MA Teen Arrested And Held Without Bail For Posting Supposed 'Terrorist Threat' On Facebook
from the being-a-lousy-rapper-still-not-a-crime dept
I'm going to take a guess and say the national Terrorism Mood Ring is still set to 'OVERREACT' if this story is any indication. Cameron D'Ambrosio, a Methuen, MA high school student, was arrested May 1st and charged with "communicating terroristic threats" based on a Facebook posting. He is being held without bail pending a hearing on May 9th and could face up to 20 years in jail for making a "bomb threat."
The threat (at least the one that appeared on Facebook), as reported by the Boston Herald, reads as follows. (For best results, fill in the blanks Mad Libs-style and spell "bombing" correctly.)
“I’m not in reality, So when u see me (expletive) go insane and make the news, the paper, and the (expletive) federal house of horror known as the white house, Don’t (expletive) cry or be worried because all YOU people (expletive) caused this (expletive).This was posted to D'Ambrosio's Facebook page, which looks altogether similar to thousands of teens' Facebook pages. (Source: I am the parent of a teenager.) Also, like thousands of Facebook-using teens, D'Ambrosio fancies himself a rapper and his "threat" appears to be nothing more than some "lyrics" in search of a quality jeep beat. (I'm dating myself with that last term.)
(Expletive) a boston bominb wait till u see the (expletive) I do, I’ma be famous rapping, and beat every murder charge that comes across me!"
So, how does some par-for-the-course teenage Facebook post become a "threat?" Well, it takes a very specific chain of events. The official Methuen PD blog breaks it all down (and throws a lot of exclamation points around in its headlines for some strange reason).
Today, Tuesday, May 1, 2013, at approximately 12:20, Methuen High School students reported to administration that they had received a Facebook phone message sent by a Methuen High School student with disturbing verbiage. The student made terrorist threats...In other words, some teens at the high school saw a status update posted by D'Ambrosio and told someone... who told someone. The rest is now
The administration acted quickly, contacted school service officer Jim Mellor, who then contacted the police department. The student was not in school but has since been located and placed under arrest. Administration working hand in hand with the Methuen Police Department, diffused the situation maintaining the best possible professional attitude.
The PD arrested the student, charged him with "communicating terrorist threats" and locked him up pending a "dangerousness" hearing. But was it really a threat? Or was it just D'Ambrosio doing what teens do best -- attracting negative attention? That ellipsis in the quotation from the PD's blog takes the place of a sentence which seems to indicate this entire chain of events should never have happened.
These threats were in general and not directed towards another person or the school.Non-specific threats are a bit problematic. There generally needs to be more going on than a Facebook post that indiscriminately "threatens" everyone who's able to read it. If it was targeted at specific people, perhaps it would be a more credible threat. (D'Ambrosio can target his threats. According to the Boston Herald, he was charged last year with threatening to stab his sister to death, but the case has been dismissed. Read into that what you will...)
Then there's the wording itself that, when taken in context with D'Ambrosio's rap aspirations, tends to indicate this is simply poorly-worded braggadocio aimed at touting his "skills." The second "stanza" (?) even says "I’ma be famous rapping, and beat every murder charge that comes across me!" This makes the preceding line read more like "I'm going to be bigger than the Boston Bombing," not altogether unlike John Lennon's proclamation that the Beatles were bigger than Jesus. Again, rap is full of this sort of self-aggrandizement and D'Ambrosio certainly listened to enough of the music to pick up the basics.
The opening "stanza" starts with "I'm not in reality," another commonality of rap music. Eminem used this as a defense against criticism, stating that Eminem was an alter ego and was far more outrageous than he, Marshall Mathers, was. "It's all an act," in other words. Stating "I'm not in reality" up front should temper any expectations of literality in what follows it. Of course, this rationalizing grants D'Ambrosio additional depth that he may not actually possess. Even so, anyone with a passing knowledge of the art form would know enough to steal a little "depth."
Despite all this, the Methuen police chief seems rather proud of his catch. A rather breathless writeup at The Valley Patriot captures some rather ridiculous quotes from the man of the hour.
“He posted a threat in the form of rap where he mentioned the White House, the Boston Marathon bombing, and said ‘everybody you will see what I am going to do, kill people.”If it was in the "form of a rap," there's a good chance this is protected speech, rather than a criminal act. Police chief Joe Solomon isn't helping his case by framing D'Ambrosio's words this way.
