NYC Arrests Stop Dead Chinese From Infringing
from the who's-being-harmed-here dept
While all too often we see people lump in "counterfeiting" with "copyright infringement" -- despite vast differences between the two -- there are some similar issues around each. One key one is how the consumer products and the luxury goods industry massively overstate the "losses" from such activities. The second issue is that there have been multiple studies that suggest many counterfeit good purchases are not substitutes at all. That is, the people buying them know full well that they're counterfeit. No one is being "tricked," and no one is being "harmed." In fact, counterfeit purchases are often aspirational, and studies have shown that people who buy counterfeits very often buy the real product at a later date. That suggests counterfeit sales can actually help the primary company in some cases (certainly not all).But, now let's take this to an even more extreme situation. Police in Manhattan recently arrested a shopworker in Chinatown for selling certain "counterfeit" items, "including Louis Vuitton and Burberry handbags." Except... this wasn't just a case of selling cheaper versions of the real things, this was a case where the items were supposed to be fakes. That's because they were being sold at Fook On Sing Funeral Supplies, and they were cardboard objects designed specifically for traditional Chinese funerals, where it's customary to burn certain items as "symbolic gifts to the deceased." Rather than burn real goods, it's become a tradition to burn cardboard versions of the real goods.
So here's a simple question: how are these luxury companies being "harmed" here. No one could possibly "confuse" these cardboard versions for the real thing. There's no likelihood of confusion at all. The whole reason they're being bought is because they're cardboard fakes. I'm guessing that Louis Vuitton and Burberry would claim that this could hurt their licensing business or reputation or something, but I can't see how that makes any sense at all either. The whole thing just seems to be yet another case of these companies and law enforcement completely overreacting... and appearing culturally insensitive on top of that.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cardboard, chinese funerals, counterfeits
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
This is just sad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is just sad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is just sad...
Violent criminals are a symptom of rap music.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: This is just sad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: This is just sad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: This is just sad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: This is just sad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: This is just sad...
Some people come here to troll and think that taking the MAFIAA side is good, they could get some laughs out of it, but what they are really doing is training people to come up with responses hard questions since the trolls will most likely zero in on the hard questions of the debate.
If they keep repeating and getting the same answers over and over again chances are that more people will see those same Q&A and be knowledgeable about it being more able to make up their own minds about the subject.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: This is just sad...
Just prolonging the logic. =]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: This is just sad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: This is just sad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think there is no question of who is being harmed. It's the dead chinese relatives who are expecting to get some good "too bad you're dead" gifts and end up with cheap cardboard knock offs!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Also, isn't this part of the fashion industry, where the knockoffs are supporting the market for the high end stuff? This seems to be against the grain.
Trademark can be used in many ways, one has to get the spin right. This isn't gonna help.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Bizzaro world indeed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But hey LV and Burberry now have uncovered a new market, they can put out cardboard copies of their products for half the price and corner the market on funeral supplies.
*Insert snarky comment about how you'd think they'd care more about their sweatshop workers*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Confusion over use of trademark, not over real or fake
I'm not saying that I agree with the tactics being used, but I can think of a way that the Luis Vuitton is being harmed. One could argue that even a moron in a hurry, seeing a cardboard cutout of a LV handbag, might reasonably assume that LV had authorized that product. "Don't be silly! LV would never sell cardboard cutouts to be used in funerals!" Exactly. And that's the harm to LV. They could be perceived as being part of an odd, if not morbid business practice.
So, the fact that a cardboard cutout of a LV handbag is a kind of counterfeit is irrelevent. It's not about people being confused into thinking that a cutout is a real handbag. It's about people being confused about the use of a company trademark on a product in such a way as to imply endorsement by the company.
