if in a few years Google Fiber sold off the entire project to a second-tier telco like CenturyLink, then shifted its focus -- like countless hugely-successful giants before it -- more toward turf protection of its legacy markets.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: competition, google fiber, kansas city
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It's sad that Fiber stalled. While it's easy to lambast Google for it, any other company would have failed way sooner. The ones to blame are actually the beloved, functional and generally awesome big ISPs, with Comcast as their shiny knight. If anything I hope the frustration translates into activism against these companies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You would do the same thing in their shoes.
And no, the frustration is NOT going to translate into activism against the companies. All we need to do is boycott them and eventually the market will correct.
The problem is that everyone are cowards and will not do without things for a little while to send the necessary messages to the market.
Right now the message is fuck us raw, we will only bitch just a little and try to send a politician you can easily buy to protect us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*why not?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
KC
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: KC
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's no suprise here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Take Advantage of the Rebuilding.
I can envision circumstances under which Comcast might prefer to surrender its franchise in certain areas, rather than pay a "fair share" towards rebuilding expenses.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Open access
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is why TD is intellectually dishonest. No mention of the part your precious regulations caused in the destruction of Google Fiber.
How do you think incumbent ISP's were so able to crush them?
This right here is why Free Market is necessary. Regulation means "government" gets to pick the winners and losers.
enjoy the bed you helped make!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I don't understand what you are saying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You must first know what you are talking about to understand it.
There is ZERO free market for telecom! Regulation destroyed it before most of us were even born. And protectionist laws are regulations. Regulation = Law, they are the same thing, so try to rebuke others without contradicting yourself next time, genius!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Having some difficulty reading? From the article:
Mike is well aware of the problem that regulation plays with the ISP market. In an ideal world we'd get rid of that regulation and foster an actual competitive market of ISPs. Failing that, however, FCC regulation of the existing monopolies is the next-best option.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dud someone never learn how to count?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Taken out of context
You left out the "The disconnect was caused by an automated system and Google Fiber fixed the problem with in an hour of being notified and gave the lady a $30 credit on her account for the trouble.", and they're putting in safety measures to prevent it from happening again. Nothing "Comcast-esque" about that.
Mistakes happen, it's how you deal with those mistakes that makes you Comcast-esque.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And if Google has had this much trouble trying to insert itself into the internet access market, imagine the difficulty faced by a startup trying to do the same thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Company Quits Unprofitable Business! News at 11!
This is kinda how business works; it's not some moral failing on Google's part for a new business venture to not work out as well as hoped-for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't want to say it but...
Google has become the "low hanging fruit" company when it comes to new business ideas. They generally start up well, often "big", and then as soon as they hit anything that suggests a headwind, they first ignore the project and the drop it.
It's why they tended to call everything "beta". It gives them an out on everything.
Google also doesn't do customer service very well. Having to deal with customers (aka, people, not machines) is not their strong suit.
Finally, it comes down to the numbers. Being an ISP is expensive, and installing service once it gets a little more difficult can get pricey. The income and the "extra" value of getting people to Google products didn't seem to add up to much. While they don't break Google Fiber out individually in their financial reports, we do know that their "moonshot" businesses absolutely lost their collective asses, year on year. Had Fiber been a big financial winner, you can be sure they would be crowing about it. Losing their asses on something that will take a decade or more to start to pay out is NOT the Google way.
I have said it before, and I will say it again: If Google can;t stomach the costs of becoming an ISP, I can't imagine too many other companies lining up to get there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google fiber constant service interruptions are now intolerable!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]