“I do want to make clear he did not make a specific threat against the school or any particular individuals but he did threaten to kill a bunch of people and specifically mentioned the Boston Marathon and the White House. The threat was disturbing enough for us to act and I think our officers did the right thing."Strange. When I reread his words, I don't find him threatening to kill anyone. He says he'll "go insane" and make "the news, the paper, the (expletive) federal house of horror the White House." "Go insane" is not the same thing as threatening violence and its takes a lot of willingness to see something that's not actually there to believe it does. Sure, D'Ambrosio mentions both the White House and the Boston bombing, but simply throwing those words into a sentence (and filling the rest out with expletives) doesn't turn this into a credible threat, or at least not one that should result in a 20-year sentence.
By all means, the police should be willing to investigate perceived threats, but putting this into context (your average profane, overdramatic, attention-seeking, rap fan teenager) should have resulted in little more than a discussion about the possibility that word dumps like this could have negative consequences or legal repercussions.
The police also went to his home and seized D'Ambrosio's Xbox and laptop, but were apparently unable to find anything to indicate the teenager was anything more than a mouthy misanthrope. So, they've decided to "dig deeper into his Facebook account."
Tom Duggan, president and publisher of The Valley Patriot, dug a little deeper himself, and reported back (breathlessly) about the "horrors" he found. (All quotes are verbatim, I shit you not.)
D’Ambrosio also had disturbing photos and posts on his Facebook page including “Fuck politics, Fuck Obama and Fuck the government!!”Wow. It's like reading a report from Morality in Media. A teen who wants to stick it to the Man with f-bombs and exclamation points? Do tell! An "unusual" interest in gangs, violence and criminals? Does this make him more or less disturbing than a large majority of the teen population? Looking at his page, I notice D'Ambrosio also has an "unusual" interest in scantily-clad females, video games, Monsters University, puppies, "Fuck Drugs Enjoy Life," the National Guard, tattoos and Mario. And as for the whole "disturbing satanic photo" -- a.) Duggan is about 30 years too late to join the satanic panic, b.) the "photo" isn't actually a photo and c.) it's at least as comical as it is disturbing.
He also had a “disturbing satanic photo posted as well as a photo of himself on a “Wanted Poster” that reads “Wanted Dead or Alive” a quick perusal of his Facebook page shows D’Ambrosio’s unusual interest in gangs, violence and a criminal lifestyle.
So, unless the police are holding some information back, it looks as if they've managed to turn a harmless bout of stupidity into a terrorist threat. Chief Solomon even credits the "see something, say something" travesty for helping the MPD corral this dangerous rapper. But while we're used to displays of immaturity from the young, there's no excusing the dangerous stupidity of zero tolerance policies, "see something, say something" and the police department's willingness to conjure up a threat out of little more than the use of "Boston" in a badly formed sentence.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: massachusetts, terrorism
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
And why the fuck would a real terrorist post any threat publicly in their Facebook profile? I'm sure Boston bombings were all over the internet before they happened, right?
For fuck's sake US, snap out of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The simple issue with us here in the states is that unlike Brazil, a lot of these acts are done because the people committing the acts have no political agenda, have been brain washed, or are zealots to a false preaching (nowhere in the entire Koran...is 72 virgins ever mentioned if you kill people)....So you see, people only attack us out of the hatred for our ideals, or the false belief that beautiful women await them. You guys are lucky down there because it is mostly political..the people that attack here are generally certified crazy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The last time this subject came up I asked you about the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon. Remember that? You never answered.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
uh oh
Nigel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is an organizers' meeting...
We are marching on Congress July the Fourth, four hundred thousand strong. From there we are dividing into two groups, one group to march on St. Augustine, Florida, the other group to march into Mississippi. Thank you.
—— Brandenburg v Ohio (1969)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is an organizers' meeting...
Your selfish, self-centered answers to your own problems of an empty worthless life no longer have the power to move the youth of this nation. Give it up. The planet is changing and you are stuck in the pleistocene era (look it up).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Minion, don't throw "moral panics" bit into actual police actions.
This is tyranny, plain and simple, because "pre-crime" suppression of mere words.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Minion, don't throw "moral panics" bit into actual police actions.
