but what is the deal lately with people misusing defused/diffused? And yes, I know it's not Tim misusing it, it's the blotter. Probably should include a [sic] though.
Administration working hand in hand with the Methuen Police Department, diffused the situation maintaining the best possible professional attitude.
So they spread the situation out? Sound like that would make it worse!
I'm not sure if I've just started noticing it, or if people have been doing it to try and avoid using the term "defused" since it's somewhat associated with bombs (Note: I am not threatening to bomb anything by including the word "bomb" in my post.)(Note 2: Same thing about the other 2 uses in the first note.)
It's slowly approaching lose/loose levels of annoyance.
Given the tripe that passes for programming MTV, I actually prefer MTV Hits (which *gasp* plays music videos most of the time) and VH1 Classic (because I have a minor addiction to old episodes of Pop-Up Video) to MTV or even MTV2, the channel created to play videos 24/7 when MTV gave it up...that turned into MTV Jr.
While I'm sure this is a reference to doing business in Colorado, for the rest of the country it seems like this probably wasn't the best choice of business names...especially if one is going to litigate for a porn company.
Or perhaps it's the perfect name and that was the plan all along...
It portrays Disney as a megalomaniac with McCarthyite, racist and misogynist tendencies
If the play is already not portraying Disney in the greatest of lights, would it not make sense to then use pariodied, exaggerated versions of the characters in question? Leave them unnamed, so you don't have to worry about actually using the words "Mickey Mouse." It's been done before in a South Park episode.
Or would that be too much of a risk that somebody with more money would decide to challenge parody use?
I guess my question to the NYT would be why even leave the article up? It's not like there was a mistake in reporting on the story or some fact slip up, or that the story was super relevant to anything going on. It was a fluff piece that was, for all intents and purposes, totally made up. Dump it. Especially if they knew in advance and posted it anyway.
I hope if they paid Cohen for the piece they politely (and forcefully) asked for their money back.
Really? They must hire some "special" folk at the patent office if they granted a patent on "announcing x on social medium y." I'd have to assume something like wedding announcements in a newspaper would be prior art, but maybe not since they're not domain name registrations and not "on the internet." Totally different, I guess.
Obviously, as an elected representative with the responsibility to make laws, what better way to understand the greatly-in-need-of-being-legislated moral degradations facing society than to experience them first hand?
What kind of representative would they be if they tried to outlaw giant boobs in your face without having first had said giant boobs in their face?
As (somewhat) common as the language is today, it would be kind of rough for the little kids and would probably not be acceptable for casual Friday. Though I admit, I am grossly tempted to pick one up anyway.
Perhaps a future/alternate version could replace "Motherfucking" with "[REDACTED]", or just an asterisked version of the word?
I guess my question would be is there any recourse after going to court to get the ticket dismissed? As someone else pointed out, you're out whatever your costs for that day were just to fight a ticket you shouldn't have gotten in the first place. If you win, can you counter-sue for harassment or something? Not that I'm a big proponent of encouraging lawsuits, but maybe getting slapped back harder a few times would make someone in power wake up and look for a solution.
Sadly, said solution would probably be to make it actually be illegal, raise the fine tenfold, and give any agent who gives out a ticket a $10K bonus for a job well done.
I read it that way too the first time. This is one of those instances where punctuation really comes in handy.
I'm assuming (ass, u, me, etc.) the line was intended to read:
To paraphrase George W(ashington)., "God and the [C]onstituition give us liberty, arms in the hands of the people are the teeth."
BTW, in the course of verifying it was Washington and not another George W, it appears the quote the paraphrase comes from is fake. Also there's no mention of God in any of the variations, so not sure where that came from. But enjoy some free enlightenment.
I don't believe it says anything about Wikipedia losing editors, just that some of the editors question if Wikipedia is losing neutrality by participating in the blackout.
Although really, it's kind of hard to be neutral when one side is basically getting permission to shut down your entire site (or at least large chunks of it) because somebody may have posted something that somebody didn't like.
My French skills are a bit rusty (and I know it's being nitpicky), but last I checked (and no offense since the original had the same error) "70" translates roughly to "seventy", not eighty.
On the post: MA Teen Arrested And Held Without Bail For Posting Supposed 'Terrorist Threat' On Facebook
Not to be completely off topic...
So they spread the situation out? Sound like that would make it worse!
I'm not sure if I've just started noticing it, or if people have been doing it to try and avoid using the term "defused" since it's somewhat associated with bombs (Note: I am not threatening to bomb anything by including the word "bomb" in my post.)(Note 2: Same thing about the other 2 uses in the first note.)
