Court Tells Pirate Bay Founders They Can No Longer Work On The Pirate Bay
from the yeah,-that'll-work dept
You can't say the entertainment industry isn't persistent in their attempts to shut down The Pirate Bay (though, a portion of the site's popularity can be attributed to their neverending campaign against the site). While the industry won its lawsuit against four of The Pirate Bay's founders earlier this year, the ongoing appeals process is taking too long for the industry -- and the court had not issued an injunction against the site, so it's still running (though, plenty of users have since bailed out due to concern about the failed attempt to sell the site). Still, the entertainment industry has been trying a bunch of different ways to shut down the site in the meantime. Initially it got an ISP serving the site to stop, which caused a brief downtime. However, the latest, as pointed out by brokep, is that the industry appears to have convinced the court to bar two of the defendants -- Gottfried Svartholm-Warg and Fredrik Neij -- from doing any work on the site (Google translation from the original, so would appreciate any detail corrections if the translation isn't accurate).It's difficult to see what this accomplishes. Brokep points out that the two aren't involved with the site in the first place, and don't live in Sweden any more as well, so it's not clear what this does. On top of that, even if they were involved, it's not like others wouldn't quickly take their place anyway. The whole crusade continues to be a massive waste of time and resources by the entertainment industry for no clear gain.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, fredrik neij, gottfried svarthold-warg, lawsuits, sweden
Companies: the pirate bay
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Something worked
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Something worked
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Something worked
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I find it interesting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I find it interesting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Waste of time and money by Big Content?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Precedent?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ugh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Give UP!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm. I think he may have just put his foot in his mouth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Some analysis
Now one of the TPB founders have for the first time forced the court to weigh legal file-sharing against illegal file-sharing by providing relevant information. Here's how the judges argues - a translation of an excerpt from the court decision protocol:
Not a very satisfactory explanation IMO. If proportionality is always assessed in that manner I'm afraid that it will have very bad consequences sooner or later.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Error in the linked article + a couple of reliable sources
Swedish Radio has some short coverage in English too (everything in this article is correct) on their SR International site.
Everything in this TorrentFreak article is correct as far as I can see.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Error in the linked article + a couple of reliable sources
brokep's only comments on anything to do with TPB should be "I don't own it or run it, ask someone who does". Instead, he keeps making public statements that make it clear that he is involved with running the site.
Basically, they are going to "cute" themselves into personal liability.
Are torrents used for legal material? I am sure some people have used it to get legal material at some point. Was TPB's top 100 traded files legal? Not a single one, last time I looked.
http://thepiratebay.org/top/all
Not a single item on the list at 5:10am pacific appeared legal.
So the concept that the distribution of legal material would be harmed by shutting down TPB is a laughable concept at best.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Error in the linked article + a couple of reliable sources
If I'm not mistaken the court may only consider the information actively presented by the parties involved (that was the case in the ISP injunction case and I assume it's the same here). From what I have seen the plaintiffs have not provided anything that dispute the statement that a significant amount of material spread via TPB is done so legally and the judges say themselves in the protocol that there is no reason to doubt this information. Neither have the plaintiffs argued about the overall contents of TPB (unless I have missed something) but rather concentrated on the works relevant to this case.
If the court were not allowed to consider other things than what the parties presented in the ISP case, why should it be any different in this case? Besides the whole case is not about TPB as such but only about a couple of hundred works.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lol
Any publicity is good publicity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Indeed. And I am very, very happy about this. I'm trying to think of more ways for the "entertainment industry" (meaning Hollywood's schlockmeister accountant-managers) to waste its time and resources. Little help?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is the gain?
Perhaps the entertainment industry will use the sentence "Not only are we losing billions of dollars in sales, look how much piracy also costs us in legal costs!" in future lawsuits... Wouldn't surprise me. This could push the opinions of people, not knowledgable on the subject, in the jury in courts
[ link to this | view in chronology ]