Re: Re: Re: My Professors Would Fail The People Who Wrote This Letter.
many older instructors/prof still allow print encyclopedias in my exp, but dont allow any electronic sources as they either dont trust them OR in even more cases, dont understand computers well enough to check up on the sources.(sadly I am not even joking, my buddy had one recently who cant even use email they have a TA who prints it for them, then types up replies from hand written letters...)
I have had instructors who allows wikipedia as a source but not as the primary source, BUT you could comb threw the sources on the wikipedia artical and link them, and it was fine.
made me laugh..
did have one that would fail if you even mentioned wikipedia in class, but gave me an a+ on a paper I did about wikipedia and the fact that time and time again its been found to be just as if not more reliable then dead tree encyclopedias(both are known to contain errors, dif being wikipedia can be fixed quickly and easily.....paper book cant)
please watch http://youtu.be/-j8ZMMuu7MU then you may understand why everbodys god agrees with them and their views, even if those views involve killing non-believers or worse.
Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
seems quite logical to me.
like a friend of mine who "believes" in his wifes religion because he loves her and he dosnt want her to leave him(and she would if she knew he thought her religion was a bullshit cult)
he pretends to believe, even trys to convense himself he believes, but get a few drinks in him away from her....and down come the pretenses..
believing in a god in order to be rewarded after death or to avoid death....sorry thats not true faith.
kinda like people who believe in science but dont understand a single thing about it....and will believe anything somebody says if they say its science...
Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
well many so called christians view the rest of us as less then human, and if it wherent for there fear of the law and death they would try and clense the world of our kind.(anybody whos not one of their death cult.)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
logic is the biggest enemy of faith and religion.
every athiest I know who started christian turned after reading the bible fully, NO christian I know or have known has actually read the thing cover to cover...not a single one...
they have read the "good parts" in bible study's but never the full book..
glad to see my gut feeling on this was correct, and what i learned other places as well.
to bad that the persecution had to drive her to kill herself.
I would bet they made threats of her going to jail/prison and such as well, as thats quite common if they cant get you to do what they want.....anything to get what they want, even if its creating a victim.
as to the students.....well, i really doubt it was THAT bad, i mean kids can be cruel but, also tend to have short memories as well, most of the issue Im willing to bet falls back on the DA and the Cops who couldnt just let this go for her sake of nothing else.
and Im betting why they didnt throw the book, weak case as you said, hard to get a conviction when you cant get anybody to testify to somebodies guilt....
I suggest you read the story behind tims inflamitory blurb, and the other comments here.
1. it wasnt rape like you and he imply.
2. she likely killed herself due to the harm their relationship did to him not because of the relationship itself.
3. this jail time isnt for rape or even statutory rape, its for being kicked out of a treatment program, despite the fact he joined another one and completed treatment and on top of that is considered low risk (not a threat to anybody)
ah the joys of the internet, people jump to conclusions and want a guys guts on a stick(well in this case 2 guys, the judge and the creepy old man who had sex with this girl years ago...)
again, I dont agree with what he did, it wasnt ok, but he has been punished, he will be punished the rest of his life, he didnt force her to have sex with him, he didnt kill her.
He did something really fucking creepy and stupid....but it was not rape no matter what the law may say(actually, if you read the charge, it wasnt even a rape charge...rapes not part of the charge wording at all....)
nope, he networks with 2 of the business networking groups our business is part of, he also does anger management, drug/alchohol and other types of counselling/treatment, nice guy really.
part of why he and his partners started the SO treatment was because there was a need for an honest program in the area, most if not all of the others are not about getting people treated but about making 60-85usd a person on "group treatment" that amounts to packet work(that he showed some of us) and sitting around talking 1-3 times a week(at 60-85bucks a time.
do the math
say they do 6 groups a day, 5 days a week, averaging 15 people a group, 2 times a week at 85bucks a head.
thats alot of money, and a good reason to never NEVER let anybody even those who your test say are perfectly normal off without years of "treatment"
and Tim nice attack, I get you dont like or agree with my opinion on this topic...
but I dont agree with your faux news esque blerb on the topic either....it seems you wrote it to fit your very angery view point, intentionally leaving out very important details....like the fact he had completed a treatment program and the sentance wasnt for the "rape" it was for having gotten kicked out of one program for what the judge considered minor violations....or the fact he finished treatment at another location and was/is considered low risk.
