Government Representatives Using 'Cybersecurity,' 'Terrorism' As Excuses To Further Trample The Bill Of Rights
from the they're-not-'rights'-so-much-as-they-are-'privileges,'-appar dept
Well, Facebook no longer needs to be the scapegoat when it comes to harvesting your personal information and doing nefarious things with it. Now, thanks to the House of Representatives, you can look forward to "a broad swath of ISPs and other private entities" collecting your personal data and sharing it with "the government, other businesses, or "any other entity" so long as it's for a vaguely-defined "cybersecurity purpose."This is yet another governmental attempt to harvest personal internet usage data in hopes of somehow preventing something bad from happening in the future, all under the pretense of being hip deep in a "cyberwar." If you're looking to see who's spearheading this new attempt to rifle through your internet drawers, look no further than the bipartisan team of Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and ranking member Dutch Ruppersberger.
And they're working with un-Representative-like speed. EFF posted this information on November 30th and they are already trying to move it out of committee today (December 1st). If someone is trying to push something through posthaste, generally speaking, it's a terrible bit of legislation that would raise all sorts of objections if left out in the sunlight for any length of time.
As it's written, this bill would "trump existing privacy statutes that strictly limit the interception and disclosure of your private communications data, as well as any other state or federal law that might get in the way," even opening the door for spyware installation. (For your own protection, of course.)
The bad news gets worse:
This broad data-sharing between companies wouldn't be subject to any oversight or transparency measures (users can't restrict companies' sharing), while the only oversight for sharing with the federal government, ironically, would be through the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board-which hasn't existed since January 2008.This privacy-trampling rush job follows on the heels of another bill, rushed through the Senate on the Monday following the Thanksgiving weekend. This one concerns itself with terrorism, or at least uses it as an excuse. The National Defense Authorization Act seeks to bring the war on terror back to the homefront:
Worse yet, the bill doesn't limit what the federal government can do with the data or private communications that ISPs and others hand over, except to say that it can't be used for "regulatory" purposes-apparently it can be used for law enforcement and intelligence targeting purposes.
Perhaps at the top of the list is concern over the fact that the bill allows information sharing with any federal agency-including the National Security Agency (NSA)-thereby threatening civilian control of domestic cybersecurity efforts.
The Senate is going to vote on whether Congress will give this president-and every future president - the power to order the military to pick up and imprison without charge or trial civilians anywhere in the world. Even Rep. Ron Paul raised his concerns about the NDAA detention provisions during last night's Republican debate. The power is so broad that even U.S. citizens could be swept up by the military and the military could be used far from any battlefield, even within the United States itself.Redefining the battlefield in order to use the military as a police force is generally the sort of thing totalitarian nations do, not nations that continue to tout a never-ending "War on Terrorism" as an essential part of securing our "freedom." This bill will now allow American citizens to join in on the "fun" that was previously only available to foreign arrestees:
The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which will be on the Senate floor on Monday.Now, whatever rights Americans might have had (like say, a speedy trial or the right to confront their accusers) are being removed and replaced with the "right" to sit in a detention center for the rest of whatever without ever being charged with a crime. Once again, a bipartisan team (Sens. Carl Levin and John McCain) put aside their political differences to draft the bill in secret and pass it in a closed committee without a single hearing.
Sen. Mark Udall tried to pass an amendment which would remove "the harmful provisions and replace them with a requirement for an orderly Congressional review of detention power" but was shot down 61-37. Rand Paul went toe-to-toe with McCain, pointing out the audacious sweep of this bill:
"Should we err today and remove some of the most important checks on state power in the name of fighting terrorism, well then the terrorists have won," Paul argued, "[D]etaining American citizens without a court trial is not American."McCain responded by fashioning a pair of blinders out of the American flag and (as Reason puts it so well) "puking up a rainbow of pro-America, pro-democracy, anti-terrorist drivel in response to Paul's very direct question":
"Facts are stubborn things," McCain repeated from the floor several times. "If the senator from Kentucky wants to have a situation prevail where people who are released go back in to the fight to kill Americans, he is entitled to his opinion."And that is how you rationalize "indefinite detention": without it, Americans will die.
In case anyone out there is getting ready to argue that this bill doesn't target Americans, the ACLU has an answer for you:
There is an exemption for American citizens from the mandatory detention requirement (section 1032 of the bill), but no exemption for American citizens from the authorization to use the military to indefinitely detain people without charge or trial (section 1031 of the bill). So, the result is that, under the bill, the military has the power to indefinitely imprison American citizens, but it does not have to use its power unless ordered to do so.All it takes is the order, and that's the whole point of the bill: to grant the President that specific power. And if you don't believe the ACLU's take, just read what one of the bill's sponsors, Sen. Lindsey Graham said about it on the Senate floor:
"1031, the statement of authority to detain, does apply to American citizens and it designates the world as the battlefield, including the homeland."Ah, the "homeland." You'd think that the people drafting bills like this would avoid using a term that conjures up images of dictators turning on their own citizens in order to maintain their power. But, if we've learned nothing else from the past decade, it's that our representatives in Washington clearly don't care what the public thinks. After all, we're just a bunch of suspects.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: constitution, cybersecurity, free speech, individual rights, terrorism
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
So...this one guy has basically said that the United States has declared war on the entire planet?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The NDAA isn't really internet related, it's about allowing the military to come to your house, arrest you, and throw you in a military prison forever without charging you with a crime. It's hard to even believe such a law is being considered in the US. I hope Obama breaks form and vetoes it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facebook is not a "scapegoat", that means WRONGLY blamed.
