The gold is actually mostly silver, only coated with 6g of gold. The silver is actually silver. Ironically it's the bronze that doesn't actually contain any bronze, it's made of brass.
You left out there was only one case "discovered" and it hasn't even been confirmed yet. It was noted her DNA sample could have come from a separate database used correctly.
However, it was very convenient of Chesa Boudin to put out a press conference so quickly. He is up for recall barely 2 years into his first term for his abysmal failure as a DA.
This lazy label he got when he decided that he doesn't need to create anything of his own, simply because blender already exists. Bastard label is just obvious to everyone who isn't blind.
> so any money he receives has no equivalent work product.
This doesn’t follow from the aforementioned premise.
This conclusion comes from the fact that when he does not create anything of his own, his work effort that he uses to advance the society is at lower level than any ordinary person who have decided to help government keep their society up and running.
> When this happens, we call it fraud.
Fraud requires some level of deceit or misinformation.
This deceit and misinformation you'll get when he subscribes to his salaru and demands compensation level that isn't grounded by the work amount that he's doing. I.e. the key issue is that other people are working harder and still he thinks he's entitled to higher salary simply for his beautyful face.
I look forward to a stunning lack of self-awareness and/or honesty
See, that is the problem. As long as people are looking forward to it, they have an audience. It's boring, boorish, dumb and stupid and the idiots just need to stop having everybody breathlessly hand them a megaphone for their stupidities by gleefully amplifying their crap.
Copyright law explicitly exempts as fair use at least some of the following: parody, satire, commentary, critical commentary, newsworthiness, and probably a couple more things.... is that about correct?
Well, I'm pretty sure that newsroom managers, the ones who assign jobs to on-site news gathers, don't send out reporters and cameramen to cover "horrific" events. Instead, their job description calls for them to assign those folks to cover newsworthy events. So let's do this: let's trade out the word "horrible", and replace it with "newsworthy" instead.
That removes knee-jerk emotion from the immediate equation, and let's us more easily bring 1A into the discussion. Which in turn lets me ask, how is 1A not going to protect the posting of this video, should a platform wish to categorize it as newsworthy and leave it up? Yes, someone has hurt feelings, but that's not up for discussion about what interest does the public have in such newsworthy matters. (Don't forget, 1A has no bearing on a citizen's private thoughts or emotions, it covers only the public interest.)
I can feel for Parker, so I won't belittle his loss. At the same time, if I were his friend, I'd be advising him that it's been nearly 7 years, and it's time to put the past behind him and move on.
p.s. You've all covered already my thoughts on copyright and NFT's, I'll incorporate them here by proxy. ;)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Some AI generated works shouldn'
In re PaulT above
That is, paradoxically, by releasing the code totally free, you pretty much guarantee that it won't remain so, at least under the current copyright system.
My question was I regard to that statement.
Is I’ve said multiple times I don’t completely agree with, personally, the same philosophical ideals as the various open source advocates.
That’s a separate thread from how public domain could in any way make the source source code not be free.
so any money he receives has no equivalent work product.
This doesn’t follow from the aforementioned premise.
When this happens, we call it fraud.
False. Fraud requires some level of deceit or misinformation. Even taking the previous statement as sound (which it isn’t), that still isn’t necessarily fraud.
Seems nobody has explained this to you, but isolationism doesn't work when it comes to the US, it needs foreign trade and investments
There are levels of isolation. I support fair trade deals. And secure borders where each and every crosser is vetted before being allowed in.
Sorry if you find it offensive that I don’t want other country’s criminals and terrorists coming in. …well, no I’m not.
Have you missed all the gushing words Trump has spilled on behalf of Putin?
Since he left office? Yes. In office I wouldn’t call them glowing, so much as strategically complimentary.
WWII called, they want their Nazi diplomacy back. Also, Mexico want Texas back.
Wrong country, the Nazi regime comes from western/Central Europe from Germany. Not Russia.
Mexico could want Texas all they Wish. But the Residents don’t want to be part of Mexico.
Outside of US and UK news, most reports show a rather even split in contested-areas or prefer Russian repatriation.