Why can't you do this more regularly?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Minion, don't throw "moral panics" bit into actual police actions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Minion, don't throw "moral panics" bit into actual police actions.
Every idiot who has pushed the report button for that comment needs to have their heads examined.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Minion, don't throw "moral panics" bit into actual police actions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess the police have solved all the murders, rapes etc if they are doing this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Mind you this case mentioned in the article does not apply here. This kid was trying to be a hardcore rapper (and yes my definition of rapping is being able to rhyme with rhythm....I was born in the 1980's just deal with it).
This case is simple....a guy who wanted to be larger than life finally got his wish....in the worst way possible.
“Fuck politics, Fuck Obama and Fuck the government!!”
-So says everyone right now.
Curiously enough we did have warnings about Boston from the Russian Federation and the brothers' own mother. Maybe he was rapping his frustration that we had 100% proof positive warning and knew about it.
typical teenager he may be and I honestly do believe this was a major overreaction. Let us hope and pray that he is under 18 so that his juvenile records from being suspected of terrorism don't shroud his future in darkness.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I better not visit the US or I will be whisked off to Gitmo as soon as I step off the plane.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sums it up
that terrorist? that's me every Tuesday.
or during the bush years Friday.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sums it up
So, do you go to remote Chinese villages and torch them to the ground, save for a young girl who will grow up with a thirst for vengeance and come after you so you can tell her that it was just a Tuesday for you?
Then remind her that you killed your father as well, but you're not whining about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: sums it up
or shold i say
OF COURSE!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: sums it up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The first man I want to get in my sights is L. B. J.
—— Watts v United States (1969)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
okay he was an accident.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Criminalizing stupidity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny thing is that I remember situations like this right after 9/11 and they did not die down until 6 months later Mr. Cushing....so I understand your frustration :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sarcasm activated
It feels so good knowing that this citizen who has a warm bed in a prison cell with other people for the crime of speaking out while ignoring the real crimes that people could commit such as robbing the nation blind through copyrights, patents, and tradmarks, working diligently to do nothing to help the nation prosper and countering the austerity campaign of those that only believe in their own reality.
It's just a fact that this kid's thought crimes were so heinous that murdering the English language deserves a police/nanny state response where it's for your own good.
So cheer up Bostonians! You've just experienced how fragile your civil rights are in a time of 9/11 where rappers are your worst enemy, you need a gun in every school, and the government can't solve real problems while manufacturing terrorists out of your citizenry.
I feel safer already...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*gets arrested*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shoot, if they go for him again, I hope they get him
"Q: What did you say?
"A: I said I felt that that would happen sooner or later.
"Q: Okay. And what did Lawrence say?
"A: Lawrence said, yeah, agreeing with me.
"Q: Okay. Now, when you - after Lawrence spoke, then what was your next comment?
"A: Well, we were talking - it's a wonder why they did that. I felt like it would be a black person that did that, because I feel like most of my kind is on welfare and CETA, and they use medicaid, and at the time, I was thinking that's what it was.
". . . But then after I said that, and then Lawrence said, yeah, he's cutting back medicaid and food stamps. And I said, yeah, welfare and CETA. I said, shoot, if they go for him again, I hope they get him."
—— Rankin v McPherson (1987)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can this kid get a carry permit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can this kid get a carry permit?
I guess we might as well scrap the bill of rights now that it's been watered down, eh?
Is he not "normal" enough for you? Normal these days means consenting and conforming to what Empire wants.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Can this kid get a carry permit?
..
Seriously what is your point?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We'll take the fucking street again
—— Hess v Indiana (1973)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the bright side
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Role Reversal?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think I read up there that he also plays video games...now-a-days its a sure sign of trouble just waiting for opportunity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Are you saying that rappers should not be able to own guns? What about people that make death metal or punk music?
To you he seems "miss-guided," however, I'm sure you seem "miss-guided" to some people as well. Is that a good reason to not allow you the right to gun ownership?
The sure sign of trouble is that people turn to the government to take away their rights because they are dependent upon an illusion (government) and not self aware and sufficient individuals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I think that the point of amendment 2 is .. it doesn't matter what the fuck you think. That's what I think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We're gonna break your damn neck.
