Apathy Isn't A Business Model: Major US Telcos Teeter Toward Bankruptcy
from the dysfunction-junction dept
For more than a decade we've noted how the US broadband industry's biggest problem is a lack of healthy competition. In countless markets consumers either have the choice of a terrible phone company or a cable giant. The nation's phone companies have spent the last decade refusing to upgrade (or in some cases even repair) their aging DSL lines, because they don't see residential broadband as worth their while. That in turn is giving giants like Comcast and Spectrum an ever greater monopoly in many markets, reducing the already muted incentive to compete on price or shore up comically terrible customer service.
Many US telcos now exist solely to milk subsidies while doing the absolute bare minimum. This dynamic often results in some absurd dysfunction. Like in West Virginia, where incumbent telco Frontier has repeatedly been busted in a series of scandals involving substandard service and the misuse of taxpayer money. The graft and corruption in the state is so severe, state leaders have buried reports, and, until recently, a Frontier executive did double duty as a state representative without anybody in the state thinking that was a conflict of interest.
Frontier has also been facing investigations in states like Minnesota, where regulators have questioned why the company has received taxpayer subsidies for doing little to nothing. Unsurprisingly the company has been struggling with using apathy as a business model, and there's chatter that a long awaited bankruptcy may finally be imminent. Unlike AT&T and Verizon, telcos like Frontier, Windstream, and CenturyLink don't have wireless income to offset the losses:
"Some financial analysts have been predicting a Frontier bankruptcy for several years. According to these analysts, companies such as Frontier and Windstream continue to rely, in large part, on copper network infrastructure, which can’t support the speeds that cable infrastructure can support. As a result, these telcos will continue to have difficulty competing in both the residential and business market. And unlike companies such as AT&T and Verizon, the second-tier telcos don’t have a wireless business to fuel growth."
Much of Frontier's debt came courtesy of a massive 2015 deal to acquire Verizon's unwanted territories in states like Florida, Texas, and California for $10.5 billion. Frontier's focus at the time was growth for growth's sake, despite the obvious fact that many of these customers were on aging phone and DSL lines that needed to be upgraded lest they fall apart. Like many of its companions, Frontier chose the latter option, and now faces a bankruptcy protection proceeding that was already technically paid for by the American taxpayer.
Again, the inevitable outcome of these telco bankruptcies is a bigger, stronger cable broadband monopoly. Despite the predictions of many, wireless isn't going to be a magical panacea that fixes the problem. And while low-orbit satellites may help, that sector too has its own lengthy history of failed promises. With the government recently deciding that the sector needs neither competition nor meaningful regulatory oversight to function properly, there's not much in the way accountability or repercussion for the mass of US telecom giants that simply refuse to give a damn.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, competition, finances, telcos
Companies: frontier
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I beg to disagree.
I beg to disagree. Apathy is a business model, for the execs. Who else matters in a corporation?
The executives have executive salaries, golden parachutes and utter immunity from accountability. Why should they care. The execs enjoy the golden life successfully. The corporation is just a means to an end.
As for the customers, employees and non-executive share holders, well they didn't think correctly. From the exec's perspective tough on them. If anyone wants to profit from a corporation then do the dirty work to become an exec (or their kept Congress-critter).
Therefore, apathy as a business model is a matter of perspective. Apathy us a very good business model for the executive few.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I beg to disagree.
Lets see...
Who needs employee's?
We contract hire different groups to be called to do the Other jobs..
They contact the customer service(hired out), then they contact an installer/repair person.(hired out on call)
Everything else is a billing service(hired out) and thats about it.
Whats left is a bank account, and someone to sort the cash.
And the best part is that all these Contractors are Write off's.
the rest can go into our pockets.
As to Frontier and the Others that are to small to have Diversified. NO ONE will buy them.. others KNow that have a broken system that needs allot of repair, and the service they have is substandard.
THEN comes LLC.. you cant sue the owners. Only the company is liable.. AND there isnt Much there.
Put the money into the Owners pockets and there is NOTHING left..
You cant even go after yearly Profits...as its all out of the bank.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Out of service... again...
for the 2nd week this month, I have NO service. The company just says "we know". No ETR. Totally could not care less.
However, the bills keep coming. Gotta pay for that service that isn't being delivered.
And that is the biggest problem. No oversight that can tell these companies that they can't bill for service not rendered.
And no, I can't call anyone else. There are 2 providers in my area - both are re-sellers of the same DSL service over the same lines.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Out of service... again...
Should ask them to prorate your bill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Out of service... again...
Try another area.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Out of service... again...
Just complain to the FCC, they'll get right on it! Oh wait... they just forward the complaint to your carrier and don't follow up...
Ok, another idea. Complain to the FTC and they'll get right on it! Daddy Pai said so! Oh wait... they are underfunded and have much bigger industries that are doing a lot of shady things... so scratch that.
Ok, another idea. Complain to your state and local officials! They will definitely help you! Oh wait... their top donors were telecom and cable industry, and they just passed a law to restrict access to help that poor, struggling internet company in your area.