Again, I don't think that any time should have gone into arresting funeral home employees. I'm just saying that on the Batshit-Crazy-Things-Done-By-Big-Companies-To-Protect-IP scale, this one ranks on the lower end.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Confusion over use of trademark, not over real or fake
So by extension... We will leave that question open.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Confusion over use of trademark, not over real or fake
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Confusion over use of trademark, not over real or fake
You might think that way, but to the kind of hyper-brand-aware executive who supports insane IP maximalism, any association with your product to death would be -- no pun intented -- brand suicide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Confusion over use of trademark, not over real or fake
Trademarks are meant to protect the public first, so I agree with your polling suggestion below - who would think badly of the brand whether those cardboard copies are legit or not?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Confusion over use of trademark, not over real or fake
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Confusion over use of trademark, not over real or fake
I don't doubt what you're saying is true. My point is that there are plenty of other people out there that would think so, most probably people who aren't aware of the extremes that companies go to to "protect" their brand. It'd be interesting to see some real polling on this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now even the fake paper luxury items for the qingming festival are getting replaced by virtual fake paper luxury items burned virtually on the internet!
http://www1.china.org.cn/english/Life/164572.htm
The plot thickens!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
every sale
What? you didn't know that most spirits return to earth for unfinished business which is purchasing accessories for the afterlife? shame on you...shame on you all!
I work out that due to this evil infringement there is $500 billion in lost handbag sales.
I therefore propose a "handbag tax" which will tax everyone $5/month. To make this completely fair the tax will be levied on a 'per-hand' basis, so if you have 2 hands you pay $10/month but if you're lucky enough to have had both arms torn off by a bear then you pay nothing!
I can't say fairer than that.
Also there will be mass lawsuits. because handbags don't have IP addresses we can't use that, BUT (and it's a big but) the owners have REAL addresses. We shall compile a list of everyone who has an 'actual address' and offer to settle out of court for $2500.
Once again this is 100% fair because the homeless will benefit by not being targetted for our shakedown (sorry court-based business model) so what could be fairer?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: every sale
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: every sale
You forgot to add the new scam collection society's slogan, "It's for the dead children"
Since the dead can't sue (but they sure can still vote), the new scam collection society will never have to pay anyone, and will just "hold on" to the money until the dead return one day to collect... or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It could be that LV & Burberry were completely aware of this and had not done anything about it because they aren't being hurt by something with such a tiny niche market that a majority of their customers would never come across, and those that did would be thankful to be able to give appropriate gifts to the deceased.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I still consider the IP holders responsible. They are the ones who convinced the police to spend lots and lots of taxpayer money to enforce their private IP rights. If I whip a pit bull into a killing frenzy and turn it loose, then I am responsible for the consequences.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they burned the real gifts then the EPA would be all over them for polluting the air with toxins and carcinogens and sue them for the HAZMAT clean-up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now that you mention it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the idea is to burn money so that it can reach them in "heaven", so they can have a good, comfortable after life. burning fake Gucci bags isn't exactly the tradition. It's just hucksterism in a material world.
if the brand name logos are on the stuff, it isn't really a question of pirated goods, as much as use of trademarks and logos without permission, and implying that the companies support this stuff.
Once again, Mike misses the point and tries to slam everyone except the real criminals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I should also point out that the title of the post is wrong, the dead people aren't infringing. It's the living that are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You understand there is life that happens outside of your bubble right?
That even if you never saw it that there are people killed for shoes, watches, sunglasses, etc. every day.
Because you have never seen it happen in the number of times you walked down the street does not mean it does not happen.
There are many cultural differences around the world, and because you were asked to attend a funeral does not mean you were invited to all of the things the family did. That some things are done privately so that judgmental self centered people do not bother them about things they do not understand.
And I can tell you knew you were on shaky ground, you tried to correct grammar rather than attempt to support your statement any more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPWhIvQ2Q-U
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My Cardboard Computer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Be an honor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Be an honor
Louis Vuitton: What is this "honor" of which you speak? And more importantly, how do we monetize it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Be an honor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Counterfeit
We keep trying to tell these folks that they can't just copy money, that's is a serious crime, etc., but they don't listen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dead Chinese don't infringe
Henri
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
reverse it then
So with that in mind, I propose the following:
The chinese have to buy GENUINE products.
We burn LV and Burberry to the ground.
(possibly throwing in a few RIAA execs, although I'm not sure if thats possible because shit doesn't burn)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]