I get that you would love nothing more then to see this guys guts on a stick as hes burned at the stake....
but the fact is, most of the world wouldnt call this rape, and your posting about it is VERY misleading, I mean....damn dude when did you get the job working for faux news/msnbs?
back at you, you know what changed my stand on some of this, reading some stories and cases about it, then meeting some of the people involved in cases like this, not just like this mind but , cases where the guy was "too old" and girl "too young"
I took the stand many here still do, till the girls we heard from talked very passionately about how they where not victims and where not abused, hell, to a one the ones we saw said they had been the aggressor and 2 of them had later married the person.
I do agree this case differs, and I feel the guy needed punished....if for no other reason then his role and job.
and I dont go to the "its a-ok" stand either, I just think we need another term and better laws to deal with cases like this.....
and i saw that, infact on gender discussions (facebook group you should join) I posted that and some other very interesting things similar.
the talk over the link you posted was pretty long,some people even removed posts they made because they commented without fully reading the situation....and without understanding, even if hes removed from the SO reg, hes still a marked man.....all because a mother and daughter where fighting....and because the law has zero flexibility in it, even for a matter of months.
On the post: Police Admit That NZ Spy Agency Illegally Spied On Kim Dotcom, But Aren't Going To Do Anything About It
Re: Re: Go Kim Go
On the post: India Wants To Ban US-Based Email Systems For Government Communications Over NSA Concerns
Re: No, the prior items seem hopelessly naive.
On the post: India Wants To Ban US-Based Email Systems For Government Communications Over NSA Concerns
On the post: Best Response To A Copyright Threat Ever? Lawyers Explain Why ABA Is Full Of S**t In Claiming Copyright On Routing Numbers
Re: Re: My Professors Would Fail The People Who Wrote This Letter.
On the post: Best Response To A Copyright Threat Ever? Lawyers Explain Why ABA Is Full Of S**t In Claiming Copyright On Routing Numbers
Re: Re: Re: My Professors Would Fail The People Who Wrote This Letter.
I have had instructors who allows wikipedia as a source but not as the primary source, BUT you could comb threw the sources on the wikipedia artical and link them, and it was fine.
made me laugh..
did have one that would fail if you even mentioned wikipedia in class, but gave me an a+ on a paper I did about wikipedia and the fact that time and time again its been found to be just as if not more reliable then dead tree encyclopedias(both are known to contain errors, dif being wikipedia can be fixed quickly and easily.....paper book cant)
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: and now we come to religion...
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
like a friend of mine who "believes" in his wifes religion because he loves her and he dosnt want her to leave him(and she would if she knew he thought her religion was a bullshit cult)
he pretends to believe, even trys to convense himself he believes, but get a few drinks in him away from her....and down come the pretenses..
believing in a god in order to be rewarded after death or to avoid death....sorry thats not true faith.
kinda like people who believe in science but dont understand a single thing about it....and will believe anything somebody says if they say its science...
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
explains why their god always believes what they themselves believe, no matter what religion they are.
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
every athiest I know who started christian turned after reading the bible fully, NO christian I know or have known has actually read the thing cover to cover...not a single one...
they have read the "good parts" in bible study's but never the full book..
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
and nice godwin!!!
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
let them rot?
fill a few meteor craters and dump on the lye?
i can do this all day!!!
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Listing of Sehorne's Apparent Religious Principles
http://youtu.be/-j8ZMMuu7MU
On the post: Man Who Raped 14-Year-Old Sentenced To 30 Days In Jail Because Girl Looked Kinda Old And The Internet Is Mean
Re: Info
to bad that the persecution had to drive her to kill herself.
