Shockingly, Streaming Providers Are Dominating Cable At Customer Satisfaction
from the innovation-nation dept
It's really no secret that traditional cable and broadband providers have some of the worst customer satisfaction of any companies in America. Comcast and Charter (Spectrum) in particular can usually be found stumbling around in last place in most satisfaction and support rankings. That's been particularly true of the American Customer Satisfaction Index, which routinely shows cable and broadband providers rank consistently worse than nearly any other company in any industry in America. In fact, these companies even tend to be ranked worse than Americans' experiences with government agencies like the IRS.
And despite seemingly bi-annual promises by these companies that customer service is their top priority (remember when Comcast promised a new "Customer Experience VP" would fix everything?), it's actually getting worse.
According to the latest ACSI report, high prices, bloated cable bundles, and terrible customer service continue to leave customers angry and frustrated:
"Customer satisfaction with subscription television service falls 3.1 percent to an ACSI score of 62, an 11-year low as the industry faces a seismic shift of subscribers defecting to lower-cost online video streaming services. In response, many cable and telecom companies are offering new Internet TV streaming in addition to legacy pay TV, but cord cutting continues."
While some cable companies have finally realized the error of their ways and begun offering less expensive, more flexible streaming alternatives (Dish's SlingTV and AT&T's DirecTV Now), by and large the mindset of the cable industry remains focused on doubling down on a lot of the dumb ideas (predominately aggressive price hikes) that brought them to this point in the first place.
For example Charter Communications, which has been pummeling consumers with price hikes in the wake of its $89 billion merger with Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks, took a particularly steep tumble during these latest satisfaction ratings for traditional cable providers:
The same story is playing out with broadband ISP satisfaction ratings, where limited competition often results in high prices as well:
It's worth noting that this year was the first year the index ranked streaming video alternatives, and (shockingly) the companies that are now offering lower prices, more flexible and innovative services, and better customer service are doing significantly better than traditional cable. Netflix, Sony PlayStation Vue, and Twitch all saw scores of 78, and the lowest rated streaming provider (Crackle at 68) was still rated better than nearly all traditional TV providers:
And while cord cutting is expected to break records this year, that's not to say that cable providers can't turn things around. Industry executives simply have to stop pretending that the traditional TV cash cow will live forever, and begin to compete by offering cheaper, more flexible options with better customer support. The bottom line many cable executives can't acknowledge is: competition simply means TV isn't going to be as profitable as it used to be, and they're going to have to actually try now. You can either get out ahead of this phenomenon now through adaptation, or continue doubling down on the same bad ideas that resulted in record cable TV customer defections in the first place.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: acsi, cord cutting, customer satisfaction, internet, pay tv, streaming
Companies: charter, comcast, netflix, time warner
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Barely. They can impose unforgiving data caps and exempt their own services. So they have to try just a tiny little bit.
Still, I have this feeling that if I hired Naruto (the monkey) to handle customer service it would do a better job than those telcos. Providing PETA didn't sue on behalf of the monkey.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
but how do pirate sites stack up?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: but how do pirate sites stack up?
-SceneSource
-ExtremeSeed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
I agree with AC at #2: you can't compete with free!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
I disagree. "Free" often means "crappy", "hard to use" and/or "malware risk" when it comes to free media on the net. You can compete with that by being reasonably priced and offering a safe, easy way to access high quality content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can be, but not always
Free doesn't necessarily mean 'lower quality', and can in fact mean higher quality if the paid for version is say infected by DRM that makes the product worse, DRM which is stripped out by those fiendish copyright infringers.
As noted by an old article on TD, saying you can't compete with free is basically saying you can't compete at all, because odds are good you already are. Whether that free alternative comes in the form of unauthorized versions of your own stuff or free stuff from other people odds are good there are alternatives, and it's up to you to add value to convince people to give you money rather than taking one of those alternatives, such as using the methods you listed(safe, easy, cheap).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not just wrong, Very wrong
Nope, try again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crybaby
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
Many unauthorized ("pirate") services are not free. Some are not even cheap.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You and your Google obsession...
If the content was all that mattered then there wouldn't be a large difference in customer satisfaction between subscription tv vs streaming options. That there is(and not a small one) shows that your claim is bunk, and in fact quality of the service is what's being measured here, not merely the content on it.
Still, thanks for another laugh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
You mean all those dis-satisfied comcrap customers are wrong?
They actually like their isp and lie about it ... why would they do that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Microsoft ranked above Google! -- Your data is invalid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Once I can buy gigabit from my community ISP and run YouTube TV over it, Comcast goes from being a broadband provider to a content provider thru its ownership of media properties like NBC/Universal which would destroy its market valuation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
2 of which are "relatively" popular, offer their own streaming services, and "relatively" quality content...
And then there's Comcast...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No amount of support staff will make someone happy about your shit sandwich.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shockingly?
Frankly, not dominating Cable at customer satisfaction seems like more of a feat. Right now I can only think of selected torture camps possibly clearing that limbo bar.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shockingly?
(Note: I am not actually thanking you. I am using the word "thanks" to mean the opposite of what it actually means.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shockingly?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You've Got to Give the People What They Want
Offering 'a la carte programing options might be enough to entice legacy cable subscribers to stick around.
It would be nice if there were more 'a la carte streaming options available too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]