Verizon Folds To Government Pressure To Blacklist Huawei Without A Shred Of Public Evidence
from the blacklisted dept
Earlier this month, AT&T cancelled a smartphone sales agreement with Huawei just moments before it was to be unveiled at CES. Why? Several members of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees had crafted an unpublished memo claiming that Huawei was spying for the Chinese government, and pressured both the FCC and carriers to blacklist the company. AT&T, a stalwart partner in the United States' own surveillance apparatus was quick to comply, in part because it's attempting to get regulators to sign off on its $86 billion acquisition of media juggernaut Time Warner.
But Verizon has also now scrapped its own plans to sell the company's smartphones based on those same ambiguous concerns:
"Verizon Communications Inc. has dropped all plans to sell phones by Chinese manufacturer Huawei Technologies Co., including the new Mate 10 Pro, under pressure from the U.S. government, according to people familiar with the matter... Huawei devices still work on both companies’ networks, but direct sales would’ve allowed them to reach more consumers than they can through third parties."
The problem? There's no publicly-available evidence that Huawei is spying for the Chinese government after more than a decade of hunting for it. Similar breathless hysteria over Huawei's connection to the Chinese government surfaced in 2011, prompting numerous investigations into the claim. One 18-month investigation found absolutely no evidence that Huawei was spying on American citizens for the Chinese government. One source at the time explained the investigation this way when asked about it by Reuters:
"We knew certain parts of government really wanted” evidence of active spying, said one of the people, who requested anonymity. “We would have found it if it were there."
Again, while it's possible that Huawei helps the Chinese government spy, a decade of hunting has resulted in zero publicly-available evidence proving it. And the evidence that does exist tends to suggest that this is little more than the same kind of protectionism the United States frequently accuses China of. And much of the hysteria surrounding Huawei's role as a Chinese spy tends to originate with companies like Cisco which simply don't want the added competition, as this 2012 Washington Post Report observed:
"What happens is you get competitors who are able to gin up lawmakers who are already wound up about China," one source told the The Washington Post. "What they do is pull the string and see where the top spins."
It's apparently easy to get cash-compromised or just plain gullible lawmakers all hot and bothered on this subject. Ignored of course is the U.S. government's own bad behavior on this front, whether we're talking about using AT&T to hoover up every shred of data that touches its network in violation of the law, or the NSA's own attempts to hack into Huawei, steal source code, then embed backdoors into Huawei gear. Similarly ignored is the fact that Chinese hardware already exists in everything from U.S.-made network gear to poorly-secured internet of things devices, creating ample surveillance opportunities already.
Again, that's not to say that it's impossible Huawei aids the Chinese government, but despite a decade of breathless face-fanning there's been little to no hard evidence that justifies this kind of blackballing. And what evidence that does exist indicates that Cisco, AT&T, Verizon, the NSA, and most of the folks beating the drum to blacklist Huawei have less than zero credibility when it comes to determining who's trustworthy in the first place.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: china, evidence, protectionism
Companies: huawei, verizon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Evidence, schevidence
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa-upgrade-factory-show-cisc o-router-getting-implant/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Evidence, schevidence
He just fell off the turnip truck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
And in any case, "free marketers" like minion here are always for undercutting American corporations / workers and importing from Chinese slave labor.
Now, watch: it's certain that I'll be called a corporate shill for even vaguely saying this is good. Standard tactic here is to just fling accusations at any dissent. It's easy to be a fanboy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
Here, have a cookie, you'll feel much better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
And in any case, "free marketers" like minion here are always for undercutting American corporations / workers and importing from Chinese slave labor.
Damn straight!
I, for one, am still waiting for the 45% tariff on Chinese goods, as promised by the Dear Orange Leader. I'm hopeful he will also impose said tariff on all Chinese parts used by "American" manufacturers. Fuck those commie-supporting pigs - we should deport them too, while we're at it!
And if the cost of goods rises exponentially, well fuck yeah! The extra $20 in our paychecks will more than offset that rise!
Murica! We can't math.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
The race to the bottom is not all roses and sunshine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
No, it actually is. Everyone is doing it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74BzSTQCl_c&t=10s
The only people bitching about it are the ones losing the race... as usual!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
That would be 99% of the population.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
The only thing that matters is that you can get your cheap crap for less.
Correct.
And I'm sure it matters just as much, or even more to the nearly 41 million Americans living at or near the poverty level. What do you tell them? I mean we've told them to "get a job (or two, or three)," "we're not paying for your health care," and "minimum wage is plenty high enough."
Now we're going to tell them they need to pay a premium because we need to subsidize American workers through ridiculously high tariffs? That sounds an awful lot like government meddling in the free market.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
How's that related to Huawei specifically? Almost all phones come from Chinese factories.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
Murica! We can't math.
That would be why our Chinese overlords are grinning in their glass-clad towers, waiting for their time to...