I would bet they made threats of her going to jail/prison and such as well, as thats quite common if they cant get you to do what they want.....anything to get what they want, even if its creating a victim.
as to the students.....well, i really doubt it was THAT bad, i mean kids can be cruel but, also tend to have short memories as well, most of the issue Im willing to bet falls back on the DA and the Cops who couldnt just let this go for her sake of nothing else.
and Im betting why they didnt throw the book, weak case as you said, hard to get a conviction when you cant get anybody to testify to somebodies guilt....
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
On the post: Texas Deputy Sues 911 Caller For Not 'Adequately Warning' Him Of Potential Danger Or 'Making The Premises Safe'
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Man Who Raped 14-Year-Old Sentenced To 30 Days In Jail Because Girl Looked Kinda Old And The Internet Is Mean
Re: Statutory Rape
1. it wasnt rape like you and he imply.
2. she likely killed herself due to the harm their relationship did to him not because of the relationship itself.
3. this jail time isnt for rape or even statutory rape, its for being kicked out of a treatment program, despite the fact he joined another one and completed treatment and on top of that is considered low risk (not a threat to anybody)
ah the joys of the internet, people jump to conclusions and want a guys guts on a stick(well in this case 2 guys, the judge and the creepy old man who had sex with this girl years ago...)
again, I dont agree with what he did, it wasnt ok, but he has been punished, he will be punished the rest of his life, he didnt force her to have sex with him, he didnt kill her.
He did something really fucking creepy and stupid....but it was not rape no matter what the law may say(actually, if you read the charge, it wasnt even a rape charge...rapes not part of the charge wording at all....)
On the post: Man Who Raped 14-Year-Old Sentenced To 30 Days In Jail Because Girl Looked Kinda Old And The Internet Is Mean
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
part of why he and his partners started the SO treatment was because there was a need for an honest program in the area, most if not all of the others are not about getting people treated but about making 60-85usd a person on "group treatment" that amounts to packet work(that he showed some of us) and sitting around talking 1-3 times a week(at 60-85bucks a time.
do the math
say they do 6 groups a day, 5 days a week, averaging 15 people a group, 2 times a week at 85bucks a head.
thats alot of money, and a good reason to never NEVER let anybody even those who your test say are perfectly normal off without years of "treatment"
and Tim nice attack, I get you dont like or agree with my opinion on this topic...
but I dont agree with your faux news esque blerb on the topic either....it seems you wrote it to fit your very angery view point, intentionally leaving out very important details....like the fact he had completed a treatment program and the sentance wasnt for the "rape" it was for having gotten kicked out of one program for what the judge considered minor violations....or the fact he finished treatment at another location and was/is considered low risk.
I get that you would love nothing more then to see this guys guts on a stick as hes burned at the stake....
but the fact is, most of the world wouldnt call this rape, and your posting about it is VERY misleading, I mean....damn dude when did you get the job working for faux news/msnbs?
On the post: Man Who Raped 14-Year-Old Sentenced To 30 Days In Jail Because Girl Looked Kinda Old And The Internet Is Mean
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I took the stand many here still do, till the girls we heard from talked very passionately about how they where not victims and where not abused, hell, to a one the ones we saw said they had been the aggressor and 2 of them had later married the person.
I do agree this case differs, and I feel the guy needed punished....if for no other reason then his role and job.
and I dont go to the "its a-ok" stand either, I just think we need another term and better laws to deal with cases like this.....
and i saw that, infact on gender discussions (facebook group you should join) I posted that and some other very interesting things similar.
the talk over the link you posted was pretty long,some people even removed posts they made because they commented without fully reading the situation....and without understanding, even if hes removed from the SO reg, hes still a marked man.....all because a mother and daughter where fighting....and because the law has zero flexibility in it, even for a matter of months.
Next >>