Twilight Producers Aggressive IP Enforcement Strikes Again: Temporarily Shut Down Silly 8-Bit YouTube Game
from the oh-come-on dept
It seems that some creative folks put together an 8-bit Twilight YouTube video game. Yes, it's exactly what it sounds like. Using YouTube as their platform, they put together what looks like a classic 8-bit video game to the plot of Twilight. It's actually kind of neat that they used YouTube to make what's effectively a "choose-your-own-adventure" type game. But, of course, when it comes to any and all things Twilight, you have to deal with producers Summit Entertainment who are notoriously over aggressive in sending out the lawyers over pretty much any ridiculous thing they feel violates their rights.So... it didn't take long for Summit to issue a DMCA takedown on the game, which caused the game to disappear. Thankfully, however, after a conversation between Summit and the game makers, the game has been put back up. But, again, it does seem problematic when we need to live in such a permission culture, where doing something creative like this leads to takedowns and legal threats.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 8-bit, copyright, games, twilight, youtube
Companies: summit entertainment
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Dear lord...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No. The safe harbors mean that *because* Google *does* take down such things when it gets sent a takedown notice, that it is not liable. It doesn't mean Google gets to ignore takedowns. In fact, it might mean Google has to deal with even more takedowns.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously though, isn't this 8-bit Twilight thing a parody?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
BELLA: "Since when do you shoot lightning?"
VICTORIA: "Uh, well, they changed actresses so now I can do that."
BELLA: "But in the movie you didn't do that either."
VICTORIA: "Oh...um...well...DIE!"
-from Turn Edward Down clip, following the motorbike scene.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mike, it's Friday, which means there must be more to this story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Really, it's a mystery.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Logic fail by ee trollings. He seems to think that because one concert series (a lame, out of date and uninteresting one) is having a bad summer - which is explained by numerous factors) it condemns basic economics.
Of course, by ee trollings' own logic, this means that any time a CD fails to sell well, it "sort of screws up the 'sell music' concept" right?
TAM hasn't quite figured out that a single failure data point is meaningless in showing whether or not a concept can work. No one ever said that all concerts will make money. But, because he has no other original thoughts in his mind he has to pretend that's what people said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Actually, thats exactly what we think of him and his ilk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
on the other hand, we have tons of canceled tours and shows this year, and one of the highest profile is lilith fair, which brings so many of the top women acts together for one (normally very entertaining) day. even packaged together, the public is not buying. yet, this buying is what is support to support the entire music industry now. music is support to be free, and the scarce concerts are suppose to pick up the slack. yet, here we face a simple fact: people stopped being willing to pay.
mike totally ignoring the situation (and mcbride is one of his poster children for the new music industry) makes me think he cannot for the life of him find a way to spin it positively or show that it isnt the start of the end for the "sell the scarce" as a business model. has the public already figured out they are getting stuffed by over expensive concert tickets? i notice he didnt touch the bon jovi situation either, very similar problems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Who? Seriously, I've never heard of her.
Maybe instead of bitching, you'll actually explain who she is and why she's "high profile", and why this single cancelled tour is important.
"it isnt the start of the end for the "sell the scarce" as a business model"
Maybe you'll explain why it is. Gigs get cancelled all the time - yes, even in the old business models - and the reasons range from the fact that the acts are shite to some kind of economic downturn. You know, like a worldwide recession that limits peoples' disposable income. You might even have heard about something like that happening right now, that affects every industry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Either way, festivals do get cancelled due to soft sales, the brand name is hardly a household name and it seems like a gimmicky "girls only" brand whose gimmick in the "girl power" 90s doesn't have the same appeal in the modern day that it did then. There are, of course, other festivals that have sold out in the same time period, some of them dealing with independent acts, but our resident moron will of course ignore those in favour of his preferred narrative.
Perhaps TAM would like to explain why this "disproves" the idea of selling scarcity when a majority of other festivals are doing well?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"We don't need more people!"
"Festival's been cancelled, not enough people, apparently."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Who wants to go to a misandryst concert?
I'm betting many women are having a hard time convincing their partners to accompany them to such events :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
A) has nothing to do with the topic of this article
B) Just because you are a musician, the world does NOT owe you a living, or riches. You have to earn it which leads to:
C) Maybe they suck and no one is willing to pay to see them. See B).
D) You have not disproven "sell the scarce" one iota with your weak, specious and misguided rant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Let me save TAM the trouble.
mike, it's Friday, which means there must be more to this story.
----------------------------------------------------------
by Anonymous Coward, Jul 2nd, 2010 @ 2:02pm
no, it is more like mike attempting desperately to get more seo keywords on his site. it is also a fairly lame story. he is still ignoring the fact that terry mcbride announced many lilith fair concerts have been canceled because of poor ticket sales. sort of screws up the "sell the scarce" when nobody is buying!
----------------------------------------------------------
Has anyone noticed that lower case AC has pretty much just admitted that he is actually TAM? lol
Troll.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What double standard!?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star-crossed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And what the god damn fuck do you think creativity IS?? You think EVERY creative thing is created 100% wholly originally with ZERO connection to anything that has come before? Time to put up or shut up: show us this vast archive of 100% original works that dont "piggyback" on ANY other product, idea or prior work. Please. Time to prove it or get the fuck out, I'm sick of you idiots proclaiming that any derivative work is "not creative" or valid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I watched it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I watched it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's IP cover for moronic posing?
But ya gotta admit this bunch of vampires stays in character at every level. Do ya think their bloodsucker lawyers could get me royalties on my turds?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ok
Oh I don't know, say around the time the sun is just setting beyond the horizon and darkness is slowly moving in.
I'm not sure what we could call this time of day, perhaps nearly-darkness-not-quite-but-getting-there-light?]
There's probably a shorter name but it escapes me for the moment.......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
also
[ link to this | view in chronology ]