...it's here!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
TD is very much a pro government regulatory cheerleader. Just because they use free market rhetoric to whine like bitches does not mean anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
But, your misdirection and obsessive whining with zero actual input value have been noted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
"I'm sure it will come a s shock to you when you realise that effective regulation is actually necessary for a free market to exist, given that without it you get monopolies, collusion, price fixing and all the other things that prevent a free marketplace."
Ah, you mean what we have now, eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
None of our regulations are "effective" but when we bitch about that, folks like him defend them like they are, but still uses that language when defending them because PaulT is not American and too stupid to know we don't give a fuck about his regulations because they don't apply to us over here in the USA.
He has it better than us because they do seem to have better and less corrupt politicians regulating things over there if he is being honest about things, so he is just here to troll like a little bitch about it.
Here in America the system just works different and PaulT lacks that knowledge.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
Sorry, did I expose your ignorance again?
I don't tell you that *your* regulations are effective, I merely correct you when you claim that no government regulations can be effective. If the problem is not that your regulations are ineffective, but that you have elected a corrupt and useless government who do not apply them effectively, that's a different point. But it's one that still needs to be pointed out when you claim that your public utilities need to be handed over wholesale to private corporations because you don't like the government you elected.
A shame you have to spend so much time obsessing over me and lying about what I'm saying rather than accept a few simple home truths, but that's your choice. I still have the right to point out that you've made the wrong choice, even if your xenophobic nationalist tiny brain can't take criticism from people outside of your sheltered borders. I'll still have the right to criticise you, even as your ISPs reduce your free access to the internet because you opposed allowing your government to regulate them effectively.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
That was my entire point, that the regulation we have in the US is supremely ineffective. Should have added a sarcasm tag I guess.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
Hence the anti-government rhetoric... from people in government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
Just like the ones we got WITH your regulation?
Ahh... I see you are using the qualifier "effective" now why did the "politicians" think of that.
Look, I know you are dumb as a box of rocks but what you ASK for and what politicians GIVE you are two different things.
Also, "effective" regulation is NOT necessary for a free-market to exist, but I will agree that "effective" regulation sure helps to keep monopolistic interests from taking hold.
In a free market, the weak and ignorant "government save me people" could band together and form a boycott. But lets be honest here... people like you don't have the "strength of character" to go without long enough to actually provide a regulatory effect to keep monopolies from forming.
You just bend right the fuck over, and for you with regulations... you at least get fucked with lube and that is fine for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
Believe me, any attempt to organise a boycott that proves any way effective will get the same treatment.
You're also assuming we have but one choice: boycott or bend over. Well didn't you know that "government" is what happens when people band together and make regulations to maintain order in their society?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
Being a communist state says nothing about whether they're spying for the government.
Just like someone who works for NASA is not a US government spy just because they helped run a launch on Russian soil.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hauwei IS Chinese gov't owned. They ALL are. It's a COMMUNIST state.
(Actually, fuck knows exactly why, your entire point is to be a contrarian cunt no matter how dumb it sounds.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe it's more about potential spying
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Maybe it's more about potential spying
"If we're doing it to American phones, they must be doing the same to theirs."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Maybe it's more about potential spying
That's the funny thing about overpriced Apple devices. Same crap, different logos.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Maybe it's more about potential spying
This more than anything else is what makes the Huawei blacklisting so nonsensical. It's blatant anti-China fearmongering with no basis in reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah I'm just a little salty with Huawei over the Nexus 6P fiasco.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Free market. My foot!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I have no love lost for them. I only wish I knew what I know now back when I purchased my old phone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
aNYONE?
Its not because of the cellphones. Its the SERVER equipment they Make, is contest with CISCO.
WOW, a competitor?
Lower costs, Prices..NOT IN THE USA..
There are only a few reasons for this to happen.
Corp espionage.. or a Corp take over..
The USA is a large market.
And for SOME reason, we are closing up the market..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: aNYONE?
When you DONT restrict the small companies, they CAN take over PARTS of the system.. AND improve it..then SELL back or Keep the system.
The ORIGINAL SYSTEM was installed by others, NOT the current companies..which means it should be OPEN to any competitor..NOT SOLD as a whole.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's no evidence that Huawei is spying for the Chinese government
2. I've visited Huawei HQ & met some of the same folks that Verizon has been talking to, and had tea with them.
Huawei HQ has its own freeway exit.
Huawei HQ looks like a combo of Bell Labs & NSA rolled into one.
Huawei HQ is part university campus, with many folks living on site.
Huawei is a "national champion", just as Nokia was for Finland. Just scale up by the ratio (China/Finland), and you'll get the idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They have the ability to remotely turn on microphones and cameras, record audio or video and then send it onwards when the device has been idle for a few hours. They can grab any document as it's opened. Because this is done via internal means, data is decrypted ON the device by whatever app and is fully accessible to Verizon at all times.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
|Keeping ANY smart device SMART, depends on the user..NOT the device.
How much of our tech is BUILT in China??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They don't care about China
[ link to this | view in chronology ]