It's slowly approaching lose/loose levels of annoyance.
On the post: Key Players In Prenda Lawsuits Also Involved In Questionable 'Class Action' Objections
I think I've just found my new favorite way to tell my kids to behave.
On the post: Cablevision Files Antitrust Suit Against Viacom For Forced Bundling Of Crappy TV Channels
Sadly...
On the post: The Next eBook Evolution: Pay As You Read eBooks
Re:
On the post: Company Behind Adam & Eve Discovers Quickly That Courts Are Now Hip To Copyright Trolling
"Mile High" Law Office
Or perhaps it's the perfect name and that was the plan all along...
On the post: Opera About Walt Disney Refused Permission To Use Disney Images
Probably a stupid question but...
If the play is already not portraying Disney in the greatest of lights, would it not make sense to then use pariodied, exaggerated versions of the characters in question? Leave them unnamed, so you don't have to worry about actually using the words "Mickey Mouse." It's been done before in a South Park episode.
Or would that be too much of a risk that somebody with more money would decide to challenge parody use?
On the post: NYTimes Columnist Proves That Among Billions Of Tweets Some People Say Stuff You Don't Care About
Why leave it?
I hope if they paid Cohen for the piece they politely (and forcefully) asked for their money back.
On the post: German Company Wants To Protect Its Use Of The '@' Sign: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
Fun (and not really relevant) Fact
On the post: The Internet Didn't 'Kill' Carly Rae Jepsen's Career
Re: I get knocked down...
Now, the question of whether that's a good thing a bad thing is somewhat up for debate...
On the post: GoDaddy Receives Patent On 'Announcing A Domain Name Registration On A Social Website'
Holy Crap
Good grief.
On the post: New Minister Of Culture In Brazil Brings Hope Of Return To Earlier Enlightened Copyright Policy
Re:
/s
On the post: GOP Platform May Include Internet Freedom Language... But Also Wants Crackdown On Internet Porn
Re:
What kind of representative would they be if they tried to outlaw giant boobs in your face without having first had said giant boobs in their face?
On the post: This T-Shirt Has Been Seized
Re: Kind of Like the Shirt
Perhaps a future/alternate version could replace "Motherfucking" with "[REDACTED]", or just an asterisked version of the word?
On the post: Police Ticketing Informal Rideshare Participants Based On No Law, But To Protect Port Authority Revenue
Sadly, said solution would probably be to make it actually be illegal, raise the fine tenfold, and give any agent who gives out a ticket a $10K bonus for a job well done.
On the post: Hollywood Bending Over Backwards To Appease China
Homefront
So does that mean Hollywood gets sued? Or maybe they can market it as not a remake? I mean, come on, nobody really played that game anyway.
Genius!
On the post: Rolling Stone Highlights FBI's Fascination With Staging Its Own Terrorist Plots... While Ignoring Real Threats
Re: Re:
I'm assuming (ass, u, me, etc.) the line was intended to read:
To paraphrase George W(ashington)., "God and the [C]onstituition give us liberty, arms in the hands of the people are the teeth."
BTW, in the course of verifying it was Washington and not another George W, it appears the quote the paraphrase comes from is fake. Also there's no mention of God in any of the variations, so not sure where that came from. But enjoy some free enlightenment.
Remember kids, punctuation is important.
"Time to eat, kids!" vs "Time to eat kids!"
On the post: Disney Refused Invitation From Senator Feinstein To Meet With Tech Companies Over PIPA/SOPA
Re:
http://www.npr.org/2012/01/18/145382877/wikipedia-editors-question-sites-24-hour-blackout
I don't believe it says anything about Wikipedia losing editors, just that some of the editors question if Wikipedia is losing neutrality by participating in the blackout.
Although really, it's kind of hard to be neutral when one side is basically getting permission to shut down your entire site (or at least large chunks of it) because somebody may have posted something that somebody didn't like.
On the post: Revolving Door: Sixteen Former Judiciary Committee Staff Are Lobbying Congress Concerning SOPA
Re: Re: Re: S M E A R
But isn't that one of the (many) major problems with SOPA/PIPA? Intent doesn't matter. Hell, guilt doesn't seem to matter, so why would intent.
On the post: Insurers Suggest Podium & Stage Collapse Tragedies Are The Inevitable Result Of File Sharing?
Re:
On the post: Could The Supreme Court Invalidate Software Patents?
Re: Re:
Next >>