Ok, another idea. Just use your 4G data plan! I mean you can't watch movies, play video games, do much of anything other than facebook and email... up until your ridiculous 'unlimited' data cap is hit, but hey, we've solved it guys! We can say the digital divide has been conquered! High Fives all around!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Out of service... again...
Complain to the court and make it a class action. I'm sure the bad company has enough people affected by the outage yet being billed anyway to qualify.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Out of service... again...
Can't do that either. In your contract you agreed to do arbitration instead of court, and no class actions either.
Just hope your "arbitrator" doesn't find in favor of the telco that is bringing them all their arbitration business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Out of service... again...
Maybe they can:
CFPB Issues Rule to Ban Companies From Using Arbitration Clauses to Deny Groups of People Their Day in Court
I don't know if this still stands, but I didn't find anything to say it doesn't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Out of service... again...
It doesn't. See the orange box on that page:
"On Nov. 1, 2017, the President signed a joint resolution passed by Congress disapproving the Arbitration Agreements Rule […] The materials relating to the Arbitration Agreements Rule on the Bureau’s website are for reference only."
Always read the agreements carefully. Sometime's it's possible for new subscribers (within a time limit) to opt out of binding arbitration or anti-class-action clauses.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Out of service... again...
If I read it correctly: the notice at the top of the article says it was revoked
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Out of service... again...
You might be right, it seems I misread that paragraph.
However, some courts have denied mandatory arbitration clauses, for different reasons.. The issue then becomes having the financial resources to proceed on such a course.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Out of service... again...
Might consider a small claims court action. If you are lucky, the judge has the same crap service. And some times small claims cases are still allowed even if class action cases are forced to arbitration.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Or just get dangerous
document all the times it happens as well as interactions with employees. Note service outages as well as when and how they happen “does weather knock your service out out easier then a twig? Is your service regulary going out for no reason due to non maintiance reasons? Is your interactions with support bear down we don’t know? Implying said knowledge?”
And for the love of god...
For the love..
Do..not..tell...them..
That you are doing it.
Because if you take it to court that gives them time to mount a capable defense or retaliate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Humble suggestion
Them:we know
You: you know...I don’t know but I heard some people are changing to “insert made up or real company that may or may not have a presence in your area just go with it” I’m thinking of trying it out. Do you think I should?
Them:”sweats profusely” so what line are you on sir or madam?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CenturyLink is adding fiber to my neighborhood in Denver.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I hadn't heard about that. They're not nearly far enough north yet for me but I'll have to keep an eye on it. According to Ars, "Customers with fiber who pay for gigabit speeds are exempt from the new data caps and overage fees" which would be nice because I have a cap with Comcast.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
CenturyLink is a really messed up company. They are next.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But 5G will fix EVERYTHING!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Rumor on reddit is ajit pai painted lines on his own driveway so he could double park twice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Did he double park so that his vehicle would feel bigger? I mean the guy obviously over-compensates with a large coffee mug. It would be expected that he would try to compensate using other objects as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Eh, I've seen bigger.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rBA6rht6p6E/maxresdefault.jpg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I like john oliver
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NetNeutrality and market competition...
Regulation requiring sharing of pipes to end users at fair prices. Removal of area-controlled zones of service monopolies.
Federal legalization of municipal ISP services.
Recovery of infrastructure largely funded through government subsidies.
These are a few of my favorite things...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Masnick supports 230, which is why he celebrates when hardworking corporations go bankrupt while pirates steal mailing lists and financial advice. He's scared of me and the police finding the trail of breadcrumbs leading to his Google paymasters.
Fuck you, Masnick!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
John Smith being a bitter, impotent fuckwit? I'm shocked, I tell you, sho...
Okay, not that shocked.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You know, there are medications that can help you. Perhaps you should go see your doctor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Are there? I don't think cyanide pills count as "medication", and I can't think of anything else that could help.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Cyanide? I was thinking addictive opiates...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
if You want to be less angry, try removing the mirrors around your house.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
**Masnick supports 230, which is why he celebrates when hardworking corporations go bankrupt while pirates steal mailing lists and financial advice. He's scared of me and the police finding the trail of breadcrumbs leading to his Google paymasters.
Fuck you, Masnick!**
All wrong. He supports 230 because it means he's not held responsible when Hamilton maligns me. Again.
he celebrates when hardworking corporations go bankrupt while pirates steal mailing lists and financial advice.
Corporations don't work, people like me work. Mike doesn't celebrate anyone going bankrupt, particularly corporations that employ large numbers of people like me who inevitably get screwed when a corporation tanks while the top tier officers make out like bandits.
You can't steal a mailing list or financial advice by copying it. If someone copies such things it's unlikely that these things, in and of themselves, will give them any kind of advantage as people like me are likely to bin unsolicited financial advice as spam. If you're a bitter spammer annoyed that someone copied your stuff, too bad. Not worth celebrating, though.
He's scared of me and the police finding the trail of breadcrumbs leading to his Google paymasters
We await the globally televised perp-walking of our Glorious Leader with bated breath, Comrade Spammer.*
*Not gonna happen. Spammer is spamming.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Seriously. Seek help. As mentioned a million times before Section 230 means the one who posted is liable not the hosting platform. It does not support piracy and "creators" can still go after those who pirate their stuff. They just can't go after the platform.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]