Similarly, I've been thinking for some time that SOPA is just a distraction for these much worse bills. Welcome to reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Facebook is not a "scapegoat", that means WRONGLY blamed.
(and no, I'm actually not being sarcastic there. Yes, really well done, for reals!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Facebook is not a "scapegoat", that means WRONGLY blamed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Facebook is not a "scapegoat", that means WRONGLY blamed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Facebook is not a "scapegoat", that means WRONGLY blamed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Facebook is not a "scapegoat", that means WRONGLY blamed.
I'm solidly agreeing with OOTB!!
I feel dirty....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For example:
Cyberspace
Cyberwar
Cybercrime
Cyberbullying
Cyberterror
For more examples, please consult your local TV news. I can't think of a single instance where somebody who was even slightly knowledgeable about computers used any of these phrases (with the possible example of "cyberspace," but only in the mid-nineties).
It's actually kind of convenient.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They are going to be reich .... err I mean rich.
Maybe one should copyright goose stepping.
Hello fellow graduate of the ministry of silly walks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spelling error
After all, we're just a bunch of subjects.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously, WTF!
You know, I'm from a supposedly friendly allied western country.. But your government is seriously overstepping the mark when you think you can just walk in kidnap anyone anywhere in the world!
It's no wonder some people around the world hate Americans, you wave a fucking flag saying 'Hate Us' !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Seriously, WTF!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Congress' new motto
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Congress' new motto
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Congress' new motto
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Congress' new motto
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Congress' new motto
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Congress' new motto
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There I fixed for them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They are putting the squeeze on us, backing us up against a wall, legally and financially. Either by bankrupting the country, or putting place such draconian laws as to really piss ppl off to the point where we take to the streets, or a combination of both, and that will be the end. Those who choose to fight will be swept up in FEMA camps never to be seen again. Those who try to help them will be labeled domestic terrorists, and will meet the same fate. They will have the excuse they need. Continuity of government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Bizaro rapture
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
this is just BS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
While I can conceive of some situations where IP and other technical disclosures might have serious national security implications (i.e., information controlled under our export control laws under the Export Administration Act and the Arms Export Control Act), absent export controlled information there is a very broad overreach here.
Frankly, read this bill and both SOPA and Protect-IP may look tame by comparison.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/30/41802.htm
Maybe she should just shut up and put up with it since what she does to others for a living is exactly what prompted her to complain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They will just say it was on the job training.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Habeas Corpus
As soon as any immediate danger passes, the "Rebellion" is over and those detained should get a hearing. I hope it doesn't pass, but if it does the bill needs judicial over site.
At a minimum, the government should be forced to file the name of every individual detained with the court, and to periodically show that the detention is Constitutional.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Then we can have them arrested for using terrorist techniques to force the country to bend to their will.
We can rip the bankers from their homes for detonating the economy, causing terror and panic.
Anyone else feel like we fell into the world of V for Vendetta?
That those tinfoil hat wearing people we made fun of for conspiracy theories of the Government putting plots into motion to keep us afraid and bending to their will, might just have been right?
People believe what the talking heads tell them and never turn a critical eye to the claims, they think those who speak out are just rocking the boat... all the while refusing to see the boat is sinking and we are all screwed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Already has been ... but it is a double secret martial law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Syria
The stupid assumption made by the people who push these things is that they will only be used by benign governments - unfortunately once the technology is out there the nasty governments can use it too - and it turns out our governments aren't that benign anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Syria
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Syria
You made a critical mistake, there are no benign governments. Governments always seek to expand themselves and their control over the population. Its a mental defect of having power. When you have power over others, you always believe all your actions are the right one. And rationalize any things that is objected to as "its for the good of XXXXXXX".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Faith
How long until terrorists start using ID theft or just take common names to get the government to arrest obviously innocent civilians without trail our due process? Also how much of those errors will people accept before they revolt?
How long until reporters are arrested for writing about the truth?
This is just a scary bill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Faith
How long until terrorists start using ID theft or just take common names to get the government to arrest obviously innocent civilians without trail our due process? Also how much of those errors will people accept before they revolt?
How long until reporters are arrested for writing about the truth?
This is just a scary bill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
you morphed into a dictator now and you have made me scared.
america where art though ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Goodbye Constitution
It used to be the Bill of Rights, now it's the Bill of Maybe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It must be so easy to make these decisions when you know you get to be the one holding the stick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
not that i really see that much of a difference anymore other then the better guns...
*waits for door to be kicked in*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They have become the domestic enemies that they swore to defend against.
It's crap like this that makes me ashamed to be an American...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]