TSA Agents Continue To Lie And Say You Can't Photograph Or Videotape Checkpoints
from the on-purpose? dept
The TSA recently reiterated that it is entirely legal to photograph or videotape airport checkpoints and security screenings:Please be assured that TSA� s goal is to protect passenger�s rights, including the right to record at passenger screening checkpoints, while ensuring that passenger screening operations can take place in an effective and efficient manner.While the TSA may be telling the press that... it appears they forgot to tell the actual TSA agents on the ground who continue to threaten people for filming their activities.
The latest incident took place in Baltimore. The videotape was uploaded on July 10.These kinds of stories seem to keep popping up every week or so. Even more ridiculous, the guy in the video who claims he's the supervisor says that the checkpoint is "classified." Later, a second TSA official says she has to delete the video. None of that is true. In fact, it's outright ridiculous.
The action starts at 1:24 when a woman is videotaping the checkpoint process, waiting for her husband to walk through.
A TSA supervisor confronts her, telling her she is not allowed to videotape the checkpoint.
But she continues to videotape, asking him for a document that confirms it is not allowed.
He tells her he doesn�t have the time to show her, but will gladly call police and then have her removed from the airport.
At 3:16 in the video, a second TSA screener storms up and tells her to stop videotaping, but she continues to do so. When she continues to question their authority, the second TSA screener tells her she is allowed to videotape on the other side of the metal detectors but not once she is inside the checkpoint area.
That, of course, is not true.
Later, the TSA agents appear to be entirely vindictive, asking for ID so they can write up a report. When asked why, the agent says he finds the questions asked "particularly... disturbing" because "there were children in the background" and the guy had asked whether or not the naked scanners could see his penis.
Once again, it seems like the TSA is making a mockery of the Constitution.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
More fun
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Think of the children!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Right to air travel
49 U.S.C. � 40103 : US Code - Section 40103: Sovereignty and use of airspace
(2) A citizen of the United States has a public right of transit through the navigable airspace.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: More fun
What I'm saying is, the people at the DHS are not as dumb as ostriches. They are, in fact, dumber than ostriches. Just thought I'd clear that up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Right to air travel
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Right to air travel
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's a disgusting waste of time all around.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is it just US Citizens
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Is it just US Citizens
[ link to this | view in thread ]
maybe cause i am a musician playing in 2 bands and happen to have red hair at the time ?
Do suicide bombers dress like punk rock musicians with crazy hair coloring ?
Every time I fly I feel like I am entering a prison !!!
I now fly only once a year just to visit my folks in florida.Any other travels are by road or train or bus.
Thank You TSA !!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Classified?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Think of the children!
Let me get this straight, somebody that gets to legally molest people hears the word penis and the first thing he thinks of is children? WTF?! I can't make those letters bold enough!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Classified?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TSA
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Classified?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Classified?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: TSA
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Is it just US Citizens
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TSA must stop using scaners!
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20079829-281/appeals-court-tsa-must-halt-airport-body- scanners/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Is it just US Citizens
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Think of the children!
On a side note, seeing penises and pussies of all ages the entire day must be traumatizing. I wonder if they'll have mental care programs for TSA agents like they have for war veterans?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Is it just US Citizens
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
If you have a stomach ache and the doctor says he has to operate your brain you won't ask why because he obviously know what's best for you, right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: TSA must stop using scaners!
So what do we suppose is "proceed in a manner consistent with this opinion"? And will they decide themselves what manner that actually is?
Opinion isn't helpful without something to back it up, like an actual order to cease and desist using the damn things.
On the other hand, where does that leave travelers? With no option except the pat-down procedure?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Nothing you say or do will change what they do. You may say different, but you can't change government. We as American people will never all agree to do something. The government knows that is dangerous because if we all agreed as one, the politicians would be history.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: TSA must stop using scaners!
Unfortunately.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Right to air travel
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
That should cover "no strip search".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Tell that to the USSR and oh, every other government that was toppled by revolution.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Ninja, yes this and the original reply are examples of me being facetious.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Last week, I noticed all the signs were covered up and another discussion on flyertalk confirmed that the airport is not enforcing the ban and the directive is no longer listed on the MAA's BWI Directive PASSUR list .
I guess nobody bothered to inform the TSA personnel.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Is it just US Citizens
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I take that to mean no one read it to them, since these troglodytes enforcing rules without meaning or sense obviously have less real life skills than the macaque who took its own picture.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes, one person can't change the government, one person saying something will never bring about change.
The problem is, people like you stop there.
It's not about the individual shouting from his home, it's about coming together as a collective. It's about the power of people uniting. You can make a law that says someone can't do something all you want, but if everyone (or at the least, enough people) decide not to obey that law, it may as well not be a law. They can put one man in prison, they can't put us all in prison.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: More fun
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey_Vulture#Ecology_and_behavior
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: TSA
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110630/17192214925/artist-behind-go-fk-to-sleep-gives -away-free-illustrated-book-jury-nullification.shtml
"A jury can nullify a law that it believes unjust or wrongly applied to a defendant"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
step one of 'doing something about it' is exactly this sort of thing, which raises awareness of the issues. which leads to more people willing and able to do something more substantial.
I'll grant you 'little yet', but not 'nothing'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why ? Good Grief !!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Other Side of the Fence
Maybe, if the DHS wasn�t such a bunch of pricks, people would be willing to spend their money vacationing and doing business in America.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why ? Good Grief !!!
So how, exactly, is standing out of the way video taping "playing games with security?"
The rules say that video taping is OK. Why she wanted to do it is irrelevant. The rules say it is OK.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Right to air travel
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Right to air travel
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ROTFLMAO!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Is it just US Citizens
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why ? Good Grief !!!
I guess you forgot about that pesky innocent until PROVEN guilty thingy?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
why
Because they want to only fondle "pure" children that are uncorrupted...until the TSA pervs can get their grubby fingers on them
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: RAMPANT THEFT ATL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
[ link to this | view in thread ]