Zelenskyy…
You really have hunk he is the whole of the government? You’re naive. What does Tucker Carlson have to do with anything? Again, my support for Russia and disdain for Ukraine are clearly documented, even here in my comment history, far before any current politicians mad opinions on a threat that didn’t (publicly) exist way back in 2015.
You really need to stop gorging on stupid conspiracy theories
The involvement of American financial interests in Ukraine dates back to the mid-to-late 90s.
You keep trying to falsely conflate some Republican’s opinions with my simply following what they say.
Where in reality I chose to vote for someone who would strengthen ties with Russia and reduce our dependence on China. Someone with no major familial ties to Ukrainian money.
You have the events backwards.
What ethnic murders?
The extreme imprisonment and murder of “criminals” of Russian/Rus and Gypsim peoples. For invented crimes.
The “police” in the area acting like the LAPD.
Because a dead person stops talking and can’t contest.
Oh boy, you are in for a surprise when it comes to Trump
Please: enlighten me. As to what financial ties Trump has personally in the Ukraine.
On the post: As Expected, Trump's Social Network Is Rapidly Banning Users It Doesn't Like, Without Telling Them Why
Actually, Stew Peters wasn't banned.
And Peters is doing a good job of fooling people into thinking he was banned.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/02/trumps-truth-social-rollout-has-been-as-glitchy- as-youd-expect/
On the post: Comcast Continues To Bleed Olympics Viewers After Years Of Bumbling
Re: Re:
The gold is actually mostly silver, only coated with 6g of gold. The silver is actually silver. Ironically it's the bronze that doesn't actually contain any bronze, it's made of brass.
On the post: Former Employees Say Mossad Members Dropped By NSO Officers To Run Off-The-Books Phone Hacks
I'm taking bets there were agents of US three letter agencies hanging around NSO, as well.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Re:
I don’t think it’s anyone else’s business besides the parties involved.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
It’s not even the first time he’s said he’d be okay with Trumpian incest.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Re:
How does the flat tax have anything to compare to the Trump/Republican tax plans of reduction? Anything at all. They’re totally incompatible!
On the post: Clearview Pitch Deck Says It's Aiming For A 100 Billion Image Database, Restarting Sales To The Private Sector
what the hell do you expect?
dont need much to say
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
The easiest way to discredit a pathological liar is to quote him.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20211109/10460447910/latest-version-congresss-anti-algorithm- bill-is-based-two-separate-debunked-myths-misunderstanding-how-things-work.shtml#c2288
https://www.t echdirt.com/articles/20211212/11063648109/tenth-circuit-appeals-court-says-fourth-sixth-amendment-ri ghts-are-meaningless-when-national-security-is-line.shtml#c445
On the post: As Expected, Trump's Social Network Is Rapidly Banning Users It Doesn't Like, Without Telling Them Why
nuf said
https://discord.com/channels/150115508157415435/308074496131072001/946568583109034014
On the post: San Francisco Cops Are Running Rape Victims' DNA Through Criminal Databases Because What Even The Fuck
Omission
You left out there was only one case "discovered" and it hasn't even been confirmed yet. It was noted her DNA sample could have come from a separate database used correctly.
However, it was very convenient of Chesa Boudin to put out a press conference so quickly. He is up for recall barely 2 years into his first term for his abysmal failure as a DA.
On the post: US Copyright Office Gets It Right (Again): AI-Generated Works Do Not Get A Copyright Monopoly
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Some AI generated works
I quoted PaulT.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
Re: Re: Re:
This lazy label he got when he decided that he doesn't need to create anything of his own, simply because blender already exists. Bastard label is just obvious to everyone who isn't blind.
This conclusion comes from the fact that when he does not create anything of his own, his work effort that he uses to advance the society is at lower level than any ordinary person who have decided to help government keep their society up and running.
This deceit and misinformation you'll get when he subscribes to his salaru and demands compensation level that isn't grounded by the work amount that he's doing. I.e. the key issue is that other people are working harder and still he thinks he's entitled to higher salary simply for his beautyful face.
On the post: As Expected, Trump's Social Network Is Rapidly Banning Users It Doesn't Like, Without Telling Them Why
Re: Re:
See, that is the problem. As long as people are looking forward to it, they have an audience. It's boring, boorish, dumb and stupid and the idiots just need to stop having everybody breathlessly hand them a megaphone for their stupidities by gleefully amplifying their crap.
