Megaupload Negotiating To Let US Gov't Officials (And Everyone Else) Retrieve Their Legit Files That Were Taken Down
from the funny-how-that-works dept
We've noted before that with the complete takedown of Megaupload by the US government, tons of people who had perfectly legitimate files hosted at the site lost those files and all the inbound links to them. While the government won't do a permanent restore, I'm sure, apparently negotiations are ongoing to let people go in and "rescue" their data. It sounds like, as part of that process, the Megaupload crew has been reviewing details of their users, and they note that many of their users appear to be in the federal government itself. That's really not a surprise, since there were plenty of legal uses for Megaupload (as well as infringing uses). But it does suggest just how widespread usage of the site was. It will certainly be interesting, however, to see if data on government users comes out as evidence in any possible trial.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, cyberlockers, legitimate uses, retrieval, us government
Companies: megaupload
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Megaupload Negotiating
I'll bet they're eager to dump those files before the court case comes up!
Bunch of hypocrites!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Any idea how many? What percentage of traffic? With only 10% of the users uploading, it would seem to be a small count.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Any idea how many? What percentage of traffic? With only 10% of the users uploading, it would seem to be a small count.
*typo* he meant, "tens".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Does it really matter? Any collateral damage to the innocent users is too much in my book. Even more so considering this about the US Government and items that are considered speech.
And you really need to lay off on that "only 10% of the users uploading" crap. That is pretty close to the Pareto principle and only shows that Mega was pretty much normal in regards to uploader/downloader ratio.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Thankfully, the courts don't agree with you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: !!!
Is it okay if 10% of the people put to death by the state are innocent?
Is it okay if 20% of the people who're serving life sentences are innocent?
Is it okay if 50% of the people stuck in the bullshit 'felon parol' system never did anything illegal?
Where does one draw the line on acceptable collateral damage?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Really? Has there been an adversarial hearing where both sides have presented arguments yet? I must have missed that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Copyright infringement is not illegal speech.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Some back of the napkin math here:
Megaupload Unique visitors: 82,764,913
Now let's say for the sake of argument that only 1% were uploading legit files:
That is 827,649 users. That is still a pretty large "some" there. And that is only looking at users and not even considering the actual number of files or what was actually infringing or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Thanks for letting us know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Thankfully God doesn't agree with the courts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This makes me think that if they really wanted, they could also take down Twitter, Tumblr and Youtube, too, all just with a few outrageous accusations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Much of it stems from how the U.S. system has been engineered. Many people end up incarcerated or fined or punished with legal penalties and fines and settlements without even having a trial because trials can be very time consuming and the process can be more time consuming and require more effort and resources and money and risk than the punishments and settlements and fines themselves.
From a Slashdot article
"More than 90 percent of criminal cases are never tried before a jury, in part because the Supreme Court ruled in 1978 that threatening someone with life imprisonment for a minor crime in an effort to induce him to forfeit a jury trial did not violate his Sixth Amendment right to trial. 'The truth is that government officials have deliberately engineered the system to assure that the jury trial system established by the Constitution is seldom used,' says Timothy Lynch, director of the criminal justice project at the libertarian Cato Institute."
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/03/12/2122247/how-to-crash-the-us-justice-system-d emand-a-trial
The comments are also worth reading.
As one of the comments points out, it wouldn't be too surprising to find that many people who are incarcerated or somehow punished by our legal system did, in fact, do nothing wrong or illegal but they just settled with a plea bargain because it's not worth the risk and trouble of going to trial.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
there's not enough lawyers and judges to cover everything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
They would be less likely to conduct searches, seizures, and wiretaps without a prior warrant because they would know ahead of time that these types of invasions will likely not be permissible in court.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Why...
We might actually get a system of law that works!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Or on the people who keep expanding the law?
Being able to threaten people to get them to give up a right, because it makes it convenient or easier for the accuser is appalling.
I wonder how "fair" the actual system is when someone gets an overwhelmed public defender who has to give you the "best" advice to just take the deal because they can't possibly give you a decent defense, and if you are silly enough to think you have rights they will just increase the charges to make you cave in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hahaha!
Don't give it to them. Expose the dirty government copyright thieves for the criminals they are!
Sue the people? SUE THE GOVERNMENT!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hahaha!
A bit hyperbolic the way you state it, but that was my first thought too. Did gov't employees infringe via the gov't's network? Well, how's that work out in other situations? The gov't network was complicit, their management was complicit for allowing it to happen, ICE should seize their domains, ... Too bad you can't extradite Obama.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"It wasn't me! My account was hacked! It was one of my staffers! Someone used my WiFi!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seeing the number of "officials" who were regularly using the site for nefarious purposes. Not like we've never seen this happen before, where they claim X is the end of the world, while they are violating the same law themselves.
I wonder if this will also let them source many of the "suspect" files the Government claims were uploaded and shared back to the IP addresses of the **AA's and Government offices. While IP address alone should NOT be enough to run a court case, it currently is accepted practice in the US. If it is sourced from a copyright holder is it sill unauthorized?
It would also be nice to show how much content was NOT infringing, so the Government can explain itself in taking away other peoples materials and then making a threat that they were to be destroyed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The wishful dreams of legit users
Why? Because Megaupload is not a backup service. It's a file transfer service. Anyone who wanted a backup would use a legit backup service with all of the features it offered. I'm sure someone thought, "Gosh, I think I'll stash a copy up at Megaupload", but most of them have got other copies.
And who are these people? I would guess that 99% of the people are folks who started using Megaupload for the other benefits like the chance to "share" content for free.
Do any of these people want the EFF to rescue their files and drag their names through the paper? I seriously doubt it. They're running for cover. They're hoping that the Feds will delete those files pronto.
If I were a lawyer for a content company, I would subpoena those files and start suing everyone caught in the crosshairs. No one wants those files to reappear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The wishful dreams of legit users
If you were then your employer wouldn't stay in business for long....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The wishful dreams of legit users
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The wishful dreams of legit users
And yes I think it would be AWESOME to get a list of who uploaded what, and when a bunch of Government people and **AA people are hauled into court we can all laugh at the biggest pirates being the people who claim to suffer the most from it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The wishful dreams of legit users
Luckily, no one cares about your "guess".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Removals Worthing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
yeah, there's a good idea.
Darwin strikes again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Google is a pirate site, we've seen the lawsuits and claims, yet millions of people place things on G+, Gmail, Google Calendars, etc...
Just because your narrative states Mega = PIRATE DEN, does not mean everyone else on the planet had the same knowledge or used it in the manner. But it is much easier to paint them all as evil stupid pirates, than to consider they were innocent people using a service to move content they created/owned easily.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]