5G Is Not A 'Race,' And We're Incapable Of Determining Winners Even If It Was
from the more-like-a-hamster-wheel dept
By now you've probably been informed that the next-generation of wireless broadband technology is going to revolutionize everything. Much like they did with 3G and 4G, wireless carriers have repeatedly hyped the fifth-generation (5G) wireless standard, insisting that the technology will somehow usher forth a "societal transformation" that's going to have a magical, cascading impact on everything, and everyone.
Reality looks, well, different. Look under the hood at any of the growing 5G "launch" markets, and you'll find service is usually barely available. Hardware support is barely existent and clunky. And while 5G networks are faster and more reliable, they're going to come at a premium, lessening the appeal to US consumers who already pay some of the highest prices in the developed world. Even Vint Cerf is underwhelmed.
Undaunted, industry has used 5G as some kind of mystical tech policy pixie dust. As in, they've been telling lawmakers around the world that unless industry gets whatever the hell it wants (less oversight, a fat new tax cut, merger approval), your country will lose the "race to 5G." China is routinely presented as our arch nemesis in this endeavor, with framing that indicates that if China wins said "race to 5G," something apparently quite terrible will happen. The frequency of this narrative is fairly intense:
China is racing ahead of the U.S. in the race to 5G, @CNBCJosh reports. pic.twitter.com/unraJmAg5m
— CNBC's Fast Money (@CNBCFastMoney) October 31, 2019
And it's usually driven by hardware vendors looking to convince the public, press, and regulators that if a country loses said "race," some immense, horrific, techo-calamity will occur:
Australia’s House of Representatives is warned the country is being left lagging behind in the global race to deploy #5G technology. #HuaweiFacts
— Huawei Facts (@HuaweiFacts) November 2, 2019
Oh no! Don't be left behind! The US technically "won" the "race to 4G," but over time (thanks in no small part to regulatory capture), US 4G LTE networks are not only far more expensive than a long list of countries, our 4G LTE networks are currently some of the slowest anywhere. How'd winning that race turn out?
Here in reality, even if 5G was a race, we're incapable of measuring who's winning. US government broadband mapping efforts have long been a shitshow. Here in the US, wireless carriers are actively trying to exclude 5G from efforts to improve said maps. Why? They know that contrary to their claims, 5G, like 4G and 3G before it, is going to have highly spotty availability. In large part because 5G (especially millimeter wave) needs a lot of fiber. You remember fiber? The technology AT&T and Verizon received billions in taxpayer subsidies to deploy and then refused to finish around halfway through?
Meanwhile, who do you trust to tell you China is actually winning the race to 5G? The Chinese government? Companies like Huawei, whose only interest is in portraying immeasurable success? Similarly, who do we trust in the States to inform us of our noble victory? The Ajit Pai FCC, which routinely simply makes things up at industry behest? The carriers themselves, who've already taken to using bogus phone icons to falsely suggest 5G is far more widely available than it actually is?
5G is absolutely an important evolution, creating faster, better, more resilient networks. But it's not a race. It's a massive, often cumbersome effort that will take the better part of the next decade. And it's not a panacea; many of the same problems we have now (high prices, stifled fiber deployment, mindless merger mania causing eroded competition, corruption) will all be very present as we stumble our way forward, stifling the technology's full potential.
There's a reason why industry wants 5G portrayed as a race, and it has nothing to do with winning, and everything to do with creating an environment where regulators and companies rush head first into deploying a new technology on industry's terms, without thinking much about things that aren't important to industry, like affordability, open and fair networks, and uniform availability.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 5g, competition, wireless
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
we're incapable of measuring who's winning
I was told there would be winning.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: we're incapable of measuring who's winning
its called whining
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: we're incapable of measuring who's winning
Ah, whinging and loosing, two works that so many people can't seem to spell right, along with defiantly. High marks for spelling it right, BTW.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: we're incapable of measuring who's winning
"words" is spelt with a "d" rather than a "k".
Also, whinge is a real word
I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: we're incapable of measuring who's winning
Isn't it a bit early to be drinking?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We're winning!
In my country 5G is being rolled out at a rapid pace. We also have 5G (Huawei) devices in abundance! I am sooo glad I live in Africa and not in a backwards shithole like the USA :P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: We're winning!
Winning is not something the USA does much any more. Unless government oppression and corporate control of the populace counts as winning. In that case we're doing a damn fine job and should overtake the #1 spot in the next few years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
China ahead in the race to 5G
Technically China IS ahead in the race to 5G. 5 Gigapersons population, that is.
At 1.34 Gigapersons, China is 4 times the US population, so technically they are ahead in that "race", but they are neck and neck with India, who are also getting "advice" from the US about Huawei.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-will-have-a-say-in-whether-china-dominates-5g-11572561367
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Consumers in the usa are ripped off by broadband providers like comcast,lack of competition and the capture of regultors by corporations .
prices will go up or there will be strict wireless caps .
5g will cost billions to build out and will be only avaidable in large towns, and citys .
5g phones will be expensive to make and design ,
it will hardly make a difference to consumers ,
get a good 4g phone and you will be fine.
look at apple they are in no hurry to make a 5 g phone ,
it will be 3-5 years before the network is built in america.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We Aren't Winning
So winning doesn't matter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You Aren't Winning
I thought I smelled the stench of a liar. Sup bro.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: We Aren't Winning
Speak for yourself, loser.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One thing we can be sure of is that if the US is declared the "winner", it'll be the US that declares it, and it'll be based on lies.
All this government and huge company crap is like children fighting over the stupidest things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The standard isn't complete
One problem is that the final 5G standard isn't expected till some time in 2020. Some parts are already finalized, but it's hard to judge a race when we don't know where the finish line's going to be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The standard isn't complete
What do you mean? This is the US! If we say we're at the finish line and we won the race, then we won! We won, I tell you!
Now let's win the race to 6G!! Keep aiming higher!
Just ignore the fact that the "losers", meaning the countries who were slower to develop the technology. were the ones to deploy it better and cheaper. And they're the ones who watched the "winners" stumble and learned from their mistakes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Change the narrative?
Wouldn't it be nice if we could change the "winning" narrative?
Let's define winning as to whoever has the least expensive 5G !
And make it a worldwide "race"...if we try really hard (Verizon, Sprint, ATT are you listening?) we can show the rest of the world how great America is.
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This winning metric screwed up the justice system, disaster relief, & everything else its touched... why not use it to allow the corporations to demand handouts & freebies so we can "win" where in winning is paying more for even less.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Massive infrastructure projects are a race like sex is
There are no prizes for coming first.
Trying to finish faster just leaves it done less well and no one really satisfied.
Focusing on finishing really quickly will leave a bad taste in everyone's mouth, especially when it turns out you've just blown it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]