On the post: US Copyright Office Gets It Right (Again): AI-Generated Works Do Not Get A Copyright Monopoly
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Some AI generated works shou
Who is claiming that?
On the post: No, Creating An NFT Of The Video Of A Horrific Shooting Will Not Get It Removed From The Internet
So let's see if I've got this right....
Copyright law explicitly exempts as fair use at least some of the following: parody, satire, commentary, critical commentary, newsworthiness, and probably a couple more things.... is that about correct?
Well, I'm pretty sure that newsroom managers, the ones who assign jobs to on-site news gathers, don't send out reporters and cameramen to cover "horrific" events. Instead, their job description calls for them to assign those folks to cover newsworthy events. So let's do this: let's trade out the word "horrible", and replace it with "newsworthy" instead.
That removes knee-jerk emotion from the immediate equation, and let's us more easily bring 1A into the discussion. Which in turn lets me ask, how is 1A not going to protect the posting of this video, should a platform wish to categorize it as newsworthy and leave it up? Yes, someone has hurt feelings, but that's not up for discussion about what interest does the public have in such newsworthy matters. (Don't forget, 1A has no bearing on a citizen's private thoughts or emotions, it covers only the public interest.)
I can feel for Parker, so I won't belittle his loss. At the same time, if I were his friend, I'd be advising him that it's been nearly 7 years, and it's time to put the past behind him and move on.
p.s. You've all covered already my thoughts on copyright and NFT's, I'll incorporate them here by proxy. ;)
On the post: ACLU & EFF Step Up To Tell Court You Don't Get To Expose An Anonymous Tweeter With A Sketchy Copyright Claim
Such a shitshow.
Is he or isn't he banging a former Ms. California... and does anyone really care?
With his skin being this thin will be be retiring from being financebro and become a cop?
5th scanned paragraph have an I to make it Indeed.
On the post: US Copyright Office Gets It Right (Again): AI-Generated Works Do Not Get A Copyright Monopoly
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Some AI generated works shouldn'
In re PaulT above
My question was I regard to that statement.
Is I’ve said multiple times I don’t completely agree with, personally, the same philosophical ideals as the various open source advocates.
That’s a separate thread from how public domain could in any way make the source source code not be free.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
Re: Re:
[citation needed]
This doesn’t follow from the aforementioned premise.
False. Fraud requires some level of deceit or misinformation. Even taking the previous statement as sound (which it isn’t), that still isn’t necessarily fraud.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Wait…
Just because the US and UK refuse to cover it doesn’t make it false.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Re: Re: Re: Re: Wait…
There are levels of isolation. I support fair trade deals. And secure borders where each and every crosser is vetted before being allowed in.
Sorry if you find it offensive that I don’t want other country’s criminals and terrorists coming in. …well, no I’m not.
Since he left office? Yes. In office I wouldn’t call them glowing, so much as strategically complimentary.
Wrong country, the Nazi regime comes from western/Central Europe from Germany. Not Russia.
Mexico could want Texas all they Wish. But the Residents don’t want to be part of Mexico.
Outside of US and UK news, most reports show a rather even split in contested-areas or prefer Russian repatriation.
You really have hunk he is the whole of the government? You’re naive. What does Tucker Carlson have to do with anything? Again, my support for Russia and disdain for Ukraine are clearly documented, even here in my comment history, far before any current politicians mad opinions on a threat that didn’t (publicly) exist way back in 2015.
The involvement of American financial interests in Ukraine dates back to the mid-to-late 90s.
You keep trying to falsely conflate some Republican’s opinions with my simply following what they say.
Where in reality I chose to vote for someone who would strengthen ties with Russia and reduce our dependence on China. Someone with no major familial ties to Ukrainian money.
You have the events backwards.
The extreme imprisonment and murder of “criminals” of Russian/Rus and Gypsim peoples. For invented crimes.
The “police” in the area acting like the LAPD.
Because a dead person stops talking and can’t contest.
Please: enlighten me. As to what financial ties Trump has personally in the Ukraine.
Next >>