—— NAACP v Claiborne Hardware (1982)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not to be completely off topic...
So they spread the situation out? Sound like that would make it worse!
I'm not sure if I've just started noticing it, or if people have been doing it to try and avoid using the term "defused" since it's somewhat associated with bombs (Note: I am not threatening to bomb anything by including the word "bomb" in my post.)(Note 2: Same thing about the other 2 uses in the first note.)
It's slowly approaching lose/loose levels of annoyance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
D-word
Or, in the case of a bomb threat, defused the situation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's the problem with things like this. They're put in place as a preventative measure. But all too often they take on a life of their own and begin to manufacture situations to justify their continued existence as well as argue for an expansion of scope.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Teens...
After reading what he wrote then I am not surprised that people wanted to talk to him even if just to point out he can only say "fuck the Government" so many times and in so many ways before the Feds start knocking on your door.
I can't blame them for arresting him when after the Boston Bombings they will be extremely keen to avoid any copy cat events where they will certainly strike against any perceived threats.
With that said then after a virtual slapping to scare him then they should let this mostly harmless teenager go under some strict warnings.
My greatest concern in all this is that they will overreact where I am sure in holding him under terrorist laws he has been denied access to a lawyer who would simply tell him to shut his teen mouth and to take the fifth. As a result they may want to provoke him into saying things no wiser person would like "he will kill them all" and "he fucked their mothers"
So while his initial FB rant provided no specific threats towards anyone they may use these days to guide him into damning himself. I can only then hope the Judge recognizes his big bad teen mouth and complete lack of offence weapons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fuck politics, Fuck Obama and Fuck the government!!
On April 26, 1968, the defendant was observed in the Los Angeles County Courthouse in the corridor outside of division 20 of the municipal court wearing a jacket bearing the words `Fuck the Draft' which were plainly visible. There were women and children present in the corridor. The defendant was arrested. The defendant testified that he wore the jacket knowing that the words were on the jacket as a means of informing the public of the depth of his feelings against the Vietnam War and the draft.
—— Cohen v California (1971)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You didn't need to disclose that you're the parent of a teenager.
We can tell from the rest of the piece. It's [expletive] obvious.
Sincerely,
Other Parents of Teenagers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1984
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wall to Wall Shag
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
police=terrorists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We can stand a person like this S. O. B. against the wall and shoot him
—— Noto v United States (1961)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
These things are not voted back into effect folks. Once you give up, have them taken or otherwise "loose" these inalienable rights you will have to fight to get them back. And by fight I don't mean arguing in public with a governor and his side-kick police chief.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Teen arrest
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Teen arrest
"We probably seem to be anti-religious. It's simple; none of us believe in God".
"We're not anti-Christ, just anti-Pope and anti-Christian."
Their press manager Derek Taylor was quoted as saying that the "boys" were so anti-Christ it shocked him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Regards and many thanks to purityspell@gmail.com
casey
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More Terror IN the US?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Taking Threats Seriously
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
REALLY?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: REALLY?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hmmm
I think it's a perfect lesson in be careful what you say. Now when this is all over he can go back to playing soccer and having his mom drop him off at the mall instead of trying to pretend he's some tough gangster.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hmmm
I think it's a perfect lesson in be careful what you say. Now when this is all over he can go back to playing soccer and having his mom drop him off at the mall instead of trying to pretend he's some tough gangster.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here, you can get arrested for liking a facebook post (which speaks the truth)
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/2-mumbai-girls-in-jail-for-tweet-against-bal-thackeray/1/ 229846.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MA Teen Arrested And Held Without Bail For Posting Supposed 'Terrorist Threat' On Facebook
you can even have your own private army and it's all totally legal but if you post a harmless comment on a social network you get lock up without a trial, Land of the Free I think not!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
yeah right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
free speech
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ridiculous
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Modern society must be changed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facts are Funny things......
Now, for the record I am a first amendment advocate who lectures on the topic quite frequently and when I first got word of this story my PERSONAL opinion was that charging this GUY (he is no kid) with terrorism was an affront to the friends I lost on 911.
NOW.... having said that... let's take a look at the story you are criticizing, shall we?
You ASSume when reading this straight news story that the writer was "breathlessly" trying to bias the readers of said story and that said bias was to paint Carmen D'Ambrosia in a bad light as to railroad an INNOCENT FLOWER with negative press.
