Amazon Insists No Licenses Needed For Cloud Player, Google Thinking Of Skipping Licenses As Well
from the floodgates,-openning dept
When Amazon launched its cloud music streaming service a few weeks ago, the big question concerned whether or not it needed licenses to do so. It certainly did not have them. And there's a strong argument that it doesn't need them. After all, it was just letting people take music files they already had, and allowing them to store and stream them from the internet. Why should it require an extra license to let people listen to music they already have? However, we did worry that Amazon would simply cave in, rather than fight, as it wanted to remain on good terms with the record labels.Perhaps that's not the case, however. Amazon has sent a letter to the record labels, once again reiterating that it does not believe it needs licenses. On top of that, it points out that, so far, the Cloud Drive appears to be driving more sales of MP3s.
Cloud Drive is a general online storage service for all digital files, not unlike Google Docs, Microsoft SkyDrive and any number of other internet file back-up services. It’s your external hard-drive in the cloud. It requires a license from content owners no more than those other internet file back-up services do and no more than makers of external hard drives for PCs do.Nice to see Amazon taking a stand here. Hopefully it keeps up.
Cloud Player is a media management and play-back application not unlike Windows Media Player and any number of other media management applications that let customers manage and play their music. It requires a license from content owners no more than those applications do.
It really is that simple.
At the same time, it appears that Google may be inspired by Amazon's decision here to stand up against the idea that licenses are needed for digital lockers. While it had been trying to negotiate licenses, rumors are coming out that it's fed up with ridiculous demands from the labels and ready to follow Amazon's lead in just offering up the service without any licenses.
Not surprisingly, the report names Warner Music as being the party that has been the worst to deal with in these negotiations. That fits with what we've heard from other negotiations, where Warner Music puts absolutely ridiculous deal terms on the table and refuses to budge. It would be nice if Google follows Amazon's lead and calls the labels' bluff on the idea that licenses are needed for this kind of service.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyoneā€™s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cloud, copyright, licenses
Companies: amazon, google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I think I may have to take advantage of this service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What about external hard drives and thumb drives? You can certainly share such drives with friends. And if it was on a network, it again could shared.
Should WD obtain licenses or should hard drives be locked down with DRM so only one person can access it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Dewie, Cheatham & Howe
Staff Attorneys
Warner Music
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
As for the "Should WD obtain licenses or should hard drives be locked down with DRM so only one person can access it?" Don't give the damn RIAA any more stupid ideas! =P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Sharing files over a network may - in some cases - be infringement, but handling someone your thumb drive? Please cite your precedent. As long as the original owner no longer has access to the files, I think it would be ok to share - no copy has been made.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
100 years of experience, going about business as usual, attacking everything new, has shown them that they have always "succeeded" in the past. But the reality was that they never succeeded, they never faced competition, and all their lobbying amounted to a naught. They were a monopoly ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
If the labels are smart, they'll stop selling CDs and MP3s completely, start selling a new medium that doesn't work on computers- only on new hardware, and tell all you leeches to go pound sand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog_hole
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hot diggity!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hot diggity!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hot diggity!
One word ... SONY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hot diggity!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Our Powers Combined!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Our Powers Combined!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Our Powers Combined!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, I suspect that they work towards a compromise in the end, but it's a sign that they need to change their tune.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The 5 five words that launched a thousand lawsuits...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fair use?
And where do you draw the line? What if I have a collection of mp3s that I bought legally online, and they happen to be stored on my personal web server that only I can access? What's the difference between that and paying Google or Amazon for cheap storage in the cloud?
To be fair, Google and Amazon (and other companies offering similar services) should be responsible for securing the licensed content they're storing, and I could totally see them being required to have an independent auditor check things out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: fair use?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: fair use?
*Hostmonster and another that I don't recall the name of.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The sad part...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The sad part...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The sad part...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The sad part...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: The sad part...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The sad part...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The sad part...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The sad part...
Old time rocker here (Rush, Queensr˙che, Journey, etc.) and my digital music library is pretty set since I really don't care too much for newer music (with a few exceptions - Rob Thomas & Melissa Etheridge to name a couple). Most of my library was ripped from my wife and I's combined CD collection.