But..... since my PERSONAL opinion was (at the time)disgusted that he was being charged with "terrorism" ... and the FACTS of the story showed D'Ambrosio in a bad light... it was the FACTS that lead the story not any personal bias. If there was personal bias in this NEWS story it would have favored Cameron.
But this does bring up an interesting point when dealing with people who like to recklessly attack others without knowing the true motives... or even bothering to ask.
It seems from your criticism of my piece, that your beef is really centered around why I did NOT show my bias when writing the story .... since THAT bias is one you would AGREE with. This amuses me greatly.
The satanic depiction on his Facebook page in and of itself means nothing. But when you take it in context with what he was being charged with, his bragging on facebook that he was going to "beat every murder charge", and saying his acts would be bigger than the Boston Marathon, previous threats,complaints by dozens of kids at Methuen High School that they felt he was a threat, and some rather DISTURBING previous posts (which we did NOT report) the satanic imagery BECOMES relevant.
Now let's address another issue. FACTS
It is rare today to find people interested in those pesky facts because most people want to fit a story to THEIR narrative not let the facts SHAPE their narrative.
Tea Party conservatives are writing blog postings and emailing me saying D'Ambrosio was targeted for his "anti government posts". Several other blogs paint him out to be a goofy kid, who was just clowning around and is up against jack booted thug government cops looking to take away his rights.
But the facts show differently.
#1 He is not being charged under the patriot act or any FEDERAL charges at all. He is being charges under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 269, Section 14B. (Bomb Threats/Hijacking threats). Which is commonly referred to by Law Enforcement as a "terrorism statute" But does not elevate the criminal offense to the Federal level.
#2 He has an arrest record and a probation record that shows him to be anything BUT a "goofy kid" or an innocent flower.The neighbors we spoke with ALL said that he was a violent kid with a really troubled home and every one of them said being in jail was better than what he had to go home to. EVERY ONE OF THEM. I did not include that in the story because I didn't think smearing the father was relevant to the story.
#3 He was not charged because of anti-government rapping, he wasn't charged because the evil government conspired against him, he was charged because he sent TEXT messages where he threatened a mass murder (NOT RAP LYRICS) and he then posted similar threats on line. Hiding behind "They were rap lyrics" doesn't cut it in the real world. This isn't high school. I cannot post on line that I am going to go out and rape women and when I get caught get a free pass claiming they were lyrics to a song.
#4 None of his threatening posts SAID they were rap lyrics. to those unfamiliar with Cameraon's aspiring rap career they looked more like the messages we saw from the columbine killers in their notebooks. These were not written in lyric form, and they didn't rhyme (though I agree not all rappers rhyme)
#5 A LIBERAL MASSACHUSETTS JUDGE looked at the ACTUAL EVIDENCE in LAWRENCE district court (the poorest city in MA and the highest minority population with BY FAR the most liberal judges). She said she found his pattern of behavior (oddly missing in your criticism) "Very troubling". I have followed Judge Rooney... she is as liberal as they come!
#6 Police that I spoke with, both the chief and officers involved said they had arrested him because they believed he was a threat and was escalating violent threats on line and in text messages, as well as verbally to students. At no time did ONE officer on or off the record cite anti government opinions as a motivating factor.
Now it is up to a jury if it goes that far.
Cameron D'Ambrosi is not a terrorist by any stretch. Deeming him a terrorist is an afront to every American who died at the hands of REAL terrorism.
But he isn't a "goofy kid" or a victim of the evil government who is prosecuting him for a RAP song either. He is a VERY troubled kid with violence issues, a very troubled home life and the perfect profile of a mass shooter. His postings and his personal behavior landed him where he is. Not some jack booted government agent hell bent on taking people's free speech rights away.
The story I wrote was an accurate depiction of the facts we had at the time. It was those FACTS that determined the direction of the story. I am sorry if they are inconvenient FACTS to those looking for a poster boy for their cause (a cause I actually agree with).
Maybe in course of fighting monsters you have become one yourself.
http://valleypatriot.com/methuen-teen-being-held-on-terrorism-charges-becomes-free-speech-poster -boy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
simple flower girl dresses
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
simple flower girl dresses
[ link to this | view in chronology ]