Actually, since I use Rythmbox in Linux as my music player on my laptop, I can change the metadata on the fly right inside my player.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: The sad part...
I like the idea of changing the metadata on the fly :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where do we send support?
Does anyone have a recommended petition site for this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Where do we send support?
http://consumerist.com/2006/12/email-amazons-executive-customer-service.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A simple idea ....
GOOGles market cap is $184 billion USD. Apples market Cap is 306 billion USD. Amazons Market Cap is $81 Billion USD. Microsoft has a market cap of $215 Billion USD. All four of these companies face serious problems in the future from ACTA, COICA, and all the other internet crushing, laws, and treaties being pushed forward by RIAA. A simple solution would be for them to each buy a record label. Then stop all payments to RIAA.
They could make all their money back in a matter of about a year or two. Destroy the collection societies. Most importantly they will stop all the internet crushing laws and treaties that will hobble them. Which saves them money and allows them to grow faster.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A simple idea ....
What if just one of these companies bought all the labels and and formed an unholy alliance with RIAA against the others?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A simple idea ....
The copyright on the lyrics, the copyright on the melody, the copyright on the recording. (possibly others?)
Just a semi educated guess here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A simple idea ....
Heck I'd pay Google £10 a month for a gmail account if it came with unlimited access to music.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: A simple idea ....
Artists contracts aside. I was thinking something along those lines. Then the word "Monopoly" echoed in my head after remembering the big four control 80% of the "label" music in the US and %70 worldwide.
A couple cool ideas would be ...
Free usage in YouTube Videos with no futher fear of DMCA takedowns. That would be a big music promotion tool and get google a ton of kudos.
A one stop shop to buy the rights to music for professional tv shows and movies. Which removes the whole ego based negotiation crap the labels put you through now.
...
add a few of your own.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I see stupid people...
BigLabhel: I see your user "IrawksLOL" has a copy of "I do the Rock" by Tim Curry stored in your "locker". You need to make sure its a legal copy else we will sue you.
Google/Amazon: LAWL
BigLabel: Hey, Mr. Leahy, here is that 4 million for your "charity" make it happen...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, I wish they'd do the same for their ebooks. But Amazon does a pretty great job 99% of the time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dammed if They Do and Dammed If They Do Not
The choices are: If they do sue Amazon can they afford the legal battle? EMI has been in court with MP3tunes.com/Michael Robertson over its cloud based offering for three years - with no end in sight yet. And finally Amazon's market cap is more than 4 times that of the whole music industry put together.
If they do not launch a law suit against Amazon whats to stop Google and Apple launching their cloud music services without licenses as a precent has already been set?
WMG's demands are ridiculous because its a drowning in debt over leveraged business where it's two head honcho's Bronfman Junior and Lyro Cohen have recklessly paid themselves increased bonuses each year whilst the company has been losing more each year. Talking about corporate recklessness. These the folks who should but up on corporate fraud charges. The industry would be all the better for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dammed if They Do and Dammed If They Do Not
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The need to stream
I have all my music stored on my PC with a backup to another PC.
In order for me to enjoy my music via the Cloud I would have to download all my music so as to be sure that any track I wanted to listen to would be there.For me it's currrently 25g.Then in order to listen I have to have a reliable connection (yeah right!)and make sure that I'm not approaching my broadband data cap.
Then I would also have to managed my collection online using even more data.
THEN I get to send in a fee every month to be able to do all this.
Then I get to HOPE that the site doesn't delete my music collection because of some perceived infringement issues,or that the site is shut down for any reason.(remember Megaupload?)Oh! and don't forget the fee increases you will be expected to pay when some genius figures out how to monetized your cloud collection.
Just how bad do you have to have all your music available on demand all the time from almost any spot on the planet.And if your busy earning a living like most of us WHEN do you have time to listen to all this music...REALLY!
The cloud is a big joke...You get to give someone money to send your music to your device that already has your music on it!
There's one born every minute.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]